Loading…

Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis

Immune responses to vaccination are heterogeneous between individuals; the same vaccine that provides protection in one circumstance may be ineffective in another. One factor that could influence the response to vaccination is concurrent or prior infection with unrelated parasites. Here, we review b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vaccine 2020-07, Vol.38 (35), p.5582-5590
Main Authors: Wait, Liana F., Dobson, Andrew P., Graham, Andrea L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443
container_end_page 5590
container_issue 35
container_start_page 5582
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 38
creator Wait, Liana F.
Dobson, Andrew P.
Graham, Andrea L.
description Immune responses to vaccination are heterogeneous between individuals; the same vaccine that provides protection in one circumstance may be ineffective in another. One factor that could influence the response to vaccination is concurrent or prior infection with unrelated parasites. Here, we review both the experimental and epidemiological literature on parasite-vaccine interactions, and present a meta-analysis of the published data. In total, our review returned 101 relevant articles, 50 of which met criteria for meta-analysis. Parasite factors potentially affecting vaccination include the type of parasite involved, the stage of infection, and the timing of infection relative to vaccination. Vaccine factors affecting likelihood of interference by parasites include vaccine formulation, route of administration, and the type of immune response required to provide protection against the target antigen. Our meta-analysis of these data show three key things: (1) parasite infections at the time of vaccination result in worse immunisation outcomes, (2) chronic helminth infections are more likely to negatively impact immunisation than acute helminth infections, and (3) thymus-dependent vaccines are more susceptible to parasite interference than thymus-independent vaccines. Our findings highlight the importance of considering and mitigating parasite infections: by taking parasites into account, it should be possible to more effectively immunise individuals and populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.064
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2420152735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X20308501</els_id><sourcerecordid>2420152735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMoun78BKXgxUvXyWfTk4jfIHpR8BbSdIpZtu2atIr_3qy7evAiDJPAPHkzPIQcUphSoOp0Nn23zvkOpwwYTEGlEhtkQnXBcyap3iQTYErkgsLLDtmNcQYAktNym-xwpqjiTE_Iw2WfLWyw0Q-Y-a5BN_i-i-k6YGgwYPbhh9fMt-3Y-WiXw7PsPAv47vEjs12dtTjY3HZ2_hl93CdbjZ1HPFife-T5-urp4ja_f7y5uzi_z50QMOQolWBlYyl31KZe6qKCsnZKaCmFqLDStlFW0cIpV0iotG6KErVyoFOC4HvkZJW7CP3biHEwrY8O53PbYT9GwwQDKlnBZUKP_6Czfgxp329KCMa45omSK8qFPsaAjVkE39rwaSiYpXAzM2vhZincgEq1XORonT5WLda_r34MJ-BsBWDSkaQFE53HzmHtQ5Jt6t7_88UXsyaTKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424422383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Wait, Liana F. ; Dobson, Andrew P. ; Graham, Andrea L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wait, Liana F. ; Dobson, Andrew P. ; Graham, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><description>Immune responses to vaccination are heterogeneous between individuals; the same vaccine that provides protection in one circumstance may be ineffective in another. One factor that could influence the response to vaccination is concurrent or prior infection with unrelated parasites. Here, we review both the experimental and epidemiological literature on parasite-vaccine interactions, and present a meta-analysis of the published data. In total, our review returned 101 relevant articles, 50 of which met criteria for meta-analysis. Parasite factors potentially affecting vaccination include the type of parasite involved, the stage of infection, and the timing of infection relative to vaccination. Vaccine factors affecting likelihood of interference by parasites include vaccine formulation, route of administration, and the type of immune response required to provide protection against the target antigen. Our meta-analysis of these data show three key things: (1) parasite infections at the time of vaccination result in worse immunisation outcomes, (2) chronic helminth infections are more likely to negatively impact immunisation than acute helminth infections, and (3) thymus-dependent vaccines are more susceptible to parasite interference than thymus-independent vaccines. Our findings highlight the importance of considering and mitigating parasite infections: by taking parasites into account, it should be possible to more effectively immunise individuals and populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.064</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32616328</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antigens ; Bacteria ; Bias ; Confidence intervals ; Datasets ; Epidemiology ; Helminthiasis - epidemiology ; Helminths ; Humans ; Immune response ; Immune system ; Immunization ; Immunology ; Infection ; Infections ; Interaction ; Interference ; Meta-analysis ; Parasites ; Reviews ; Studies ; Thymus ; Thymus gland ; Vaccination ; Vaccine ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2020-07, Vol.38 (35), p.5582-5590</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7665-9336</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32616328$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wait, Liana F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobson, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><title>Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Immune responses to vaccination are heterogeneous between individuals; the same vaccine that provides protection in one circumstance may be ineffective in another. One factor that could influence the response to vaccination is concurrent or prior infection with unrelated parasites. Here, we review both the experimental and epidemiological literature on parasite-vaccine interactions, and present a meta-analysis of the published data. In total, our review returned 101 relevant articles, 50 of which met criteria for meta-analysis. Parasite factors potentially affecting vaccination include the type of parasite involved, the stage of infection, and the timing of infection relative to vaccination. Vaccine factors affecting likelihood of interference by parasites include vaccine formulation, route of administration, and the type of immune response required to provide protection against the target antigen. Our meta-analysis of these data show three key things: (1) parasite infections at the time of vaccination result in worse immunisation outcomes, (2) chronic helminth infections are more likely to negatively impact immunisation than acute helminth infections, and (3) thymus-dependent vaccines are more susceptible to parasite interference than thymus-independent vaccines. Our findings highlight the importance of considering and mitigating parasite infections: by taking parasites into account, it should be possible to more effectively immunise individuals and populations.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Helminthiasis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Helminths</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Thymus</subject><subject>Thymus gland</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMoun78BKXgxUvXyWfTk4jfIHpR8BbSdIpZtu2atIr_3qy7evAiDJPAPHkzPIQcUphSoOp0Nn23zvkOpwwYTEGlEhtkQnXBcyap3iQTYErkgsLLDtmNcQYAktNym-xwpqjiTE_Iw2WfLWyw0Q-Y-a5BN_i-i-k6YGgwYPbhh9fMt-3Y-WiXw7PsPAv47vEjs12dtTjY3HZ2_hl93CdbjZ1HPFife-T5-urp4ja_f7y5uzi_z50QMOQolWBlYyl31KZe6qKCsnZKaCmFqLDStlFW0cIpV0iotG6KErVyoFOC4HvkZJW7CP3biHEwrY8O53PbYT9GwwQDKlnBZUKP_6Czfgxp329KCMa45omSK8qFPsaAjVkE39rwaSiYpXAzM2vhZincgEq1XORonT5WLda_r34MJ-BsBWDSkaQFE53HzmHtQ5Jt6t7_88UXsyaTKA</recordid><startdate>20200731</startdate><enddate>20200731</enddate><creator>Wait, Liana F.</creator><creator>Dobson, Andrew P.</creator><creator>Graham, Andrea L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7665-9336</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200731</creationdate><title>Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis</title><author>Wait, Liana F. ; Dobson, Andrew P. ; Graham, Andrea L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Helminthiasis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Helminths</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Thymus</topic><topic>Thymus gland</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wait, Liana F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobson, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Family Health</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wait, Liana F.</au><au>Dobson, Andrew P.</au><au>Graham, Andrea L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2020-07-31</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>35</issue><spage>5582</spage><epage>5590</epage><pages>5582-5590</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Immune responses to vaccination are heterogeneous between individuals; the same vaccine that provides protection in one circumstance may be ineffective in another. One factor that could influence the response to vaccination is concurrent or prior infection with unrelated parasites. Here, we review both the experimental and epidemiological literature on parasite-vaccine interactions, and present a meta-analysis of the published data. In total, our review returned 101 relevant articles, 50 of which met criteria for meta-analysis. Parasite factors potentially affecting vaccination include the type of parasite involved, the stage of infection, and the timing of infection relative to vaccination. Vaccine factors affecting likelihood of interference by parasites include vaccine formulation, route of administration, and the type of immune response required to provide protection against the target antigen. Our meta-analysis of these data show three key things: (1) parasite infections at the time of vaccination result in worse immunisation outcomes, (2) chronic helminth infections are more likely to negatively impact immunisation than acute helminth infections, and (3) thymus-dependent vaccines are more susceptible to parasite interference than thymus-independent vaccines. Our findings highlight the importance of considering and mitigating parasite infections: by taking parasites into account, it should be possible to more effectively immunise individuals and populations.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32616328</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.064</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7665-9336</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2020-07, Vol.38 (35), p.5582-5590
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2420152735
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Animals
Antigens
Bacteria
Bias
Confidence intervals
Datasets
Epidemiology
Helminthiasis - epidemiology
Helminths
Humans
Immune response
Immune system
Immunization
Immunology
Infection
Infections
Interaction
Interference
Meta-analysis
Parasites
Reviews
Studies
Thymus
Thymus gland
Vaccination
Vaccine
Vaccines
title Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A46%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20parasite%20infections%20interfere%20with%20immunisation?%20A%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Wait,%20Liana%20F.&rft.date=2020-07-31&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=35&rft.spage=5582&rft.epage=5590&rft.pages=5582-5590&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.064&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2420152735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e56429fa13c1aa13987b09dc6485544beb8af6a617c6c750b88f79e86c08c4443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424422383&rft_id=info:pmid/32616328&rfr_iscdi=true