Seasonal evaluation of biotic and abiotic factors suggests phosphorus retention in constructed floodplains in three agricultural streams

• Published in: The Science of the total environment 2020-08, Vol.729, p.138744-138744, Article 138744
• Main Authors: Trentman, Matt T., Tank, Jennifer L., Jones, Stuart E., McMillan, Sara K., Royer, Todd V.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agriculture; Floodplains; Phosphorus; Streams; Two-stage ditch
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138744

Floodplain restoration constructed via the two-stage ditch in agricultural streams has the potential to enhance nutrient retention and prevent the eutrophication of downstream ecosystems. Identifying the role of biotic and abiotic factors influencing soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) retention in floodplains is of interest given that changing redox conditions associated with floodplain inundation can result in a release of geochemically sorbed SRP to the water column. In three agricultural waterways (Indiana, USA), we conducted seasonal measurements of a suite of biogeochemical pools (total P, bioavailable P and Fe) and processes (SRP flux and microbial respiration) from multiple floodplain transects, along with their adjacent stream sediments, to determine the role of biotic and abiotic processes on floodplain SRP retention or release. Across floodplain soils, organic matter explained a significant amount of variation in soil respiration, and SRP flux from the water column to the floodplain soils was driven by the molar ratio of Fe: P, with values >6 indicating potential SRP sorption due to increased available sorption sites. We developed a mass balance model at a single site to relate seasonal floodplain processes with water column SRP export, above and below the study reach, using measurements in this study combined with data from the literature. Grab sample data suggest that the reach retained 26% of incoming SRP, which the mass balance model attributed to seasonal synergy between plant assimilation in spring and summer (removing P from floodplain soils) and abiotic P sorption during winter and spring inundation (adding SRP to the floodplain). Retention of SRP was higher in floodplain soils compared to stream sediments based on the modeled SRP budget. Thus, we suggest that these constructed floodplains will maximize SRP retention from the water column if they inundate regularly, have floodplain soils with Fe:P > 3–6, and that promote sustained plant life. [Display omitted] •Floodplains can be sources or sinks of phosphorus via biotic and abiotic processes.•Processes were measured or modeled seasonally in restored agricultural floodplains.•Soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) was retained on floodplains.•Annual retention was dictated by seasonal synergy between plants and iron sorption.•Restored agricultural floodplains can provide a benefit of SRP retention.