Single‐port robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis of the preliminary experiences

Objective To summarize the clinical experiences with single‐port (SP) robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) reported in the literature and to describe the peri‐operative and short‐term outcomes of this procedure. Material and Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed in Decem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJU international 2020-07, Vol.126 (1), p.55-64
Main Authors: Checcucci, Enrico, De Cillis, Sabrina, Pecoraro, Angela, Peretti, Dario, Volpi, Gabriele, Amparore, Daniele, Piramide, Federico, Piana, Alberto, Manfredi, Matteo, Fiori, Cristian, Autorino, Riccardo, Dasgupta, Prokar, Porpiglia, Francesco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Body image
Cadavers
Cancer surgery
Catheterization
Literature reviews
Lymph nodes
oncology
Patients
Preservation
prostate
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
Quality of life
Robotic surgery
single port
Systematic review
Transient ischemic attack
Urological surgery
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To summarize the clinical experiences with single‐port (SP) robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) reported in the literature and to describe the peri‐operative and short‐term outcomes of this procedure. Material and Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed in December 2019 using Medline (via PubMed), Embase (via Ovid), Cochrane databases, Scopus and Web of Science (PROSPERO registry number 164129). All studies that reported intra‐ and peri‐operative data on SP‐RARP were included. Cadaveric series and perineal or partial prostatectomy series were excluded. Results The pooled mean operating time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay and catheterization time were 190.55 min, 198.4 mL, 1.86 days and 8.21 days, respectively. The pooled mean number of lymph nodes removed was 8.33, and the pooled rate of positive surgical margins was 33%. The pooled minor complication rate was 15%. Only one urinary leakage and one major complication (transient ischaemic attack) were recorded. Regarding functional outcomes, pooled continence and potency rates at 12 weeks were 55% and 42%, respectively. Conclusions The present analysis confirms that SP‐RARP is safe and feasible. This novel robotic platform resulted in similar intra‐operative and peri‐operative outcomes to those obtained with the standard multiport da Vinci system. The advantages of single incision can be translated into a preservation of the patient’s body image and self‐esteem and cosmesis, which have a great impact on a patient's quality of life.
ISSN:1464-4096
1464-410X
DOI:10.1111/bju.15069