Performance-related stress mediates the online control and integration of sequential movements

• Published in: Acta psychologica 2020-07, Vol.208, p.103105-103105, Article 103105
• Main Authors: Goddard, Natalie, Roberts, James W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Distraction; Integration; Self-focus; Sequential aiming; Stress
• ISSN: 0001-6918; 1873-6297
• DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103105

The effects of stress on directing attention within performance have been broadly explained by self-focus and distraction perspectives, where stress causes attention to be drawn internally or toward the sources of worry, respectively. Recent studies that have adopted manual aiming under different levels of stress have illuminated our understanding of the stress-performance framework. The present study seeks to elaborate on this current trend by introducing a sequential task, where the integration of individual movement segments enhances the demands on preparation and control, and thus closely examines the explanatory power of the self-focus and distraction perspectives. This study involved executing aiming movements solely to one-target (1T), or continuing by extending (2TE) and reversing (2TR) the limb to a second target. Participants were instructed to simply execute rapid and accurate movements (low-stress), and additionally provided a socio-comparative stressor (high-stress). While there was no one- (1 T vs. 2TE) or two-target (1T vs. 2TR) advantage, there was a shorter movement time in the first segment of the one-target task that appeared to dissipate when under high-stress. In addition, the high-stress conditions caused shorter reaction and pause times, while the proportion of the sequence time decreased within the pause, but increased within the second segment. Consequently, the overall sequence time failed to differ between low- and high-stress. These findings indicate that the online control of movement is accommodated under high-stress. We suggest these procedures unfold following a primary focus to uphold the performance outcome. Thus, these findings appear to be consistent with the distraction perspective. •Performance can be mediated by stress following self-focus or general distraction•Discrete and sequential aiming were executed under low- and high-stress•Shorter first segment times under low-, but not high-stress•Shorter reaction and pause times, and longer second segment time under high-stress•Attention to the performance outcome under stress may accommodate online control