Loading…

U.S. Army Medical Corps Recruitment, Job Satisfaction, and Retention: Historical Perspectives and Current Issues

Abstract Introduction This study was conducted to identify and understand the current factors affecting recruitment, job satisfaction, and retention of U.S. Army Medical Corps officers and provide historical background to understand if the current factors are dissimilar. Materials and Methods An ano...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Military medicine 2020-09, Vol.185 (9-10), p.e1596-e1602
Main Authors: Marble, W Sanders, Cox, E Darrin, Hundertmark, Julie A, Goymerac, Paul J, Murray, Clinton K, Soderdahl, Douglas W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-22014b56a847acf2f7eeabc72251094d864fc5d3c405248fcd2c715ef6e610b33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-22014b56a847acf2f7eeabc72251094d864fc5d3c405248fcd2c715ef6e610b33
container_end_page e1602
container_issue 9-10
container_start_page e1596
container_title Military medicine
container_volume 185
creator Marble, W Sanders
Cox, E Darrin
Hundertmark, Julie A
Goymerac, Paul J
Murray, Clinton K
Soderdahl, Douglas W
description Abstract Introduction This study was conducted to identify and understand the current factors affecting recruitment, job satisfaction, and retention of U.S. Army Medical Corps officers and provide historical background to understand if the current factors are dissimilar. Materials and Methods An anonymous, voluntary questionnaire was sent to U.S. Army Medical Corps officers, and responses were tabulated and analyzed. Historical research was conducted and historical analysis applied. Results Recruiting, job satisfaction, and retention among Army Medical Corps Officers have been problematic throughout the 50-year history of the all-volunteer force. Recruiting has largely been of medical students, with very limited numbers of direct accessions. At times, satisfactory overall numbers have camouflaged shortages in key go-to-war specialties. Also, satisfactory numbers in a specialty have sometimes camouflaged problems in depth of experience. Satisfaction has been seen as a problem but apparently only studied informally and/or episodically. Retention has largely been addressed through service obligations, followed by monetary bonuses, although these have to be across the Department of Defense, limiting service flexibility. There has never been consistent, longitudinal sampling of opinion among Medical Corps Officers to allow senior leaders to influence the Department of Defense policy. A recent (2016) study provides substantial data but should be repeated rather than being isolated. Conclusion As the situation in the Department of Defense and Army Medical Department changes, with more focus on go-to-war specialties, the Army needs to better measure opinion among Medical Corps Officers to inform policy. These studies should be conducted regularly to generate reliable information on trends and allow prioritization of effort to areas that hamper recruiting, undermine satisfaction, and prevent retention.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/milmed/usaa094
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2419098203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/milmed/usaa094</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2419098203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-22014b56a847acf2f7eeabc72251094d864fc5d3c405248fcd2c715ef6e610b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctLwzAYAPAgipvTq0cJeFFYu7yatt5GUTeZKM6Bt5KmKXS0TU1aYf-92evixVNI8vseyQfANUY-RjGd1GVVq3zSWyFQzE7AEMcUeRzTr1MwRIhwj6EwGIALa9cIYRZH-BwMKOEI85gPQbvylz6cmnoDX1VeSlHBRJvWwg8lTV92tWq6MXzRGVyKrrSFkF2pmzEUTe5I527d9gHOSttpswt_V8a2yrEfZXcs6Y1xDs6t7ZW9BGeFqKy6OqwjsHp6_Exm3uLteZ5MF56kcdh5hLhms4CLiIVCFqQIlRKZDAkJ3LtZHnFWyCCnkqGAsKiQOZEhDlTBFccoo3QE7vZ5W6O_Xd0urUsrVVWJRunepoThGMURQVt6-4eudW8a151TIY0IZpg55e-VNNpao4q0NWUtzCbFKN3OIt3PIj3MwgXcHNL22fb8yI-f78D9Hui-_S_ZL051lSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473821414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>U.S. Army Medical Corps Recruitment, Job Satisfaction, and Retention: Historical Perspectives and Current Issues</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Marble, W Sanders ; Cox, E Darrin ; Hundertmark, Julie A ; Goymerac, Paul J ; Murray, Clinton K ; Soderdahl, Douglas W</creator><creatorcontrib>Marble, W Sanders ; Cox, E Darrin ; Hundertmark, Julie A ; Goymerac, Paul J ; Murray, Clinton K ; Soderdahl, Douglas W</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction This study was conducted to identify and understand the current factors affecting recruitment, job satisfaction, and retention of U.S. Army Medical Corps officers and provide historical background to understand if the current factors are dissimilar. Materials and Methods An anonymous, voluntary questionnaire was sent to U.S. Army Medical Corps officers, and responses were tabulated and analyzed. Historical research was conducted and historical analysis applied. Results Recruiting, job satisfaction, and retention among Army Medical Corps Officers have been problematic throughout the 50-year history of the all-volunteer force. Recruiting has largely been of medical students, with very limited numbers of direct accessions. At times, satisfactory overall numbers have camouflaged shortages in key go-to-war specialties. Also, satisfactory numbers in a specialty have sometimes camouflaged problems in depth of experience. Satisfaction has been seen as a problem but apparently only studied informally and/or episodically. Retention has largely been addressed through service obligations, followed by monetary bonuses, although these have to be across the Department of Defense, limiting service flexibility. There has never been consistent, longitudinal sampling of opinion among Medical Corps Officers to allow senior leaders to influence the Department of Defense policy. A recent (2016) study provides substantial data but should be repeated rather than being isolated. Conclusion As the situation in the Department of Defense and Army Medical Department changes, with more focus on go-to-war specialties, the Army needs to better measure opinion among Medical Corps Officers to inform policy. These studies should be conducted regularly to generate reliable information on trends and allow prioritization of effort to areas that hamper recruiting, undermine satisfaction, and prevent retention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usaa094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32601696</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Armed forces ; Humans ; Job Satisfaction ; Military Personnel ; Organizations ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2020-09, Vol.185 (9-10), p.e1596-e1602</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2020. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US. 2020</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2020. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-22014b56a847acf2f7eeabc72251094d864fc5d3c405248fcd2c715ef6e610b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-22014b56a847acf2f7eeabc72251094d864fc5d3c405248fcd2c715ef6e610b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32601696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marble, W Sanders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, E Darrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hundertmark, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goymerac, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Clinton K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soderdahl, Douglas W</creatorcontrib><title>U.S. Army Medical Corps Recruitment, Job Satisfaction, and Retention: Historical Perspectives and Current Issues</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction This study was conducted to identify and understand the current factors affecting recruitment, job satisfaction, and retention of U.S. Army Medical Corps officers and provide historical background to understand if the current factors are dissimilar. Materials and Methods An anonymous, voluntary questionnaire was sent to U.S. Army Medical Corps officers, and responses were tabulated and analyzed. Historical research was conducted and historical analysis applied. Results Recruiting, job satisfaction, and retention among Army Medical Corps Officers have been problematic throughout the 50-year history of the all-volunteer force. Recruiting has largely been of medical students, with very limited numbers of direct accessions. At times, satisfactory overall numbers have camouflaged shortages in key go-to-war specialties. Also, satisfactory numbers in a specialty have sometimes camouflaged problems in depth of experience. Satisfaction has been seen as a problem but apparently only studied informally and/or episodically. Retention has largely been addressed through service obligations, followed by monetary bonuses, although these have to be across the Department of Defense, limiting service flexibility. There has never been consistent, longitudinal sampling of opinion among Medical Corps Officers to allow senior leaders to influence the Department of Defense policy. A recent (2016) study provides substantial data but should be repeated rather than being isolated. Conclusion As the situation in the Department of Defense and Army Medical Department changes, with more focus on go-to-war specialties, the Army needs to better measure opinion among Medical Corps Officers to inform policy. These studies should be conducted regularly to generate reliable information on trends and allow prioritization of effort to areas that hamper recruiting, undermine satisfaction, and prevent retention.</description><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0ctLwzAYAPAgipvTq0cJeFFYu7yatt5GUTeZKM6Bt5KmKXS0TU1aYf-92evixVNI8vseyQfANUY-RjGd1GVVq3zSWyFQzE7AEMcUeRzTr1MwRIhwj6EwGIALa9cIYRZH-BwMKOEI85gPQbvylz6cmnoDX1VeSlHBRJvWwg8lTV92tWq6MXzRGVyKrrSFkF2pmzEUTe5I527d9gHOSttpswt_V8a2yrEfZXcs6Y1xDs6t7ZW9BGeFqKy6OqwjsHp6_Exm3uLteZ5MF56kcdh5hLhms4CLiIVCFqQIlRKZDAkJ3LtZHnFWyCCnkqGAsKiQOZEhDlTBFccoo3QE7vZ5W6O_Xd0urUsrVVWJRunepoThGMURQVt6-4eudW8a151TIY0IZpg55e-VNNpao4q0NWUtzCbFKN3OIt3PIj3MwgXcHNL22fb8yI-f78D9Hui-_S_ZL051lSQ</recordid><startdate>20200918</startdate><enddate>20200918</enddate><creator>Marble, W Sanders</creator><creator>Cox, E Darrin</creator><creator>Hundertmark, Julie A</creator><creator>Goymerac, Paul J</creator><creator>Murray, Clinton K</creator><creator>Soderdahl, Douglas W</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200918</creationdate><title>U.S. Army Medical Corps Recruitment, Job Satisfaction, and Retention: Historical Perspectives and Current Issues</title><author>Marble, W Sanders ; Cox, E Darrin ; Hundertmark, Julie A ; Goymerac, Paul J ; Murray, Clinton K ; Soderdahl, Douglas W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-22014b56a847acf2f7eeabc72251094d864fc5d3c405248fcd2c715ef6e610b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marble, W Sanders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, E Darrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hundertmark, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goymerac, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Clinton K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soderdahl, Douglas W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marble, W Sanders</au><au>Cox, E Darrin</au><au>Hundertmark, Julie A</au><au>Goymerac, Paul J</au><au>Murray, Clinton K</au><au>Soderdahl, Douglas W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>U.S. Army Medical Corps Recruitment, Job Satisfaction, and Retention: Historical Perspectives and Current Issues</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2020-09-18</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>185</volume><issue>9-10</issue><spage>e1596</spage><epage>e1602</epage><pages>e1596-e1602</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction This study was conducted to identify and understand the current factors affecting recruitment, job satisfaction, and retention of U.S. Army Medical Corps officers and provide historical background to understand if the current factors are dissimilar. Materials and Methods An anonymous, voluntary questionnaire was sent to U.S. Army Medical Corps officers, and responses were tabulated and analyzed. Historical research was conducted and historical analysis applied. Results Recruiting, job satisfaction, and retention among Army Medical Corps Officers have been problematic throughout the 50-year history of the all-volunteer force. Recruiting has largely been of medical students, with very limited numbers of direct accessions. At times, satisfactory overall numbers have camouflaged shortages in key go-to-war specialties. Also, satisfactory numbers in a specialty have sometimes camouflaged problems in depth of experience. Satisfaction has been seen as a problem but apparently only studied informally and/or episodically. Retention has largely been addressed through service obligations, followed by monetary bonuses, although these have to be across the Department of Defense, limiting service flexibility. There has never been consistent, longitudinal sampling of opinion among Medical Corps Officers to allow senior leaders to influence the Department of Defense policy. A recent (2016) study provides substantial data but should be repeated rather than being isolated. Conclusion As the situation in the Department of Defense and Army Medical Department changes, with more focus on go-to-war specialties, the Army needs to better measure opinion among Medical Corps Officers to inform policy. These studies should be conducted regularly to generate reliable information on trends and allow prioritization of effort to areas that hamper recruiting, undermine satisfaction, and prevent retention.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32601696</pmid><doi>10.1093/milmed/usaa094</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-4075
ispartof Military medicine, 2020-09, Vol.185 (9-10), p.e1596-e1602
issn 0026-4075
1930-613X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2419098203
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Armed forces
Humans
Job Satisfaction
Military Personnel
Organizations
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
title U.S. Army Medical Corps Recruitment, Job Satisfaction, and Retention: Historical Perspectives and Current Issues
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A00%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=U.S.%20Army%20Medical%20Corps%20Recruitment,%20Job%20Satisfaction,%20and%20Retention:%20Historical%20Perspectives%20and%20Current%20Issues&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=Marble,%20W%20Sanders&rft.date=2020-09-18&rft.volume=185&rft.issue=9-10&rft.spage=e1596&rft.epage=e1602&rft.pages=e1596-e1602&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/milmed/usaa094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2419098203%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-22014b56a847acf2f7eeabc72251094d864fc5d3c405248fcd2c715ef6e610b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473821414&rft_id=info:pmid/32601696&rft_oup_id=10.1093/milmed/usaa094&rfr_iscdi=true