Loading…

Lead Extraction for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

The goal of this study was to assess the utility of transvenous lead extraction for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The use of transvenous lead extraction for the management CIED infection in patients with a dura...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JACC. Clinical electrophysiology 2020-06, Vol.6 (6), p.672-680
Main Authors: Black-Maier, Eric, Piccini, Jonathan P., Bishawi, Muath, Pokorney, Sean D., Bryner, Benjamin, Schroder, Jacob N., Fowler, Vance G., Katz, Jason N., Haney, John C., Milano, Carmelo A., Nicoara, Alina, Hegland, Donald D., Daubert, James P., Lewis, Robert K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-1e1155bf90d07ba1bbc1d0fdea72ed6ef602aa6cef9d0a942f7b508257c8dccf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-1e1155bf90d07ba1bbc1d0fdea72ed6ef602aa6cef9d0a942f7b508257c8dccf3
container_end_page 680
container_issue 6
container_start_page 672
container_title JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 6
creator Black-Maier, Eric
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Bishawi, Muath
Pokorney, Sean D.
Bryner, Benjamin
Schroder, Jacob N.
Fowler, Vance G.
Katz, Jason N.
Haney, John C.
Milano, Carmelo A.
Nicoara, Alina
Hegland, Donald D.
Daubert, James P.
Lewis, Robert K.
description The goal of this study was to assess the utility of transvenous lead extraction for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The use of transvenous lead extraction for the management CIED infection in patients with a durable LVAD has not been well described. Clinical and outcomes data were collected retrospectively among patients who underwent lead extraction for CIED infection after LVAD implantation at Duke University Hospital. Overall, 27 patients (n = 6 HVAD; n = 15 HeartMate II; n = 6 Heartmate III) underwent lead extraction for infection. Median (interquartile range) time from LVAD implantation to infection was 6.1 (2.5 to 14.9) months. Indications included endocarditis (n = 16), bacteremia (n = 9), and pocket infection (n = 2). Common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 7), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 3). Sixty-eight leads were removed, with a median lead implant time of 5.7 (3.6 to 9.2) years. Laser sheaths were used in all procedures, with a median laser time of 35.0 s (17.5 to 85.5s). Mechanical cutting tools were required in 11 (40.7%) and femoral snaring in 4 (14.8%). Complete procedural success was achieved in 25 (93.6%) patients and clinical success in 27 (100%). No procedural failures or major adverse events occurred. Twenty-one patients (77.8%) were alive without persistent endovascular infection 1 year after lead extraction. Most were treated with oral suppressive antibiotics after extraction (n = 23 [82.5%]). Persistent infection after extraction occurred in 4 patients and was associated with 50% 1-year mortality. Transvenous lead extraction for LVAD-associated CIED infection can be performed safely with low rates of persistent infection and 1-year mortality. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.02.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2415290655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2405500X20301560</els_id><sourcerecordid>2415290655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-1e1155bf90d07ba1bbc1d0fdea72ed6ef602aa6cef9d0a942f7b508257c8dccf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhhdRsGh_gZccvew6SZv9OHgotWqhoAe_biGbTDDLdrcmaVH886Zu8ehpZuB9XpgnSS4oZBRoftVkjVS4yRgwyIBlAPlRMmJT4CkHWh7_7fB2moy9bwCAclYyOh0l3yuUmiw-g5Mq2L4jpndkLp22_U56tW2lI8v1ppVdkHWLZNGiCq7vrCI3uLMKybIzOKC2I48yWOyCJ682vJMVmkBe4u3s0DTz3vpwIP15cmJk63F8mGfJ8-3iaX6frh7ulvPZKlWTkoaUIqWc16YCDUUtaV0rqsFolAVDnaPJgUmZKzSVBllNmSlqDiXjhSq1UmZyllwOvRvXf2zRB7G2XmEbn8J-6wWbRh0V5JzH6GSIKtd779CIjbNr6b4EBbG3LRrxa1vsbQtgItqO1PVAYfxiZ9EJr6IGhdq66Ebo3v7L_wBBsowj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2415290655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lead Extraction for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices</title><source>SCIENCE DIRECT</source><creator>Black-Maier, Eric ; Piccini, Jonathan P. ; Bishawi, Muath ; Pokorney, Sean D. ; Bryner, Benjamin ; Schroder, Jacob N. ; Fowler, Vance G. ; Katz, Jason N. ; Haney, John C. ; Milano, Carmelo A. ; Nicoara, Alina ; Hegland, Donald D. ; Daubert, James P. ; Lewis, Robert K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Black-Maier, Eric ; Piccini, Jonathan P. ; Bishawi, Muath ; Pokorney, Sean D. ; Bryner, Benjamin ; Schroder, Jacob N. ; Fowler, Vance G. ; Katz, Jason N. ; Haney, John C. ; Milano, Carmelo A. ; Nicoara, Alina ; Hegland, Donald D. ; Daubert, James P. ; Lewis, Robert K.</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this study was to assess the utility of transvenous lead extraction for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The use of transvenous lead extraction for the management CIED infection in patients with a durable LVAD has not been well described. Clinical and outcomes data were collected retrospectively among patients who underwent lead extraction for CIED infection after LVAD implantation at Duke University Hospital. Overall, 27 patients (n = 6 HVAD; n = 15 HeartMate II; n = 6 Heartmate III) underwent lead extraction for infection. Median (interquartile range) time from LVAD implantation to infection was 6.1 (2.5 to 14.9) months. Indications included endocarditis (n = 16), bacteremia (n = 9), and pocket infection (n = 2). Common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 7), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 3). Sixty-eight leads were removed, with a median lead implant time of 5.7 (3.6 to 9.2) years. Laser sheaths were used in all procedures, with a median laser time of 35.0 s (17.5 to 85.5s). Mechanical cutting tools were required in 11 (40.7%) and femoral snaring in 4 (14.8%). Complete procedural success was achieved in 25 (93.6%) patients and clinical success in 27 (100%). No procedural failures or major adverse events occurred. Twenty-one patients (77.8%) were alive without persistent endovascular infection 1 year after lead extraction. Most were treated with oral suppressive antibiotics after extraction (n = 23 [82.5%]). Persistent infection after extraction occurred in 4 patients and was associated with 50% 1-year mortality. Transvenous lead extraction for LVAD-associated CIED infection can be performed safely with low rates of persistent infection and 1-year mortality. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-500X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-5018</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.02.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection ; lead extraction ; left ventricular assist device</subject><ispartof>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2020-06, Vol.6 (6), p.672-680</ispartof><rights>2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-1e1155bf90d07ba1bbc1d0fdea72ed6ef602aa6cef9d0a942f7b508257c8dccf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-1e1155bf90d07ba1bbc1d0fdea72ed6ef602aa6cef9d0a942f7b508257c8dccf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405500X20301560$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Black-Maier, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccini, Jonathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishawi, Muath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokorney, Sean D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryner, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroder, Jacob N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Vance G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jason N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haney, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milano, Carmelo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicoara, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegland, Donald D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daubert, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Robert K.</creatorcontrib><title>Lead Extraction for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices</title><title>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology</title><description>The goal of this study was to assess the utility of transvenous lead extraction for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The use of transvenous lead extraction for the management CIED infection in patients with a durable LVAD has not been well described. Clinical and outcomes data were collected retrospectively among patients who underwent lead extraction for CIED infection after LVAD implantation at Duke University Hospital. Overall, 27 patients (n = 6 HVAD; n = 15 HeartMate II; n = 6 Heartmate III) underwent lead extraction for infection. Median (interquartile range) time from LVAD implantation to infection was 6.1 (2.5 to 14.9) months. Indications included endocarditis (n = 16), bacteremia (n = 9), and pocket infection (n = 2). Common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 7), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 3). Sixty-eight leads were removed, with a median lead implant time of 5.7 (3.6 to 9.2) years. Laser sheaths were used in all procedures, with a median laser time of 35.0 s (17.5 to 85.5s). Mechanical cutting tools were required in 11 (40.7%) and femoral snaring in 4 (14.8%). Complete procedural success was achieved in 25 (93.6%) patients and clinical success in 27 (100%). No procedural failures or major adverse events occurred. Twenty-one patients (77.8%) were alive without persistent endovascular infection 1 year after lead extraction. Most were treated with oral suppressive antibiotics after extraction (n = 23 [82.5%]). Persistent infection after extraction occurred in 4 patients and was associated with 50% 1-year mortality. Transvenous lead extraction for LVAD-associated CIED infection can be performed safely with low rates of persistent infection and 1-year mortality. [Display omitted]</description><subject>cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection</subject><subject>lead extraction</subject><subject>left ventricular assist device</subject><issn>2405-500X</issn><issn>2405-5018</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhhdRsGh_gZccvew6SZv9OHgotWqhoAe_biGbTDDLdrcmaVH886Zu8ehpZuB9XpgnSS4oZBRoftVkjVS4yRgwyIBlAPlRMmJT4CkHWh7_7fB2moy9bwCAclYyOh0l3yuUmiw-g5Mq2L4jpndkLp22_U56tW2lI8v1ppVdkHWLZNGiCq7vrCI3uLMKybIzOKC2I48yWOyCJ682vJMVmkBe4u3s0DTz3vpwIP15cmJk63F8mGfJ8-3iaX6frh7ulvPZKlWTkoaUIqWc16YCDUUtaV0rqsFolAVDnaPJgUmZKzSVBllNmSlqDiXjhSq1UmZyllwOvRvXf2zRB7G2XmEbn8J-6wWbRh0V5JzH6GSIKtd779CIjbNr6b4EBbG3LRrxa1vsbQtgItqO1PVAYfxiZ9EJr6IGhdq66Ebo3v7L_wBBsowj</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Black-Maier, Eric</creator><creator>Piccini, Jonathan P.</creator><creator>Bishawi, Muath</creator><creator>Pokorney, Sean D.</creator><creator>Bryner, Benjamin</creator><creator>Schroder, Jacob N.</creator><creator>Fowler, Vance G.</creator><creator>Katz, Jason N.</creator><creator>Haney, John C.</creator><creator>Milano, Carmelo A.</creator><creator>Nicoara, Alina</creator><creator>Hegland, Donald D.</creator><creator>Daubert, James P.</creator><creator>Lewis, Robert K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Lead Extraction for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices</title><author>Black-Maier, Eric ; Piccini, Jonathan P. ; Bishawi, Muath ; Pokorney, Sean D. ; Bryner, Benjamin ; Schroder, Jacob N. ; Fowler, Vance G. ; Katz, Jason N. ; Haney, John C. ; Milano, Carmelo A. ; Nicoara, Alina ; Hegland, Donald D. ; Daubert, James P. ; Lewis, Robert K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-1e1155bf90d07ba1bbc1d0fdea72ed6ef602aa6cef9d0a942f7b508257c8dccf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection</topic><topic>lead extraction</topic><topic>left ventricular assist device</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Black-Maier, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccini, Jonathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishawi, Muath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokorney, Sean D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryner, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroder, Jacob N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Vance G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jason N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haney, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milano, Carmelo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicoara, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegland, Donald D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daubert, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Robert K.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Black-Maier, Eric</au><au>Piccini, Jonathan P.</au><au>Bishawi, Muath</au><au>Pokorney, Sean D.</au><au>Bryner, Benjamin</au><au>Schroder, Jacob N.</au><au>Fowler, Vance G.</au><au>Katz, Jason N.</au><au>Haney, John C.</au><au>Milano, Carmelo A.</au><au>Nicoara, Alina</au><au>Hegland, Donald D.</au><au>Daubert, James P.</au><au>Lewis, Robert K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lead Extraction for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices</atitle><jtitle>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>672</spage><epage>680</epage><pages>672-680</pages><issn>2405-500X</issn><eissn>2405-5018</eissn><abstract>The goal of this study was to assess the utility of transvenous lead extraction for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The use of transvenous lead extraction for the management CIED infection in patients with a durable LVAD has not been well described. Clinical and outcomes data were collected retrospectively among patients who underwent lead extraction for CIED infection after LVAD implantation at Duke University Hospital. Overall, 27 patients (n = 6 HVAD; n = 15 HeartMate II; n = 6 Heartmate III) underwent lead extraction for infection. Median (interquartile range) time from LVAD implantation to infection was 6.1 (2.5 to 14.9) months. Indications included endocarditis (n = 16), bacteremia (n = 9), and pocket infection (n = 2). Common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 7), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 3). Sixty-eight leads were removed, with a median lead implant time of 5.7 (3.6 to 9.2) years. Laser sheaths were used in all procedures, with a median laser time of 35.0 s (17.5 to 85.5s). Mechanical cutting tools were required in 11 (40.7%) and femoral snaring in 4 (14.8%). Complete procedural success was achieved in 25 (93.6%) patients and clinical success in 27 (100%). No procedural failures or major adverse events occurred. Twenty-one patients (77.8%) were alive without persistent endovascular infection 1 year after lead extraction. Most were treated with oral suppressive antibiotics after extraction (n = 23 [82.5%]). Persistent infection after extraction occurred in 4 patients and was associated with 50% 1-year mortality. Transvenous lead extraction for LVAD-associated CIED infection can be performed safely with low rates of persistent infection and 1-year mortality. [Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jacep.2020.02.006</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2405-500X
ispartof JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2020-06, Vol.6 (6), p.672-680
issn 2405-500X
2405-5018
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2415290655
source SCIENCE DIRECT
subjects cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection
lead extraction
left ventricular assist device
title Lead Extraction for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T08%3A34%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lead%20Extraction%20for%20Cardiovascular%20Implantable%20Electronic%20Device%20Infection%20in%20Patients%20With%20Left%20Ventricular%20Assist%20Devices&rft.jtitle=JACC.%20Clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Black-Maier,%20Eric&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=672&rft.epage=680&rft.pages=672-680&rft.issn=2405-500X&rft.eissn=2405-5018&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacep.2020.02.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2415290655%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-1e1155bf90d07ba1bbc1d0fdea72ed6ef602aa6cef9d0a942f7b508257c8dccf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2415290655&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true