Loading…

Three Popular Force Fields Predict Consensus Mechanism of Amyloid β Peptide Binding to the Dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine Bilayer

Using all-atom explicit water replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations, we examined the impact of three popular force fields (FF) on the equilibrium binding of Aβ10–40 peptide to the dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine (DMPC) bilayer. The comparison included CHARMM22 protein FF with CHARMM36 lip...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of chemical information and modeling 2020-04, Vol.60 (4), p.2282-2293
Main Authors: Lockhart, Christopher, Smith, Amy K, Klimov, Dmitri K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-5df654d5f8946af5b5dcb7ca93d72bbed8f5028dbf29369e1dce473a6f31e7ea3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-5df654d5f8946af5b5dcb7ca93d72bbed8f5028dbf29369e1dce473a6f31e7ea3
container_end_page 2293
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2282
container_title Journal of chemical information and modeling
container_volume 60
creator Lockhart, Christopher
Smith, Amy K
Klimov, Dmitri K
description Using all-atom explicit water replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations, we examined the impact of three popular force fields (FF) on the equilibrium binding of Aβ10–40 peptide to the dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine (DMPC) bilayer. The comparison included CHARMM22 protein FF with CHARMM36 lipid FF (C22), CHARMM36m protein FF with CHARMM36 lipid FF (C36), and Amber14SB protein FF with Lipid14 lipid FF (A14). Analysis of Aβ10–40 binding to the DMPC bilayer in three FFs revealed a consensus binding mechanism. Its main features include (i) a stable helical structure in the bound peptide, (ii) insertion of the C-terminus and, in part, the central hydrophobic cluster into the bilayer hydrophobic core, (iii) considerable thinning of the DMPC bilayer beneath the bound peptide coupled with significant drop in bilayer density, and (iv) a strong disordering in the DMPC fatty acid tails. Although the three FFs diverge on many details concerning Aβ and bilayer conformational ensembles, these discrepancies do not offset the features of the consensus binding mechanism. We compared our findings with other FF evaluations and proposed that an agreement between C22, C36, and A14 is a consequence of a strong ordering effect created by polar–apolar interface in the lipid bilayer. By comparing the consensus Aβ binding mechanism with experimental data, we surmise that the three tested FFs largely correctly capture the interactions of Aβ peptides with the DMPC lipid bilayer.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00096
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2378007124</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2378007124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-5df654d5f8946af5b5dcb7ca93d72bbed8f5028dbf29369e1dce473a6f31e7ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbtu2zAUhomiQXNp9kwBgS4dYocXiTLH1InbACniIQWyCRR5GNGgRJWUBu15ojxIn6lybXco0IE4HL7_Pwf4ELqgZE4Jo9dKp_lGu2ZONCFEinfohOaZnElBnt8f_rkUx-g0pQ0hnEvBPqBjzmghMslP0OtTHQHwOnSDVxGvQtSAVw68SXgdwTjd42VoE7RpSPg76Fq1LjU4WHzTjD44g3-94TV0vTOAv7jWuPYF9wH3NeBb14zRpT6M_mX0GmLo6pCmp-vgXbvlvRohfkRHVvkE5_t5hn6s7p6W32YPj1_vlzcPM8VF1s9yY0WemdwuZCaUzavc6KrQSnJTsKoCs7A5YQtTWSa5kECNhqzgSlhOoQDFz9DnXW8Xw88BUl82LmnwXrUQhlQyXiwIKSjLJvTTP-gmDLGdrpsoWQiZMcImiuwoHUNKEWzZRdeoOJaUlFtD5WSo3Boq94amyOW-eKgaMH8DByUTcLUD_kQPS__b9xtjl6Bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2397694202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three Popular Force Fields Predict Consensus Mechanism of Amyloid β Peptide Binding to the Dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine Bilayer</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Lockhart, Christopher ; Smith, Amy K ; Klimov, Dmitri K</creator><creatorcontrib>Lockhart, Christopher ; Smith, Amy K ; Klimov, Dmitri K</creatorcontrib><description>Using all-atom explicit water replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations, we examined the impact of three popular force fields (FF) on the equilibrium binding of Aβ10–40 peptide to the dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine (DMPC) bilayer. The comparison included CHARMM22 protein FF with CHARMM36 lipid FF (C22), CHARMM36m protein FF with CHARMM36 lipid FF (C36), and Amber14SB protein FF with Lipid14 lipid FF (A14). Analysis of Aβ10–40 binding to the DMPC bilayer in three FFs revealed a consensus binding mechanism. Its main features include (i) a stable helical structure in the bound peptide, (ii) insertion of the C-terminus and, in part, the central hydrophobic cluster into the bilayer hydrophobic core, (iii) considerable thinning of the DMPC bilayer beneath the bound peptide coupled with significant drop in bilayer density, and (iv) a strong disordering in the DMPC fatty acid tails. Although the three FFs diverge on many details concerning Aβ and bilayer conformational ensembles, these discrepancies do not offset the features of the consensus binding mechanism. We compared our findings with other FF evaluations and proposed that an agreement between C22, C36, and A14 is a consequence of a strong ordering effect created by polar–apolar interface in the lipid bilayer. By comparing the consensus Aβ binding mechanism with experimental data, we surmise that the three tested FFs largely correctly capture the interactions of Aβ peptides with the DMPC lipid bilayer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-9596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-960X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00096</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32176493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Amyloid beta-Peptides ; Binding ; Consensus ; Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine ; Fatty acids ; Hydrophobicity ; Lipid Bilayers ; Lipids ; Molecular dynamics ; Molecular Dynamics Simulation ; Peptides ; Proteins</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2020-04, Vol.60 (4), p.2282-2293</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Apr 27, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-5df654d5f8946af5b5dcb7ca93d72bbed8f5028dbf29369e1dce473a6f31e7ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-5df654d5f8946af5b5dcb7ca93d72bbed8f5028dbf29369e1dce473a6f31e7ea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2893-867X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32176493$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lockhart, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Amy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimov, Dmitri K</creatorcontrib><title>Three Popular Force Fields Predict Consensus Mechanism of Amyloid β Peptide Binding to the Dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine Bilayer</title><title>Journal of chemical information and modeling</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Inf. Model</addtitle><description>Using all-atom explicit water replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations, we examined the impact of three popular force fields (FF) on the equilibrium binding of Aβ10–40 peptide to the dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine (DMPC) bilayer. The comparison included CHARMM22 protein FF with CHARMM36 lipid FF (C22), CHARMM36m protein FF with CHARMM36 lipid FF (C36), and Amber14SB protein FF with Lipid14 lipid FF (A14). Analysis of Aβ10–40 binding to the DMPC bilayer in three FFs revealed a consensus binding mechanism. Its main features include (i) a stable helical structure in the bound peptide, (ii) insertion of the C-terminus and, in part, the central hydrophobic cluster into the bilayer hydrophobic core, (iii) considerable thinning of the DMPC bilayer beneath the bound peptide coupled with significant drop in bilayer density, and (iv) a strong disordering in the DMPC fatty acid tails. Although the three FFs diverge on many details concerning Aβ and bilayer conformational ensembles, these discrepancies do not offset the features of the consensus binding mechanism. We compared our findings with other FF evaluations and proposed that an agreement between C22, C36, and A14 is a consequence of a strong ordering effect created by polar–apolar interface in the lipid bilayer. By comparing the consensus Aβ binding mechanism with experimental data, we surmise that the three tested FFs largely correctly capture the interactions of Aβ peptides with the DMPC lipid bilayer.</description><subject>Amyloid beta-Peptides</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Lipid Bilayers</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Molecular dynamics</subject><subject>Molecular Dynamics Simulation</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><issn>1549-9596</issn><issn>1549-960X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kbtu2zAUhomiQXNp9kwBgS4dYocXiTLH1InbACniIQWyCRR5GNGgRJWUBu15ojxIn6lybXco0IE4HL7_Pwf4ELqgZE4Jo9dKp_lGu2ZONCFEinfohOaZnElBnt8f_rkUx-g0pQ0hnEvBPqBjzmghMslP0OtTHQHwOnSDVxGvQtSAVw68SXgdwTjd42VoE7RpSPg76Fq1LjU4WHzTjD44g3-94TV0vTOAv7jWuPYF9wH3NeBb14zRpT6M_mX0GmLo6pCmp-vgXbvlvRohfkRHVvkE5_t5hn6s7p6W32YPj1_vlzcPM8VF1s9yY0WemdwuZCaUzavc6KrQSnJTsKoCs7A5YQtTWSa5kECNhqzgSlhOoQDFz9DnXW8Xw88BUl82LmnwXrUQhlQyXiwIKSjLJvTTP-gmDLGdrpsoWQiZMcImiuwoHUNKEWzZRdeoOJaUlFtD5WSo3Boq94amyOW-eKgaMH8DByUTcLUD_kQPS__b9xtjl6Bg</recordid><startdate>20200427</startdate><enddate>20200427</enddate><creator>Lockhart, Christopher</creator><creator>Smith, Amy K</creator><creator>Klimov, Dmitri K</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2893-867X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200427</creationdate><title>Three Popular Force Fields Predict Consensus Mechanism of Amyloid β Peptide Binding to the Dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine Bilayer</title><author>Lockhart, Christopher ; Smith, Amy K ; Klimov, Dmitri K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-5df654d5f8946af5b5dcb7ca93d72bbed8f5028dbf29369e1dce473a6f31e7ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Amyloid beta-Peptides</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Lipid Bilayers</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Molecular dynamics</topic><topic>Molecular Dynamics Simulation</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lockhart, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Amy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimov, Dmitri K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical information and modeling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lockhart, Christopher</au><au>Smith, Amy K</au><au>Klimov, Dmitri K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three Popular Force Fields Predict Consensus Mechanism of Amyloid β Peptide Binding to the Dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine Bilayer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical information and modeling</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Inf. Model</addtitle><date>2020-04-27</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2282</spage><epage>2293</epage><pages>2282-2293</pages><issn>1549-9596</issn><eissn>1549-960X</eissn><abstract>Using all-atom explicit water replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations, we examined the impact of three popular force fields (FF) on the equilibrium binding of Aβ10–40 peptide to the dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine (DMPC) bilayer. The comparison included CHARMM22 protein FF with CHARMM36 lipid FF (C22), CHARMM36m protein FF with CHARMM36 lipid FF (C36), and Amber14SB protein FF with Lipid14 lipid FF (A14). Analysis of Aβ10–40 binding to the DMPC bilayer in three FFs revealed a consensus binding mechanism. Its main features include (i) a stable helical structure in the bound peptide, (ii) insertion of the C-terminus and, in part, the central hydrophobic cluster into the bilayer hydrophobic core, (iii) considerable thinning of the DMPC bilayer beneath the bound peptide coupled with significant drop in bilayer density, and (iv) a strong disordering in the DMPC fatty acid tails. Although the three FFs diverge on many details concerning Aβ and bilayer conformational ensembles, these discrepancies do not offset the features of the consensus binding mechanism. We compared our findings with other FF evaluations and proposed that an agreement between C22, C36, and A14 is a consequence of a strong ordering effect created by polar–apolar interface in the lipid bilayer. By comparing the consensus Aβ binding mechanism with experimental data, we surmise that the three tested FFs largely correctly capture the interactions of Aβ peptides with the DMPC lipid bilayer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>32176493</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00096</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2893-867X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-9596
ispartof Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2020-04, Vol.60 (4), p.2282-2293
issn 1549-9596
1549-960X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2378007124
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Amyloid beta-Peptides
Binding
Consensus
Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine
Fatty acids
Hydrophobicity
Lipid Bilayers
Lipids
Molecular dynamics
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Peptides
Proteins
title Three Popular Force Fields Predict Consensus Mechanism of Amyloid β Peptide Binding to the Dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine Bilayer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A16%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%20Popular%20Force%20Fields%20Predict%20Consensus%20Mechanism%20of%20Amyloid%20%CE%B2%20Peptide%20Binding%20to%20the%20Dimyristoylgylcerophosphocholine%20Bilayer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20information%20and%20modeling&rft.au=Lockhart,%20Christopher&rft.date=2020-04-27&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2282&rft.epage=2293&rft.pages=2282-2293&rft.issn=1549-9596&rft.eissn=1549-960X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00096&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2378007124%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-5df654d5f8946af5b5dcb7ca93d72bbed8f5028dbf29369e1dce473a6f31e7ea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2397694202&rft_id=info:pmid/32176493&rfr_iscdi=true