Loading…

Acceptance of systematic reviews as Master/PhD theses in Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry

Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether a master and PhD thesis in Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry can be based on a systematic review (SR). Methods In this cross‐sectional study, we surveyed the coordinators of Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry using a self‐administered quest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of evidence-based medicine 2020-05, Vol.13 (2), p.125-129
Main Authors: Dotto, Lara, T. O. Lemes, Letícia, O. Spazzin, Aloísio, Sousa, Yara Teresinha Correa Silva, Pereira, Gabriel K.R., Bacchi, Ataís, Sarkis‐Onofre, Rafael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether a master and PhD thesis in Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry can be based on a systematic review (SR). Methods In this cross‐sectional study, we surveyed the coordinators of Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry using a self‐administered questionnaire including questions about whether an SR meets requirements for approval of a master or PhD thesis, instructions regarding how to use an SR as the method for a master or PhD thesis, and reasons and barriers that SRs were not recognized as acceptable for a master or PhD thesis. The responses were analyzed descriptively, and tables and graphs were created to summarize the data. Results Among 101 graduate programs invited to participate in the study, 38 (37.6%) returned the questionnaire. Over three‐quarters of surveyed programs (n = 30, 78.1%) answered that SRs, in whole or in part, meet the criteria for a master or PhD thesis. Likewise, most programs answered that a master or PhD thesis could be exclusively based on an SR (n = 28, 73.7%). The same number of programs pointed out that one possible reason for not recognizing SRs as a master or PhD thesis is either the lack of SR expertise among committee members (n = 28, 73.7%) or the lack of adequate training of candidates in SR methodology (n = 26, 68.4%). Conclusions SRs are well accepted as a master or PhD thesis by Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry. Educational initiatives should be encouraged to promote understanding of SR methodology and increase acceptance among graduate programs worldwide.
ISSN:1756-5391
1756-5383
1756-5391
DOI:10.1111/jebm.12382