Sexual dysfunction in Egyptian females with systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross sectional study

• Published in: Lupus 2020-08, Vol.29 (9), p.1085-1094
• Main Authors: Dorgham, Dalia, Haggag, Hisham M, Attia, Doaa HS
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Egypt; Female; Females; Health Status Indicators; Humans; Lupus; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - complications; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - physiopathology; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - psychology; Pain perception; Quality of Life; Regression Analysis; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - epidemiology; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - psychology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0961-2033; 1477-0962
• DOI: 10.1177/0961203320935518

Objectives Sexual dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) patients is an important issue to be tackled. We aimed to study the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in SLE women and detect its association with depression, functional disability and quality of life. Methods This study included 94 SLE females. Ninety-eight control females agreed to participate. Patients and controls answered a written form of the Arabic version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Short Form 36 (SF-36). Disease activity and damage were assessed using the SLE Disease Activity Index and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index. Results The frequency of sexual dysfunction was similar in the patients and control groups (77.7% versus 82.7%) while the BDI, HAQ-DI and SF-36 scores were significantly worse in SLE patients. SLE patients with and without sexual dysfunction differed in neither disease characteristics nor disease activity and damage indices. The FSFI showed a strong positive correlation with SF-36, and strong inverse correlations with BDI and HAQ-DI in the patients group while it had a weaker positive correlation with SF-36 and no correlations with the other two indices in the control group. Conclusion No significant difference was found in the prevalence of sexual dysfunction between SLE patients and controls. Sexual dysfunction in SLE patients is mostly related to depression, poor functional status, increased pain, poor health perception and bad quality of life. Neither disease activity nor damage contributes significantly to sexual dysfunction in lupus females.