Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future

• Published in: Current gastroenterology reports 2020-06, Vol.22 (6), p.28-28, Article 28
• Main Authors: Millien, Valentine Ongeri, Mansour, Nabil M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acids; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Electrolytes; Endoscopy; Gastroenterology; Gastrointestinal surgery; Large Intestine (R Chokshi; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Patients; Polyethylene glycol; Section Editor; Sodium; Suctioning; Topical Collection on Large Intestine; Tumors
• ISSN: 1522-8037; 1534-312X
• DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00764-4

Purpose of this Review Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the USA. Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening and can offer both diagnosis and therapy. The bowel preparation remains a significant barrier for patients who need to undergo colonoscopy and is often cited as the most dreaded aspect of the colonoscopy process. Inadequate bowel preparations still occur in 10–25% of colonoscopies, and this in turn can lead to increased procedural times, lower cecal intubation rates, and shorter interval between colonoscopies. From a quality standpoint, it is imperative that we do what we can to decrease the rate of inadequate bowel preparations. This review will focus on recent data regarding bowel preparation and offers a glimpse into what may be coming in the future. Recent Findings Recent advances in the field have been made to improve tolerability of bowel preparations and allow for more adequate colonoscopies. Newer, lower volume, flavored preparations, the use of adjuncts, and using split-dose preparations all can help with tolerability, compliance, and, in turn, preparation quality. Edible bowel preparations may become available in the near future. Early data on the use of artificial intelligence for assessment of preparation quality has been promising. Additionally, utilization of smartphone technology for education prior to the bowel preparation has also been shown to improve the adequacy of bowel preparations. Conclusions Ongoing efforts to improve the tolerability and palatability of colonoscopy bowel preparations are important from a quality improvement standpoint to ensure the adequacy of colonoscopy. Incorporating patient-specific factors and comorbidities is also an essential aspect of improving the quality of bowel preparation. Leveraging technology to better communicate with and educate patients on the bowel preparation process is likely to play a larger role in the coming years.