Loading…
Prioritization within visual working memory reflects a flexible focus of attention
When motivated, people can keep nonrecent items in a list active during the presentation of new items, facilitating fast and accurate recall of the earlier items. It has been proposed that this occurs by flexibly orienting attention to a single prioritized list item, thus increasing the amount of at...
Saved in:
Published in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2020-08, Vol.82 (6), p.2985-3004 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-70aa92f40b7f1c3f1774dea84a3678552782e70bd2fec6c48c977bc210a43e3a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-70aa92f40b7f1c3f1774dea84a3678552782e70bd2fec6c48c977bc210a43e3a3 |
container_end_page | 3004 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2985 |
container_title | Attention, perception & psychophysics |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Sandry, Joshua Ricker, Timothy J. |
description | When motivated, people can keep nonrecent items in a list active during the presentation of new items, facilitating fast and accurate recall of the earlier items. It has been proposed that this occurs by flexibly orienting attention to a single prioritized list item, thus increasing the amount of attention-based maintenance directed toward this item at the expense of other items. This is manipulated experimentally by associating a single distinct feature with a higher reward value, such as a single red item in a list of black items. These findings may be more parsimoniously explained under a distinctiveness of encoding framework rather than a flexible attention allocation framework. The retrieval advantage for the prioritized list position may be because the incongruent feature stands out in the list perceptually and causes it to become better encoded. Across three visual working memory experiments, we contrast a flexible attention theory against a distinctiveness of encoding theory by manipulating the reward value associated with the incongruent feature. Findings from all three experiments show strong support in favor of the flexible attention theory and no support for the distinctiveness of encoding theory. We also evaluate and find no evidence that strategy use, motivation, or tiredness/fatigue associated with reward value can adequately explain flexible prioritization of attention. Flexible attentional prioritization effects may be best understood under the context of an online attentional refreshing mechanism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13414-020-02049-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2409194490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2409194490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-70aa92f40b7f1c3f1774dea84a3678552782e70bd2fec6c48c977bc210a43e3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXAjZvRvGYyWYr4goIiCu5CJk1q6nRSk4y1_npTRxRcuLjcu_jO4Z4DwCFGJ5SX9WnElGFWIII2w0TBtsAIC0YLKujT9s9N8C7Yi3GOUEUrjkbg_i44H1xyHyo538GVS8-ug28u9qqFKx9eXDeDC7PwYQ2Dsa3RKUIF8_HumtZA63UfobdQpWS6jcc-2LGqjebge4_B4-XFw_l1Mbm9ujk_mxSaiioVHCkliGWo4RZrajHnbGpUzVT-rC5LwmtiOGqmxBpdaVZrwXmjCUaKUUMVHYPjwXcZ_GtvYpILF7VpW9UZ30dJGBI5NhMoo0d_0LnvQ5e_yxTFBNcVKTNFBkoHH2MOK5fBLVRYS4zkpmY51CxzxfKrZsmyiA6imOFuZsKv9T-qT58mgJc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2431218625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritization within visual working memory reflects a flexible focus of attention</title><source>ProQuest - social science premium collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Sandry, Joshua ; Ricker, Timothy J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sandry, Joshua ; Ricker, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><description>When motivated, people can keep nonrecent items in a list active during the presentation of new items, facilitating fast and accurate recall of the earlier items. It has been proposed that this occurs by flexibly orienting attention to a single prioritized list item, thus increasing the amount of attention-based maintenance directed toward this item at the expense of other items. This is manipulated experimentally by associating a single distinct feature with a higher reward value, such as a single red item in a list of black items. These findings may be more parsimoniously explained under a distinctiveness of encoding framework rather than a flexible attention allocation framework. The retrieval advantage for the prioritized list position may be because the incongruent feature stands out in the list perceptually and causes it to become better encoded. Across three visual working memory experiments, we contrast a flexible attention theory against a distinctiveness of encoding theory by manipulating the reward value associated with the incongruent feature. Findings from all three experiments show strong support in favor of the flexible attention theory and no support for the distinctiveness of encoding theory. We also evaluate and find no evidence that strategy use, motivation, or tiredness/fatigue associated with reward value can adequately explain flexible prioritization of attention. Flexible attentional prioritization effects may be best understood under the context of an online attentional refreshing mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02049-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Attention ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive Processes ; Cognitive Psychology ; Evidence ; Experiments ; Fatigue ; Fatigue (Biology) ; Flexibility ; Memorization ; Memory ; Motivation ; Psychology ; Short Term Memory</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020-08, Vol.82 (6), p.2985-3004</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2020</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Aug 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-70aa92f40b7f1c3f1774dea84a3678552782e70bd2fec6c48c977bc210a43e3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-70aa92f40b7f1c3f1774dea84a3678552782e70bd2fec6c48c977bc210a43e3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2431218625/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2431218625?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21359,21375,27905,27906,33592,33593,33858,33859,43714,43861,73970,74146</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sandry, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricker, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritization within visual working memory reflects a flexible focus of attention</title><title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>When motivated, people can keep nonrecent items in a list active during the presentation of new items, facilitating fast and accurate recall of the earlier items. It has been proposed that this occurs by flexibly orienting attention to a single prioritized list item, thus increasing the amount of attention-based maintenance directed toward this item at the expense of other items. This is manipulated experimentally by associating a single distinct feature with a higher reward value, such as a single red item in a list of black items. These findings may be more parsimoniously explained under a distinctiveness of encoding framework rather than a flexible attention allocation framework. The retrieval advantage for the prioritized list position may be because the incongruent feature stands out in the list perceptually and causes it to become better encoded. Across three visual working memory experiments, we contrast a flexible attention theory against a distinctiveness of encoding theory by manipulating the reward value associated with the incongruent feature. Findings from all three experiments show strong support in favor of the flexible attention theory and no support for the distinctiveness of encoding theory. We also evaluate and find no evidence that strategy use, motivation, or tiredness/fatigue associated with reward value can adequately explain flexible prioritization of attention. Flexible attentional prioritization effects may be best understood under the context of an online attentional refreshing mechanism.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Fatigue (Biology)</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Memorization</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXAjZvRvGYyWYr4goIiCu5CJk1q6nRSk4y1_npTRxRcuLjcu_jO4Z4DwCFGJ5SX9WnElGFWIII2w0TBtsAIC0YLKujT9s9N8C7Yi3GOUEUrjkbg_i44H1xyHyo538GVS8-ug28u9qqFKx9eXDeDC7PwYQ2Dsa3RKUIF8_HumtZA63UfobdQpWS6jcc-2LGqjebge4_B4-XFw_l1Mbm9ujk_mxSaiioVHCkliGWo4RZrajHnbGpUzVT-rC5LwmtiOGqmxBpdaVZrwXmjCUaKUUMVHYPjwXcZ_GtvYpILF7VpW9UZ30dJGBI5NhMoo0d_0LnvQ5e_yxTFBNcVKTNFBkoHH2MOK5fBLVRYS4zkpmY51CxzxfKrZsmyiA6imOFuZsKv9T-qT58mgJc</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Sandry, Joshua</creator><creator>Ricker, Timothy J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Prioritization within visual working memory reflects a flexible focus of attention</title><author>Sandry, Joshua ; Ricker, Timothy J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-70aa92f40b7f1c3f1774dea84a3678552782e70bd2fec6c48c977bc210a43e3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Fatigue (Biology)</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Memorization</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sandry, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricker, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest - social science premium collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sandry, Joshua</au><au>Ricker, Timothy J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritization within visual working memory reflects a flexible focus of attention</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2985</spage><epage>3004</epage><pages>2985-3004</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>When motivated, people can keep nonrecent items in a list active during the presentation of new items, facilitating fast and accurate recall of the earlier items. It has been proposed that this occurs by flexibly orienting attention to a single prioritized list item, thus increasing the amount of attention-based maintenance directed toward this item at the expense of other items. This is manipulated experimentally by associating a single distinct feature with a higher reward value, such as a single red item in a list of black items. These findings may be more parsimoniously explained under a distinctiveness of encoding framework rather than a flexible attention allocation framework. The retrieval advantage for the prioritized list position may be because the incongruent feature stands out in the list perceptually and causes it to become better encoded. Across three visual working memory experiments, we contrast a flexible attention theory against a distinctiveness of encoding theory by manipulating the reward value associated with the incongruent feature. Findings from all three experiments show strong support in favor of the flexible attention theory and no support for the distinctiveness of encoding theory. We also evaluate and find no evidence that strategy use, motivation, or tiredness/fatigue associated with reward value can adequately explain flexible prioritization of attention. Flexible attentional prioritization effects may be best understood under the context of an online attentional refreshing mechanism.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.3758/s13414-020-02049-4</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1943-3921 |
ispartof | Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020-08, Vol.82 (6), p.2985-3004 |
issn | 1943-3921 1943-393X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2409194490 |
source | ProQuest - social science premium collection; Springer Link; Education Collection |
subjects | Attention Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Ability Cognitive Processes Cognitive Psychology Evidence Experiments Fatigue Fatigue (Biology) Flexibility Memorization Memory Motivation Psychology Short Term Memory |
title | Prioritization within visual working memory reflects a flexible focus of attention |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A11%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritization%20within%20visual%20working%20memory%20reflects%20a%20flexible%20focus%20of%20attention&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Sandry,%20Joshua&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2985&rft.epage=3004&rft.pages=2985-3004&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-020-02049-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2409194490%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-70aa92f40b7f1c3f1774dea84a3678552782e70bd2fec6c48c977bc210a43e3a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2431218625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |