Loading…
Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective
Empirical studies have suggested that language-capable robots have the persuasive power to shape the shared moral norms based on how they respond to human norm violations. This persuasive power presents cause for concern, but also the opportunity to persuade humans to cultivate their own moral devel...
Saved in:
Published in: | Science and engineering ethics 2020-10, Vol.26 (5), p.2511-2526 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193 |
container_end_page | 2526 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2511 |
container_title | Science and engineering ethics |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Zhu, Qin Williams, Tom Jackson, Blake Wen, Ruchen |
description | Empirical studies have suggested that language-capable robots have the persuasive power to shape the shared moral norms based on how they respond to human norm violations. This persuasive power presents cause for concern, but also the opportunity to persuade humans to cultivate their own moral development. We argue that a truly socially integrated and morally competent robot must be willing to communicate its objection to humans’ proposed violations of shared norms by using strategies such as blame-laden rebukes, even if doing so may violate other standing norms, such as politeness. By drawing on Confucian ethics, we argue that a robot’s ability to employ blame-laden moral rebukes to respond to unethical human requests is crucial for cultivating a flourishing “moral ecology” of human–robot interaction. Such positive moral ecology allows human teammates to develop their own moral reflection skills and grow their own virtues. Furthermore, this ability can and should be considered as one criterion for assessing artificial moral agency. Finally, this paper discusses potential implications of the Confucian theories for designing socially integrated and morally competent robots. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11948-020-00246-w |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2421107901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2421107901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlKxTAUhoMozi_gQgpu3ETPSZMO7vTiBFcU0Y2bkOaearXDNWkV395oHcCFq4ST7_9P-BjbQthDgHTfI-Yy4yCAAwiZ8NcFtooyRa6UTBbDPVYxj6USK2zN-8cAqUwmy2wlFkks0ixZZXdHtWmIT82M2uiic6aOrqkYnshHpp1F_QON0_otmnTNnHpq--i6K7r-IDoMo7YcbGXa6Lh_qGwIX5Hzc7J99UIbbKk0tafNr3Od3Z4c30zO-PTy9HxyOOVWYtbzzEIWqxkoApvbgnJCIUuRFGBFhkUiAFNFJmCYlgpyU6Q5lMYUKLFMMI_X2e7YO3fd80C-103lLdW1aakbvBZSIEIIYUB3_qCP3eDa8DstgjMFoDANlBgp6zrvHZV67qrGuDeNoD_M69G8Dub1p3n9GkLbX9VD0dDsJ_KtOgDxCPjw1N6T-939T-07-puNHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2554500517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective</title><source>Springer Link</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>Zhu, Qin ; Williams, Tom ; Jackson, Blake ; Wen, Ruchen</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qin ; Williams, Tom ; Jackson, Blake ; Wen, Ruchen</creatorcontrib><description>Empirical studies have suggested that language-capable robots have the persuasive power to shape the shared moral norms based on how they respond to human norm violations. This persuasive power presents cause for concern, but also the opportunity to persuade humans to cultivate their own moral development. We argue that a truly socially integrated and morally competent robot must be willing to communicate its objection to humans’ proposed violations of shared norms by using strategies such as blame-laden rebukes, even if doing so may violate other standing norms, such as politeness. By drawing on Confucian ethics, we argue that a robot’s ability to employ blame-laden moral rebukes to respond to unethical human requests is crucial for cultivating a flourishing “moral ecology” of human–robot interaction. Such positive moral ecology allows human teammates to develop their own moral reflection skills and grow their own virtues. Furthermore, this ability can and should be considered as one criterion for assessing artificial moral agency. Finally, this paper discusses potential implications of the Confucian theories for designing socially integrated and morally competent robots.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-3452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5546</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00246-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32632786</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bioethics ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Brain-Based and Artificial Intelligence: Socio-ethical Conversations in Computing and Neurotechnology ; Ecology ; Education ; Engineering ; Ethical standards ; Ethics ; Medicine/Public Health ; Norms ; Original Research/Scholarship ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Science ; Robots ; Social integration</subject><ispartof>Science and engineering ethics, 2020-10, Vol.26 (5), p.2511-2526</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12127,27901,27902,33826</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632786$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Ruchen</creatorcontrib><title>Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective</title><title>Science and engineering ethics</title><addtitle>Sci Eng Ethics</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Eng Ethics</addtitle><description>Empirical studies have suggested that language-capable robots have the persuasive power to shape the shared moral norms based on how they respond to human norm violations. This persuasive power presents cause for concern, but also the opportunity to persuade humans to cultivate their own moral development. We argue that a truly socially integrated and morally competent robot must be willing to communicate its objection to humans’ proposed violations of shared norms by using strategies such as blame-laden rebukes, even if doing so may violate other standing norms, such as politeness. By drawing on Confucian ethics, we argue that a robot’s ability to employ blame-laden moral rebukes to respond to unethical human requests is crucial for cultivating a flourishing “moral ecology” of human–robot interaction. Such positive moral ecology allows human teammates to develop their own moral reflection skills and grow their own virtues. Furthermore, this ability can and should be considered as one criterion for assessing artificial moral agency. Finally, this paper discusses potential implications of the Confucian theories for designing socially integrated and morally competent robots.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Brain-Based and Artificial Intelligence: Socio-ethical Conversations in Computing and Neurotechnology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Ethical standards</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Medicine/Public Health</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Original Research/Scholarship</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Social integration</subject><issn>1353-3452</issn><issn>1471-5546</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlKxTAUhoMozi_gQgpu3ETPSZMO7vTiBFcU0Y2bkOaearXDNWkV395oHcCFq4ST7_9P-BjbQthDgHTfI-Yy4yCAAwiZ8NcFtooyRa6UTBbDPVYxj6USK2zN-8cAqUwmy2wlFkks0ixZZXdHtWmIT82M2uiic6aOrqkYnshHpp1F_QON0_otmnTNnHpq--i6K7r-IDoMo7YcbGXa6Lh_qGwIX5Hzc7J99UIbbKk0tafNr3Od3Z4c30zO-PTy9HxyOOVWYtbzzEIWqxkoApvbgnJCIUuRFGBFhkUiAFNFJmCYlgpyU6Q5lMYUKLFMMI_X2e7YO3fd80C-103lLdW1aakbvBZSIEIIYUB3_qCP3eDa8DstgjMFoDANlBgp6zrvHZV67qrGuDeNoD_M69G8Dub1p3n9GkLbX9VD0dDsJ_KtOgDxCPjw1N6T-939T-07-puNHg</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Zhu, Qin</creator><creator>Williams, Tom</creator><creator>Jackson, Blake</creator><creator>Wen, Ruchen</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective</title><author>Zhu, Qin ; Williams, Tom ; Jackson, Blake ; Wen, Ruchen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Brain-Based and Artificial Intelligence: Socio-ethical Conversations in Computing and Neurotechnology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Ethical standards</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Medicine/Public Health</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Original Research/Scholarship</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Social integration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Ruchen</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Science and engineering ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Qin</au><au>Williams, Tom</au><au>Jackson, Blake</au><au>Wen, Ruchen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Science and engineering ethics</jtitle><stitle>Sci Eng Ethics</stitle><addtitle>Sci Eng Ethics</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2511</spage><epage>2526</epage><pages>2511-2526</pages><issn>1353-3452</issn><eissn>1471-5546</eissn><abstract>Empirical studies have suggested that language-capable robots have the persuasive power to shape the shared moral norms based on how they respond to human norm violations. This persuasive power presents cause for concern, but also the opportunity to persuade humans to cultivate their own moral development. We argue that a truly socially integrated and morally competent robot must be willing to communicate its objection to humans’ proposed violations of shared norms by using strategies such as blame-laden rebukes, even if doing so may violate other standing norms, such as politeness. By drawing on Confucian ethics, we argue that a robot’s ability to employ blame-laden moral rebukes to respond to unethical human requests is crucial for cultivating a flourishing “moral ecology” of human–robot interaction. Such positive moral ecology allows human teammates to develop their own moral reflection skills and grow their own virtues. Furthermore, this ability can and should be considered as one criterion for assessing artificial moral agency. Finally, this paper discusses potential implications of the Confucian theories for designing socially integrated and morally competent robots.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>32632786</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11948-020-00246-w</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1353-3452 |
ispartof | Science and engineering ethics, 2020-10, Vol.26 (5), p.2511-2526 |
issn | 1353-3452 1471-5546 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2421107901 |
source | Springer Link; Humanities Index |
subjects | Bioethics Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Brain-Based and Artificial Intelligence: Socio-ethical Conversations in Computing and Neurotechnology Ecology Education Engineering Ethical standards Ethics Medicine/Public Health Norms Original Research/Scholarship Philosophy Philosophy of Science Robots Social integration |
title | Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A38%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blame-Laden%20Moral%20Rebukes%20and%20the%20Morally%20Competent%20Robot:%20A%20Confucian%20Ethical%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Science%20and%20engineering%20ethics&rft.au=Zhu,%20Qin&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2511&rft.epage=2526&rft.pages=2511-2526&rft.issn=1353-3452&rft.eissn=1471-5546&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11948-020-00246-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2421107901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2554500517&rft_id=info:pmid/32632786&rfr_iscdi=true |