A questionnaire study on perception and clinical management of molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) by Irish dentists

• Published in: European archives of paediatric dentistry 2020-12, Vol.21 (6), p.703-710
• Main Authors: Wall, A., Leith, R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Anesthesia; Child; Composite materials; Composite Resins; Dental enamel; Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - diagnosis; Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - therapy; Dentistry; Dentists; Humans; Medicine; Molar; Oral hygiene; Original Scientific Article; Perception; Perceptions; Prevalence; Public health; Questionnaires; Statistical analysis; Surveys and Questionnaires; Systematic review
• ISSN: 1818-6300; 1996-9805
• DOI: 10.1007/s40368-020-00519-9

Aim Molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) is a significant global health problem frequently encountered by dentists. The aim of this questionnaire-based study was to gain a better understanding of how dentists in the Republic of Ireland perceive and manage MIH. In addition, to compare these findings with results of existing international studies. Methods Following ethical approval, an online survey was created consisting of 16 questions based on previous surveys regarding perception and treatment of MIH. Photographs and information regarding three specific cases were also included. The questionnaire was distributed by email and the data were analysed using SPSS statistical software. Results The total number of respondents was 230, of which 204 were general dentists. The majority of dentists (58%) reported that they observe MIH on a weekly basis. Those dentists exclusively in private practice and respondents aged 36 and older were less likely to note frequent MIH ( p  = 0.042). The vast majority of respondents felt either confident or very confident in diagnosing MIH (91%). Overall, 71% reported to feel comfortable managing MIH; however, those in private practice only ( p  = 0.023) and those aged 36 and older ( p  = 0.011) were less likely to report being comfortable managing MIH. The most commonly cited barrier to care was the child’s behaviour, followed by difficulty in achieving local anaesthesia. Composite resin was the most commonly selected material used to restore teeth affected by MIH (84%). In the scenario on cavity design, the results showed a similar number of dentists selected the most conservative and the most aggressive preparation indicating a disparity among choices. Conclusions MIH is frequently encountered by Irish general dentists. The overall wide disparity of responses is in line with other studies, and further highlights the need for the development of strong treatment guidelines and continuing dental education to assist dentists in treatment planning for MIH.