Staying with Questions and Resisting Quick Answers: Commentary on Zagaria, Andò, and Zennaro

In their target article, Zagaria et al. ( Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science , 2020 ) highlight the fragmented state of mainstream Psychology. Their diagnosis begins with an analysis of how core psychological terms are treated in introductory textbooks. To remedy the state of affairs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Integrative physiological and behavioral science 2020-09, Vol.54 (3), p.572-578
Main Author: Gozli, Davood
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anthropology
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Biological Evolution
Clay
Evolutionary psychology
Humans
Psychology
Regular Article
Sociology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In their target article, Zagaria et al. ( Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science , 2020 ) highlight the fragmented state of mainstream Psychology. Their diagnosis begins with an analysis of how core psychological terms are treated in introductory textbooks. To remedy the state of affairs, they propose using evolutionary psychology to unify Psychology. In the present commentary, I join the authors’ critical stance, while also raising several questions: (1) Can we adopt an evolutionary meta-theory and still demand that our core concepts have fixed meaning? (2) Can evolutionary theory apply to the normative dimension of the sociocultural domain? (3) Can evolutionary theory account for the critique of psychological science? These questions, I believe, point out several gaps in the target article that require further attention. I argue that unless we identify the essential differences between mainstream psychology and contrarian psychology, we repeat the mistakes of mainstream psychology under a new guise.
ISSN:1932-4502
1936-3567
DOI:10.1007/s12124-020-09542-3