Loading…

Optimisation of energetic and reproductive gains explains behavioural responses to environmental variation across seasons and years

Animals switch between inactive and active states, simultaneously impacting their energy intake, energy expenditure and predation risk, and collectively defining how they engage with environmental variation and trophic interactions. We assess daily activity responses to long‐term variation in temper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology letters 2020-05, Vol.23 (5), p.841-850
Main Authors: Studd, E. K., Menzies, A. K., Siracusa, E. R., Dantzer, B., Lane, J. E., McAdam, A. G., Boutin, S., Humphries, M. M., Auer, Sonya
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-f79a98643c57035d3daa9e44c954efa41284273cc7c4de6c2697ea9e88bfd49a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-f79a98643c57035d3daa9e44c954efa41284273cc7c4de6c2697ea9e88bfd49a3
container_end_page 850
container_issue 5
container_start_page 841
container_title Ecology letters
container_volume 23
creator Studd, E. K.
Menzies, A. K.
Siracusa, E. R.
Dantzer, B.
Lane, J. E.
McAdam, A. G.
Boutin, S.
Humphries, M. M.
Auer, Sonya
description Animals switch between inactive and active states, simultaneously impacting their energy intake, energy expenditure and predation risk, and collectively defining how they engage with environmental variation and trophic interactions. We assess daily activity responses to long‐term variation in temperature, resources and mating opportunities to examine whether individuals choose to be active or inactive according to an optimisation of the relative energetic and reproductive gains each state offers. We show that this simplified behavioural decision approach predicts most activity variation (R2 = 0.83) expressed by free‐ranging red squirrels over 4 years, as quantified through accelerometer recordings (489 deployments; 5066 squirrel‐days). Recognising activity as a determinant of energetic status, the predictability of activity variation aggregated at a daily scale, and the clear signal that behaviour is environmentally forced through optimisation of gain, provides an integrated approach to examine behavioural variation as an intermediary between environmental variation and energetic, life‐history and ecological outcomes. By assessing daily activity responses to long‐term variation in temperature, resources, and mating opportunities, we examine whether individuals choose to be active or inactive according to an optimization of energetic and reproductive gains. This simplified behavioural decision approach predicts most daily activity variation (R2 = 0.83) expressed by free‐ranging red squirrels over four years, as quantified through accelerometer recordings. Here we provide an integrated approach to examine behavioural variation as an intermediary between environmental variation and energetic, life‐history, and ecological outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ele.13494
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2379014582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2379014582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-f79a98643c57035d3daa9e44c954efa41284273cc7c4de6c2697ea9e88bfd49a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFr2zAUx8VoWdtsh36BYuhlPSSxrGdbOo6QtYNALy3sZl7k50zBkTzJTpvzvvjUOOthsHfRA_348f78Gbvm6YzHmVNLMy5AwQd2yaHg0zQDefa-ix8X7CqEbZryTJX8I7sQGZcKCnXJfj92vdmZgL1xNnFNQpb8hnqjE7R14qnzrh50b_aUbNDYkNBr1x6XNf3EvXGDxzZyoXM2UEh6FxV7453dke3j1x69Ge2ovQshCYQhskf_gdCHT-y8wTbQ59M7Yc_flk-Lh-nq8f774utqqoWUMG1KhUoWIHRepiKvRY2oCECrHKhB4JmErBRalxpqKnRWqJIiIeW6qUGhmLAvozdm-jVQ6KsYXFPboiU3hCoTpUo55DKL6O0_6DYGtfG6SEmVc0gBInU3Usdgnpqq82aH_lDxtHprporNVMdmIntzMg7rHdXv5N8qIjAfgRfT0uH_pmq5Wo7KP1jwmt8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2389514044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimisation of energetic and reproductive gains explains behavioural responses to environmental variation across seasons and years</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Studd, E. K. ; Menzies, A. K. ; Siracusa, E. R. ; Dantzer, B. ; Lane, J. E. ; McAdam, A. G. ; Boutin, S. ; Humphries, M. M. ; Auer, Sonya</creator><contributor>Auer, Sonya</contributor><creatorcontrib>Studd, E. K. ; Menzies, A. K. ; Siracusa, E. R. ; Dantzer, B. ; Lane, J. E. ; McAdam, A. G. ; Boutin, S. ; Humphries, M. M. ; Auer, Sonya ; Auer, Sonya</creatorcontrib><description>Animals switch between inactive and active states, simultaneously impacting their energy intake, energy expenditure and predation risk, and collectively defining how they engage with environmental variation and trophic interactions. We assess daily activity responses to long‐term variation in temperature, resources and mating opportunities to examine whether individuals choose to be active or inactive according to an optimisation of the relative energetic and reproductive gains each state offers. We show that this simplified behavioural decision approach predicts most activity variation (R2 = 0.83) expressed by free‐ranging red squirrels over 4 years, as quantified through accelerometer recordings (489 deployments; 5066 squirrel‐days). Recognising activity as a determinant of energetic status, the predictability of activity variation aggregated at a daily scale, and the clear signal that behaviour is environmentally forced through optimisation of gain, provides an integrated approach to examine behavioural variation as an intermediary between environmental variation and energetic, life‐history and ecological outcomes. By assessing daily activity responses to long‐term variation in temperature, resources, and mating opportunities, we examine whether individuals choose to be active or inactive according to an optimization of energetic and reproductive gains. This simplified behavioural decision approach predicts most daily activity variation (R2 = 0.83) expressed by free‐ranging red squirrels over four years, as quantified through accelerometer recordings. Here we provide an integrated approach to examine behavioural variation as an intermediary between environmental variation and energetic, life‐history, and ecological outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ele.13494</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32189469</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accelerometer ; Accelerometers ; Activity recognition ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; behaviour ; decision‐making ; energetic gain ; Energy expenditure ; Energy intake ; Energy Metabolism ; hoarding ; metabolic ecology ; optimal behaviour ; Optimization ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; Reproduction ; Sciuridae ; Seasons ; Squirrels ; Tamiasciurus hudsonicus ; Trophic relationships ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2020-05, Vol.23 (5), p.841-850</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd/CNRS.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-f79a98643c57035d3daa9e44c954efa41284273cc7c4de6c2697ea9e88bfd49a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-f79a98643c57035d3daa9e44c954efa41284273cc7c4de6c2697ea9e88bfd49a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6317-038X ; 0000-0002-1883-2652 ; 0000-0003-0849-7181 ; 0000-0003-4205-7278 ; 0000-0002-3058-265X ; 0000-0001-7323-2572</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32189469$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Auer, Sonya</contributor><creatorcontrib>Studd, E. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menzies, A. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siracusa, E. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantzer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAdam, A. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutin, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphries, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auer, Sonya</creatorcontrib><title>Optimisation of energetic and reproductive gains explains behavioural responses to environmental variation across seasons and years</title><title>Ecology letters</title><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><description>Animals switch between inactive and active states, simultaneously impacting their energy intake, energy expenditure and predation risk, and collectively defining how they engage with environmental variation and trophic interactions. We assess daily activity responses to long‐term variation in temperature, resources and mating opportunities to examine whether individuals choose to be active or inactive according to an optimisation of the relative energetic and reproductive gains each state offers. We show that this simplified behavioural decision approach predicts most activity variation (R2 = 0.83) expressed by free‐ranging red squirrels over 4 years, as quantified through accelerometer recordings (489 deployments; 5066 squirrel‐days). Recognising activity as a determinant of energetic status, the predictability of activity variation aggregated at a daily scale, and the clear signal that behaviour is environmentally forced through optimisation of gain, provides an integrated approach to examine behavioural variation as an intermediary between environmental variation and energetic, life‐history and ecological outcomes. By assessing daily activity responses to long‐term variation in temperature, resources, and mating opportunities, we examine whether individuals choose to be active or inactive according to an optimization of energetic and reproductive gains. This simplified behavioural decision approach predicts most daily activity variation (R2 = 0.83) expressed by free‐ranging red squirrels over four years, as quantified through accelerometer recordings. Here we provide an integrated approach to examine behavioural variation as an intermediary between environmental variation and energetic, life‐history, and ecological outcomes.</description><subject>Accelerometer</subject><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Activity recognition</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>behaviour</subject><subject>decision‐making</subject><subject>energetic gain</subject><subject>Energy expenditure</subject><subject>Energy intake</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism</subject><subject>hoarding</subject><subject>metabolic ecology</subject><subject>optimal behaviour</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Sciuridae</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Squirrels</subject><subject>Tamiasciurus hudsonicus</subject><subject>Trophic relationships</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFr2zAUx8VoWdtsh36BYuhlPSSxrGdbOo6QtYNALy3sZl7k50zBkTzJTpvzvvjUOOthsHfRA_348f78Gbvm6YzHmVNLMy5AwQd2yaHg0zQDefa-ix8X7CqEbZryTJX8I7sQGZcKCnXJfj92vdmZgL1xNnFNQpb8hnqjE7R14qnzrh50b_aUbNDYkNBr1x6XNf3EvXGDxzZyoXM2UEh6FxV7453dke3j1x69Ge2ovQshCYQhskf_gdCHT-y8wTbQ59M7Yc_flk-Lh-nq8f774utqqoWUMG1KhUoWIHRepiKvRY2oCECrHKhB4JmErBRalxpqKnRWqJIiIeW6qUGhmLAvozdm-jVQ6KsYXFPboiU3hCoTpUo55DKL6O0_6DYGtfG6SEmVc0gBInU3Usdgnpqq82aH_lDxtHprporNVMdmIntzMg7rHdXv5N8qIjAfgRfT0uH_pmq5Wo7KP1jwmt8</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Studd, E. K.</creator><creator>Menzies, A. K.</creator><creator>Siracusa, E. R.</creator><creator>Dantzer, B.</creator><creator>Lane, J. E.</creator><creator>McAdam, A. G.</creator><creator>Boutin, S.</creator><creator>Humphries, M. M.</creator><creator>Auer, Sonya</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-038X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1883-2652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0849-7181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-7278</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3058-265X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7323-2572</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Optimisation of energetic and reproductive gains explains behavioural responses to environmental variation across seasons and years</title><author>Studd, E. K. ; Menzies, A. K. ; Siracusa, E. R. ; Dantzer, B. ; Lane, J. E. ; McAdam, A. G. ; Boutin, S. ; Humphries, M. M. ; Auer, Sonya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-f79a98643c57035d3daa9e44c954efa41284273cc7c4de6c2697ea9e88bfd49a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accelerometer</topic><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Activity recognition</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>behaviour</topic><topic>decision‐making</topic><topic>energetic gain</topic><topic>Energy expenditure</topic><topic>Energy intake</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism</topic><topic>hoarding</topic><topic>metabolic ecology</topic><topic>optimal behaviour</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Sciuridae</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Squirrels</topic><topic>Tamiasciurus hudsonicus</topic><topic>Trophic relationships</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Studd, E. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menzies, A. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siracusa, E. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantzer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAdam, A. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutin, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphries, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auer, Sonya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Studd, E. K.</au><au>Menzies, A. K.</au><au>Siracusa, E. R.</au><au>Dantzer, B.</au><au>Lane, J. E.</au><au>McAdam, A. G.</au><au>Boutin, S.</au><au>Humphries, M. M.</au><au>Auer, Sonya</au><au>Auer, Sonya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimisation of energetic and reproductive gains explains behavioural responses to environmental variation across seasons and years</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>841</spage><epage>850</epage><pages>841-850</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>Animals switch between inactive and active states, simultaneously impacting their energy intake, energy expenditure and predation risk, and collectively defining how they engage with environmental variation and trophic interactions. We assess daily activity responses to long‐term variation in temperature, resources and mating opportunities to examine whether individuals choose to be active or inactive according to an optimisation of the relative energetic and reproductive gains each state offers. We show that this simplified behavioural decision approach predicts most activity variation (R2 = 0.83) expressed by free‐ranging red squirrels over 4 years, as quantified through accelerometer recordings (489 deployments; 5066 squirrel‐days). Recognising activity as a determinant of energetic status, the predictability of activity variation aggregated at a daily scale, and the clear signal that behaviour is environmentally forced through optimisation of gain, provides an integrated approach to examine behavioural variation as an intermediary between environmental variation and energetic, life‐history and ecological outcomes. By assessing daily activity responses to long‐term variation in temperature, resources, and mating opportunities, we examine whether individuals choose to be active or inactive according to an optimization of energetic and reproductive gains. This simplified behavioural decision approach predicts most daily activity variation (R2 = 0.83) expressed by free‐ranging red squirrels over four years, as quantified through accelerometer recordings. Here we provide an integrated approach to examine behavioural variation as an intermediary between environmental variation and energetic, life‐history, and ecological outcomes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32189469</pmid><doi>10.1111/ele.13494</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-038X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1883-2652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0849-7181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-7278</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3058-265X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7323-2572</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-023X
ispartof Ecology letters, 2020-05, Vol.23 (5), p.841-850
issn 1461-023X
1461-0248
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2379014582
source Wiley
subjects Accelerometer
Accelerometers
Activity recognition
Animal behavior
Animals
behaviour
decision‐making
energetic gain
Energy expenditure
Energy intake
Energy Metabolism
hoarding
metabolic ecology
optimal behaviour
Optimization
Predation
Predatory Behavior
Reproduction
Sciuridae
Seasons
Squirrels
Tamiasciurus hudsonicus
Trophic relationships
Variation
title Optimisation of energetic and reproductive gains explains behavioural responses to environmental variation across seasons and years
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A35%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimisation%20of%20energetic%20and%20reproductive%20gains%20explains%20behavioural%20responses%20to%20environmental%20variation%20across%20seasons%20and%20years&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=Studd,%20E.%20K.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=841&rft.epage=850&rft.pages=841-850&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ele.13494&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2379014582%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-f79a98643c57035d3daa9e44c954efa41284273cc7c4de6c2697ea9e88bfd49a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2389514044&rft_id=info:pmid/32189469&rfr_iscdi=true