Loading…

Rapid pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation additively improve catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation

Introduction Catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with higher ablation success rates. Rapid cardiac pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) independently improve catheter stability. Simultaneous modulation of cardiac and respiratory motion has not been previo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2020-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1678-1686
Main Authors: Aizer, Anthony, Qiu, Jessica K., Cheng, Austin V., Wu, Patrick B., Barbhaiya, Chirag R., Jankelson, Lior, Linton, Patrick, Bernstein, Scott A., Park, David S., Holmes, Douglas S., Chinitz, Larry A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-83b22b47c685f5308d01f937b26cc14950403636e130ca2c6376026d2fc950533
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-83b22b47c685f5308d01f937b26cc14950403636e130ca2c6376026d2fc950533
container_end_page 1686
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1678
container_title Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
container_volume 31
creator Aizer, Anthony
Qiu, Jessica K.
Cheng, Austin V.
Wu, Patrick B.
Barbhaiya, Chirag R.
Jankelson, Lior
Linton, Patrick
Bernstein, Scott A.
Park, David S.
Holmes, Douglas S.
Chinitz, Larry A.
description Introduction Catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with higher ablation success rates. Rapid cardiac pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) independently improve catheter stability. Simultaneous modulation of cardiac and respiratory motion has not been previously studied. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of simultaneous heart rate and respiratory rate modulation on catheter stability. Methods Forty patients undergoing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation received ablation lesions at 15 prespecified locations (12 left atria, 3 right atria). Patients were randomly assigned to undergo rapid atrial pacing for either the first or the second half of each lesion. Within each group, half of the patients received HFJV and the other half standard ventilation. Contact force and ablation data for all lesions were compared among the study groups. Standard deviation of contact force was the primary endpoint defined to examine contact force variability. Results Lesions with no pacing and standard ventilation had the greatest contact force standard deviation (5.86 ± 3.08 g), compared to lesions with pacing and standard ventilation (5.45 ± 3.28 g; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jce.14507
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2393040291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2393040291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-83b22b47c685f5308d01f937b26cc14950403636e130ca2c6376026d2fc950533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9K5TAUh4M4-H_hC0jAjS6qSU6Stku5qDODMDDoOqRp6s2lt70m6ZXixkfwGX2SiVZnIXg250A-Pn7hh9AhJWc0zfnC2DPKBck30A4VnGQFlflmugkXGRQ5bKPdEBaEUJBEbKFtYEB5wekOevqrV67GK21cd491V-O5u5-_Pr803j4MtjMjXtiI17aLrtXR9R3Wde2iW9t2xG658v3aYqPj3EbrcYi6cq2LI64H_26M3ukWN67yrv0UVNOxj340ug324GPvobury9vZz-zmz_Wv2cVNZkBAnhVQMVbx3MhCNAJIURPalJBXTBpDeSkIJyBBWgrEaGYk5JIwWbPGpDcBsIdOJm8Km_4Uolq6YGyK09l-CIpBCcnBSprQ4y_ooh98l9IpxmnJcikkSdTpRBnfh-Bto1beLbUfFSXqrRGVGlHvjST26MM4VEtb_yc_K0jA-QQ8utaO35vU79nlpPwHT0mWCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2419276560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation additively improve catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Aizer, Anthony ; Qiu, Jessica K. ; Cheng, Austin V. ; Wu, Patrick B. ; Barbhaiya, Chirag R. ; Jankelson, Lior ; Linton, Patrick ; Bernstein, Scott A. ; Park, David S. ; Holmes, Douglas S. ; Chinitz, Larry A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aizer, Anthony ; Qiu, Jessica K. ; Cheng, Austin V. ; Wu, Patrick B. ; Barbhaiya, Chirag R. ; Jankelson, Lior ; Linton, Patrick ; Bernstein, Scott A. ; Park, David S. ; Holmes, Douglas S. ; Chinitz, Larry A.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with higher ablation success rates. Rapid cardiac pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) independently improve catheter stability. Simultaneous modulation of cardiac and respiratory motion has not been previously studied. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of simultaneous heart rate and respiratory rate modulation on catheter stability. Methods Forty patients undergoing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation received ablation lesions at 15 prespecified locations (12 left atria, 3 right atria). Patients were randomly assigned to undergo rapid atrial pacing for either the first or the second half of each lesion. Within each group, half of the patients received HFJV and the other half standard ventilation. Contact force and ablation data for all lesions were compared among the study groups. Standard deviation of contact force was the primary endpoint defined to examine contact force variability. Results Lesions with no pacing and standard ventilation had the greatest contact force standard deviation (5.86 ± 3.08 g), compared to lesions with pacing and standard ventilation (5.45 ± 3.28 g; P &lt; .01) or to lesions with no pacing and HFJV (4.92 ± 3.00 g; P &lt; .01). Lesions with both pacing and HFJV had the greatest reduction in contact force standard deviation (4.35 ± 2.81 g; P &lt; .01), confirming an additive benefit of each maneuver. Pacing and HFJV together was also associated with a reduction in the proportion of lesions with excessive maximum contact force (P &lt; .001). Discussion Rapid pacing and HFJV additively improve catheter stability. Simultaneous pacing with HFJV further improves catheter stability over pacing or HFJV alone to optimize ablation lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jce.14507</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32314841</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation ; atrial fibrillation ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Catheters ; contact force ; Fibrillation ; Heart rate ; jet ventilation ; lesion quality ; Lesions ; Mechanical ventilation ; pacing ; Respiration ; Standard deviation ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2020-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1678-1686</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-83b22b47c685f5308d01f937b26cc14950403636e130ca2c6376026d2fc950533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-83b22b47c685f5308d01f937b26cc14950403636e130ca2c6376026d2fc950533</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6550-0178 ; 0000-0003-3479-936X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32314841$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aizer, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Jessica K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Austin V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Patrick B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbhaiya, Chirag R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jankelson, Lior</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linton, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Douglas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinitz, Larry A.</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation additively improve catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation</title><title>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Introduction Catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with higher ablation success rates. Rapid cardiac pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) independently improve catheter stability. Simultaneous modulation of cardiac and respiratory motion has not been previously studied. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of simultaneous heart rate and respiratory rate modulation on catheter stability. Methods Forty patients undergoing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation received ablation lesions at 15 prespecified locations (12 left atria, 3 right atria). Patients were randomly assigned to undergo rapid atrial pacing for either the first or the second half of each lesion. Within each group, half of the patients received HFJV and the other half standard ventilation. Contact force and ablation data for all lesions were compared among the study groups. Standard deviation of contact force was the primary endpoint defined to examine contact force variability. Results Lesions with no pacing and standard ventilation had the greatest contact force standard deviation (5.86 ± 3.08 g), compared to lesions with pacing and standard ventilation (5.45 ± 3.28 g; P &lt; .01) or to lesions with no pacing and HFJV (4.92 ± 3.00 g; P &lt; .01). Lesions with both pacing and HFJV had the greatest reduction in contact force standard deviation (4.35 ± 2.81 g; P &lt; .01), confirming an additive benefit of each maneuver. Pacing and HFJV together was also associated with a reduction in the proportion of lesions with excessive maximum contact force (P &lt; .001). Discussion Rapid pacing and HFJV additively improve catheter stability. Simultaneous pacing with HFJV further improves catheter stability over pacing or HFJV alone to optimize ablation lesions.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>contact force</subject><subject>Fibrillation</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>jet ventilation</subject><subject>lesion quality</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>pacing</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>1045-3873</issn><issn>1540-8167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9K5TAUh4M4-H_hC0jAjS6qSU6Stku5qDODMDDoOqRp6s2lt70m6ZXixkfwGX2SiVZnIXg250A-Pn7hh9AhJWc0zfnC2DPKBck30A4VnGQFlflmugkXGRQ5bKPdEBaEUJBEbKFtYEB5wekOevqrV67GK21cd491V-O5u5-_Pr803j4MtjMjXtiI17aLrtXR9R3Wde2iW9t2xG658v3aYqPj3EbrcYi6cq2LI64H_26M3ukWN67yrv0UVNOxj340ug324GPvobury9vZz-zmz_Wv2cVNZkBAnhVQMVbx3MhCNAJIURPalJBXTBpDeSkIJyBBWgrEaGYk5JIwWbPGpDcBsIdOJm8Km_4Uolq6YGyK09l-CIpBCcnBSprQ4y_ooh98l9IpxmnJcikkSdTpRBnfh-Bto1beLbUfFSXqrRGVGlHvjST26MM4VEtb_yc_K0jA-QQ8utaO35vU79nlpPwHT0mWCA</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Aizer, Anthony</creator><creator>Qiu, Jessica K.</creator><creator>Cheng, Austin V.</creator><creator>Wu, Patrick B.</creator><creator>Barbhaiya, Chirag R.</creator><creator>Jankelson, Lior</creator><creator>Linton, Patrick</creator><creator>Bernstein, Scott A.</creator><creator>Park, David S.</creator><creator>Holmes, Douglas S.</creator><creator>Chinitz, Larry A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-0178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-936X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Rapid pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation additively improve catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation</title><author>Aizer, Anthony ; Qiu, Jessica K. ; Cheng, Austin V. ; Wu, Patrick B. ; Barbhaiya, Chirag R. ; Jankelson, Lior ; Linton, Patrick ; Bernstein, Scott A. ; Park, David S. ; Holmes, Douglas S. ; Chinitz, Larry A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-83b22b47c685f5308d01f937b26cc14950403636e130ca2c6376026d2fc950533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>contact force</topic><topic>Fibrillation</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>jet ventilation</topic><topic>lesion quality</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>pacing</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aizer, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Jessica K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Austin V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Patrick B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbhaiya, Chirag R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jankelson, Lior</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linton, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Douglas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinitz, Larry A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aizer, Anthony</au><au>Qiu, Jessica K.</au><au>Cheng, Austin V.</au><au>Wu, Patrick B.</au><au>Barbhaiya, Chirag R.</au><au>Jankelson, Lior</au><au>Linton, Patrick</au><au>Bernstein, Scott A.</au><au>Park, David S.</au><au>Holmes, Douglas S.</au><au>Chinitz, Larry A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation additively improve catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1678</spage><epage>1686</epage><pages>1678-1686</pages><issn>1045-3873</issn><eissn>1540-8167</eissn><abstract>Introduction Catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with higher ablation success rates. Rapid cardiac pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) independently improve catheter stability. Simultaneous modulation of cardiac and respiratory motion has not been previously studied. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of simultaneous heart rate and respiratory rate modulation on catheter stability. Methods Forty patients undergoing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation received ablation lesions at 15 prespecified locations (12 left atria, 3 right atria). Patients were randomly assigned to undergo rapid atrial pacing for either the first or the second half of each lesion. Within each group, half of the patients received HFJV and the other half standard ventilation. Contact force and ablation data for all lesions were compared among the study groups. Standard deviation of contact force was the primary endpoint defined to examine contact force variability. Results Lesions with no pacing and standard ventilation had the greatest contact force standard deviation (5.86 ± 3.08 g), compared to lesions with pacing and standard ventilation (5.45 ± 3.28 g; P &lt; .01) or to lesions with no pacing and HFJV (4.92 ± 3.00 g; P &lt; .01). Lesions with both pacing and HFJV had the greatest reduction in contact force standard deviation (4.35 ± 2.81 g; P &lt; .01), confirming an additive benefit of each maneuver. Pacing and HFJV together was also associated with a reduction in the proportion of lesions with excessive maximum contact force (P &lt; .001). Discussion Rapid pacing and HFJV additively improve catheter stability. Simultaneous pacing with HFJV further improves catheter stability over pacing or HFJV alone to optimize ablation lesions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32314841</pmid><doi>10.1111/jce.14507</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-0178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-936X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-3873
ispartof Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2020-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1678-1686
issn 1045-3873
1540-8167
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2393040291
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Ablation
atrial fibrillation
Cardiac arrhythmia
Catheters
contact force
Fibrillation
Heart rate
jet ventilation
lesion quality
Lesions
Mechanical ventilation
pacing
Respiration
Standard deviation
Ventilation
title Rapid pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation additively improve catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20pacing%20and%20high%E2%80%90frequency%20jet%20ventilation%20additively%20improve%20catheter%20stability%20during%20atrial%20fibrillation%20ablation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiovascular%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Aizer,%20Anthony&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1678&rft.epage=1686&rft.pages=1678-1686&rft.issn=1045-3873&rft.eissn=1540-8167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jce.14507&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2393040291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-83b22b47c685f5308d01f937b26cc14950403636e130ca2c6376026d2fc950533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2419276560&rft_id=info:pmid/32314841&rfr_iscdi=true