Electrophysiologic evidence of epicardial connections between low right atrium and remote right atrial region or coronary sinus musculature: Relevance for catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter

• Published in: Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2020-09, Vol.31 (9), p.2344-2351
• Main Authors: Chaumont, Corentin, Saoudi, Nadir, Savouré, Arnaud, Lațcu, Decebal G., Anselme, Frédéric
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ablation; Atrium; Cardiac arrhythmia; catheter ablation; Catheters; coronary sinus; Electrophysiology; electrophysiology study; epicardial connections; Mapping; Patients; Radiofrequency ablation; Tachycardia; typical atrial flutter
• ISSN: 1045-3873; 1540-8167
• DOI: 10.1111/jce.14627

Background The coronary sinus (CS) is surrounded by a myocardial coat with extensive connections to the left and right atria that contributes to the interatrial electrical connection. Whereas epicardial connections between CS musculature and the left atrium have largely been demonstrated, clinically relevant epicardial connections from the CS musculature toward the low right atrium (LRA) and epicardial connections between two regions of the right atrium remain questionable. Methods Five patients underwent electrophysiology (EP) study for typical atrial flutter (AFl) using either conventional multipolar catheters (four patients) or three‐dimensional high‐density mapping system (one patient). Results All five patients had a similar sequence of events during the EP studies. After several cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) radiofrequency (RF) applications, double potentials were recorded along the ablation line while tachycardia persisted. The right atrial activation pattern strongly suggested the presence of a complete endocardial CTI line of the block. Based on the detailed conventional atrial mapping, RF applications at the middle cardiac vein/CS ostium allowed sinus rhythm restoration in four patients. High‐density mapping showed an early breakthrough site at the septal side of the ablation line, close to the CS ostium during counterclockwise AFl, in the fifth patient. RF applications at this site resulted in tachycardia termination. Conclusion Our observations suggested the existence of epicardial fibers connecting the LRA with either the CS musculature or a remote right atrial region. When AFl ablation fails whereas evidence for the local endocardial block is observed, the operators should integrate this finding in the diagnosis and ablation strategy.