The Longitudinal Efficiency of Robotic Surgery: an MBSAQIP Propensity Matched 4-Year Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

Background The objective of this study was to examine the MBSAQIP database to assess efficiency trends and perioperative outcomes in robotic bariatric surgery. Methods Robotic (RA) and laparoscopic (L) sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (RYGB) were compared using the 2015–2018 MBSAQIP Partic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity surgery 2020-10, Vol.30 (10), p.3706-3713
Main Authors: Dudash, Mark, Kuhn, Jason, Dove, James, Fluck, Marcus, Horsley, Ryan, Gabrielsen, Jon, Daouadi, Mustapha, Petrick, Anthony T., Parker, David M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bariatric Surgery
Efficiency
Gastrectomy
Gastric Bypass
Gastrointestinal surgery
Humans
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Original Contributions
Retrospective Studies
Robotic surgery
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Robotics
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The objective of this study was to examine the MBSAQIP database to assess efficiency trends and perioperative outcomes in robotic bariatric surgery. Methods Robotic (RA) and laparoscopic (L) sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (RYGB) were compared using the 2015–2018 MBSAQIP Participant Use Data Files. Patients were propensity matched 1:1 based on sex, body mass index, assistant, and previous obesity or foregut surgery. A total of 93,802 patients were included. Results Median operative times were significantly longer for both RA-SG (89 vs. 62 min; p  
ISSN:0960-8923
1708-0428
DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-04712-z