Loading…

Development and Validation of a Controlled Pressure Method Test Protocol for Vapor Intrusion Pathway Assessment

Controlled pressure method (CPM) testing is a building-specific diagnostic tool for vapor intrusion (VI) pathway assessment which offers advantages over traditional pathway assessment approaches. By manipulating the building pressure conditions, the CPM creates the worst-case VI impact and provides...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science & technology 2020-06, Vol.54 (12), p.7117-7125
Main Authors: Guo, Yuanming, Dahlen, Paul, Johnson, Paul C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-d01793d297ba458c6f2d38b8b50e992071d0e7ae93ccc82a7e823bcbf1d3523f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-d01793d297ba458c6f2d38b8b50e992071d0e7ae93ccc82a7e823bcbf1d3523f3
container_end_page 7125
container_issue 12
container_start_page 7117
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 54
creator Guo, Yuanming
Dahlen, Paul
Johnson, Paul C
description Controlled pressure method (CPM) testing is a building-specific diagnostic tool for vapor intrusion (VI) pathway assessment which offers advantages over traditional pathway assessment approaches. By manipulating the building pressure conditions, the CPM creates the worst-case VI impact and provides rapid insight into the type of vapor source(s). The primary barrier to general acceptance and use of this tool is the need for definitive guidance on test design parameters, such as the indoor-outdoor pressure difference (or exhaust fan flow rate), CPM test duration, exhaust fan location, and air sampling location(s) and conditions. This study focused on a systematic evaluation of each of these factors, which then led to the formulation of proposed CPM testing guidelines. The results suggest that CPM tests should be conducted with both negative and positive pressure indoor-outdoor differentials of about 10-15 Pa, and the tests should last for at least nine indoor air exchanges for negative pressure difference testing and four indoor air exchanges for positive pressure difference testing. Although exhaust fan intake sampling is sufficient to provide critical information to assess impacts during negative pressure testing, adding room-specific indoor air sampling to both negative and positive pressure difference testing can provide insight into vapor entry locations and indoor source contributions.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.0c00811
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2404040467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2414433761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-d01793d297ba458c6f2d38b8b50e992071d0e7ae93ccc82a7e823bcbf1d3523f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1LAzEQxYMotlbP3iTgxcu2k2S3mz2W-lVQ7KGKtyWbzNKW7aYmu0r_e7O2epDABIbfezPMI-SSwZABZyOl_RB9MwQNIBk7In2WcIgSmbBj0gdgIsrE-L1HzrxfAwAXIE9JT_AYZBqLPrG3-ImV3W6wbqiqDX1T1cqoZmVrakuq6NTWjbNVhYbOHXrfOqTP2CytoYswOTRtY7WtaGldEG9DnQVF6zuHuWqWX2pHJ94HaTfjnJyUqvJ4cfgH5PX-bjF9jJ5eHmbTyVOkBU-ayABLM2F4lhYqTqQel9wIWcgiAcwyDikzgKnCTGitJVcpSi4KXZTMiISLUgzIzd536-xHGxbNNyuvsapUjbb1eTjAzxunAb3-h65t6-qwXaBYHAuRjlmgRntKO-u9wzLfutVGuV3OIO-yyEMWeac-ZBEUVwffttig-eN_jy--AbKChzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414433761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Validation of a Controlled Pressure Method Test Protocol for Vapor Intrusion Pathway Assessment</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Guo, Yuanming ; Dahlen, Paul ; Johnson, Paul C</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yuanming ; Dahlen, Paul ; Johnson, Paul C</creatorcontrib><description>Controlled pressure method (CPM) testing is a building-specific diagnostic tool for vapor intrusion (VI) pathway assessment which offers advantages over traditional pathway assessment approaches. By manipulating the building pressure conditions, the CPM creates the worst-case VI impact and provides rapid insight into the type of vapor source(s). The primary barrier to general acceptance and use of this tool is the need for definitive guidance on test design parameters, such as the indoor-outdoor pressure difference (or exhaust fan flow rate), CPM test duration, exhaust fan location, and air sampling location(s) and conditions. This study focused on a systematic evaluation of each of these factors, which then led to the formulation of proposed CPM testing guidelines. The results suggest that CPM tests should be conducted with both negative and positive pressure indoor-outdoor differentials of about 10-15 Pa, and the tests should last for at least nine indoor air exchanges for negative pressure difference testing and four indoor air exchanges for positive pressure difference testing. Although exhaust fan intake sampling is sufficient to provide critical information to assess impacts during negative pressure testing, adding room-specific indoor air sampling to both negative and positive pressure difference testing can provide insight into vapor entry locations and indoor source contributions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00811</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32408743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Air sampling ; Design parameters ; Diagnostic software ; Diagnostic systems ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Indoor air quality ; Indoor environments ; Intrusion ; Pressure ; Test procedures ; Vapor sources ; Vapors</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2020-06, Vol.54 (12), p.7117-7125</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jun 16, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-d01793d297ba458c6f2d38b8b50e992071d0e7ae93ccc82a7e823bcbf1d3523f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-d01793d297ba458c6f2d38b8b50e992071d0e7ae93ccc82a7e823bcbf1d3523f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1182-4702</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yuanming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Paul C</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Validation of a Controlled Pressure Method Test Protocol for Vapor Intrusion Pathway Assessment</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Controlled pressure method (CPM) testing is a building-specific diagnostic tool for vapor intrusion (VI) pathway assessment which offers advantages over traditional pathway assessment approaches. By manipulating the building pressure conditions, the CPM creates the worst-case VI impact and provides rapid insight into the type of vapor source(s). The primary barrier to general acceptance and use of this tool is the need for definitive guidance on test design parameters, such as the indoor-outdoor pressure difference (or exhaust fan flow rate), CPM test duration, exhaust fan location, and air sampling location(s) and conditions. This study focused on a systematic evaluation of each of these factors, which then led to the formulation of proposed CPM testing guidelines. The results suggest that CPM tests should be conducted with both negative and positive pressure indoor-outdoor differentials of about 10-15 Pa, and the tests should last for at least nine indoor air exchanges for negative pressure difference testing and four indoor air exchanges for positive pressure difference testing. Although exhaust fan intake sampling is sufficient to provide critical information to assess impacts during negative pressure testing, adding room-specific indoor air sampling to both negative and positive pressure difference testing can provide insight into vapor entry locations and indoor source contributions.</description><subject>Air sampling</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Diagnostic software</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Intrusion</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Vapor sources</subject><subject>Vapors</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc1LAzEQxYMotlbP3iTgxcu2k2S3mz2W-lVQ7KGKtyWbzNKW7aYmu0r_e7O2epDABIbfezPMI-SSwZABZyOl_RB9MwQNIBk7In2WcIgSmbBj0gdgIsrE-L1HzrxfAwAXIE9JT_AYZBqLPrG3-ImV3W6wbqiqDX1T1cqoZmVrakuq6NTWjbNVhYbOHXrfOqTP2CytoYswOTRtY7WtaGldEG9DnQVF6zuHuWqWX2pHJ94HaTfjnJyUqvJ4cfgH5PX-bjF9jJ5eHmbTyVOkBU-ayABLM2F4lhYqTqQel9wIWcgiAcwyDikzgKnCTGitJVcpSi4KXZTMiISLUgzIzd536-xHGxbNNyuvsapUjbb1eTjAzxunAb3-h65t6-qwXaBYHAuRjlmgRntKO-u9wzLfutVGuV3OIO-yyEMWeac-ZBEUVwffttig-eN_jy--AbKChzg</recordid><startdate>20200616</startdate><enddate>20200616</enddate><creator>Guo, Yuanming</creator><creator>Dahlen, Paul</creator><creator>Johnson, Paul C</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1182-4702</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200616</creationdate><title>Development and Validation of a Controlled Pressure Method Test Protocol for Vapor Intrusion Pathway Assessment</title><author>Guo, Yuanming ; Dahlen, Paul ; Johnson, Paul C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-d01793d297ba458c6f2d38b8b50e992071d0e7ae93ccc82a7e823bcbf1d3523f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air sampling</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Diagnostic software</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Intrusion</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Vapor sources</topic><topic>Vapors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yuanming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Paul C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Yuanming</au><au>Dahlen, Paul</au><au>Johnson, Paul C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and Validation of a Controlled Pressure Method Test Protocol for Vapor Intrusion Pathway Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2020-06-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7117</spage><epage>7125</epage><pages>7117-7125</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>Controlled pressure method (CPM) testing is a building-specific diagnostic tool for vapor intrusion (VI) pathway assessment which offers advantages over traditional pathway assessment approaches. By manipulating the building pressure conditions, the CPM creates the worst-case VI impact and provides rapid insight into the type of vapor source(s). The primary barrier to general acceptance and use of this tool is the need for definitive guidance on test design parameters, such as the indoor-outdoor pressure difference (or exhaust fan flow rate), CPM test duration, exhaust fan location, and air sampling location(s) and conditions. This study focused on a systematic evaluation of each of these factors, which then led to the formulation of proposed CPM testing guidelines. The results suggest that CPM tests should be conducted with both negative and positive pressure indoor-outdoor differentials of about 10-15 Pa, and the tests should last for at least nine indoor air exchanges for negative pressure difference testing and four indoor air exchanges for positive pressure difference testing. Although exhaust fan intake sampling is sufficient to provide critical information to assess impacts during negative pressure testing, adding room-specific indoor air sampling to both negative and positive pressure difference testing can provide insight into vapor entry locations and indoor source contributions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>32408743</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.0c00811</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1182-4702</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2020-06, Vol.54 (12), p.7117-7125
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2404040467
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Air sampling
Design parameters
Diagnostic software
Diagnostic systems
Flow rates
Flow velocity
Indoor air quality
Indoor environments
Intrusion
Pressure
Test procedures
Vapor sources
Vapors
title Development and Validation of a Controlled Pressure Method Test Protocol for Vapor Intrusion Pathway Assessment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A25%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Validation%20of%20a%20Controlled%20Pressure%20Method%20Test%20Protocol%20for%20Vapor%20Intrusion%20Pathway%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Guo,%20Yuanming&rft.date=2020-06-16&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7117&rft.epage=7125&rft.pages=7117-7125&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c00811&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2414433761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-d01793d297ba458c6f2d38b8b50e992071d0e7ae93ccc82a7e823bcbf1d3523f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414433761&rft_id=info:pmid/32408743&rfr_iscdi=true