Loading…
Acceptance of systematic reviews as Master/PhD theses in Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry
Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether a master and PhD thesis in Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry can be based on a systematic review (SR). Methods In this cross‐sectional study, we surveyed the coordinators of Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry using a self‐administered quest...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of evidence-based medicine 2020-05, Vol.13 (2), p.125-129 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
This study aimed to evaluate whether a master and PhD thesis in Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry can be based on a systematic review (SR).
Methods
In this cross‐sectional study, we surveyed the coordinators of Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry using a self‐administered questionnaire including questions about whether an SR meets requirements for approval of a master or PhD thesis, instructions regarding how to use an SR as the method for a master or PhD thesis, and reasons and barriers that SRs were not recognized as acceptable for a master or PhD thesis. The responses were analyzed descriptively, and tables and graphs were created to summarize the data.
Results
Among 101 graduate programs invited to participate in the study, 38 (37.6%) returned the questionnaire. Over three‐quarters of surveyed programs (n = 30, 78.1%) answered that SRs, in whole or in part, meet the criteria for a master or PhD thesis. Likewise, most programs answered that a master or PhD thesis could be exclusively based on an SR (n = 28, 73.7%). The same number of programs pointed out that one possible reason for not recognizing SRs as a master or PhD thesis is either the lack of SR expertise among committee members (n = 28, 73.7%) or the lack of adequate training of candidates in SR methodology (n = 26, 68.4%).
Conclusions
SRs are well accepted as a master or PhD thesis by Brazilian graduate programs in dentistry. Educational initiatives should be encouraged to promote understanding of SR methodology and increase acceptance among graduate programs worldwide. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1756-5391 1756-5383 1756-5391 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jebm.12382 |