Loading…
The influence of peer beliefs on nurses' use of new health information technology: A social network analysis
Implementation of health information technology fails at an alarming rate because intended users often choose not to use it. Implementation theory and frameworks suggest that social networks may influence individuals' use, but empirical study remains limited. Furthermore, neither theory nor res...
Saved in:
Published in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2020-06, Vol.255, p.113002-8, Article 113002 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-e08488751694b4d2dc5361ef349fda191fecdb4c410ae2e82ed2a26d744c89b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-e08488751694b4d2dc5361ef349fda191fecdb4c410ae2e82ed2a26d744c89b3 |
container_end_page | 8 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 113002 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 255 |
creator | Yuan, Christina T. Nembhard, Ingrid M. Kane, Gerald C. |
description | Implementation of health information technology fails at an alarming rate because intended users often choose not to use it. Implementation theory and frameworks suggest that social networks may influence individuals' use, but empirical study remains limited. Furthermore, neither theory nor research has identified whose beliefs within the network matter most for implementation. We examine the relationship between an individual's system use and the beliefs of his or her peers. We assess the relationship for two peer groups: the entire group of peers and the subset that shares the individual's beliefs about the system. We used data collected from an academic hospital in the United States that had recently implemented a bar code medication administration system, a technology meant to increase medication safety. We administered a survey to nurses (N = 207) in six clinical units approximately 3–5 months (April–June 2013) after the “go-live” of the system to identify peer groups and beliefs about system usefulness. We calculated mean peer belief for the entire peer group and sharedness of belief using a homophily measure. From the hospital's electronic health record system, we obtained nurses' system use during the 3-month data collection period. We used multivariable linear regression to examine relationships. We found no effect of mean peer beliefs on individual system use. However, sharedness of belief about usefulness was positively associated with individual system use. Individuals' own positive belief was only associated with greater system use when shared with peers. Our findings indicate a significant role of social networks in implementation, and specifically that shared beliefs between an individual and his or her peer network may be critical to implementation success, more so than the beliefs across the entire peer group. Reinforcement by the social network appears to dictate whether individuals' own beliefs translate into system use.
•First study to examine effects of peer beliefs on health information technology use.•When nurses shared positive beliefs about the technology with peers, use increased.•Reinforcement by peers appears to translate individual's own beliefs into action. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2397688881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953620302215</els_id><sourcerecordid>2397688881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-e08488751694b4d2dc5361ef349fda191fecdb4c410ae2e82ed2a26d744c89b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtP3DAUha2qqEyhf6FY6oJuMviVOGY3Qn0gIbGZveXYNx1PPfFgJ6D59zgMsOim3li69zvHRz4IXVCypIQ2V9tljjZbvwO3ZISVKeWEsA9oQVvJq5oL-REtCJOyUjVvTtHnnLeEEEpa_gmdcsbLtGYLFNYbwH7owwSDBRx7vAdIuIPgoc84DniYUoZ8iaf8sh7gCW_AhHEzy2LamdEXagS7GWKIfw7XeIVLOG9CYcenmP5iM5hwyD6fo5PehAxfXu8ztP75Y33zu7q7_3V7s7qrLFdqrIC0om1lTRslOuGYsyUshZ4L1TtDFe3Buk5YQYkBBi0DxwxrnBTCtqrjZ-j70Xaf4sMEedQ7ny2EYAaIU9aMK9m05dCCfvsH3cYplbiFElxSVUvaFEoeKZtizgl6vU9-Z9JBU6LnPvRWv_eh5z70sY-i_PrqP3Xz7k33VkABVkcAyn88eki6uMxVOJ_AjtpF_99HngHkAqBo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437195716</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of peer beliefs on nurses' use of new health information technology: A social network analysis</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Yuan, Christina T. ; Nembhard, Ingrid M. ; Kane, Gerald C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Christina T. ; Nembhard, Ingrid M. ; Kane, Gerald C.</creatorcontrib><description>Implementation of health information technology fails at an alarming rate because intended users often choose not to use it. Implementation theory and frameworks suggest that social networks may influence individuals' use, but empirical study remains limited. Furthermore, neither theory nor research has identified whose beliefs within the network matter most for implementation. We examine the relationship between an individual's system use and the beliefs of his or her peers. We assess the relationship for two peer groups: the entire group of peers and the subset that shares the individual's beliefs about the system. We used data collected from an academic hospital in the United States that had recently implemented a bar code medication administration system, a technology meant to increase medication safety. We administered a survey to nurses (N = 207) in six clinical units approximately 3–5 months (April–June 2013) after the “go-live” of the system to identify peer groups and beliefs about system usefulness. We calculated mean peer belief for the entire peer group and sharedness of belief using a homophily measure. From the hospital's electronic health record system, we obtained nurses' system use during the 3-month data collection period. We used multivariable linear regression to examine relationships. We found no effect of mean peer beliefs on individual system use. However, sharedness of belief about usefulness was positively associated with individual system use. Individuals' own positive belief was only associated with greater system use when shared with peers. Our findings indicate a significant role of social networks in implementation, and specifically that shared beliefs between an individual and his or her peer network may be critical to implementation success, more so than the beliefs across the entire peer group. Reinforcement by the social network appears to dictate whether individuals' own beliefs translate into system use.
•First study to examine effects of peer beliefs on health information technology use.•When nurses shared positive beliefs about the technology with peers, use increased.•Reinforcement by peers appears to translate individual's own beliefs into action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32353652</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bar code medication administration ; Beliefs ; Data collection ; Drugs ; Female ; Health behavior ; Health information ; Health information technology ; Homophily ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Implementation ; Influence ; Information technology ; Medical records ; Medical technology ; Medication Systems ; Nurses ; Peer beliefs ; Peer Group ; Peer groups ; Peer relationships ; Peers ; Reinforcement ; Social Network Analysis ; Social networks ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; System use ; United States ; United States of America ; Usefulness</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2020-06, Vol.255, p.113002-8, Article 113002</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-e08488751694b4d2dc5361ef349fda191fecdb4c410ae2e82ed2a26d744c89b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-e08488751694b4d2dc5361ef349fda191fecdb4c410ae2e82ed2a26d744c89b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32353652$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Christina T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nembhard, Ingrid M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Gerald C.</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of peer beliefs on nurses' use of new health information technology: A social network analysis</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>Implementation of health information technology fails at an alarming rate because intended users often choose not to use it. Implementation theory and frameworks suggest that social networks may influence individuals' use, but empirical study remains limited. Furthermore, neither theory nor research has identified whose beliefs within the network matter most for implementation. We examine the relationship between an individual's system use and the beliefs of his or her peers. We assess the relationship for two peer groups: the entire group of peers and the subset that shares the individual's beliefs about the system. We used data collected from an academic hospital in the United States that had recently implemented a bar code medication administration system, a technology meant to increase medication safety. We administered a survey to nurses (N = 207) in six clinical units approximately 3–5 months (April–June 2013) after the “go-live” of the system to identify peer groups and beliefs about system usefulness. We calculated mean peer belief for the entire peer group and sharedness of belief using a homophily measure. From the hospital's electronic health record system, we obtained nurses' system use during the 3-month data collection period. We used multivariable linear regression to examine relationships. We found no effect of mean peer beliefs on individual system use. However, sharedness of belief about usefulness was positively associated with individual system use. Individuals' own positive belief was only associated with greater system use when shared with peers. Our findings indicate a significant role of social networks in implementation, and specifically that shared beliefs between an individual and his or her peer network may be critical to implementation success, more so than the beliefs across the entire peer group. Reinforcement by the social network appears to dictate whether individuals' own beliefs translate into system use.
•First study to examine effects of peer beliefs on health information technology use.•When nurses shared positive beliefs about the technology with peers, use increased.•Reinforcement by peers appears to translate individual's own beliefs into action.</description><subject>Bar code medication administration</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health information</subject><subject>Health information technology</subject><subject>Homophily</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Medication Systems</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Peer beliefs</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Peer groups</subject><subject>Peer relationships</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Social Network Analysis</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>System use</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Usefulness</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtP3DAUha2qqEyhf6FY6oJuMviVOGY3Qn0gIbGZveXYNx1PPfFgJ6D59zgMsOim3li69zvHRz4IXVCypIQ2V9tljjZbvwO3ZISVKeWEsA9oQVvJq5oL-REtCJOyUjVvTtHnnLeEEEpa_gmdcsbLtGYLFNYbwH7owwSDBRx7vAdIuIPgoc84DniYUoZ8iaf8sh7gCW_AhHEzy2LamdEXagS7GWKIfw7XeIVLOG9CYcenmP5iM5hwyD6fo5PehAxfXu8ztP75Y33zu7q7_3V7s7qrLFdqrIC0om1lTRslOuGYsyUshZ4L1TtDFe3Buk5YQYkBBi0DxwxrnBTCtqrjZ-j70Xaf4sMEedQ7ny2EYAaIU9aMK9m05dCCfvsH3cYplbiFElxSVUvaFEoeKZtizgl6vU9-Z9JBU6LnPvRWv_eh5z70sY-i_PrqP3Xz7k33VkABVkcAyn88eki6uMxVOJ_AjtpF_99HngHkAqBo</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Yuan, Christina T.</creator><creator>Nembhard, Ingrid M.</creator><creator>Kane, Gerald C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>The influence of peer beliefs on nurses' use of new health information technology: A social network analysis</title><author>Yuan, Christina T. ; Nembhard, Ingrid M. ; Kane, Gerald C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-e08488751694b4d2dc5361ef349fda191fecdb4c410ae2e82ed2a26d744c89b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bar code medication administration</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health information</topic><topic>Health information technology</topic><topic>Homophily</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Medication Systems</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Peer beliefs</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Peer groups</topic><topic>Peer relationships</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Social Network Analysis</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>System use</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Usefulness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Christina T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nembhard, Ingrid M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Gerald C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yuan, Christina T.</au><au>Nembhard, Ingrid M.</au><au>Kane, Gerald C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of peer beliefs on nurses' use of new health information technology: A social network analysis</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>255</volume><spage>113002</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>113002-8</pages><artnum>113002</artnum><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>Implementation of health information technology fails at an alarming rate because intended users often choose not to use it. Implementation theory and frameworks suggest that social networks may influence individuals' use, but empirical study remains limited. Furthermore, neither theory nor research has identified whose beliefs within the network matter most for implementation. We examine the relationship between an individual's system use and the beliefs of his or her peers. We assess the relationship for two peer groups: the entire group of peers and the subset that shares the individual's beliefs about the system. We used data collected from an academic hospital in the United States that had recently implemented a bar code medication administration system, a technology meant to increase medication safety. We administered a survey to nurses (N = 207) in six clinical units approximately 3–5 months (April–June 2013) after the “go-live” of the system to identify peer groups and beliefs about system usefulness. We calculated mean peer belief for the entire peer group and sharedness of belief using a homophily measure. From the hospital's electronic health record system, we obtained nurses' system use during the 3-month data collection period. We used multivariable linear regression to examine relationships. We found no effect of mean peer beliefs on individual system use. However, sharedness of belief about usefulness was positively associated with individual system use. Individuals' own positive belief was only associated with greater system use when shared with peers. Our findings indicate a significant role of social networks in implementation, and specifically that shared beliefs between an individual and his or her peer network may be critical to implementation success, more so than the beliefs across the entire peer group. Reinforcement by the social network appears to dictate whether individuals' own beliefs translate into system use.
•First study to examine effects of peer beliefs on health information technology use.•When nurses shared positive beliefs about the technology with peers, use increased.•Reinforcement by peers appears to translate individual's own beliefs into action.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32353652</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2020-06, Vol.255, p.113002-8, Article 113002 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2397688881 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Bar code medication administration Beliefs Data collection Drugs Female Health behavior Health information Health information technology Homophily Hospitals Humans Implementation Influence Information technology Medical records Medical technology Medication Systems Nurses Peer beliefs Peer Group Peer groups Peer relationships Peers Reinforcement Social Network Analysis Social networks Surveys and Questionnaires System use United States United States of America Usefulness |
title | The influence of peer beliefs on nurses' use of new health information technology: A social network analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A47%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20peer%20beliefs%20on%20nurses'%20use%20of%20new%20health%20information%20technology:%20A%20social%20network%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Yuan,%20Christina%20T.&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=255&rft.spage=113002&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=113002-8&rft.artnum=113002&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2397688881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-e08488751694b4d2dc5361ef349fda191fecdb4c410ae2e82ed2a26d744c89b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437195716&rft_id=info:pmid/32353652&rfr_iscdi=true |