Loading…

Beyond Progression: Devising a New Training Model for Candidate Assessment, Advancement, and Advising at Columbia

Research over several decades has identified significant problems with the progression model—the traditional approach to assessment and advancement of psychoanalytic candidates—including candidates’ anxiety and uncertainty about the methods and fairness of their assessment, avoidance of conflictual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 2020-04, Vol.68 (2), p.201-216
Main Authors: Richardson, Justin, Cabaniss, Deborah, L., Halperin, Jane, Vaughan, Susan, C., Cherry, Sabrina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a5b48238f113939566b63d64596e73b19f47beccdbd018c725617d83b8a524573
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a5b48238f113939566b63d64596e73b19f47beccdbd018c725617d83b8a524573
container_end_page 216
container_issue 2
container_start_page 201
container_title Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
container_volume 68
creator Richardson, Justin
Cabaniss, Deborah, L.
Halperin, Jane
Vaughan, Susan, C.
Cherry, Sabrina
description Research over several decades has identified significant problems with the progression model—the traditional approach to assessment and advancement of psychoanalytic candidates—including candidates’ anxiety and uncertainty about the methods and fairness of their assessment, avoidance of conflictual issues with patients in order to keep cases, and reluctance to share their challenges with supervisors and advisors. In light of these findings, the Columbia Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research restructured its psychoanalytic training programs. The progression committee, the progression advisor role, candidate application to advance through the program, and routine committee discussion of candidates were eliminated and replaced by confidential mentorship and a clear and predictable system of trainee advancement. Analytic competency—a requirement for graduation—is now determined solely from detailed written feedback regarding the candidate’s achievement of the Center’s learning objectives. The number of months of supervised analysis required for graduation has been reduced, as has the required length of the candidate’s longest case; in addition, three-times-weekly analyses are now accepted for credit. These changes are meant to increase the transparency, objectivity, and predictability of the training experience and reduce the pressure on clinical decision making and communication between trainees and faculty. An extensive evaluation of the impact of these innovations is currently under way.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0003065120923040
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398162365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0003065120923040</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2398162365</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a5b48238f113939566b63d64596e73b19f47beccdbd018c725617d83b8a524573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EokvhzglZ4sKB0PFHHIdbWD6K1EIP5WzZ8WSVKrG3dtKq_55Eu_TAoSdrPM_7SPMS8pbBJ8aq6gwABKiScai5AAnPyIbVkhVcKnhONuu6WPcn5FXONwCc8Yq9JCeCCyW01hty-wUfYvD0KsVdwpz7GD7Tr3jX5z7sqKW_8J5eJ9uHdbyMHgfaxUS3Nvje2wlpk_MSGzFMH2nj72xo8TAsxPpxFE10G4d5dL19TV50dsj45viekj_fv11vz4uL3z9-bpuLopVMToUtndRc6I4xUYu6VMop4ZUsa4WVcKzuZOWwbb3zwHRb8VKxymvhtC25LCtxSj4cvPsUb2fMkxn73OIw2IBxzoaLWjO1FFEuKBzQNsWcE3Zmn_rRpgfDwKxFm_-LXiLvjvbZjegfA_-aXYDiAGS7Q3MT5xSWa58Svj8KcX-P7lHYXDUGlDbAgTXiL6LIj0s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2398162365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond Progression: Devising a New Training Model for Candidate Assessment, Advancement, and Advising at Columbia</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Richardson, Justin ; Cabaniss, Deborah, L. ; Halperin, Jane ; Vaughan, Susan, C. ; Cherry, Sabrina</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Justin ; Cabaniss, Deborah, L. ; Halperin, Jane ; Vaughan, Susan, C. ; Cherry, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><description>Research over several decades has identified significant problems with the progression model—the traditional approach to assessment and advancement of psychoanalytic candidates—including candidates’ anxiety and uncertainty about the methods and fairness of their assessment, avoidance of conflictual issues with patients in order to keep cases, and reluctance to share their challenges with supervisors and advisors. In light of these findings, the Columbia Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research restructured its psychoanalytic training programs. The progression committee, the progression advisor role, candidate application to advance through the program, and routine committee discussion of candidates were eliminated and replaced by confidential mentorship and a clear and predictable system of trainee advancement. Analytic competency—a requirement for graduation—is now determined solely from detailed written feedback regarding the candidate’s achievement of the Center’s learning objectives. The number of months of supervised analysis required for graduation has been reduced, as has the required length of the candidate’s longest case; in addition, three-times-weekly analyses are now accepted for credit. These changes are meant to increase the transparency, objectivity, and predictability of the training experience and reduce the pressure on clinical decision making and communication between trainees and faculty. An extensive evaluation of the impact of these innovations is currently under way.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0003065120923040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32363888</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: The American Psychoanalytic Association</publisher><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate ; Humans ; Mentors ; Psychoanalysis - education ; Psychoanalytic Therapy - education</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2020-04, Vol.68 (2), p.201-216</ispartof><rights>2020 by the American Psychoanalytic Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a5b48238f113939566b63d64596e73b19f47beccdbd018c725617d83b8a524573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a5b48238f113939566b63d64596e73b19f47beccdbd018c725617d83b8a524573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363888$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabaniss, Deborah, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halperin, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Susan, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherry, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond Progression: Devising a New Training Model for Candidate Assessment, Advancement, and Advising at Columbia</title><title>Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association</title><addtitle>J Am Psychoanal Assoc</addtitle><description>Research over several decades has identified significant problems with the progression model—the traditional approach to assessment and advancement of psychoanalytic candidates—including candidates’ anxiety and uncertainty about the methods and fairness of their assessment, avoidance of conflictual issues with patients in order to keep cases, and reluctance to share their challenges with supervisors and advisors. In light of these findings, the Columbia Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research restructured its psychoanalytic training programs. The progression committee, the progression advisor role, candidate application to advance through the program, and routine committee discussion of candidates were eliminated and replaced by confidential mentorship and a clear and predictable system of trainee advancement. Analytic competency—a requirement for graduation—is now determined solely from detailed written feedback regarding the candidate’s achievement of the Center’s learning objectives. The number of months of supervised analysis required for graduation has been reduced, as has the required length of the candidate’s longest case; in addition, three-times-weekly analyses are now accepted for credit. These changes are meant to increase the transparency, objectivity, and predictability of the training experience and reduce the pressure on clinical decision making and communication between trainees and faculty. An extensive evaluation of the impact of these innovations is currently under way.</description><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mentors</subject><subject>Psychoanalysis - education</subject><subject>Psychoanalytic Therapy - education</subject><issn>0003-0651</issn><issn>1941-2460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EokvhzglZ4sKB0PFHHIdbWD6K1EIP5WzZ8WSVKrG3dtKq_55Eu_TAoSdrPM_7SPMS8pbBJ8aq6gwABKiScai5AAnPyIbVkhVcKnhONuu6WPcn5FXONwCc8Yq9JCeCCyW01hty-wUfYvD0KsVdwpz7GD7Tr3jX5z7sqKW_8J5eJ9uHdbyMHgfaxUS3Nvje2wlpk_MSGzFMH2nj72xo8TAsxPpxFE10G4d5dL19TV50dsj45viekj_fv11vz4uL3z9-bpuLopVMToUtndRc6I4xUYu6VMop4ZUsa4WVcKzuZOWwbb3zwHRb8VKxymvhtC25LCtxSj4cvPsUb2fMkxn73OIw2IBxzoaLWjO1FFEuKBzQNsWcE3Zmn_rRpgfDwKxFm_-LXiLvjvbZjegfA_-aXYDiAGS7Q3MT5xSWa58Svj8KcX-P7lHYXDUGlDbAgTXiL6LIj0s</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Richardson, Justin</creator><creator>Cabaniss, Deborah, L.</creator><creator>Halperin, Jane</creator><creator>Vaughan, Susan, C.</creator><creator>Cherry, Sabrina</creator><general>The American Psychoanalytic Association</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Beyond Progression: Devising a New Training Model for Candidate Assessment, Advancement, and Advising at Columbia</title><author>Richardson, Justin ; Cabaniss, Deborah, L. ; Halperin, Jane ; Vaughan, Susan, C. ; Cherry, Sabrina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a5b48238f113939566b63d64596e73b19f47beccdbd018c725617d83b8a524573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mentors</topic><topic>Psychoanalysis - education</topic><topic>Psychoanalytic Therapy - education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabaniss, Deborah, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halperin, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Susan, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherry, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, Justin</au><au>Cabaniss, Deborah, L.</au><au>Halperin, Jane</au><au>Vaughan, Susan, C.</au><au>Cherry, Sabrina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond Progression: Devising a New Training Model for Candidate Assessment, Advancement, and Advising at Columbia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Psychoanal Assoc</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>201-216</pages><issn>0003-0651</issn><eissn>1941-2460</eissn><abstract>Research over several decades has identified significant problems with the progression model—the traditional approach to assessment and advancement of psychoanalytic candidates—including candidates’ anxiety and uncertainty about the methods and fairness of their assessment, avoidance of conflictual issues with patients in order to keep cases, and reluctance to share their challenges with supervisors and advisors. In light of these findings, the Columbia Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research restructured its psychoanalytic training programs. The progression committee, the progression advisor role, candidate application to advance through the program, and routine committee discussion of candidates were eliminated and replaced by confidential mentorship and a clear and predictable system of trainee advancement. Analytic competency—a requirement for graduation—is now determined solely from detailed written feedback regarding the candidate’s achievement of the Center’s learning objectives. The number of months of supervised analysis required for graduation has been reduced, as has the required length of the candidate’s longest case; in addition, three-times-weekly analyses are now accepted for credit. These changes are meant to increase the transparency, objectivity, and predictability of the training experience and reduce the pressure on clinical decision making and communication between trainees and faculty. An extensive evaluation of the impact of these innovations is currently under way.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>The American Psychoanalytic Association</pub><pmid>32363888</pmid><doi>10.1177/0003065120923040</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0651
ispartof Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2020-04, Vol.68 (2), p.201-216
issn 0003-0651
1941-2460
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398162365
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Education, Medical, Graduate
Humans
Mentors
Psychoanalysis - education
Psychoanalytic Therapy - education
title Beyond Progression: Devising a New Training Model for Candidate Assessment, Advancement, and Advising at Columbia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A04%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20Progression:%20Devising%20a%20New%20Training%20Model%20for%20Candidate%20Assessment,%20Advancement,%20and%20Advising%20at%20Columbia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Psychoanalytic%20Association&rft.au=Richardson,%20Justin&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=201-216&rft.issn=0003-0651&rft.eissn=1941-2460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0003065120923040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2398162365%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a5b48238f113939566b63d64596e73b19f47beccdbd018c725617d83b8a524573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2398162365&rft_id=info:pmid/32363888&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0003065120923040&rfr_iscdi=true