The effectiveness of emotional wellness programs on mental health outcomes for adults with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Multiple sclerosis and related disorders 2020-09, Vol.44, p.102171-102171, Article 102171
• Main Authors: Russell, R.D., Black, L.J., Pham, N.M., Begley, A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Anxiety; Anxiety - therapy; behavior change techniques; depression; emotional wellness; Health Promotion; Humans; Mental Health; Multiple Sclerosis - therapy; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; quality of life; stress
• ISSN: 2211-0348; 2211-0356
• DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102171

•Mental health outcomes in MS were improved by emotional wellness programs•Emotional wellness programs were most effective at reducing stress (large effect)•Emotional wellness programs were moderately effective for depression and anxiety•Behaviour practice and social comparison were common behaviour change techniques People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have a greater prevalence of depression and anxiety than the general population. Emotional wellness programs (any psychological or psychosocial interventions that focus on awareness, acceptance, managing, or challenging thoughts and feelings) could be important for people with MS. However, there have been no reviews on the effectiveness of emotional wellness programs for people with MS. The objective of this review was to determine the effectiveness of emotional wellness programs on mental health outcomes for adults with MS. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental trials evaluating emotional wellness programs for adults with any form of MS were included. Mental health outcomes included were depression, anxiety, quality of life, and stress. The comparator groups were waitlist controls, usual care, or another intervention. This review was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42019131082) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Cochrane register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched for English- language publications. Titles and abstracts were initially screened, followed by a screen of full text articles. Studies were critically appraised for methodological quality using the JBI standardised critical appraisal checklists. Data were extracted on intervention details, study outcome measures, behaviour change techniques, and results. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for outcomes assessed in at least five studies, with results reported as the standardised mean difference (SMD). This review comprised 25 RCTs and four quasi-experimental studies (n participants=2323); 21 were included in meta-analyses. Meta-analyses produced statistically significant results favouring the interventions (SMD (95% CI) for depression -0.55 (-0.87, -0.24); anxiety -0.42 (-0.70, -0.14); quality of life 0.28 (0.14, 0.43); and stress -1.00 (-1.58, -0.43)). The most commonly used behaviour change techniques were behaviour practice/rehearsal, social comparison, and social support. This