Restoring Attentional Resources With Nature: A Replication Study of Berto’s (2005) Paradigm Including Commentary From Dr. Rita Berto

Objective The aim of this study is to replicate Berto’s (2005) heavily cited work on attention restoration. Background Nature interventions have gained increased interest for improving performance of attentionally demanding tasks. Berto (2005) indicated that viewing digital nature images could impro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human factors 2021-09, Vol.63 (6), p.1046-1060
Main Authors: Neilson, Brittany N., Craig, Curtis M., Curiel, Raelyn Y., Klein, Martina I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Attention task
Depletion
Design of experiments
Digital imaging
Experimental design
Female
Humans
Performance enhancement
Performance measurement
Reaction Time - physiology
Replication
Response time
Restoration
Task Performance and Analysis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective The aim of this study is to replicate Berto’s (2005) heavily cited work on attention restoration. Background Nature interventions have gained increased interest for improving performance of attentionally demanding tasks. Berto (2005) indicated that viewing digital nature images could improve performance on a subsequent response inhibition task, the sustained attention to response task (SART). However, experimental design and statistical concerns about her experiments as well as failure to support her findings across multiple unpublished studies in our laboratory provided rationale for this replication study. Method Twenty participants were each assigned to one of three digital image conditions: nature, urban, and control. Participants performed the SART before and after digital image exposure. Results SART performance metrics (total correct target responses, mean response time, and transformed d′) were analyzed using 2 (SART) × 3 (image interventions) mixed design ANOVAs. The results failed to replicate Berto (2005). Conclusion Possible reasons for not replicating Berto (2005) are discussed, including (1) sample differences, (2) different testing environments and procedures, (3) insufficient attentional depletion, and (4) individual differences. Applications Research needs to determine the effectiveness of such interventions, the specific attention tasks that might benefit, and the individual difference variables relevant for attention restoration.
ISSN:0018-7208
1547-8181
DOI:10.1177/0018720820909287