Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials

The purpose of this retrospective survey was to assess the esthetic aspects of adjacent zirconia and titanium implants in the anterior maxillary area. A total of 40 patients and 109 adjacent implants (17 patients with 47 titanium implants and 23 patients with 62 zirconia implants) was included. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2020-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1489-1496
Main Authors: Kniha, K., Bock, A., Peters, F., Heitzer, M., Modabber, A., Kniha, H., Hölzle, F., Möhlhenrich, S.C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Crown
Dental implant
Dentistry
Papilla
Soft tissue
Titanium
Zirconia
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f65bb14fdcbba38dda69f02e8158aa8dccf6d5b815dda9c28f8e94e0ed78eb53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f65bb14fdcbba38dda69f02e8158aa8dccf6d5b815dda9c28f8e94e0ed78eb53
container_end_page 1496
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1489
container_title International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 49
creator Kniha, K.
Bock, A.
Peters, F.
Heitzer, M.
Modabber, A.
Kniha, H.
Hölzle, F.
Möhlhenrich, S.C.
description The purpose of this retrospective survey was to assess the esthetic aspects of adjacent zirconia and titanium implants in the anterior maxillary area. A total of 40 patients and 109 adjacent implants (17 patients with 47 titanium implants and 23 patients with 62 zirconia implants) was included. The primary aim of this survey was to assess the papillary fill (Jemt score). Additionally, further esthetic aspects were assessed. Papillae were fully present (Jemt score 3) around 39.1% of adjacent zirconia implants and 17.4% of adjacent titanium implants (p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398159396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502720301326</els_id><sourcerecordid>2398159396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f65bb14fdcbba38dda69f02e8158aa8dccf6d5b815dda9c28f8e94e0ed78eb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1TAQRa0K1L4WfoAFypJN0on9khdLbKqqpUiV2MDacuwxTJQ4D9uhLat-BF_Il-DotSy7Gs3MvVe6h7F3NVQ11O35UNEwTxUHDhVsKwBxxDa1kLKEfHrFNiChLhvguxN2GuMAAFJ0u2N2IrhoeSN2G3Z3gTH9wESm0HGPJsVidoW2gzboUzHpexpHHR6KSP77iKUJ850vaNqP2qf49_EPeTcu6A2uvt8UzOxJF9rbIlHSnpYpBz8bcl7CQHqMb9hrlwe-fZpn7Nv11dfLm_L2y6fPlxe3pRFNm0rp2qbv662zpu-16KzVrXTAsaubTuvOGuNa2_R5zS9peOc6lFsEtLsO-0acsQ-H3H2Yfy65q5ooGsydPM5LVFzI7JVCtlnKD9LcMcaATu0DTbm7qkGtwNWgVuBqBa5gqzLwbHr_lL_0E9r_lmfCWfDxIMDc8hdhUNHQystSyLiVneml_H-RB5b0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2398159396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Kniha, K. ; Bock, A. ; Peters, F. ; Heitzer, M. ; Modabber, A. ; Kniha, H. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K. ; Bock, A. ; Peters, F. ; Heitzer, M. ; Modabber, A. ; Kniha, H. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this retrospective survey was to assess the esthetic aspects of adjacent zirconia and titanium implants in the anterior maxillary area. A total of 40 patients and 109 adjacent implants (17 patients with 47 titanium implants and 23 patients with 62 zirconia implants) was included. The primary aim of this survey was to assess the papillary fill (Jemt score). Additionally, further esthetic aspects were assessed. Papillae were fully present (Jemt score 3) around 39.1% of adjacent zirconia implants and 17.4% of adjacent titanium implants (p&lt;0.01). The papilla deficit was significantly higher 1.64 mm (SD 1.35) around titanium compared to zirconia implants 0.92 mm (SD 0.94, p&lt;0.01). The evaluation of the soft tissue recessions revealed no differences between implant materials, whereas titanium implants presented more visible implant shadows (p&lt;0.01). Zirconia implants had more implants with papillae that filled the entire proximal space compared to titanium implants. Furthermore, titanium implants had a greater frequency of visible implant shadowing than the zirconia implants. Esthetic rules such as the interdental contact area and golden percentage rules did not differ significantly between the titanium and zirconia implants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32362537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Crown ; Dental implant ; Dentistry ; Papilla ; Soft tissue ; Titanium ; Zirconia</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2020-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1489-1496</ispartof><rights>2020 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f65bb14fdcbba38dda69f02e8158aa8dccf6d5b815dda9c28f8e94e0ed78eb53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f65bb14fdcbba38dda69f02e8158aa8dccf6d5b815dda9c28f8e94e0ed78eb53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8579-2622</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32362537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitzer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modabber, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kniha, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzle, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>The purpose of this retrospective survey was to assess the esthetic aspects of adjacent zirconia and titanium implants in the anterior maxillary area. A total of 40 patients and 109 adjacent implants (17 patients with 47 titanium implants and 23 patients with 62 zirconia implants) was included. The primary aim of this survey was to assess the papillary fill (Jemt score). Additionally, further esthetic aspects were assessed. Papillae were fully present (Jemt score 3) around 39.1% of adjacent zirconia implants and 17.4% of adjacent titanium implants (p&lt;0.01). The papilla deficit was significantly higher 1.64 mm (SD 1.35) around titanium compared to zirconia implants 0.92 mm (SD 0.94, p&lt;0.01). The evaluation of the soft tissue recessions revealed no differences between implant materials, whereas titanium implants presented more visible implant shadows (p&lt;0.01). Zirconia implants had more implants with papillae that filled the entire proximal space compared to titanium implants. Furthermore, titanium implants had a greater frequency of visible implant shadowing than the zirconia implants. Esthetic rules such as the interdental contact area and golden percentage rules did not differ significantly between the titanium and zirconia implants.</description><subject>Crown</subject><subject>Dental implant</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Papilla</subject><subject>Soft tissue</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Zirconia</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1TAQRa0K1L4WfoAFypJN0on9khdLbKqqpUiV2MDacuwxTJQ4D9uhLat-BF_Il-DotSy7Gs3MvVe6h7F3NVQ11O35UNEwTxUHDhVsKwBxxDa1kLKEfHrFNiChLhvguxN2GuMAAFJ0u2N2IrhoeSN2G3Z3gTH9wESm0HGPJsVidoW2gzboUzHpexpHHR6KSP77iKUJ850vaNqP2qf49_EPeTcu6A2uvt8UzOxJF9rbIlHSnpYpBz8bcl7CQHqMb9hrlwe-fZpn7Nv11dfLm_L2y6fPlxe3pRFNm0rp2qbv662zpu-16KzVrXTAsaubTuvOGuNa2_R5zS9peOc6lFsEtLsO-0acsQ-H3H2Yfy65q5ooGsydPM5LVFzI7JVCtlnKD9LcMcaATu0DTbm7qkGtwNWgVuBqBa5gqzLwbHr_lL_0E9r_lmfCWfDxIMDc8hdhUNHQystSyLiVneml_H-RB5b0</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Kniha, K.</creator><creator>Bock, A.</creator><creator>Peters, F.</creator><creator>Heitzer, M.</creator><creator>Modabber, A.</creator><creator>Kniha, H.</creator><creator>Hölzle, F.</creator><creator>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-2622</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials</title><author>Kniha, K. ; Bock, A. ; Peters, F. ; Heitzer, M. ; Modabber, A. ; Kniha, H. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f65bb14fdcbba38dda69f02e8158aa8dccf6d5b815dda9c28f8e94e0ed78eb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Crown</topic><topic>Dental implant</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Papilla</topic><topic>Soft tissue</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Zirconia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitzer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modabber, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kniha, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzle, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kniha, K.</au><au>Bock, A.</au><au>Peters, F.</au><au>Heitzer, M.</au><au>Modabber, A.</au><au>Kniha, H.</au><au>Hölzle, F.</au><au>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1489</spage><epage>1496</epage><pages>1489-1496</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this retrospective survey was to assess the esthetic aspects of adjacent zirconia and titanium implants in the anterior maxillary area. A total of 40 patients and 109 adjacent implants (17 patients with 47 titanium implants and 23 patients with 62 zirconia implants) was included. The primary aim of this survey was to assess the papillary fill (Jemt score). Additionally, further esthetic aspects were assessed. Papillae were fully present (Jemt score 3) around 39.1% of adjacent zirconia implants and 17.4% of adjacent titanium implants (p&lt;0.01). The papilla deficit was significantly higher 1.64 mm (SD 1.35) around titanium compared to zirconia implants 0.92 mm (SD 0.94, p&lt;0.01). The evaluation of the soft tissue recessions revealed no differences between implant materials, whereas titanium implants presented more visible implant shadows (p&lt;0.01). Zirconia implants had more implants with papillae that filled the entire proximal space compared to titanium implants. Furthermore, titanium implants had a greater frequency of visible implant shadowing than the zirconia implants. Esthetic rules such as the interdental contact area and golden percentage rules did not differ significantly between the titanium and zirconia implants.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32362537</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-2622</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0901-5027
ispartof International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2020-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1489-1496
issn 0901-5027
1399-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398159396
source Elsevier
subjects Crown
Dental implant
Dentistry
Papilla
Soft tissue
Titanium
Zirconia
title Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A23%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aesthetic%20aspects%20of%20adjacent%20maxillary%20single-crown%20implants%E2%80%94influence%20of%20zirconia%20and%20titanium%20as%20implant%20materials&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Kniha,%20K.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1489&rft.epage=1496&rft.pages=1489-1496&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2398159396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f65bb14fdcbba38dda69f02e8158aa8dccf6d5b815dda9c28f8e94e0ed78eb53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2398159396&rft_id=info:pmid/32362537&rfr_iscdi=true