Loading…

Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for Prediction of Thirty-Day Mortality in the Emergency Department

We validate the Clinical Frailty Scale by examining its independent predictive validity for 30-day mortality, ICU admission, and hospitalization and by determining its reliability. We also determine frailty prevalence in our emergency department (ED) as measured with the Clinical Frailty Scale. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of emergency medicine 2020-09, Vol.76 (3), p.291-300
Main Authors: Kaeppeli, Tobias, Rueegg, Marco, Dreher-Hummel, Thomas, Brabrand, Mikkel, Kabell-Nissen, Søren, Carpenter, Christopher R., Bingisser, Roland, Nickel, Christian H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-a29c96e21fb88b2a435d4eb360a94983c0dc69e71f5b1a058429cf324eb992493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-a29c96e21fb88b2a435d4eb360a94983c0dc69e71f5b1a058429cf324eb992493
container_end_page 300
container_issue 3
container_start_page 291
container_title Annals of emergency medicine
container_volume 76
creator Kaeppeli, Tobias
Rueegg, Marco
Dreher-Hummel, Thomas
Brabrand, Mikkel
Kabell-Nissen, Søren
Carpenter, Christopher R.
Bingisser, Roland
Nickel, Christian H.
description We validate the Clinical Frailty Scale by examining its independent predictive validity for 30-day mortality, ICU admission, and hospitalization and by determining its reliability. We also determine frailty prevalence in our emergency department (ED) as measured with the Clinical Frailty Scale. This was a prospective observational study including consecutive ED patients aged 65 years or older, from a single tertiary care center during a 9-week period. To examine predictive validity, association with mortality was investigated through a Cox proportional hazards regression; hospitalization and ICU transfer were investigated through multivariable logistic regression. We assessed reliability by calculating Cohen's weighted κ for agreement of experts who independently assigned Clinical Frailty Scale levels, compared with trained study assistants. Frailty was defined as a Clinical Frailty Scale score of 5 and higher. A total of 2,393 patients were analyzed in this study, of whom 128 died. Higher frailty levels were associated with higher hazards for death independent of age, sex, and condition (medical versus surgical). The area under the curve for 30-day mortality prediction was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.85), for hospitalization 0.72 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.74), and for ICU admission 0.69 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.73). Interrater reliability between the reference standard and the study team was good (weighted Cohen’s κ was 0.74; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85). Frailty prevalence was 36.8% (n=880). The Clinical Frailty Scale appears to be a valid and reliable instrument to identify frailty in the ED. It might provide ED clinicians with useful information for decisionmaking in regard to triage, disposition, and treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.028
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2395261852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196064420302183</els_id><sourcerecordid>2395261852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-a29c96e21fb88b2a435d4eb360a94983c0dc69e71f5b1a058429cf324eb992493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtP3DAURi1EVaaUv4DMjk3S60c88RINr0pUrQRlaznOTfE0j6ntQcq_x9NhpC67siyf77vXh5ALBiUDpr6sSzuOOGD4NWBbcuBQgiiB10dkwUAvC7VUcEwWwLQqQEl5Qj7FuAYALTn7SE4EF0LJWi3I72fb-9YmP4106mh6Qbrq_eid7eltsL5PM33MF6TdFOiPgK13B_jpxYc0F9d2pt-mkHJRhv34t-Rmtx2ObqbXuLEhDTimz-RDZ_uIZ-_nKfl5e_O0ui8evt99XV09FE5KkQrLtdMKOeuaum64laJqJTZCgdVS18JB65TGJeuqhlmoapkDneCZ0ZpLLU7J5b53E6Y_W4zJDD467Hs74rSNhgtdccXqimdU71EXphgDdmYT_GDDbBiYnWuzNv-4NjvXBoTJrnP2_H3Mttm9HZIHuRlY7QHMn331GEx0PjvJDgO6ZNrJ_8eYNx6hlmc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2395261852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for Prediction of Thirty-Day Mortality in the Emergency Department</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kaeppeli, Tobias ; Rueegg, Marco ; Dreher-Hummel, Thomas ; Brabrand, Mikkel ; Kabell-Nissen, Søren ; Carpenter, Christopher R. ; Bingisser, Roland ; Nickel, Christian H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaeppeli, Tobias ; Rueegg, Marco ; Dreher-Hummel, Thomas ; Brabrand, Mikkel ; Kabell-Nissen, Søren ; Carpenter, Christopher R. ; Bingisser, Roland ; Nickel, Christian H.</creatorcontrib><description>We validate the Clinical Frailty Scale by examining its independent predictive validity for 30-day mortality, ICU admission, and hospitalization and by determining its reliability. We also determine frailty prevalence in our emergency department (ED) as measured with the Clinical Frailty Scale. This was a prospective observational study including consecutive ED patients aged 65 years or older, from a single tertiary care center during a 9-week period. To examine predictive validity, association with mortality was investigated through a Cox proportional hazards regression; hospitalization and ICU transfer were investigated through multivariable logistic regression. We assessed reliability by calculating Cohen's weighted κ for agreement of experts who independently assigned Clinical Frailty Scale levels, compared with trained study assistants. Frailty was defined as a Clinical Frailty Scale score of 5 and higher. A total of 2,393 patients were analyzed in this study, of whom 128 died. Higher frailty levels were associated with higher hazards for death independent of age, sex, and condition (medical versus surgical). The area under the curve for 30-day mortality prediction was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.85), for hospitalization 0.72 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.74), and for ICU admission 0.69 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.73). Interrater reliability between the reference standard and the study team was good (weighted Cohen’s κ was 0.74; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85). Frailty prevalence was 36.8% (n=880). The Clinical Frailty Scale appears to be a valid and reliable instrument to identify frailty in the ED. It might provide ED clinicians with useful information for decisionmaking in regard to triage, disposition, and treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32336486</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 2020-09, Vol.76 (3), p.291-300</ispartof><rights>2020 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-a29c96e21fb88b2a435d4eb360a94983c0dc69e71f5b1a058429cf324eb992493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-a29c96e21fb88b2a435d4eb360a94983c0dc69e71f5b1a058429cf324eb992493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8498-972X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32336486$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaeppeli, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueegg, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreher-Hummel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brabrand, Mikkel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabell-Nissen, Søren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingisser, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickel, Christian H.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for Prediction of Thirty-Day Mortality in the Emergency Department</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>We validate the Clinical Frailty Scale by examining its independent predictive validity for 30-day mortality, ICU admission, and hospitalization and by determining its reliability. We also determine frailty prevalence in our emergency department (ED) as measured with the Clinical Frailty Scale. This was a prospective observational study including consecutive ED patients aged 65 years or older, from a single tertiary care center during a 9-week period. To examine predictive validity, association with mortality was investigated through a Cox proportional hazards regression; hospitalization and ICU transfer were investigated through multivariable logistic regression. We assessed reliability by calculating Cohen's weighted κ for agreement of experts who independently assigned Clinical Frailty Scale levels, compared with trained study assistants. Frailty was defined as a Clinical Frailty Scale score of 5 and higher. A total of 2,393 patients were analyzed in this study, of whom 128 died. Higher frailty levels were associated with higher hazards for death independent of age, sex, and condition (medical versus surgical). The area under the curve for 30-day mortality prediction was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.85), for hospitalization 0.72 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.74), and for ICU admission 0.69 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.73). Interrater reliability between the reference standard and the study team was good (weighted Cohen’s κ was 0.74; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85). Frailty prevalence was 36.8% (n=880). The Clinical Frailty Scale appears to be a valid and reliable instrument to identify frailty in the ED. It might provide ED clinicians with useful information for decisionmaking in regard to triage, disposition, and treatment.</description><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtP3DAURi1EVaaUv4DMjk3S60c88RINr0pUrQRlaznOTfE0j6ntQcq_x9NhpC67siyf77vXh5ALBiUDpr6sSzuOOGD4NWBbcuBQgiiB10dkwUAvC7VUcEwWwLQqQEl5Qj7FuAYALTn7SE4EF0LJWi3I72fb-9YmP4106mh6Qbrq_eid7eltsL5PM33MF6TdFOiPgK13B_jpxYc0F9d2pt-mkHJRhv34t-Rmtx2ObqbXuLEhDTimz-RDZ_uIZ-_nKfl5e_O0ui8evt99XV09FE5KkQrLtdMKOeuaum64laJqJTZCgdVS18JB65TGJeuqhlmoapkDneCZ0ZpLLU7J5b53E6Y_W4zJDD467Hs74rSNhgtdccXqimdU71EXphgDdmYT_GDDbBiYnWuzNv-4NjvXBoTJrnP2_H3Mttm9HZIHuRlY7QHMn331GEx0PjvJDgO6ZNrJ_8eYNx6hlmc</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Kaeppeli, Tobias</creator><creator>Rueegg, Marco</creator><creator>Dreher-Hummel, Thomas</creator><creator>Brabrand, Mikkel</creator><creator>Kabell-Nissen, Søren</creator><creator>Carpenter, Christopher R.</creator><creator>Bingisser, Roland</creator><creator>Nickel, Christian H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8498-972X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for Prediction of Thirty-Day Mortality in the Emergency Department</title><author>Kaeppeli, Tobias ; Rueegg, Marco ; Dreher-Hummel, Thomas ; Brabrand, Mikkel ; Kabell-Nissen, Søren ; Carpenter, Christopher R. ; Bingisser, Roland ; Nickel, Christian H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-a29c96e21fb88b2a435d4eb360a94983c0dc69e71f5b1a058429cf324eb992493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaeppeli, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueegg, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreher-Hummel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brabrand, Mikkel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabell-Nissen, Søren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingisser, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickel, Christian H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaeppeli, Tobias</au><au>Rueegg, Marco</au><au>Dreher-Hummel, Thomas</au><au>Brabrand, Mikkel</au><au>Kabell-Nissen, Søren</au><au>Carpenter, Christopher R.</au><au>Bingisser, Roland</au><au>Nickel, Christian H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for Prediction of Thirty-Day Mortality in the Emergency Department</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>291-300</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><abstract>We validate the Clinical Frailty Scale by examining its independent predictive validity for 30-day mortality, ICU admission, and hospitalization and by determining its reliability. We also determine frailty prevalence in our emergency department (ED) as measured with the Clinical Frailty Scale. This was a prospective observational study including consecutive ED patients aged 65 years or older, from a single tertiary care center during a 9-week period. To examine predictive validity, association with mortality was investigated through a Cox proportional hazards regression; hospitalization and ICU transfer were investigated through multivariable logistic regression. We assessed reliability by calculating Cohen's weighted κ for agreement of experts who independently assigned Clinical Frailty Scale levels, compared with trained study assistants. Frailty was defined as a Clinical Frailty Scale score of 5 and higher. A total of 2,393 patients were analyzed in this study, of whom 128 died. Higher frailty levels were associated with higher hazards for death independent of age, sex, and condition (medical versus surgical). The area under the curve for 30-day mortality prediction was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.85), for hospitalization 0.72 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.74), and for ICU admission 0.69 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.73). Interrater reliability between the reference standard and the study team was good (weighted Cohen’s κ was 0.74; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85). Frailty prevalence was 36.8% (n=880). The Clinical Frailty Scale appears to be a valid and reliable instrument to identify frailty in the ED. It might provide ED clinicians with useful information for decisionmaking in regard to triage, disposition, and treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32336486</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.028</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8498-972X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0644
ispartof Annals of emergency medicine, 2020-09, Vol.76 (3), p.291-300
issn 0196-0644
1097-6760
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2395261852
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
title Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for Prediction of Thirty-Day Mortality in the Emergency Department
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A12%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Clinical%20Frailty%20Scale%20for%20Prediction%20of%20Thirty-Day%20Mortality%20in%20the%20Emergency%20Department&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Kaeppeli,%20Tobias&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=291-300&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2395261852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-a29c96e21fb88b2a435d4eb360a94983c0dc69e71f5b1a058429cf324eb992493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2395261852&rft_id=info:pmid/32336486&rfr_iscdi=true