Loading…
Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services
The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured dee...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Hastings Center report 2020-05, Vol.50 (3), p.79-80 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3 |
container_end_page | 80 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | The Hastings Center report |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Garrett, Jeremy R. McNolty, Leslie Ann Wolfe, Ian D. Lantos, John D. |
description | The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured deeply rooted problems in health care and deflected attempts to address them. As hospitals begin to welcome all patients back, they should resist the temptation to go back to business as usual. Instead, they should retain the more deliberative, explicit, and transparent ways of thinking that have informed the development of crisis standards of care. The key lesson to be learned from those exercises in rational deliberation is that justice must be the ethical foundation of all standards of care. Justice demands that hospitals take a safety‐net approach to providing services that prioritizes the most vulnerable segments of society, continue to expand telemedicine in ways that improve access without exacerbating disparities, invest in community‐based care, and fully staff hospitals and clinics on nights and weekends. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hast.1145 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2418727004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2418727004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFK3VhS8gA250kXYumWSykhLUCtIWrOAuTCcnNjJJdCbxsuuD6Mv1SUxtdSF4Nmfz8XPOj9ARJT1KCOvPlat7lPpiC3WoEMyjfnC_jTqERNwjnPt7aN-5R9KOL_ku2uNMREFERAdNxo3FI3ir8USVKRS5xhf1PNcOx3NlDJQPcI4HxlRa1Xn5gJeLj1FlC2WWi088BGXqOY6VBXwL9iXX4A7QTqaMg8PN7qK7y4tpPPRuxlfX8eDG01xK4SlQigYgwjTkVIkgYiwjEUmZhnRGJKUQMEqj0AcgINunZMaYlIEvQWox07yLTte5T7Z6bsDVSZE7DcaoEqrGJcynMmRh-3FLT_7Qx6qxZXvdSoVRwKkgrTpbK20r5yxkyZPNC2XfE0qSVc3JquZkVXNrjzeJzayA9Ff-9NqC_hq85gbe_09KhoPb6XfkF6_8hsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417963150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Garrett, Jeremy R. ; McNolty, Leslie Ann ; Wolfe, Ian D. ; Lantos, John D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Jeremy R. ; McNolty, Leslie Ann ; Wolfe, Ian D. ; Lantos, John D.</creatorcontrib><description>The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured deeply rooted problems in health care and deflected attempts to address them. As hospitals begin to welcome all patients back, they should resist the temptation to go back to business as usual. Instead, they should retain the more deliberative, explicit, and transparent ways of thinking that have informed the development of crisis standards of care. The key lesson to be learned from those exercises in rational deliberation is that justice must be the ethical foundation of all standards of care. Justice demands that hospitals take a safety‐net approach to providing services that prioritizes the most vulnerable segments of society, continue to expand telemedicine in ways that improve access without exacerbating disparities, invest in community‐based care, and fully staff hospitals and clinics on nights and weekends.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-0334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-146X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hast.1145</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32596905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Betacoronavirus ; Bioethics ; Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology ; COVID-19 ; crisis standard of care ; Health Care Rationing - ethics ; Health Services Accessibility - ethics ; Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration ; Healthcare Disparities - ethics ; Healthcare Disparities - organization & administration ; Humans ; justice ; Medical ethics ; Pandemics ; Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - ethics ; Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - organization & administration ; Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology ; rationing ; resource allocation ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Standard of care ; Standard of Care - ethics ; Standard of Care - organization & administration ; Telemedicine - ethics ; Telemedicine - organization & administration</subject><ispartof>The Hastings Center report, 2020-05, Vol.50 (3), p.79-80</ispartof><rights>2020 The Hastings Center</rights><rights>2020 The Hastings Center.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Jeremy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNolty, Leslie Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Ian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lantos, John D.</creatorcontrib><title>Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services</title><title>The Hastings Center report</title><addtitle>Hastings Cent Rep</addtitle><description>The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured deeply rooted problems in health care and deflected attempts to address them. As hospitals begin to welcome all patients back, they should resist the temptation to go back to business as usual. Instead, they should retain the more deliberative, explicit, and transparent ways of thinking that have informed the development of crisis standards of care. The key lesson to be learned from those exercises in rational deliberation is that justice must be the ethical foundation of all standards of care. Justice demands that hospitals take a safety‐net approach to providing services that prioritizes the most vulnerable segments of society, continue to expand telemedicine in ways that improve access without exacerbating disparities, invest in community‐based care, and fully staff hospitals and clinics on nights and weekends.</description><subject>Betacoronavirus</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>crisis standard of care</subject><subject>Health Care Rationing - ethics</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - ethics</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - ethics</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>justice</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - ethics</subject><subject>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - organization & administration</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology</subject><subject>rationing</subject><subject>resource allocation</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Standard of care</subject><subject>Standard of Care - ethics</subject><subject>Standard of Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Telemedicine - ethics</subject><subject>Telemedicine - organization & administration</subject><issn>0093-0334</issn><issn>1552-146X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFK3VhS8gA250kXYumWSykhLUCtIWrOAuTCcnNjJJdCbxsuuD6Mv1SUxtdSF4Nmfz8XPOj9ARJT1KCOvPlat7lPpiC3WoEMyjfnC_jTqERNwjnPt7aN-5R9KOL_ku2uNMREFERAdNxo3FI3ir8USVKRS5xhf1PNcOx3NlDJQPcI4HxlRa1Xn5gJeLj1FlC2WWi088BGXqOY6VBXwL9iXX4A7QTqaMg8PN7qK7y4tpPPRuxlfX8eDG01xK4SlQigYgwjTkVIkgYiwjEUmZhnRGJKUQMEqj0AcgINunZMaYlIEvQWox07yLTte5T7Z6bsDVSZE7DcaoEqrGJcynMmRh-3FLT_7Qx6qxZXvdSoVRwKkgrTpbK20r5yxkyZPNC2XfE0qSVc3JquZkVXNrjzeJzayA9Ff-9NqC_hq85gbe_09KhoPb6XfkF6_8hsQ</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Garrett, Jeremy R.</creator><creator>McNolty, Leslie Ann</creator><creator>Wolfe, Ian D.</creator><creator>Lantos, John D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services</title><author>Garrett, Jeremy R. ; McNolty, Leslie Ann ; Wolfe, Ian D. ; Lantos, John D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Betacoronavirus</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>crisis standard of care</topic><topic>Health Care Rationing - ethics</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - ethics</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - ethics</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>justice</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - ethics</topic><topic>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - organization & administration</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology</topic><topic>rationing</topic><topic>resource allocation</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Standard of care</topic><topic>Standard of Care - ethics</topic><topic>Standard of Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Telemedicine - ethics</topic><topic>Telemedicine - organization & administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Jeremy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNolty, Leslie Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Ian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lantos, John D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Hastings Center report</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garrett, Jeremy R.</au><au>McNolty, Leslie Ann</au><au>Wolfe, Ian D.</au><au>Lantos, John D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services</atitle><jtitle>The Hastings Center report</jtitle><addtitle>Hastings Cent Rep</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>79-80</pages><issn>0093-0334</issn><eissn>1552-146X</eissn><abstract>The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured deeply rooted problems in health care and deflected attempts to address them. As hospitals begin to welcome all patients back, they should resist the temptation to go back to business as usual. Instead, they should retain the more deliberative, explicit, and transparent ways of thinking that have informed the development of crisis standards of care. The key lesson to be learned from those exercises in rational deliberation is that justice must be the ethical foundation of all standards of care. Justice demands that hospitals take a safety‐net approach to providing services that prioritizes the most vulnerable segments of society, continue to expand telemedicine in ways that improve access without exacerbating disparities, invest in community‐based care, and fully staff hospitals and clinics on nights and weekends.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32596905</pmid><doi>10.1002/hast.1145</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-0334 |
ispartof | The Hastings Center report, 2020-05, Vol.50 (3), p.79-80 |
issn | 0093-0334 1552-146X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2418727004 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Betacoronavirus Bioethics Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology COVID-19 crisis standard of care Health Care Rationing - ethics Health Services Accessibility - ethics Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration Healthcare Disparities - ethics Healthcare Disparities - organization & administration Humans justice Medical ethics Pandemics Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - ethics Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - organization & administration Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology rationing resource allocation SARS-CoV-2 Standard of care Standard of Care - ethics Standard of Care - organization & administration Telemedicine - ethics Telemedicine - organization & administration |
title | Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A23%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Our%20Next%20Pandemic%20Ethics%20Challenge?%20Allocating%20%E2%80%9CNormal%E2%80%9D%20Health%20Care%20Services&rft.jtitle=The%20Hastings%20Center%20report&rft.au=Garrett,%20Jeremy%20R.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=79-80&rft.issn=0093-0334&rft.eissn=1552-146X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hast.1145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418727004%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417963150&rft_id=info:pmid/32596905&rfr_iscdi=true |