Loading…

Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta‐analysis

Purpose Nonunion is the most frequent cause of reoperation and is associated with high morbidity after distal femur fracture (DFF). We examined the rates of nonunion requiring reoperation after fixation for DFF using a locking compression plate (LCP) or retrograde intramedullary nail (RIMN). Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2021-02, Vol.141 (2), p.225-233
Main Authors: Yoon, Byung-Ho, Park, In Keun, Kim, Youngwoo, Oh, Hyoung-Keun, Choo, Suk Kyu, Sung, Yerl-Bo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f4a702f0f910525106f4c8a3357f7b82d67b229050ce2176d9c9ee5374acf8cb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f4a702f0f910525106f4c8a3357f7b82d67b229050ce2176d9c9ee5374acf8cb3
container_end_page 233
container_issue 2
container_start_page 225
container_title Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
container_volume 141
creator Yoon, Byung-Ho
Park, In Keun
Kim, Youngwoo
Oh, Hyoung-Keun
Choo, Suk Kyu
Sung, Yerl-Bo
description Purpose Nonunion is the most frequent cause of reoperation and is associated with high morbidity after distal femur fracture (DFF). We examined the rates of nonunion requiring reoperation after fixation for DFF using a locking compression plate (LCP) or retrograde intramedullary nail (RIMN). Methods We included four studies comparing LCP and RIMN and 38 single-cohort studies reporting LCP or RIMN. In total, 2156 femurs were included and 166 non-unions were detected. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the four comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the 38 articles to estimate the nonunion rate. We performed sensitivity analysis by comparing studies using LCP with less invasive surgical systems (LISS) with those that used RIMN. Results The pairwise meta-analysis showed a similar nonunion rate between the groups [odds ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–1.11, p  = 0.633]. According to proportional meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of nonunion was 5% (95% CI 4–7) totally, 6% (95% CI 4–8) in the LCP group, and 4% (95% CI 2–6) in the RIMN group (heterogeneity: p  = 0.105). According to the sensitivity analysis, there was no difference in the union rate. The pooled prevalence of nonunion from sensitivity analysis was 4 % (95% CI, 3–5); it was 4% (95% CI, 3–6) in LCP with LISS and was 4% (95% CI, 2–6) in RIMN group (heterogeneity: p = 0.941). Conclusion Approximately 5% of patients who underwent LCP or RIMN fixation developed nonunion. Therefore, LCP and RIMN are effective DFF techniques and mastering one of them is essential.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00402-020-03463-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2401125071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2401125071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f4a702f0f910525106f4c8a3357f7b82d67b229050ce2176d9c9ee5374acf8cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbuOFDEQRS0EYoeFHyBALZGQNJRfbTcZWvFYaSUSiC2Pu7zyqtse7DaazfgEvpEvwc0sIBEQVXBP3XpcQp5SeEkB1KsCIID1wKAHLgbeH--RHRVc9Hykw32yg5EPvQZJz8ijUm4AKNMjPCRnnHGtB6F3pF5GFyaMDrvku5hijSHFzvoVc1dqvsZ8uylTKKudO49LylvN1q01Y-lqCfG6cymuuBya1nAfjnbdXCb8Ghy-7my34Gp_fPtuo51vSyiPyQNv54JP7uo5-fzu7aeLD_3Vx_eXF2-ueseVXHsvrALmwY8UJJMUBi-ctpxL5dVes2lQe8ZGkOCQUTVMoxsRJVfCOq_dnp-TFyffQ05fKpbVLKE4nGcbMdVimABKmQRFG_r8H_Qm1dz23Sg9tiFKDo1iJ8rlVEpGbw45LO1oQ8FsoZhTKKaFYn6FYo6t6dmddd0vOP1p-Z1CA_gJKE2K7eV_Z__H9id1I5oK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489905756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta‐analysis</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Yoon, Byung-Ho ; Park, In Keun ; Kim, Youngwoo ; Oh, Hyoung-Keun ; Choo, Suk Kyu ; Sung, Yerl-Bo</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Byung-Ho ; Park, In Keun ; Kim, Youngwoo ; Oh, Hyoung-Keun ; Choo, Suk Kyu ; Sung, Yerl-Bo</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Nonunion is the most frequent cause of reoperation and is associated with high morbidity after distal femur fracture (DFF). We examined the rates of nonunion requiring reoperation after fixation for DFF using a locking compression plate (LCP) or retrograde intramedullary nail (RIMN). Methods We included four studies comparing LCP and RIMN and 38 single-cohort studies reporting LCP or RIMN. In total, 2156 femurs were included and 166 non-unions were detected. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the four comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the 38 articles to estimate the nonunion rate. We performed sensitivity analysis by comparing studies using LCP with less invasive surgical systems (LISS) with those that used RIMN. Results The pairwise meta-analysis showed a similar nonunion rate between the groups [odds ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–1.11, p  = 0.633]. According to proportional meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of nonunion was 5% (95% CI 4–7) totally, 6% (95% CI 4–8) in the LCP group, and 4% (95% CI 2–6) in the RIMN group (heterogeneity: p  = 0.105). According to the sensitivity analysis, there was no difference in the union rate. The pooled prevalence of nonunion from sensitivity analysis was 4 % (95% CI, 3–5); it was 4% (95% CI, 3–6) in LCP with LISS and was 4% (95% CI, 2–6) in RIMN group (heterogeneity: p = 0.941). Conclusion Approximately 5% of patients who underwent LCP or RIMN fixation developed nonunion. Therefore, LCP and RIMN are effective DFF techniques and mastering one of them is essential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03463-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32388648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Fractures ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Orthopedics ; Sensitivity analysis ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Trauma ; Trauma Surgery</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021-02, Vol.141 (2), p.225-233</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f4a702f0f910525106f4c8a3357f7b82d67b229050ce2176d9c9ee5374acf8cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f4a702f0f910525106f4c8a3357f7b82d67b229050ce2176d9c9ee5374acf8cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32388648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Byung-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, In Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Youngwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Hyoung-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choo, Suk Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Yerl-Bo</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta‐analysis</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose Nonunion is the most frequent cause of reoperation and is associated with high morbidity after distal femur fracture (DFF). We examined the rates of nonunion requiring reoperation after fixation for DFF using a locking compression plate (LCP) or retrograde intramedullary nail (RIMN). Methods We included four studies comparing LCP and RIMN and 38 single-cohort studies reporting LCP or RIMN. In total, 2156 femurs were included and 166 non-unions were detected. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the four comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the 38 articles to estimate the nonunion rate. We performed sensitivity analysis by comparing studies using LCP with less invasive surgical systems (LISS) with those that used RIMN. Results The pairwise meta-analysis showed a similar nonunion rate between the groups [odds ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–1.11, p  = 0.633]. According to proportional meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of nonunion was 5% (95% CI 4–7) totally, 6% (95% CI 4–8) in the LCP group, and 4% (95% CI 2–6) in the RIMN group (heterogeneity: p  = 0.105). According to the sensitivity analysis, there was no difference in the union rate. The pooled prevalence of nonunion from sensitivity analysis was 4 % (95% CI, 3–5); it was 4% (95% CI, 3–6) in LCP with LISS and was 4% (95% CI, 2–6) in RIMN group (heterogeneity: p = 0.941). Conclusion Approximately 5% of patients who underwent LCP or RIMN fixation developed nonunion. Therefore, LCP and RIMN are effective DFF techniques and mastering one of them is essential.</description><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Trauma Surgery</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kbuOFDEQRS0EYoeFHyBALZGQNJRfbTcZWvFYaSUSiC2Pu7zyqtse7DaazfgEvpEvwc0sIBEQVXBP3XpcQp5SeEkB1KsCIID1wKAHLgbeH--RHRVc9Hykw32yg5EPvQZJz8ijUm4AKNMjPCRnnHGtB6F3pF5GFyaMDrvku5hijSHFzvoVc1dqvsZ8uylTKKudO49LylvN1q01Y-lqCfG6cymuuBya1nAfjnbdXCb8Ghy-7my34Gp_fPtuo51vSyiPyQNv54JP7uo5-fzu7aeLD_3Vx_eXF2-ueseVXHsvrALmwY8UJJMUBi-ctpxL5dVes2lQe8ZGkOCQUTVMoxsRJVfCOq_dnp-TFyffQ05fKpbVLKE4nGcbMdVimABKmQRFG_r8H_Qm1dz23Sg9tiFKDo1iJ8rlVEpGbw45LO1oQ8FsoZhTKKaFYn6FYo6t6dmddd0vOP1p-Z1CA_gJKE2K7eV_Z__H9id1I5oK</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Yoon, Byung-Ho</creator><creator>Park, In Keun</creator><creator>Kim, Youngwoo</creator><creator>Oh, Hyoung-Keun</creator><creator>Choo, Suk Kyu</creator><creator>Sung, Yerl-Bo</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta‐analysis</title><author>Yoon, Byung-Ho ; Park, In Keun ; Kim, Youngwoo ; Oh, Hyoung-Keun ; Choo, Suk Kyu ; Sung, Yerl-Bo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f4a702f0f910525106f4c8a3357f7b82d67b229050ce2176d9c9ee5374acf8cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Trauma Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Byung-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, In Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Youngwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Hyoung-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choo, Suk Kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Yerl-Bo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoon, Byung-Ho</au><au>Park, In Keun</au><au>Kim, Youngwoo</au><au>Oh, Hyoung-Keun</au><au>Choo, Suk Kyu</au><au>Sung, Yerl-Bo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>225-233</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Purpose Nonunion is the most frequent cause of reoperation and is associated with high morbidity after distal femur fracture (DFF). We examined the rates of nonunion requiring reoperation after fixation for DFF using a locking compression plate (LCP) or retrograde intramedullary nail (RIMN). Methods We included four studies comparing LCP and RIMN and 38 single-cohort studies reporting LCP or RIMN. In total, 2156 femurs were included and 166 non-unions were detected. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the four comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the 38 articles to estimate the nonunion rate. We performed sensitivity analysis by comparing studies using LCP with less invasive surgical systems (LISS) with those that used RIMN. Results The pairwise meta-analysis showed a similar nonunion rate between the groups [odds ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–1.11, p  = 0.633]. According to proportional meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of nonunion was 5% (95% CI 4–7) totally, 6% (95% CI 4–8) in the LCP group, and 4% (95% CI 2–6) in the RIMN group (heterogeneity: p  = 0.105). According to the sensitivity analysis, there was no difference in the union rate. The pooled prevalence of nonunion from sensitivity analysis was 4 % (95% CI, 3–5); it was 4% (95% CI, 3–6) in LCP with LISS and was 4% (95% CI, 2–6) in RIMN group (heterogeneity: p = 0.941). Conclusion Approximately 5% of patients who underwent LCP or RIMN fixation developed nonunion. Therefore, LCP and RIMN are effective DFF techniques and mastering one of them is essential.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32388648</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-020-03463-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-8051
ispartof Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021-02, Vol.141 (2), p.225-233
issn 0936-8051
1434-3916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2401125071
source Springer Nature
subjects Fractures
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Orthopedics
Sensitivity analysis
Surgery
Systematic review
Trauma
Trauma Surgery
title Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta‐analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A07%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20of%20nonunion%20after%20surgery%20of%20distal%20femoral%20fractures%20using%20contemporary%20fixation%20device:%20a%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Yoon,%20Byung-Ho&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=225-233&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-020-03463-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2401125071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f4a702f0f910525106f4c8a3357f7b82d67b229050ce2176d9c9ee5374acf8cb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489905756&rft_id=info:pmid/32388648&rfr_iscdi=true