Loading…

Propensity to decide on involuntary hospitalisation in primary medical care: Dispositional or situational determinants?

The incidence of involuntary hospitalisations varies widely among and within countries. One factor that could account for these variations is the local profile of medical doctors deciding on involuntary admissions. The first goal of this study was to test whether to decide on an involuntary hospital...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of law and psychiatry 2020-03, Vol.69, p.101552-101552, Article 101552
Main Authors: Morandi, Stéphane, Silva, Benedetta, Bonsack, Charles, Golay, Philippe
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4eec449b67ad275ebe567902fa14db2420014bfbfb0c027afc7beecaa7d5c19d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4eec449b67ad275ebe567902fa14db2420014bfbfb0c027afc7beecaa7d5c19d3
container_end_page 101552
container_issue
container_start_page 101552
container_title International journal of law and psychiatry
container_volume 69
creator Morandi, Stéphane
Silva, Benedetta
Bonsack, Charles
Golay, Philippe
description The incidence of involuntary hospitalisations varies widely among and within countries. One factor that could account for these variations is the local profile of medical doctors deciding on involuntary admissions. The first goal of this study was to test whether to decide on an involuntary hospitalisation was an individual or a situational disposition. The second goal was to explore doctors' characteristics associated with the use of coercion in specific situations. Medical doctors of four French-speaking Swiss cantons with the competence, according to cantonal laws, to decide on an involuntary hospitalisation were invited to take part in an online survey. Respondents were asked whether they would decide on an involuntary hospitalisation or not in seven clinical vignettes. Propensity to decide on involuntary hospitalisation was estimated with a two-parameter logistic item response model and latent class analysis. Univariate logistic regression models were used to test whether individual factors were associated with the use of coercion in each situation. 192 medical doctors completed the online questionnaire. There was near-zero correlation between vignettes: an involuntary hospitalisation decided on by a doctor in one situation was not related to the use of coercion in another. No subgroup was more prone to generally resort to coercion. However, some individual characteristics were related to the use of coercion in specific situations. Medical doctors' propensity to use coercion for mental health problems was better accounted for by situational rather than dispositional factors. Thus, the use of coercion should be examined as a multidimensional concept.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101552
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2386284379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016025272030011X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2386284379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4eec449b67ad275ebe567902fa14db2420014bfbfb0c027afc7beecaa7d5c19d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAyEQhonRaP34Ax4MRy9bgYWlNSbG-J000YOeCQuzkWa7rMDW9N9LbfVoOAAzz7zJPAidUjKmhFYX87Gbt_2YEfZTEILtoBGdyLKoykm1i0YZIgUTTB6gwxjnhJCKCLmPDkrGOOWiGqGv1-B76KJLK5w8tmCcBew77Lqlb4cu6bDCHz72LunWRZ3cTw_3wS3WrQVYZ3SLjQ5wie9c7H3OylCu-YDze9Dbr4UEYeE63aV4fYz2Gt1GONneR-j94f7t9qmYvTw-397MClOKKhUcwHA-rSupLZMCahCVnBLWaMptzTgjhPK6yYcYwqRujKzziNbSCkOntjxC55vcPvjPAWJSCxcNtK3uwA9RsWyKTXgppxllG9QEH2OARm2XVJSotXA1V2vhai1cbYTnobNt_lBnF38jv4YzcLUBIG-5dBBUNA46k70FMElZ7_7L_wZalpWd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386284379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Propensity to decide on involuntary hospitalisation in primary medical care: Dispositional or situational determinants?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Morandi, Stéphane ; Silva, Benedetta ; Bonsack, Charles ; Golay, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Morandi, Stéphane ; Silva, Benedetta ; Bonsack, Charles ; Golay, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>The incidence of involuntary hospitalisations varies widely among and within countries. One factor that could account for these variations is the local profile of medical doctors deciding on involuntary admissions. The first goal of this study was to test whether to decide on an involuntary hospitalisation was an individual or a situational disposition. The second goal was to explore doctors' characteristics associated with the use of coercion in specific situations. Medical doctors of four French-speaking Swiss cantons with the competence, according to cantonal laws, to decide on an involuntary hospitalisation were invited to take part in an online survey. Respondents were asked whether they would decide on an involuntary hospitalisation or not in seven clinical vignettes. Propensity to decide on involuntary hospitalisation was estimated with a two-parameter logistic item response model and latent class analysis. Univariate logistic regression models were used to test whether individual factors were associated with the use of coercion in each situation. 192 medical doctors completed the online questionnaire. There was near-zero correlation between vignettes: an involuntary hospitalisation decided on by a doctor in one situation was not related to the use of coercion in another. No subgroup was more prone to generally resort to coercion. However, some individual characteristics were related to the use of coercion in specific situations. Medical doctors' propensity to use coercion for mental health problems was better accounted for by situational rather than dispositional factors. Thus, the use of coercion should be examined as a multidimensional concept.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-2527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101552</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32241456</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Coercion ; Commitment of Mentally Ill ; Decision Making ; Female ; Humans ; Involuntary hospitalisation ; Involuntary Treatment ; Male ; Mental health ; Middle Aged ; Physicians - psychology ; Primary medical care ; Psychiatry ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Switzerland - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of law and psychiatry, 2020-03, Vol.69, p.101552-101552, Article 101552</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4eec449b67ad275ebe567902fa14db2420014bfbfb0c027afc7beecaa7d5c19d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4eec449b67ad275ebe567902fa14db2420014bfbfb0c027afc7beecaa7d5c19d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32241456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morandi, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Benedetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonsack, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golay, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Propensity to decide on involuntary hospitalisation in primary medical care: Dispositional or situational determinants?</title><title>International journal of law and psychiatry</title><addtitle>Int J Law Psychiatry</addtitle><description>The incidence of involuntary hospitalisations varies widely among and within countries. One factor that could account for these variations is the local profile of medical doctors deciding on involuntary admissions. The first goal of this study was to test whether to decide on an involuntary hospitalisation was an individual or a situational disposition. The second goal was to explore doctors' characteristics associated with the use of coercion in specific situations. Medical doctors of four French-speaking Swiss cantons with the competence, according to cantonal laws, to decide on an involuntary hospitalisation were invited to take part in an online survey. Respondents were asked whether they would decide on an involuntary hospitalisation or not in seven clinical vignettes. Propensity to decide on involuntary hospitalisation was estimated with a two-parameter logistic item response model and latent class analysis. Univariate logistic regression models were used to test whether individual factors were associated with the use of coercion in each situation. 192 medical doctors completed the online questionnaire. There was near-zero correlation between vignettes: an involuntary hospitalisation decided on by a doctor in one situation was not related to the use of coercion in another. No subgroup was more prone to generally resort to coercion. However, some individual characteristics were related to the use of coercion in specific situations. Medical doctors' propensity to use coercion for mental health problems was better accounted for by situational rather than dispositional factors. Thus, the use of coercion should be examined as a multidimensional concept.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>Commitment of Mentally Ill</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Involuntary hospitalisation</subject><subject>Involuntary Treatment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Primary medical care</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Switzerland - epidemiology</subject><issn>0160-2527</issn><issn>1873-6386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PAyEQhonRaP34Ax4MRy9bgYWlNSbG-J000YOeCQuzkWa7rMDW9N9LbfVoOAAzz7zJPAidUjKmhFYX87Gbt_2YEfZTEILtoBGdyLKoykm1i0YZIgUTTB6gwxjnhJCKCLmPDkrGOOWiGqGv1-B76KJLK5w8tmCcBew77Lqlb4cu6bDCHz72LunWRZ3cTw_3wS3WrQVYZ3SLjQ5wie9c7H3OylCu-YDze9Dbr4UEYeE63aV4fYz2Gt1GONneR-j94f7t9qmYvTw-397MClOKKhUcwHA-rSupLZMCahCVnBLWaMptzTgjhPK6yYcYwqRujKzziNbSCkOntjxC55vcPvjPAWJSCxcNtK3uwA9RsWyKTXgppxllG9QEH2OARm2XVJSotXA1V2vhai1cbYTnobNt_lBnF38jv4YzcLUBIG-5dBBUNA46k70FMElZ7_7L_wZalpWd</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Morandi, Stéphane</creator><creator>Silva, Benedetta</creator><creator>Bonsack, Charles</creator><creator>Golay, Philippe</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Propensity to decide on involuntary hospitalisation in primary medical care: Dispositional or situational determinants?</title><author>Morandi, Stéphane ; Silva, Benedetta ; Bonsack, Charles ; Golay, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4eec449b67ad275ebe567902fa14db2420014bfbfb0c027afc7beecaa7d5c19d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>Commitment of Mentally Ill</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Involuntary hospitalisation</topic><topic>Involuntary Treatment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Primary medical care</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Switzerland - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morandi, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Benedetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonsack, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golay, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of law and psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morandi, Stéphane</au><au>Silva, Benedetta</au><au>Bonsack, Charles</au><au>Golay, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Propensity to decide on involuntary hospitalisation in primary medical care: Dispositional or situational determinants?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of law and psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Law Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>69</volume><spage>101552</spage><epage>101552</epage><pages>101552-101552</pages><artnum>101552</artnum><issn>0160-2527</issn><eissn>1873-6386</eissn><abstract>The incidence of involuntary hospitalisations varies widely among and within countries. One factor that could account for these variations is the local profile of medical doctors deciding on involuntary admissions. The first goal of this study was to test whether to decide on an involuntary hospitalisation was an individual or a situational disposition. The second goal was to explore doctors' characteristics associated with the use of coercion in specific situations. Medical doctors of four French-speaking Swiss cantons with the competence, according to cantonal laws, to decide on an involuntary hospitalisation were invited to take part in an online survey. Respondents were asked whether they would decide on an involuntary hospitalisation or not in seven clinical vignettes. Propensity to decide on involuntary hospitalisation was estimated with a two-parameter logistic item response model and latent class analysis. Univariate logistic regression models were used to test whether individual factors were associated with the use of coercion in each situation. 192 medical doctors completed the online questionnaire. There was near-zero correlation between vignettes: an involuntary hospitalisation decided on by a doctor in one situation was not related to the use of coercion in another. No subgroup was more prone to generally resort to coercion. However, some individual characteristics were related to the use of coercion in specific situations. Medical doctors' propensity to use coercion for mental health problems was better accounted for by situational rather than dispositional factors. Thus, the use of coercion should be examined as a multidimensional concept.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32241456</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101552</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-2527
ispartof International journal of law and psychiatry, 2020-03, Vol.69, p.101552-101552, Article 101552
issn 0160-2527
1873-6386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2386284379
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Coercion
Commitment of Mentally Ill
Decision Making
Female
Humans
Involuntary hospitalisation
Involuntary Treatment
Male
Mental health
Middle Aged
Physicians - psychology
Primary medical care
Psychiatry
Surveys and Questionnaires
Switzerland - epidemiology
title Propensity to decide on involuntary hospitalisation in primary medical care: Dispositional or situational determinants?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A08%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Propensity%20to%20decide%20on%20involuntary%20hospitalisation%20in%20primary%20medical%20care:%20Dispositional%20or%20situational%20determinants?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20law%20and%20psychiatry&rft.au=Morandi,%20St%C3%A9phane&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=69&rft.spage=101552&rft.epage=101552&rft.pages=101552-101552&rft.artnum=101552&rft.issn=0160-2527&rft.eissn=1873-6386&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101552&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2386284379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4eec449b67ad275ebe567902fa14db2420014bfbfb0c027afc7beecaa7d5c19d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386284379&rft_id=info:pmid/32241456&rfr_iscdi=true