Static and Fatigue Loading of Veneered Implant‐Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses

• Published in: Journal of prosthodontics 2020-10, Vol.29 (8), p.679-685
• Main Authors: Rayyan, Mohammad M., Abdallah, Jihad, Segaan, Lucette G., Bonfante, Estevam A., Osman, Essam
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Composite materials; Dental restorative materials; Dentistry; fiber‐reinforced composites; fracture; implants; lifetime; Mastication; Prostheses; Prosthetics; Survival; Thermal cycling; Zirconia
• ISSN: 1059-941X; 1532-849X
• DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13173

Purpose This study aimed to compare the load to failure and the probability of survival of porcelain fused to zirconia (PFZ) three‐unit, implant‐supported, fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) to those of indirect composites veneered to either zirconia (CVZ) or milled fiber‐reinforced composite (FRC) frameworks under static and fatigue loading. Materials and Methods One‐hundred and twenty posterior three‐unit FDP (second premolar pontic) frameworks were fabricated via milling from a single Standard Tessellation Language (STL) file. The FDPs were divided into three groups. Each group (n = 40) was subjected to static (n = 20) and fatigue (n = 20) loading tests, as follows: (1) PFZ: zirconia framework layered with porcelain veneer; (2) CVZ: zirconia framework veneered with indirect composite resin; and (3) FRC: FRC framework veneered with indirect composite resin. After porcelain veneering onto sintered zirconia frameworks, or resin composite veneering onto zirconia or FRC frameworks, FDPs were cemented on their abutments using self‐adhesive resin cement. After thermal cycling, half of the FDPs were subjected to an accelerated fatigue test. The other half of the FDPs were subjected to single load‐to‐failure (SLF) testing at a crosshead speed (1 mm/min). Lifetime analysis was conducted to determine the probability of survival, and fractographic analysis was performed. Results Significant differences were observed among the studied groups for SLF with the highest characteristic strength values observed for PFZ (2154 N), followed by 1905.47 N for CVZ and 1679.56 N for FRC. The probability of survival for 100,000 cycles at 500 N was the highest for FRC (98%) and CVZ (100%) and was significantly lower for PFZ (88%). Different fracture patterns were observed in the fractography. Conclusions In fatigue testing, which simulates masticatory function better than static tests, a higher probability of survival was observed for FRC and CVZ than for PFZ. Framework fractures were not observed only for the FRC group, indicating that chairside repair with the addition of indirect composite could be performed for continued function.