Loading…
What happens to drug use and expenditure when cost sharing is completely removed? Evidence from a Canadian provincial public drug plan
•Completely removing drug cost-sharing increased drug use (16%) and expenditure (19%).•Much change was attributable to new users of medicines, especially systemic anti-infectives.•The appropriateness of this additional medication use requires investigation. The role of cost-sharing for medicines is...
Saved in:
Published in: | Health policy (Amsterdam) 2020-09, Vol.124 (9), p.977-983 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-284ae07e03a1494d9b1e8ce9c2042648337e0a07c3e0b3642ee5b7ddb0c0f4663 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-284ae07e03a1494d9b1e8ce9c2042648337e0a07c3e0b3642ee5b7ddb0c0f4663 |
container_end_page | 983 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 977 |
container_title | Health policy (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Laba, Tracey-Lea Cheng, Lucy Worthington, Heather C. McGrail, Kimberlyn M. Chan, Fiona K.I. Mamdani, Muhammad Law, Michael R. |
description | •Completely removing drug cost-sharing increased drug use (16%) and expenditure (19%).•Much change was attributable to new users of medicines, especially systemic anti-infectives.•The appropriateness of this additional medication use requires investigation.
The role of cost-sharing for medicines is under active policy discussion, including in proposals for value-based insurance design. To inform this debate, we estimated the impact of completely removing cost-sharing on medication use and expenditure using a quasi-experimental approach.
Fair PharmaCare, British Columbia’s income-based public drug plan, includes a household out-of-pocket limit. Therefore, when one household member starts a long-term high-cost drug surpassing this maximum, cost-sharing is completely removed for other family members. We used an interrupted time series design to estimate monthly prescriptions and expenditures of other household members, 24 months before and after cost-sharing removal.
We studied 2191 household members newly free of cost-sharing requirements, most of whom had lower incomes. R emoving cost-sharing increased the level of drug expenditure and prescription numbers by 16 and 19%, respectively (i.e. $2659.43 (95%$1507.27–$3811.59, p < 0.001); 50.0 (95%CI 25.1–74.9, p < 0.001)) relative to prior expenditures and utilization without changing pre-existing trends. Much of this change was driven by 533 individuals initiating medication for the first time after cost-sharing removal. This initiation substantially increased average expenditure, especially for antiviral agents.
Completely removing cost-sharing, independent of health status, significantly increased medication use and expenditure particularly due to medicine initiation by new users. While costs may be preventing use, the appropriateness of additional use, especially among new users, is unclear. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2415294463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168851018305876</els_id><sourcerecordid>2415294463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-284ae07e03a1494d9b1e8ce9c2042648337e0a07c3e0b3642ee5b7ddb0c0f4663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiMEEkvbZ6glLlySjv_EyZ5QtWqhUiUuVBwtx55tvErsYDsLfQGeG68WceDCybLnNzOfv6-qrik0FKi8OTQj6imPS5gaBgwaaBsA-qra0L5jtYRWvK42hezrvqXwtnqX0gEAOs7lpvr1bdSZjHpZ0CeSA7FxfSZrQqK9JfizPFuX14jkx4iemJAySaOOzj8Tl8p9XibMOL2QiHM4ov1I7o7OojdI9jHMRJOd9to67ckSw9F54_RElnWYnDkvWybtL6s3ez0lvPpzXlRP93dfd5_rxy-fHna3j7Xhncw164VG6BC4pmIr7Hag2BvcGgaCSdFzXmoaOsMRBi4FQ2yHztoBDOyFlPyi-nCeW7R8XzFlNbtkcCoSMKxJMUFbthVC8oK-_wc9hDX6oq5Qfc9EcZYVqjtTJoaUIu7VEt2s44uioE75qIP6m4865aOgVSWf0nl77sTy36PDqJJxJ9-si2iyssH9d8Zv-OGeyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2488246052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What happens to drug use and expenditure when cost sharing is completely removed? Evidence from a Canadian provincial public drug plan</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Laba, Tracey-Lea ; Cheng, Lucy ; Worthington, Heather C. ; McGrail, Kimberlyn M. ; Chan, Fiona K.I. ; Mamdani, Muhammad ; Law, Michael R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Laba, Tracey-Lea ; Cheng, Lucy ; Worthington, Heather C. ; McGrail, Kimberlyn M. ; Chan, Fiona K.I. ; Mamdani, Muhammad ; Law, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><description>•Completely removing drug cost-sharing increased drug use (16%) and expenditure (19%).•Much change was attributable to new users of medicines, especially systemic anti-infectives.•The appropriateness of this additional medication use requires investigation.
The role of cost-sharing for medicines is under active policy discussion, including in proposals for value-based insurance design. To inform this debate, we estimated the impact of completely removing cost-sharing on medication use and expenditure using a quasi-experimental approach.
Fair PharmaCare, British Columbia’s income-based public drug plan, includes a household out-of-pocket limit. Therefore, when one household member starts a long-term high-cost drug surpassing this maximum, cost-sharing is completely removed for other family members. We used an interrupted time series design to estimate monthly prescriptions and expenditures of other household members, 24 months before and after cost-sharing removal.
We studied 2191 household members newly free of cost-sharing requirements, most of whom had lower incomes. R emoving cost-sharing increased the level of drug expenditure and prescription numbers by 16 and 19%, respectively (i.e. $2659.43 (95%$1507.27–$3811.59, p < 0.001); 50.0 (95%CI 25.1–74.9, p < 0.001)) relative to prior expenditures and utilization without changing pre-existing trends. Much of this change was driven by 533 individuals initiating medication for the first time after cost-sharing removal. This initiation substantially increased average expenditure, especially for antiviral agents.
Completely removing cost-sharing, independent of health status, significantly increased medication use and expenditure particularly due to medicine initiation by new users. While costs may be preventing use, the appropriateness of additional use, especially among new users, is unclear.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antiviral drugs ; Canada ; Cost sharing ; Drug abuse ; Drug policy ; Expenditures ; Health administration ; Health care expenditures ; Health insurance ; Health status ; Households ; Interrupted time series ; Personal expenditure ; Prescription drugs ; Quasi-experimental methods ; Relatives ; Time series</subject><ispartof>Health policy (Amsterdam), 2020-09, Vol.124 (9), p.977-983</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-284ae07e03a1494d9b1e8ce9c2042648337e0a07c3e0b3642ee5b7ddb0c0f4663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-284ae07e03a1494d9b1e8ce9c2042648337e0a07c3e0b3642ee5b7ddb0c0f4663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9349-1915 ; 0000-0001-9394-3347</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laba, Tracey-Lea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worthington, Heather C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGrail, Kimberlyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Fiona K.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamdani, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><title>What happens to drug use and expenditure when cost sharing is completely removed? Evidence from a Canadian provincial public drug plan</title><title>Health policy (Amsterdam)</title><description>•Completely removing drug cost-sharing increased drug use (16%) and expenditure (19%).•Much change was attributable to new users of medicines, especially systemic anti-infectives.•The appropriateness of this additional medication use requires investigation.
The role of cost-sharing for medicines is under active policy discussion, including in proposals for value-based insurance design. To inform this debate, we estimated the impact of completely removing cost-sharing on medication use and expenditure using a quasi-experimental approach.
Fair PharmaCare, British Columbia’s income-based public drug plan, includes a household out-of-pocket limit. Therefore, when one household member starts a long-term high-cost drug surpassing this maximum, cost-sharing is completely removed for other family members. We used an interrupted time series design to estimate monthly prescriptions and expenditures of other household members, 24 months before and after cost-sharing removal.
We studied 2191 household members newly free of cost-sharing requirements, most of whom had lower incomes. R emoving cost-sharing increased the level of drug expenditure and prescription numbers by 16 and 19%, respectively (i.e. $2659.43 (95%$1507.27–$3811.59, p < 0.001); 50.0 (95%CI 25.1–74.9, p < 0.001)) relative to prior expenditures and utilization without changing pre-existing trends. Much of this change was driven by 533 individuals initiating medication for the first time after cost-sharing removal. This initiation substantially increased average expenditure, especially for antiviral agents.
Completely removing cost-sharing, independent of health status, significantly increased medication use and expenditure particularly due to medicine initiation by new users. While costs may be preventing use, the appropriateness of additional use, especially among new users, is unclear.</description><subject>Antiviral drugs</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cost sharing</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug policy</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Interrupted time series</subject><subject>Personal expenditure</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>Relatives</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>0168-8510</issn><issn>1872-6054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiMEEkvbZ6glLlySjv_EyZ5QtWqhUiUuVBwtx55tvErsYDsLfQGeG68WceDCybLnNzOfv6-qrik0FKi8OTQj6imPS5gaBgwaaBsA-qra0L5jtYRWvK42hezrvqXwtnqX0gEAOs7lpvr1bdSZjHpZ0CeSA7FxfSZrQqK9JfizPFuX14jkx4iemJAySaOOzj8Tl8p9XibMOL2QiHM4ov1I7o7OojdI9jHMRJOd9to67ckSw9F54_RElnWYnDkvWybtL6s3ez0lvPpzXlRP93dfd5_rxy-fHna3j7Xhncw164VG6BC4pmIr7Hag2BvcGgaCSdFzXmoaOsMRBi4FQ2yHztoBDOyFlPyi-nCeW7R8XzFlNbtkcCoSMKxJMUFbthVC8oK-_wc9hDX6oq5Qfc9EcZYVqjtTJoaUIu7VEt2s44uioE75qIP6m4865aOgVSWf0nl77sTy36PDqJJxJ9-si2iyssH9d8Zv-OGeyw</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Laba, Tracey-Lea</creator><creator>Cheng, Lucy</creator><creator>Worthington, Heather C.</creator><creator>McGrail, Kimberlyn M.</creator><creator>Chan, Fiona K.I.</creator><creator>Mamdani, Muhammad</creator><creator>Law, Michael R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9349-1915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9394-3347</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>What happens to drug use and expenditure when cost sharing is completely removed? Evidence from a Canadian provincial public drug plan</title><author>Laba, Tracey-Lea ; Cheng, Lucy ; Worthington, Heather C. ; McGrail, Kimberlyn M. ; Chan, Fiona K.I. ; Mamdani, Muhammad ; Law, Michael R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-284ae07e03a1494d9b1e8ce9c2042648337e0a07c3e0b3642ee5b7ddb0c0f4663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antiviral drugs</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cost sharing</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug policy</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Interrupted time series</topic><topic>Personal expenditure</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>Relatives</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laba, Tracey-Lea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worthington, Heather C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGrail, Kimberlyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Fiona K.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamdani, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laba, Tracey-Lea</au><au>Cheng, Lucy</au><au>Worthington, Heather C.</au><au>McGrail, Kimberlyn M.</au><au>Chan, Fiona K.I.</au><au>Mamdani, Muhammad</au><au>Law, Michael R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What happens to drug use and expenditure when cost sharing is completely removed? Evidence from a Canadian provincial public drug plan</atitle><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>977</spage><epage>983</epage><pages>977-983</pages><issn>0168-8510</issn><eissn>1872-6054</eissn><abstract>•Completely removing drug cost-sharing increased drug use (16%) and expenditure (19%).•Much change was attributable to new users of medicines, especially systemic anti-infectives.•The appropriateness of this additional medication use requires investigation.
The role of cost-sharing for medicines is under active policy discussion, including in proposals for value-based insurance design. To inform this debate, we estimated the impact of completely removing cost-sharing on medication use and expenditure using a quasi-experimental approach.
Fair PharmaCare, British Columbia’s income-based public drug plan, includes a household out-of-pocket limit. Therefore, when one household member starts a long-term high-cost drug surpassing this maximum, cost-sharing is completely removed for other family members. We used an interrupted time series design to estimate monthly prescriptions and expenditures of other household members, 24 months before and after cost-sharing removal.
We studied 2191 household members newly free of cost-sharing requirements, most of whom had lower incomes. R emoving cost-sharing increased the level of drug expenditure and prescription numbers by 16 and 19%, respectively (i.e. $2659.43 (95%$1507.27–$3811.59, p < 0.001); 50.0 (95%CI 25.1–74.9, p < 0.001)) relative to prior expenditures and utilization without changing pre-existing trends. Much of this change was driven by 533 individuals initiating medication for the first time after cost-sharing removal. This initiation substantially increased average expenditure, especially for antiviral agents.
Completely removing cost-sharing, independent of health status, significantly increased medication use and expenditure particularly due to medicine initiation by new users. While costs may be preventing use, the appropriateness of additional use, especially among new users, is unclear.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9349-1915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9394-3347</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-8510 |
ispartof | Health policy (Amsterdam), 2020-09, Vol.124 (9), p.977-983 |
issn | 0168-8510 1872-6054 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2415294463 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; PAIS Index |
subjects | Antiviral drugs Canada Cost sharing Drug abuse Drug policy Expenditures Health administration Health care expenditures Health insurance Health status Households Interrupted time series Personal expenditure Prescription drugs Quasi-experimental methods Relatives Time series |
title | What happens to drug use and expenditure when cost sharing is completely removed? Evidence from a Canadian provincial public drug plan |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A59%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20happens%20to%20drug%20use%20and%20expenditure%20when%20cost%20sharing%20is%20completely%20removed?%20Evidence%20from%20a%20Canadian%20provincial%20public%20drug%20plan&rft.jtitle=Health%20policy%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Laba,%20Tracey-Lea&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=977&rft.epage=983&rft.pages=977-983&rft.issn=0168-8510&rft.eissn=1872-6054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2415294463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-284ae07e03a1494d9b1e8ce9c2042648337e0a07c3e0b3642ee5b7ddb0c0f4663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2488246052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |