Something old, something new

Recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis has major clinical ramifications, but is often difficult to distinguish from residual clot by ultrasound. van Dam et al demonstrated that magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging can accurately distinguish the two, with a low risk of venous thromboembolis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Blood 2020-04, Vol.135 (16), p.1307-1308
Main Author: Stevens, Scott M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Recurrence
Thrombosis - diagnosis
Ultrasonography
Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis
Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ab56e7c3b6e89eaaf887cbe5daebe7a2d0cde4fed210fe98c8f23bb20363a363
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ab56e7c3b6e89eaaf887cbe5daebe7a2d0cde4fed210fe98c8f23bb20363a363
container_end_page 1308
container_issue 16
container_start_page 1307
container_title Blood
container_volume 135
creator Stevens, Scott M.
description Recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis has major clinical ramifications, but is often difficult to distinguish from residual clot by ultrasound. van Dam et al demonstrated that magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging can accurately distinguish the two, with a low risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence after a negative study.
doi_str_mv 10.1182/blood.2020005119
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2391978120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006497120620912</els_id><sourcerecordid>2391978120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ab56e7c3b6e89eaaf887cbe5daebe7a2d0cde4fed210fe98c8f23bb20363a363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvHkR69ODWSbIfiTcpfkHBg72HfMxqZHdTN1vF_95otZ48DMM83nswP0KOKcwoFezCNCG4GQMGAAWlcoeMacFEBknZJeOkllkuKzoiBzG-ANCcs2KfjDhjUuQ5jMnJY2hxePbd0zQ07nwat2eH74dkr9ZNxKOfPSHLm-vl_C5bPNzez68WmeWSDZk2RYmV5aZEIVHrWojKGiycRoOVZg6sw7xGxyjUKIUVNePGMOAl12km5GxTu-rD6xrjoFofLTaN7jCso2JcUlkJmgITAhur7UOMPdZq1ftW9x-KgvpCor6RqD8kKXL60742Lbpt4JdBMlxuDJhefPPYq2g9dhad79EOygX_f_snTLNwOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2391978120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Something old, something new</title><source>ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Stevens, Scott M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Scott M.</creatorcontrib><description>Recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis has major clinical ramifications, but is often difficult to distinguish from residual clot by ultrasound. van Dam et al demonstrated that magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging can accurately distinguish the two, with a low risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence after a negative study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-4971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020005119</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32298440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Recurrence ; Thrombosis - diagnosis ; Ultrasonography ; Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis ; Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Blood, 2020-04, Vol.135 (16), p.1307-1308</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Hematology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ab56e7c3b6e89eaaf887cbe5daebe7a2d0cde4fed210fe98c8f23bb20363a363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ab56e7c3b6e89eaaf887cbe5daebe7a2d0cde4fed210fe98c8f23bb20363a363</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9988-1551</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497120620912$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3535,27903,27904,45759</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Scott M.</creatorcontrib><title>Something old, something new</title><title>Blood</title><addtitle>Blood</addtitle><description>Recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis has major clinical ramifications, but is often difficult to distinguish from residual clot by ultrasound. van Dam et al demonstrated that magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging can accurately distinguish the two, with a low risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence after a negative study.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Thrombosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis</subject><issn>0006-4971</issn><issn>1528-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvHkR69ODWSbIfiTcpfkHBg72HfMxqZHdTN1vF_95otZ48DMM83nswP0KOKcwoFezCNCG4GQMGAAWlcoeMacFEBknZJeOkllkuKzoiBzG-ANCcs2KfjDhjUuQ5jMnJY2hxePbd0zQ07nwat2eH74dkr9ZNxKOfPSHLm-vl_C5bPNzez68WmeWSDZk2RYmV5aZEIVHrWojKGiycRoOVZg6sw7xGxyjUKIUVNePGMOAl12km5GxTu-rD6xrjoFofLTaN7jCso2JcUlkJmgITAhur7UOMPdZq1ftW9x-KgvpCor6RqD8kKXL60742Lbpt4JdBMlxuDJhefPPYq2g9dhad79EOygX_f_snTLNwOg</recordid><startdate>20200416</startdate><enddate>20200416</enddate><creator>Stevens, Scott M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9988-1551</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200416</creationdate><title>Something old, something new</title><author>Stevens, Scott M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ab56e7c3b6e89eaaf887cbe5daebe7a2d0cde4fed210fe98c8f23bb20363a363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Thrombosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Scott M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Blood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevens, Scott M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Something old, something new</atitle><jtitle>Blood</jtitle><addtitle>Blood</addtitle><date>2020-04-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>1307</spage><epage>1308</epage><pages>1307-1308</pages><issn>0006-4971</issn><eissn>1528-0020</eissn><abstract>Recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis has major clinical ramifications, but is often difficult to distinguish from residual clot by ultrasound. van Dam et al demonstrated that magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging can accurately distinguish the two, with a low risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence after a negative study.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32298440</pmid><doi>10.1182/blood.2020005119</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9988-1551</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-4971
ispartof Blood, 2020-04, Vol.135 (16), p.1307-1308
issn 0006-4971
1528-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2391978120
source ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Recurrence
Thrombosis - diagnosis
Ultrasonography
Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis
Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis
title Something old, something new
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A21%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Something%20old,%20something%20new&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Stevens,%20Scott%20M.&rft.date=2020-04-16&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=1307&rft.epage=1308&rft.pages=1307-1308&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182/blood.2020005119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2391978120%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ab56e7c3b6e89eaaf887cbe5daebe7a2d0cde4fed210fe98c8f23bb20363a363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2391978120&rft_id=info:pmid/32298440&rfr_iscdi=true