A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of ginseng in reducing fatigue in patients treated for head and neck cancer

• Published in: Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2020-10, Vol.146 (10), p.2479-2487
• Main Authors: Guglielmo, Mauro, Di Pede, Patricia, Alfieri, Salvatore, Bergamini, Cristiana, Platini, Francesca, Ripamonti, Carla Ida, Orlandi, Ester, Iacovelli, Nicola Alessandro, Licitra, Lisa, Maddalo, Marta, Bossi, Paolo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Cancer Research; Cancer therapies; Double-blind studies; Fatigue; Fatigue - diagnosis; Fatigue - drug therapy; Fatigue - etiology; Female; Ginseng; Head & neck cancer; Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology; Head and Neck Neoplasms - therapy; Hematology; Humans; Internal Medicine; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Oncology; Original Article – Cancer Research; Panax; Phytotherapy - methods
• ISSN: 0171-5216; 1432-1335; 1432-1335
• DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03300-z

Purpose Fatigue is a distressing symptom in head & neck cancer patients before during and at the end of curative therapy. Pharmacologic and not pharmacologic treatments have been proposed with scarce or no evidence of efficacy. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of American ginseng in respect to placebo in reducing fatigue in patients treated for head and neck cancer with curative intent. Methods Thirty-two patients who had completed oncological treatment for a primary Head & neck tumor for at least 1 year and had a global fatigue score > 4 by means of Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) were randomized to receive 1000 mg of American ginseng or placebo per day for 8 weeks with the aim to assess their efficacy. Changes in fatigue scores in the 2 subgroups of patients before and after the treatment with American ginseng or placebo, were assessed by the BFI at baseline and at the end of week 8. Results The mean of the mean values of the BFI measured at 8 weeks (end of treatment) was 4.6 in the Ginseng arm and 3.4 in the Placebo arm ( p  = ns). Mean comparison showed a tendency to statistical significance only for the single item on interference with general activity ( p  = 0.06), with better performance for placebo. The mean of the differences between baseline values and 8 weeks values was not significantly different between treatment arms considering the entire questionnaire. Conclusion The present data shows that American ginseng has insufficient evidence to be recommended for Cancer Related Fatigue (CRF) in post treatment HNC survivors.