Loading…

Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services

The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured dee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Hastings Center report 2020-05, Vol.50 (3), p.79-80
Main Authors: Garrett, Jeremy R., McNolty, Leslie Ann, Wolfe, Ian D., Lantos, John D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3
container_end_page 80
container_issue 3
container_start_page 79
container_title The Hastings Center report
container_volume 50
creator Garrett, Jeremy R.
McNolty, Leslie Ann
Wolfe, Ian D.
Lantos, John D.
description The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured deeply rooted problems in health care and deflected attempts to address them. As hospitals begin to welcome all patients back, they should resist the temptation to go back to business as usual. Instead, they should retain the more deliberative, explicit, and transparent ways of thinking that have informed the development of crisis standards of care. The key lesson to be learned from those exercises in rational deliberation is that justice must be the ethical foundation of all standards of care. Justice demands that hospitals take a safety‐net approach to providing services that prioritizes the most vulnerable segments of society, continue to expand telemedicine in ways that improve access without exacerbating disparities, invest in community‐based care, and fully staff hospitals and clinics on nights and weekends.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hast.1145
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2418727004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2418727004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFK3VhS8gA250kXYumWSykhLUCtIWrOAuTCcnNjJJdCbxsuuD6Mv1SUxtdSF4Nmfz8XPOj9ARJT1KCOvPlat7lPpiC3WoEMyjfnC_jTqERNwjnPt7aN-5R9KOL_ku2uNMREFERAdNxo3FI3ir8USVKRS5xhf1PNcOx3NlDJQPcI4HxlRa1Xn5gJeLj1FlC2WWi088BGXqOY6VBXwL9iXX4A7QTqaMg8PN7qK7y4tpPPRuxlfX8eDG01xK4SlQigYgwjTkVIkgYiwjEUmZhnRGJKUQMEqj0AcgINunZMaYlIEvQWox07yLTte5T7Z6bsDVSZE7DcaoEqrGJcynMmRh-3FLT_7Qx6qxZXvdSoVRwKkgrTpbK20r5yxkyZPNC2XfE0qSVc3JquZkVXNrjzeJzayA9Ff-9NqC_hq85gbe_09KhoPb6XfkF6_8hsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417963150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Garrett, Jeremy R. ; McNolty, Leslie Ann ; Wolfe, Ian D. ; Lantos, John D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Jeremy R. ; McNolty, Leslie Ann ; Wolfe, Ian D. ; Lantos, John D.</creatorcontrib><description>The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured deeply rooted problems in health care and deflected attempts to address them. As hospitals begin to welcome all patients back, they should resist the temptation to go back to business as usual. Instead, they should retain the more deliberative, explicit, and transparent ways of thinking that have informed the development of crisis standards of care. The key lesson to be learned from those exercises in rational deliberation is that justice must be the ethical foundation of all standards of care. Justice demands that hospitals take a safety‐net approach to providing services that prioritizes the most vulnerable segments of society, continue to expand telemedicine in ways that improve access without exacerbating disparities, invest in community‐based care, and fully staff hospitals and clinics on nights and weekends.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-0334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-146X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hast.1145</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32596905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Betacoronavirus ; Bioethics ; Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology ; COVID-19 ; crisis standard of care ; Health Care Rationing - ethics ; Health Services Accessibility - ethics ; Health Services Accessibility - organization &amp; administration ; Healthcare Disparities - ethics ; Healthcare Disparities - organization &amp; administration ; Humans ; justice ; Medical ethics ; Pandemics ; Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - ethics ; Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - organization &amp; administration ; Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology ; rationing ; resource allocation ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Standard of care ; Standard of Care - ethics ; Standard of Care - organization &amp; administration ; Telemedicine - ethics ; Telemedicine - organization &amp; administration</subject><ispartof>The Hastings Center report, 2020-05, Vol.50 (3), p.79-80</ispartof><rights>2020 The Hastings Center</rights><rights>2020 The Hastings Center.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Jeremy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNolty, Leslie Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Ian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lantos, John D.</creatorcontrib><title>Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services</title><title>The Hastings Center report</title><addtitle>Hastings Cent Rep</addtitle><description>The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured deeply rooted problems in health care and deflected attempts to address them. As hospitals begin to welcome all patients back, they should resist the temptation to go back to business as usual. Instead, they should retain the more deliberative, explicit, and transparent ways of thinking that have informed the development of crisis standards of care. The key lesson to be learned from those exercises in rational deliberation is that justice must be the ethical foundation of all standards of care. Justice demands that hospitals take a safety‐net approach to providing services that prioritizes the most vulnerable segments of society, continue to expand telemedicine in ways that improve access without exacerbating disparities, invest in community‐based care, and fully staff hospitals and clinics on nights and weekends.</description><subject>Betacoronavirus</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>crisis standard of care</subject><subject>Health Care Rationing - ethics</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - ethics</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - ethics</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>justice</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - ethics</subject><subject>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology</subject><subject>rationing</subject><subject>resource allocation</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Standard of care</subject><subject>Standard of Care - ethics</subject><subject>Standard of Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Telemedicine - ethics</subject><subject>Telemedicine - organization &amp; administration</subject><issn>0093-0334</issn><issn>1552-146X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFK3VhS8gA250kXYumWSykhLUCtIWrOAuTCcnNjJJdCbxsuuD6Mv1SUxtdSF4Nmfz8XPOj9ARJT1KCOvPlat7lPpiC3WoEMyjfnC_jTqERNwjnPt7aN-5R9KOL_ku2uNMREFERAdNxo3FI3ir8USVKRS5xhf1PNcOx3NlDJQPcI4HxlRa1Xn5gJeLj1FlC2WWi088BGXqOY6VBXwL9iXX4A7QTqaMg8PN7qK7y4tpPPRuxlfX8eDG01xK4SlQigYgwjTkVIkgYiwjEUmZhnRGJKUQMEqj0AcgINunZMaYlIEvQWox07yLTte5T7Z6bsDVSZE7DcaoEqrGJcynMmRh-3FLT_7Qx6qxZXvdSoVRwKkgrTpbK20r5yxkyZPNC2XfE0qSVc3JquZkVXNrjzeJzayA9Ff-9NqC_hq85gbe_09KhoPb6XfkF6_8hsQ</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Garrett, Jeremy R.</creator><creator>McNolty, Leslie Ann</creator><creator>Wolfe, Ian D.</creator><creator>Lantos, John D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services</title><author>Garrett, Jeremy R. ; McNolty, Leslie Ann ; Wolfe, Ian D. ; Lantos, John D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Betacoronavirus</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>crisis standard of care</topic><topic>Health Care Rationing - ethics</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - ethics</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - ethics</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>justice</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - ethics</topic><topic>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology</topic><topic>rationing</topic><topic>resource allocation</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Standard of care</topic><topic>Standard of Care - ethics</topic><topic>Standard of Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Telemedicine - ethics</topic><topic>Telemedicine - organization &amp; administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Jeremy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNolty, Leslie Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Ian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lantos, John D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Hastings Center report</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garrett, Jeremy R.</au><au>McNolty, Leslie Ann</au><au>Wolfe, Ian D.</au><au>Lantos, John D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services</atitle><jtitle>The Hastings Center report</jtitle><addtitle>Hastings Cent Rep</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>79-80</pages><issn>0093-0334</issn><eissn>1552-146X</eissn><abstract>The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured deeply rooted problems in health care and deflected attempts to address them. As hospitals begin to welcome all patients back, they should resist the temptation to go back to business as usual. Instead, they should retain the more deliberative, explicit, and transparent ways of thinking that have informed the development of crisis standards of care. The key lesson to be learned from those exercises in rational deliberation is that justice must be the ethical foundation of all standards of care. Justice demands that hospitals take a safety‐net approach to providing services that prioritizes the most vulnerable segments of society, continue to expand telemedicine in ways that improve access without exacerbating disparities, invest in community‐based care, and fully staff hospitals and clinics on nights and weekends.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32596905</pmid><doi>10.1002/hast.1145</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-0334
ispartof The Hastings Center report, 2020-05, Vol.50 (3), p.79-80
issn 0093-0334
1552-146X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2418727004
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Betacoronavirus
Bioethics
Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology
COVID-19
crisis standard of care
Health Care Rationing - ethics
Health Services Accessibility - ethics
Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration
Healthcare Disparities - ethics
Healthcare Disparities - organization & administration
Humans
justice
Medical ethics
Pandemics
Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - ethics
Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - organization & administration
Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology
rationing
resource allocation
SARS-CoV-2
Standard of care
Standard of Care - ethics
Standard of Care - organization & administration
Telemedicine - ethics
Telemedicine - organization & administration
title Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A23%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Our%20Next%20Pandemic%20Ethics%20Challenge?%20Allocating%20%E2%80%9CNormal%E2%80%9D%20Health%20Care%20Services&rft.jtitle=The%20Hastings%20Center%20report&rft.au=Garrett,%20Jeremy%20R.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=79-80&rft.issn=0093-0334&rft.eissn=1552-146X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hast.1145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418727004%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-aeaa16e57d731a56922f090d2cedb0811e6211974ee0e81558f2288648e8c5bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417963150&rft_id=info:pmid/32596905&rfr_iscdi=true