Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss

COVID-19 has been prohibitive to traditional audiological services. No- or low-touch audiological assessment outside a sound-booth precludes test batteries including bone conduction audiometry. This study investigated whether conductive hearing loss (CHL) can be differentiated from sensorineural hea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of audiology 2020-10, Vol.59 (10), p.801-808
Main Authors: De Sousa, Karina C, Smits, Cas, Moore, David R, Myburgh, Hermanus Carel, Swanepoel, De Wet
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods
Auditory Threshold
Betacoronavirus
Coronavirus Infections - prevention & control
COVID-19
Diagnosis, Differential
Hearing Loss, Conductive - diagnosis
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis
Humans
Middle Aged
Pandemics - prevention & control
Pneumonia, Viral - prevention & control
Retrospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2
Speech Reception Threshold Test
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:COVID-19 has been prohibitive to traditional audiological services. No- or low-touch audiological assessment outside a sound-booth precludes test batteries including bone conduction audiometry. This study investigated whether conductive hearing loss (CHL) can be differentiated from sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) using pure-tone air conduction audiometry and a digits-in-noise (DIN) test. A retrospective sample was analysed using binomial logistic regressions, which determined the effects of pure tone thresholds or averages, speech recognition threshold (SRT), and age on the likelihood that participants had CHL or bilateral SNHL. Data of 158 adults with bilateral SNHL (  = 122; PTA > 25 dB HL bilaterally) or CHL (  = 36; air conduction PTA  > 25 dB HL and ≥20 dB air bone gap in the affected ears) were included. The model which best discriminated between CHL and bilateral SNHL used low-frequency pure-tone average (PTA), diotic DIN SRT, and age with an area under the ROC curve of 0.98 and sensitivity and specificity of 97.2 and 93.4%, respectively. CHL can be accurately distinguished from SNHL using pure-tone air conduction audiometry and a diotic DIN. Restrictions on traditional audiological assessment due to COVID-19 require lower touch audiological care which reduces infection risk.
ISSN:1499-2027
1708-8186
DOI:10.1080/14992027.2020.1783585