Skull osteology and osteological phylogeny of the Western whip snake Hierophis viridiflavus (Squamata, Colubridae)

• Published in: Journal of morphology (1931) 2020-07, Vol.281 (7), p.808-833
• Main Authors: Racca, Luca, Villa, Andrea, Wencker, Lukardis C. M., Camaiti, Marco, Blain, Hugues‐Alexandre, Delfino, Massimo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Colubridae - anatomy & histology; intraspecific variation; ontogenetic variation; Osteology; Phylogeny; Skull - anatomy & histology; Skull - diagnostic imaging; specimen‐level phylogeny; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
• ISSN: 0362-2525; 1097-4687
• DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21148

The skull osteology of Hierophis viridiflavus is here described and figured in detail on the basis of 18 specimens. The sample includes specimens from the ranges of both H. viridiflavus viridiflavus and H. viridiflavus carbonarius as well as specimens not identified at sub‐specific level. The main characters that define H. viridiflavus in comparison to the parapatric congeneric species Hierophis gemonensis are wide maxillary diastema, basioccipital crest well distinct in three lobes and basioccipital process well marked. The foramina of the otoccipital and prootic, and the basioccipital process of the basioccipital are among the most ontogenetically variable characters, as indicated by two juvenile specimens included in the sample. A specimen‐level phylogenetic analysis including H. gemonensis and other outgroups (overall 6 species, 26 specimens, 64 skull characters) recovered all H. viridiflavus specimens in one clade, indicating the presence of a clear phylogenetic signal in the applied characters. However, the resolution within the H. viridiflavus clade is poor the monophyly of H. viridiflavus carbonarius was retrieved, but not that of Hierophis v. viridiflavus. Probably due to the relatively high variability, the skull morphology does not support the recently proposed specific status of the two subspecies. The detailed analysis of the skull osteology of H. v. carbonarius and H. v. viridiflavus provides several specific diagnostic characters of phylogenetic value but does not support the recent proposal of raising these two subspecies at species level.