Loading…

Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer

Cytology-based cervical screening had unequivocal success in reducing the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in the last century. The recognition of the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) as a necessary cause of cervical cancer led to the development of HPV testing. Gradually, there has been...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 2020-05, Vol.65, p.98-108
Main Authors: Bhatla, Neerja, Singhal, Seema
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-afdad2174c37ba293defdbc5d7c639af609c9ca5529fe86fccb6edb5c468f91c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-afdad2174c37ba293defdbc5d7c639af609c9ca5529fe86fccb6edb5c468f91c3
container_end_page 108
container_issue
container_start_page 98
container_title Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology
container_volume 65
creator Bhatla, Neerja
Singhal, Seema
description Cytology-based cervical screening had unequivocal success in reducing the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in the last century. The recognition of the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) as a necessary cause of cervical cancer led to the development of HPV testing. Gradually, there has been a shift from reflex HPV testing for mild cytological abnormalities, to co-testing with cytology and HPV, and lately to primary HPV screening, based on evidence from well-designed large randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Advantages of primary HPV screening include higher sensitivity to detect pre-neoplastic lesions, better re-assurance with a negative test, and safe prolongation of screening intervals. However, clinicians and policy makers must ensure the availability of clinically validated HPV assays and triage protocols of screen positive cases prior to implementation of primary HPV screening. This is likely to reduce potential harm from over-treatment as well as extra burden on the health care system. •The high sensitivity of HPV test (95%) makes it ideal for primary screening.•A negative HPV test provides better reassurance and allows safe prolongation of screening interval.•HPV test is more effective in detecting glandular lesions and precursors of adenocarcinoma.•HPV testing is more suitable for screening HPV-vaccinated populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2390159580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1521693420300353</els_id><sourcerecordid>2390159580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-afdad2174c37ba293defdbc5d7c639af609c9ca5529fe86fccb6edb5c468f91c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwE0A5wiHBj9qJTwhVvKRK9ABcLWe9rly1SbHbSv33pErhymnnMLOj-Qi5ZrRglKn7RVGv23q-bwpOOS0oLyitTsiQScFzpgU_PWjOcqXFeEAuUlpQKoTm8pwMBOeasbIakrtZDCsb99nr7CtLEBGb0Mwz38YMMO4C2GUGtun0JTnzdpnw6nhH5PP56WPymk_fX94mj9MchJKb3HpnHWflGERZW66FQ-9qkK4EJbT1imrQYKXk2mOlPECt0NUSxqrymoEYkdv-7zq231tMG7MKCXC5tA2222S40JRJLSvaWWVvhdimFNGbdb_GMGoOlMzCHCmZAyVDuekodbmbY8W2XqH7S_1i6QwPvQG7obuA0SQI2FFwISJsjGvDPxU_Ggd7Rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2390159580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Bhatla, Neerja ; Singhal, Seema</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhatla, Neerja ; Singhal, Seema</creatorcontrib><description>Cytology-based cervical screening had unequivocal success in reducing the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in the last century. The recognition of the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) as a necessary cause of cervical cancer led to the development of HPV testing. Gradually, there has been a shift from reflex HPV testing for mild cytological abnormalities, to co-testing with cytology and HPV, and lately to primary HPV screening, based on evidence from well-designed large randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Advantages of primary HPV screening include higher sensitivity to detect pre-neoplastic lesions, better re-assurance with a negative test, and safe prolongation of screening intervals. However, clinicians and policy makers must ensure the availability of clinically validated HPV assays and triage protocols of screen positive cases prior to implementation of primary HPV screening. This is likely to reduce potential harm from over-treatment as well as extra burden on the health care system. •The high sensitivity of HPV test (95%) makes it ideal for primary screening.•A negative HPV test provides better reassurance and allows safe prolongation of screening interval.•HPV test is more effective in detecting glandular lesions and precursors of adenocarcinoma.•HPV testing is more suitable for screening HPV-vaccinated populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1521-6934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32291178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cervical cancer ; Elimination ; HPV test ; Screening ; Triage</subject><ispartof>Best practice &amp; research. Clinical obstetrics &amp; gynaecology, 2020-05, Vol.65, p.98-108</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-afdad2174c37ba293defdbc5d7c639af609c9ca5529fe86fccb6edb5c468f91c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-afdad2174c37ba293defdbc5d7c639af609c9ca5529fe86fccb6edb5c468f91c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291178$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhatla, Neerja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singhal, Seema</creatorcontrib><title>Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer</title><title>Best practice &amp; research. Clinical obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</title><addtitle>Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Cytology-based cervical screening had unequivocal success in reducing the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in the last century. The recognition of the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) as a necessary cause of cervical cancer led to the development of HPV testing. Gradually, there has been a shift from reflex HPV testing for mild cytological abnormalities, to co-testing with cytology and HPV, and lately to primary HPV screening, based on evidence from well-designed large randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Advantages of primary HPV screening include higher sensitivity to detect pre-neoplastic lesions, better re-assurance with a negative test, and safe prolongation of screening intervals. However, clinicians and policy makers must ensure the availability of clinically validated HPV assays and triage protocols of screen positive cases prior to implementation of primary HPV screening. This is likely to reduce potential harm from over-treatment as well as extra burden on the health care system. •The high sensitivity of HPV test (95%) makes it ideal for primary screening.•A negative HPV test provides better reassurance and allows safe prolongation of screening interval.•HPV test is more effective in detecting glandular lesions and precursors of adenocarcinoma.•HPV testing is more suitable for screening HPV-vaccinated populations.</description><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Elimination</subject><subject>HPV test</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Triage</subject><issn>1521-6934</issn><issn>1532-1932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwE0A5wiHBj9qJTwhVvKRK9ABcLWe9rly1SbHbSv33pErhymnnMLOj-Qi5ZrRglKn7RVGv23q-bwpOOS0oLyitTsiQScFzpgU_PWjOcqXFeEAuUlpQKoTm8pwMBOeasbIakrtZDCsb99nr7CtLEBGb0Mwz38YMMO4C2GUGtun0JTnzdpnw6nhH5PP56WPymk_fX94mj9MchJKb3HpnHWflGERZW66FQ-9qkK4EJbT1imrQYKXk2mOlPECt0NUSxqrymoEYkdv-7zq231tMG7MKCXC5tA2222S40JRJLSvaWWVvhdimFNGbdb_GMGoOlMzCHCmZAyVDuekodbmbY8W2XqH7S_1i6QwPvQG7obuA0SQI2FFwISJsjGvDPxU_Ggd7Rw</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Bhatla, Neerja</creator><creator>Singhal, Seema</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer</title><author>Bhatla, Neerja ; Singhal, Seema</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-afdad2174c37ba293defdbc5d7c639af609c9ca5529fe86fccb6edb5c468f91c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Elimination</topic><topic>HPV test</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Triage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhatla, Neerja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singhal, Seema</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Best practice &amp; research. Clinical obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhatla, Neerja</au><au>Singhal, Seema</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer</atitle><jtitle>Best practice &amp; research. Clinical obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><spage>98</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>98-108</pages><issn>1521-6934</issn><eissn>1532-1932</eissn><abstract>Cytology-based cervical screening had unequivocal success in reducing the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in the last century. The recognition of the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) as a necessary cause of cervical cancer led to the development of HPV testing. Gradually, there has been a shift from reflex HPV testing for mild cytological abnormalities, to co-testing with cytology and HPV, and lately to primary HPV screening, based on evidence from well-designed large randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Advantages of primary HPV screening include higher sensitivity to detect pre-neoplastic lesions, better re-assurance with a negative test, and safe prolongation of screening intervals. However, clinicians and policy makers must ensure the availability of clinically validated HPV assays and triage protocols of screen positive cases prior to implementation of primary HPV screening. This is likely to reduce potential harm from over-treatment as well as extra burden on the health care system. •The high sensitivity of HPV test (95%) makes it ideal for primary screening.•A negative HPV test provides better reassurance and allows safe prolongation of screening interval.•HPV test is more effective in detecting glandular lesions and precursors of adenocarcinoma.•HPV testing is more suitable for screening HPV-vaccinated populations.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32291178</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.008</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1521-6934
ispartof Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2020-05, Vol.65, p.98-108
issn 1521-6934
1532-1932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2390159580
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Cervical cancer
Elimination
HPV test
Screening
Triage
title Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T17%3A44%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Primary%20HPV%20screening%20for%20cervical%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Best%20practice%20&%20research.%20Clinical%20obstetrics%20&%20gynaecology&rft.au=Bhatla,%20Neerja&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=65&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=98-108&rft.issn=1521-6934&rft.eissn=1532-1932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2390159580%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-afdad2174c37ba293defdbc5d7c639af609c9ca5529fe86fccb6edb5c468f91c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2390159580&rft_id=info:pmid/32291178&rfr_iscdi=true