Loading…
Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis
Immune responses to vaccination are heterogeneous between individuals; the same vaccine that provides protection in one circumstance may be ineffective in another. One factor that could influence the response to vaccination is concurrent or prior infection with unrelated parasites. Here, we review b...
Saved in:
Published in: | Vaccine 2020-07, Vol.38 (35), p.5582-5590 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443 |
container_end_page | 5590 |
container_issue | 35 |
container_start_page | 5582 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Wait, Liana F. Dobson, Andrew P. Graham, Andrea L. |
description | Immune responses to vaccination are heterogeneous between individuals; the same vaccine that provides protection in one circumstance may be ineffective in another. One factor that could influence the response to vaccination is concurrent or prior infection with unrelated parasites. Here, we review both the experimental and epidemiological literature on parasite-vaccine interactions, and present a meta-analysis of the published data. In total, our review returned 101 relevant articles, 50 of which met criteria for meta-analysis. Parasite factors potentially affecting vaccination include the type of parasite involved, the stage of infection, and the timing of infection relative to vaccination. Vaccine factors affecting likelihood of interference by parasites include vaccine formulation, route of administration, and the type of immune response required to provide protection against the target antigen. Our meta-analysis of these data show three key things: (1) parasite infections at the time of vaccination result in worse immunisation outcomes, (2) chronic helminth infections are more likely to negatively impact immunisation than acute helminth infections, and (3) thymus-dependent vaccines are more susceptible to parasite interference than thymus-independent vaccines. Our findings highlight the importance of considering and mitigating parasite infections: by taking parasites into account, it should be possible to more effectively immunise individuals and populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.064 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2420152735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X20308501</els_id><sourcerecordid>2420152735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMoun78BKXgxUvXyWfTk4jfIHpR8BbSdIpZtu2atIr_3qy7evAiDJPAPHkzPIQcUphSoOp0Nn23zvkOpwwYTEGlEhtkQnXBcyap3iQTYErkgsLLDtmNcQYAktNym-xwpqjiTE_Iw2WfLWyw0Q-Y-a5BN_i-i-k6YGgwYPbhh9fMt-3Y-WiXw7PsPAv47vEjs12dtTjY3HZ2_hl93CdbjZ1HPFife-T5-urp4ja_f7y5uzi_z50QMOQolWBlYyl31KZe6qKCsnZKaCmFqLDStlFW0cIpV0iotG6KErVyoFOC4HvkZJW7CP3biHEwrY8O53PbYT9GwwQDKlnBZUKP_6Czfgxp329KCMa45omSK8qFPsaAjVkE39rwaSiYpXAzM2vhZincgEq1XORonT5WLda_r34MJ-BsBWDSkaQFE53HzmHtQ5Jt6t7_88UXsyaTKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424422383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Wait, Liana F. ; Dobson, Andrew P. ; Graham, Andrea L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wait, Liana F. ; Dobson, Andrew P. ; Graham, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><description>Immune responses to vaccination are heterogeneous between individuals; the same vaccine that provides protection in one circumstance may be ineffective in another. One factor that could influence the response to vaccination is concurrent or prior infection with unrelated parasites. Here, we review both the experimental and epidemiological literature on parasite-vaccine interactions, and present a meta-analysis of the published data. In total, our review returned 101 relevant articles, 50 of which met criteria for meta-analysis. Parasite factors potentially affecting vaccination include the type of parasite involved, the stage of infection, and the timing of infection relative to vaccination. Vaccine factors affecting likelihood of interference by parasites include vaccine formulation, route of administration, and the type of immune response required to provide protection against the target antigen. Our meta-analysis of these data show three key things: (1) parasite infections at the time of vaccination result in worse immunisation outcomes, (2) chronic helminth infections are more likely to negatively impact immunisation than acute helminth infections, and (3) thymus-dependent vaccines are more susceptible to parasite interference than thymus-independent vaccines. Our findings highlight the importance of considering and mitigating parasite infections: by taking parasites into account, it should be possible to more effectively immunise individuals and populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.064</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32616328</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antigens ; Bacteria ; Bias ; Confidence intervals ; Datasets ; Epidemiology ; Helminthiasis - epidemiology ; Helminths ; Humans ; Immune response ; Immune system ; Immunization ; Immunology ; Infection ; Infections ; Interaction ; Interference ; Meta-analysis ; Parasites ; Reviews ; Studies ; Thymus ; Thymus gland ; Vaccination ; Vaccine ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2020-07, Vol.38 (35), p.5582-5590</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7665-9336</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32616328$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wait, Liana F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobson, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><title>Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Immune responses to vaccination are heterogeneous between individuals; the same vaccine that provides protection in one circumstance may be ineffective in another. One factor that could influence the response to vaccination is concurrent or prior infection with unrelated parasites. Here, we review both the experimental and epidemiological literature on parasite-vaccine interactions, and present a meta-analysis of the published data. In total, our review returned 101 relevant articles, 50 of which met criteria for meta-analysis. Parasite factors potentially affecting vaccination include the type of parasite involved, the stage of infection, and the timing of infection relative to vaccination. Vaccine factors affecting likelihood of interference by parasites include vaccine formulation, route of administration, and the type of immune response required to provide protection against the target antigen. Our meta-analysis of these data show three key things: (1) parasite infections at the time of vaccination result in worse immunisation outcomes, (2) chronic helminth infections are more likely to negatively impact immunisation than acute helminth infections, and (3) thymus-dependent vaccines are more susceptible to parasite interference than thymus-independent vaccines. Our findings highlight the importance of considering and mitigating parasite infections: by taking parasites into account, it should be possible to more effectively immunise individuals and populations.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Helminthiasis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Helminths</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Thymus</subject><subject>Thymus gland</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMoun78BKXgxUvXyWfTk4jfIHpR8BbSdIpZtu2atIr_3qy7evAiDJPAPHkzPIQcUphSoOp0Nn23zvkOpwwYTEGlEhtkQnXBcyap3iQTYErkgsLLDtmNcQYAktNym-xwpqjiTE_Iw2WfLWyw0Q-Y-a5BN_i-i-k6YGgwYPbhh9fMt-3Y-WiXw7PsPAv47vEjs12dtTjY3HZ2_hl93CdbjZ1HPFife-T5-urp4ja_f7y5uzi_z50QMOQolWBlYyl31KZe6qKCsnZKaCmFqLDStlFW0cIpV0iotG6KErVyoFOC4HvkZJW7CP3biHEwrY8O53PbYT9GwwQDKlnBZUKP_6Czfgxp329KCMa45omSK8qFPsaAjVkE39rwaSiYpXAzM2vhZincgEq1XORonT5WLda_r34MJ-BsBWDSkaQFE53HzmHtQ5Jt6t7_88UXsyaTKA</recordid><startdate>20200731</startdate><enddate>20200731</enddate><creator>Wait, Liana F.</creator><creator>Dobson, Andrew P.</creator><creator>Graham, Andrea L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7665-9336</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200731</creationdate><title>Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis</title><author>Wait, Liana F. ; Dobson, Andrew P. ; Graham, Andrea L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Helminthiasis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Helminths</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Thymus</topic><topic>Thymus gland</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wait, Liana F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobson, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Family Health</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wait, Liana F.</au><au>Dobson, Andrew P.</au><au>Graham, Andrea L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2020-07-31</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>35</issue><spage>5582</spage><epage>5590</epage><pages>5582-5590</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Immune responses to vaccination are heterogeneous between individuals; the same vaccine that provides protection in one circumstance may be ineffective in another. One factor that could influence the response to vaccination is concurrent or prior infection with unrelated parasites. Here, we review both the experimental and epidemiological literature on parasite-vaccine interactions, and present a meta-analysis of the published data. In total, our review returned 101 relevant articles, 50 of which met criteria for meta-analysis. Parasite factors potentially affecting vaccination include the type of parasite involved, the stage of infection, and the timing of infection relative to vaccination. Vaccine factors affecting likelihood of interference by parasites include vaccine formulation, route of administration, and the type of immune response required to provide protection against the target antigen. Our meta-analysis of these data show three key things: (1) parasite infections at the time of vaccination result in worse immunisation outcomes, (2) chronic helminth infections are more likely to negatively impact immunisation than acute helminth infections, and (3) thymus-dependent vaccines are more susceptible to parasite interference than thymus-independent vaccines. Our findings highlight the importance of considering and mitigating parasite infections: by taking parasites into account, it should be possible to more effectively immunise individuals and populations.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32616328</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.064</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7665-9336</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2020-07, Vol.38 (35), p.5582-5590 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2420152735 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Animals Antigens Bacteria Bias Confidence intervals Datasets Epidemiology Helminthiasis - epidemiology Helminths Humans Immune response Immune system Immunization Immunology Infection Infections Interaction Interference Meta-analysis Parasites Reviews Studies Thymus Thymus gland Vaccination Vaccine Vaccines |
title | Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A46%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20parasite%20infections%20interfere%20with%20immunisation?%20A%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Wait,%20Liana%20F.&rft.date=2020-07-31&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=35&rft.spage=5582&rft.epage=5590&rft.pages=5582-5590&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.064&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2420152735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424422383&rft_id=info:pmid/32616328&rfr_iscdi=true |