Loading…
Protective effects of fecal microbiota transplantation in sepsis are independent of the modulation of the intestinal flora
The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effects of probiotics and fecal transplantation on inflammatory and oxidative parameters in the intestines of two rat models of sepsis. Rats were treated with prebiotics, probiotics, or symbiotics and exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or zymo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2020-05, Vol.73, p.110727-110727, Article 110727 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b82c361428fb8563d30e4ab0ce04951f7baf310ce497ca5de824f3daf855d51f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b82c361428fb8563d30e4ab0ce04951f7baf310ce497ca5de824f3daf855d51f3 |
container_end_page | 110727 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 110727 |
container_title | Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Ávila, Pricila Romão Marcondes Michels, Monique Vuolo, Francieli Bilésimo, Rafaela Burger, Henrique Milioli, Maria Vitória Meller Sonai, Beatriz Borges, Heloisa Carneiro, Celso Abatti, Mariane Santana, Iara Viana Vidigal Michelon, Cleonice Dal-Pizzol, Felipe |
description | The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effects of probiotics and fecal transplantation on inflammatory and oxidative parameters in the intestines of two rat models of sepsis.
Rats were treated with prebiotics, probiotics, or symbiotics and exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or zymosan after 15 d to induce endotoxemia. Oxidative damage and inflammation were analyzed, and histologic examination of the intestinal tissue was performed. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was carried out in LPS- and zymosan-induced rat models of sepsis.
Supplementation with symbiotics for 15 d effectively reduced the inflammatory parameters compared with supplementation for 7 d. Probiotics, prebiotics, and symbiotics exerted different effects on the evaluated parameters. In general, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. casei exerted better local protective effects. Evaluation of the role of the intestinal microbiota through FMT revealed its protective effects irrespective of the previous treatment with probiotics.
Probiotic strains significantly differ among themselves and exert different effects on the host's health. Symbiotics and FMT could offer additional immunomodulatory benefits to drug therapy, thus serving as a new therapeutic alternative in pediatric patients with sepsis.
•Lactobacillus casei and L. rhamnosus reduce inflammation and oxidative damage in sepsis.•Probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation may offer additional immunomodulatory benefits.•Probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation may be an option in the therapeutic management of sepsis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110727 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2378000777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0899900720300101</els_id><sourcerecordid>2425692740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b82c361428fb8563d30e4ab0ce04951f7baf310ce497ca5de824f3daf855d51f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2v1CAUhonReMfRH-DGNHHjpiNfLSWuzI1fyU10oWtCyyEyaaECvYn-es-kowsXboADz3lzeF9CnjN6YpT1r8-nuNUTpxxrRhVXD8iBDUq0jEv5kBzooHWrKVU35EkpZ0op071-TG4EZ0pLKg7k15ecKkw13EMD3uOpNMk3eLBzs4QppzGkapuabSzrbGO1NaTYhNgUWEsojc2AlYMVcIn10l2_Q7Mkt807e70JsUKpIaKwn1O2T8kjb-cCz677kXx7_-7r7cf27vOHT7dv79pJclnbceCT6Jnkgx-HrhdOUJB2pBNQqTvm1Wi9YFhKrSbbORi49MJZP3Sdw3dxJK923TWnHxuOYJZQJpjxM5C2YrhQA1qjlEL05T_oOW0ZJ0ZK8q7XXKFrR8J2Ct0pJYM3aw6LzT8No-YSjDkbDMZcgjF7MNjz4qq8jQu4vx1_kkDgzQ4AWnEfIJsyBYgTuJAxFeNS-I_8b8xzn-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425692740</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Protective effects of fecal microbiota transplantation in sepsis are independent of the modulation of the intestinal flora</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Ávila, Pricila Romão Marcondes ; Michels, Monique ; Vuolo, Francieli ; Bilésimo, Rafaela ; Burger, Henrique ; Milioli, Maria Vitória Meller ; Sonai, Beatriz ; Borges, Heloisa ; Carneiro, Celso ; Abatti, Mariane ; Santana, Iara Viana Vidigal ; Michelon, Cleonice ; Dal-Pizzol, Felipe</creator><creatorcontrib>Ávila, Pricila Romão Marcondes ; Michels, Monique ; Vuolo, Francieli ; Bilésimo, Rafaela ; Burger, Henrique ; Milioli, Maria Vitória Meller ; Sonai, Beatriz ; Borges, Heloisa ; Carneiro, Celso ; Abatti, Mariane ; Santana, Iara Viana Vidigal ; Michelon, Cleonice ; Dal-Pizzol, Felipe</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effects of probiotics and fecal transplantation on inflammatory and oxidative parameters in the intestines of two rat models of sepsis.
Rats were treated with prebiotics, probiotics, or symbiotics and exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or zymosan after 15 d to induce endotoxemia. Oxidative damage and inflammation were analyzed, and histologic examination of the intestinal tissue was performed. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was carried out in LPS- and zymosan-induced rat models of sepsis.
Supplementation with symbiotics for 15 d effectively reduced the inflammatory parameters compared with supplementation for 7 d. Probiotics, prebiotics, and symbiotics exerted different effects on the evaluated parameters. In general, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. casei exerted better local protective effects. Evaluation of the role of the intestinal microbiota through FMT revealed its protective effects irrespective of the previous treatment with probiotics.
Probiotic strains significantly differ among themselves and exert different effects on the host's health. Symbiotics and FMT could offer additional immunomodulatory benefits to drug therapy, thus serving as a new therapeutic alternative in pediatric patients with sepsis.
•Lactobacillus casei and L. rhamnosus reduce inflammation and oxidative damage in sepsis.•Probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation may offer additional immunomodulatory benefits.•Probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation may be an option in the therapeutic management of sepsis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-9007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32179403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal models ; Bacteria ; Chemotherapy ; Drug therapy ; Endotoxemia ; Evaluation ; Fecal microbiota transplantation ; Fecal microflora ; Feces ; Flora ; Immunomodulation ; Inflammation ; Intestinal microflora ; Intestine ; Lipopolysaccharides ; Mathematical models ; Microbiota ; Parameters ; Pediatrics ; Prebiotics ; Probiotics ; Proteins ; Sepsis ; Supplements ; Symbiotics ; Transplantation ; Transplants & implants ; Tumor necrosis factor-TNF</subject><ispartof>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2020-05, Vol.73, p.110727-110727, Article 110727</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b82c361428fb8563d30e4ab0ce04951f7baf310ce497ca5de824f3daf855d51f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b82c361428fb8563d30e4ab0ce04951f7baf310ce497ca5de824f3daf855d51f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8440-1976</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32179403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ávila, Pricila Romão Marcondes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michels, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuolo, Francieli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilésimo, Rafaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milioli, Maria Vitória Meller</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonai, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Heloisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Celso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abatti, Mariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Iara Viana Vidigal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelon, Cleonice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal-Pizzol, Felipe</creatorcontrib><title>Protective effects of fecal microbiota transplantation in sepsis are independent of the modulation of the intestinal flora</title><title>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)</title><addtitle>Nutrition</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effects of probiotics and fecal transplantation on inflammatory and oxidative parameters in the intestines of two rat models of sepsis.
Rats were treated with prebiotics, probiotics, or symbiotics and exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or zymosan after 15 d to induce endotoxemia. Oxidative damage and inflammation were analyzed, and histologic examination of the intestinal tissue was performed. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was carried out in LPS- and zymosan-induced rat models of sepsis.
Supplementation with symbiotics for 15 d effectively reduced the inflammatory parameters compared with supplementation for 7 d. Probiotics, prebiotics, and symbiotics exerted different effects on the evaluated parameters. In general, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. casei exerted better local protective effects. Evaluation of the role of the intestinal microbiota through FMT revealed its protective effects irrespective of the previous treatment with probiotics.
Probiotic strains significantly differ among themselves and exert different effects on the host's health. Symbiotics and FMT could offer additional immunomodulatory benefits to drug therapy, thus serving as a new therapeutic alternative in pediatric patients with sepsis.
•Lactobacillus casei and L. rhamnosus reduce inflammation and oxidative damage in sepsis.•Probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation may offer additional immunomodulatory benefits.•Probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation may be an option in the therapeutic management of sepsis.</description><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Endotoxemia</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fecal microbiota transplantation</subject><subject>Fecal microflora</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Flora</subject><subject>Immunomodulation</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Lipopolysaccharides</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Prebiotics</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Supplements</subject><subject>Symbiotics</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Tumor necrosis factor-TNF</subject><issn>0899-9007</issn><issn>1873-1244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2v1CAUhonReMfRH-DGNHHjpiNfLSWuzI1fyU10oWtCyyEyaaECvYn-es-kowsXboADz3lzeF9CnjN6YpT1r8-nuNUTpxxrRhVXD8iBDUq0jEv5kBzooHWrKVU35EkpZ0op071-TG4EZ0pLKg7k15ecKkw13EMD3uOpNMk3eLBzs4QppzGkapuabSzrbGO1NaTYhNgUWEsojc2AlYMVcIn10l2_Q7Mkt807e70JsUKpIaKwn1O2T8kjb-cCz677kXx7_-7r7cf27vOHT7dv79pJclnbceCT6Jnkgx-HrhdOUJB2pBNQqTvm1Wi9YFhKrSbbORi49MJZP3Sdw3dxJK923TWnHxuOYJZQJpjxM5C2YrhQA1qjlEL05T_oOW0ZJ0ZK8q7XXKFrR8J2Ct0pJYM3aw6LzT8No-YSjDkbDMZcgjF7MNjz4qq8jQu4vx1_kkDgzQ4AWnEfIJsyBYgTuJAxFeNS-I_8b8xzn-Q</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Ávila, Pricila Romão Marcondes</creator><creator>Michels, Monique</creator><creator>Vuolo, Francieli</creator><creator>Bilésimo, Rafaela</creator><creator>Burger, Henrique</creator><creator>Milioli, Maria Vitória Meller</creator><creator>Sonai, Beatriz</creator><creator>Borges, Heloisa</creator><creator>Carneiro, Celso</creator><creator>Abatti, Mariane</creator><creator>Santana, Iara Viana Vidigal</creator><creator>Michelon, Cleonice</creator><creator>Dal-Pizzol, Felipe</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8440-1976</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Protective effects of fecal microbiota transplantation in sepsis are independent of the modulation of the intestinal flora</title><author>Ávila, Pricila Romão Marcondes ; Michels, Monique ; Vuolo, Francieli ; Bilésimo, Rafaela ; Burger, Henrique ; Milioli, Maria Vitória Meller ; Sonai, Beatriz ; Borges, Heloisa ; Carneiro, Celso ; Abatti, Mariane ; Santana, Iara Viana Vidigal ; Michelon, Cleonice ; Dal-Pizzol, Felipe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b82c361428fb8563d30e4ab0ce04951f7baf310ce497ca5de824f3daf855d51f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Endotoxemia</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fecal microbiota transplantation</topic><topic>Fecal microflora</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Flora</topic><topic>Immunomodulation</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Lipopolysaccharides</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Prebiotics</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Supplements</topic><topic>Symbiotics</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Tumor necrosis factor-TNF</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ávila, Pricila Romão Marcondes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michels, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuolo, Francieli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilésimo, Rafaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milioli, Maria Vitória Meller</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonai, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Heloisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Celso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abatti, Mariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Iara Viana Vidigal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelon, Cleonice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal-Pizzol, Felipe</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ávila, Pricila Romão Marcondes</au><au>Michels, Monique</au><au>Vuolo, Francieli</au><au>Bilésimo, Rafaela</au><au>Burger, Henrique</au><au>Milioli, Maria Vitória Meller</au><au>Sonai, Beatriz</au><au>Borges, Heloisa</au><au>Carneiro, Celso</au><au>Abatti, Mariane</au><au>Santana, Iara Viana Vidigal</au><au>Michelon, Cleonice</au><au>Dal-Pizzol, Felipe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Protective effects of fecal microbiota transplantation in sepsis are independent of the modulation of the intestinal flora</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)</jtitle><addtitle>Nutrition</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>73</volume><spage>110727</spage><epage>110727</epage><pages>110727-110727</pages><artnum>110727</artnum><issn>0899-9007</issn><eissn>1873-1244</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effects of probiotics and fecal transplantation on inflammatory and oxidative parameters in the intestines of two rat models of sepsis.
Rats were treated with prebiotics, probiotics, or symbiotics and exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or zymosan after 15 d to induce endotoxemia. Oxidative damage and inflammation were analyzed, and histologic examination of the intestinal tissue was performed. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was carried out in LPS- and zymosan-induced rat models of sepsis.
Supplementation with symbiotics for 15 d effectively reduced the inflammatory parameters compared with supplementation for 7 d. Probiotics, prebiotics, and symbiotics exerted different effects on the evaluated parameters. In general, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. casei exerted better local protective effects. Evaluation of the role of the intestinal microbiota through FMT revealed its protective effects irrespective of the previous treatment with probiotics.
Probiotic strains significantly differ among themselves and exert different effects on the host's health. Symbiotics and FMT could offer additional immunomodulatory benefits to drug therapy, thus serving as a new therapeutic alternative in pediatric patients with sepsis.
•Lactobacillus casei and L. rhamnosus reduce inflammation and oxidative damage in sepsis.•Probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation may offer additional immunomodulatory benefits.•Probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation may be an option in the therapeutic management of sepsis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32179403</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nut.2020.110727</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8440-1976</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-9007 |
ispartof | Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2020-05, Vol.73, p.110727-110727, Article 110727 |
issn | 0899-9007 1873-1244 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2378000777 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Animal models Bacteria Chemotherapy Drug therapy Endotoxemia Evaluation Fecal microbiota transplantation Fecal microflora Feces Flora Immunomodulation Inflammation Intestinal microflora Intestine Lipopolysaccharides Mathematical models Microbiota Parameters Pediatrics Prebiotics Probiotics Proteins Sepsis Supplements Symbiotics Transplantation Transplants & implants Tumor necrosis factor-TNF |
title | Protective effects of fecal microbiota transplantation in sepsis are independent of the modulation of the intestinal flora |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A18%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Protective%20effects%20of%20fecal%20microbiota%20transplantation%20in%20sepsis%20are%20independent%20of%20the%20modulation%20of%20the%20intestinal%20flora&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20(Burbank,%20Los%20Angeles%20County,%20Calif.)&rft.au=%C3%81vila,%20Pricila%20Rom%C3%A3o%20Marcondes&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=73&rft.spage=110727&rft.epage=110727&rft.pages=110727-110727&rft.artnum=110727&rft.issn=0899-9007&rft.eissn=1873-1244&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nut.2020.110727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2425692740%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b82c361428fb8563d30e4ab0ce04951f7baf310ce497ca5de824f3daf855d51f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425692740&rft_id=info:pmid/32179403&rfr_iscdi=true |