Loading…

Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective

Empirical studies have suggested that language-capable robots have the persuasive power to shape the shared moral norms based on how they respond to human norm violations. This persuasive power presents cause for concern, but also the opportunity to persuade humans to cultivate their own moral devel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science and engineering ethics 2020-10, Vol.26 (5), p.2511-2526
Main Authors: Zhu, Qin, Williams, Tom, Jackson, Blake, Wen, Ruchen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193
container_end_page 2526
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2511
container_title Science and engineering ethics
container_volume 26
creator Zhu, Qin
Williams, Tom
Jackson, Blake
Wen, Ruchen
description Empirical studies have suggested that language-capable robots have the persuasive power to shape the shared moral norms based on how they respond to human norm violations. This persuasive power presents cause for concern, but also the opportunity to persuade humans to cultivate their own moral development. We argue that a truly socially integrated and morally competent robot must be willing to communicate its objection to humans’ proposed violations of shared norms by using strategies such as blame-laden rebukes, even if doing so may violate other standing norms, such as politeness. By drawing on Confucian ethics, we argue that a robot’s ability to employ blame-laden moral rebukes to respond to unethical human requests is crucial for cultivating a flourishing “moral ecology” of human–robot interaction. Such positive moral ecology allows human teammates to develop their own moral reflection skills and grow their own virtues. Furthermore, this ability can and should be considered as one criterion for assessing artificial moral agency. Finally, this paper discusses potential implications of the Confucian theories for designing socially integrated and morally competent robots.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11948-020-00246-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2421107901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2421107901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlKxTAUhoMozi_gQgpu3ETPSZMO7vTiBFcU0Y2bkOaearXDNWkV395oHcCFq4ST7_9P-BjbQthDgHTfI-Yy4yCAAwiZ8NcFtooyRa6UTBbDPVYxj6USK2zN-8cAqUwmy2wlFkks0ixZZXdHtWmIT82M2uiic6aOrqkYnshHpp1F_QON0_otmnTNnHpq--i6K7r-IDoMo7YcbGXa6Lh_qGwIX5Hzc7J99UIbbKk0tafNr3Od3Z4c30zO-PTy9HxyOOVWYtbzzEIWqxkoApvbgnJCIUuRFGBFhkUiAFNFJmCYlgpyU6Q5lMYUKLFMMI_X2e7YO3fd80C-103lLdW1aakbvBZSIEIIYUB3_qCP3eDa8DstgjMFoDANlBgp6zrvHZV67qrGuDeNoD_M69G8Dub1p3n9GkLbX9VD0dDsJ_KtOgDxCPjw1N6T-939T-07-puNHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2554500517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective</title><source>Springer Link</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>Zhu, Qin ; Williams, Tom ; Jackson, Blake ; Wen, Ruchen</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qin ; Williams, Tom ; Jackson, Blake ; Wen, Ruchen</creatorcontrib><description>Empirical studies have suggested that language-capable robots have the persuasive power to shape the shared moral norms based on how they respond to human norm violations. This persuasive power presents cause for concern, but also the opportunity to persuade humans to cultivate their own moral development. We argue that a truly socially integrated and morally competent robot must be willing to communicate its objection to humans’ proposed violations of shared norms by using strategies such as blame-laden rebukes, even if doing so may violate other standing norms, such as politeness. By drawing on Confucian ethics, we argue that a robot’s ability to employ blame-laden moral rebukes to respond to unethical human requests is crucial for cultivating a flourishing “moral ecology” of human–robot interaction. Such positive moral ecology allows human teammates to develop their own moral reflection skills and grow their own virtues. Furthermore, this ability can and should be considered as one criterion for assessing artificial moral agency. Finally, this paper discusses potential implications of the Confucian theories for designing socially integrated and morally competent robots.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-3452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5546</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00246-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32632786</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bioethics ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Brain-Based and Artificial Intelligence: Socio-ethical Conversations in Computing and Neurotechnology ; Ecology ; Education ; Engineering ; Ethical standards ; Ethics ; Medicine/Public Health ; Norms ; Original Research/Scholarship ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Science ; Robots ; Social integration</subject><ispartof>Science and engineering ethics, 2020-10, Vol.26 (5), p.2511-2526</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12127,27901,27902,33826</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632786$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Ruchen</creatorcontrib><title>Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective</title><title>Science and engineering ethics</title><addtitle>Sci Eng Ethics</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Eng Ethics</addtitle><description>Empirical studies have suggested that language-capable robots have the persuasive power to shape the shared moral norms based on how they respond to human norm violations. This persuasive power presents cause for concern, but also the opportunity to persuade humans to cultivate their own moral development. We argue that a truly socially integrated and morally competent robot must be willing to communicate its objection to humans’ proposed violations of shared norms by using strategies such as blame-laden rebukes, even if doing so may violate other standing norms, such as politeness. By drawing on Confucian ethics, we argue that a robot’s ability to employ blame-laden moral rebukes to respond to unethical human requests is crucial for cultivating a flourishing “moral ecology” of human–robot interaction. Such positive moral ecology allows human teammates to develop their own moral reflection skills and grow their own virtues. Furthermore, this ability can and should be considered as one criterion for assessing artificial moral agency. Finally, this paper discusses potential implications of the Confucian theories for designing socially integrated and morally competent robots.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Brain-Based and Artificial Intelligence: Socio-ethical Conversations in Computing and Neurotechnology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Ethical standards</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Medicine/Public Health</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Original Research/Scholarship</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Social integration</subject><issn>1353-3452</issn><issn>1471-5546</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlKxTAUhoMozi_gQgpu3ETPSZMO7vTiBFcU0Y2bkOaearXDNWkV395oHcCFq4ST7_9P-BjbQthDgHTfI-Yy4yCAAwiZ8NcFtooyRa6UTBbDPVYxj6USK2zN-8cAqUwmy2wlFkks0ixZZXdHtWmIT82M2uiic6aOrqkYnshHpp1F_QON0_otmnTNnHpq--i6K7r-IDoMo7YcbGXa6Lh_qGwIX5Hzc7J99UIbbKk0tafNr3Od3Z4c30zO-PTy9HxyOOVWYtbzzEIWqxkoApvbgnJCIUuRFGBFhkUiAFNFJmCYlgpyU6Q5lMYUKLFMMI_X2e7YO3fd80C-103lLdW1aakbvBZSIEIIYUB3_qCP3eDa8DstgjMFoDANlBgp6zrvHZV67qrGuDeNoD_M69G8Dub1p3n9GkLbX9VD0dDsJ_KtOgDxCPjw1N6T-939T-07-puNHg</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Zhu, Qin</creator><creator>Williams, Tom</creator><creator>Jackson, Blake</creator><creator>Wen, Ruchen</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective</title><author>Zhu, Qin ; Williams, Tom ; Jackson, Blake ; Wen, Ruchen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Brain-Based and Artificial Intelligence: Socio-ethical Conversations in Computing and Neurotechnology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Ethical standards</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Medicine/Public Health</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Original Research/Scholarship</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Social integration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Ruchen</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Science and engineering ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Qin</au><au>Williams, Tom</au><au>Jackson, Blake</au><au>Wen, Ruchen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Science and engineering ethics</jtitle><stitle>Sci Eng Ethics</stitle><addtitle>Sci Eng Ethics</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2511</spage><epage>2526</epage><pages>2511-2526</pages><issn>1353-3452</issn><eissn>1471-5546</eissn><abstract>Empirical studies have suggested that language-capable robots have the persuasive power to shape the shared moral norms based on how they respond to human norm violations. This persuasive power presents cause for concern, but also the opportunity to persuade humans to cultivate their own moral development. We argue that a truly socially integrated and morally competent robot must be willing to communicate its objection to humans’ proposed violations of shared norms by using strategies such as blame-laden rebukes, even if doing so may violate other standing norms, such as politeness. By drawing on Confucian ethics, we argue that a robot’s ability to employ blame-laden moral rebukes to respond to unethical human requests is crucial for cultivating a flourishing “moral ecology” of human–robot interaction. Such positive moral ecology allows human teammates to develop their own moral reflection skills and grow their own virtues. Furthermore, this ability can and should be considered as one criterion for assessing artificial moral agency. Finally, this paper discusses potential implications of the Confucian theories for designing socially integrated and morally competent robots.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>32632786</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11948-020-00246-w</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1353-3452
ispartof Science and engineering ethics, 2020-10, Vol.26 (5), p.2511-2526
issn 1353-3452
1471-5546
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2421107901
source Springer Link; Humanities Index
subjects Bioethics
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Brain-Based and Artificial Intelligence: Socio-ethical Conversations in Computing and Neurotechnology
Ecology
Education
Engineering
Ethical standards
Ethics
Medicine/Public Health
Norms
Original Research/Scholarship
Philosophy
Philosophy of Science
Robots
Social integration
title Blame-Laden Moral Rebukes and the Morally Competent Robot: A Confucian Ethical Perspective
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A38%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blame-Laden%20Moral%20Rebukes%20and%20the%20Morally%20Competent%20Robot:%20A%20Confucian%20Ethical%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Science%20and%20engineering%20ethics&rft.au=Zhu,%20Qin&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2511&rft.epage=2526&rft.pages=2511-2526&rft.issn=1353-3452&rft.eissn=1471-5546&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11948-020-00246-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2421107901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8c0835d05e0c9cbe9e124f26b0c281b620175ea8c017f509ab790faab141f6193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2554500517&rft_id=info:pmid/32632786&rfr_iscdi=true