Ethical and medicolegal aspects in the management of neurosurgical emergencies among Jehovah’s Witnesses: Clinical implications and review

• Published in: Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2020-07, Vol.194, p.105798-105798, Article 105798
• Main Authors: Taylor, Blake E.S., Narayan, Vinayak, Jumah, Fareed, Al-Mufti, Fawaz, Nosko, Michael, Roychowdhury, Sudipta, Nanda, Anil, Gupta, Gaurav
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Autonomy; Blood loss; Blood products; Christianity; Computed tomography; Consent; Decompression; Emergency medical care; Emergency neurosurgery; Ethics; Hematoma; Hemoglobin; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Jehovah Witness; Medical prognosis; Medicolegal; Morbidity; Mortality; Nausea; Neurology; Neurosurgery; Operative delay; Patients; Religion; Surgery; Trauma; Traumatic brain injury; Vomiting
• ISSN: 0303-8467; 1872-6968
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105798

•The ethical concerns in Jehovah Witnesses pose management challenges in neurosurgery.•Clinical management of this patient population presents a moral dilemma.•We provide review on medicolegal and ethical issues in the neurosurgical management of Jehovah’s Witnesses. When an incapacitated Jehovah’s Witness neurologically deteriorates and requires immediate craniectomy, institutional protocols may delay surgery if the patient’s refusal of blood products is ambiguous. We are among the first to describe such an ethically contentious case in emergency neurosurgery, review the morbidity of operative delays, discuss medicolegal concerns raised, and provide a detailed guide to hemostasis in patients who refuse blood products. We discuss the case of a 46-year-old woman presented with nausea, vomiting, and right-sided weakness, progressing to stupor over several hours. When an initial Computed Tomography (CT) scan showed a large, left-sided intraparenchymal hematoma with significant midline shift, she was booked for an emergency hemicraniectomy. According to the family, she was a Jehovah’s Witness and would have refused blood consent, but was without the proper documentation. Despite her worsening neurological status, an indeterminate blood consent delayed surgery for more than two hours. Her neurological exam did not improve postoperatively, and she later expired. The ethical, legal, and operative concerns that arise in the emergency neurosurgical treatment of Jehovah’s Witness patients pose unique management challenges. Since operative delay is a preventable cause of mortality in patients requiring urgent craniectomy, and the likelihood of requiring a transfusion from hemorrhage is minimal, an ambiguous blood consent should not postpone a potentially life-saving treatment. For the beneficence and autonomy of Jehovah’s Witness patients, institutional policies should respect the family’s wishes in order to expedite surgical decompression. In addition to discussing the nuances of such ethical considerations, we also provide a detailed list of commonly used, topical and parenteral hemostatic agents from the neurosurgical operating room which, depending on whether they are blood-derived, either should or should not be used when treating a Jehovah’s Witness.