Loading…

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in very elderly patients: short-and long-term outcomes

Purpose It remains unclear whether laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer is a suitable treatment for very elderly (VE) patients. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of LG for gastric cancer in VE patients. Methods We reviewed 226 consecutive patients who underwent LG between Jan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2021-02, Vol.51 (2), p.219-225
Main Authors: Mikami, Ryuichi, Tanaka, Eiji, Murakami, Teppei, Ishida, Satoshi, Matsui, Yugo, Horita, Kenta, Yamada, Masaki, Nitta, Takashi, Mise, Masahiro, Harada, Takehisa, Takeo, Masahiko, Arii, Shigeki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-210cfe658575f3f937d5c5e2c7899a162e2cbdd1b78cd6616e3e6f2ba52abdaa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-210cfe658575f3f937d5c5e2c7899a162e2cbdd1b78cd6616e3e6f2ba52abdaa3
container_end_page 225
container_issue 2
container_start_page 219
container_title Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)
container_volume 51
creator Mikami, Ryuichi
Tanaka, Eiji
Murakami, Teppei
Ishida, Satoshi
Matsui, Yugo
Horita, Kenta
Yamada, Masaki
Nitta, Takashi
Mise, Masahiro
Harada, Takehisa
Takeo, Masahiko
Arii, Shigeki
description Purpose It remains unclear whether laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer is a suitable treatment for very elderly (VE) patients. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of LG for gastric cancer in VE patients. Methods We reviewed 226 consecutive patients who underwent LG between January 2010 and December 2016. We compared VE patients (age ≥ 80, n  = 38) with non-elderly patients (age ≤ 79, n  = 188). Results An ASA-PS score ≥ 2 was more common in VE group (86.8 vs. 48.9%; P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00595-020-02078-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2425000588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2425000588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-210cfe658575f3f937d5c5e2c7899a162e2cbdd1b78cd6616e3e6f2ba52abdaa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtO3TAQhi1UBAfaF2BRecnGrS-x47BDCCgSUjd0bTnO-BCUxKntVMqOR68PoSy7GM3tn1-aD6ELRr8xSuvviVLZSEI5PUStSXWEdqwSinDNxCe0o03FCOMNO0VnKb1QyitN6Qk6FVzVSldqh16fngEn6yGv2E4d9mBT3_ZDX_rg8WBnG0NyYe4d3tuUI7gcxhX7ELe-zJ2dHETcT_gPxBXD0EEcVjzb3MOU0xVOzyFmcrAfwrQnGeKIw5JdGCF9RsfeDgm-vOdz9Ovu9unmB3n8ef9wc_1InKhZJpxR50FJLWvphW9E3UkngbtaN41lipey7TrW1tp1SjEFApTnrZXctp214hxdbr5zDL8XSNmMfXIwDHaCsCTDKy5pAap1kfJN6srrKYI3c-xHG1fDqDmQNxt5U6ibN_KmKkdf3_2XdoTu4-Qf6iIQmyCV1bSHaF7CEqfy8_9s_wJ105HF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425000588</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in very elderly patients: short-and long-term outcomes</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Mikami, Ryuichi ; Tanaka, Eiji ; Murakami, Teppei ; Ishida, Satoshi ; Matsui, Yugo ; Horita, Kenta ; Yamada, Masaki ; Nitta, Takashi ; Mise, Masahiro ; Harada, Takehisa ; Takeo, Masahiko ; Arii, Shigeki</creator><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Ryuichi ; Tanaka, Eiji ; Murakami, Teppei ; Ishida, Satoshi ; Matsui, Yugo ; Horita, Kenta ; Yamada, Masaki ; Nitta, Takashi ; Mise, Masahiro ; Harada, Takehisa ; Takeo, Masahiko ; Arii, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose It remains unclear whether laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer is a suitable treatment for very elderly (VE) patients. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of LG for gastric cancer in VE patients. Methods We reviewed 226 consecutive patients who underwent LG between January 2010 and December 2016. We compared VE patients (age ≥ 80, n  = 38) with non-elderly patients (age ≤ 79, n  = 188). Results An ASA-PS score ≥ 2 was more common in VE group (86.8 vs. 48.9%; P  &lt; 0.01). There were no significant differences in the operating time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or postoperative morbidity between the groups. The 3-year survival rate and 3-year disease-specific survival rate were lower in the VE group (53.7 vs. 85.6%; P  &lt; 0.0001, 78.5 vs. 92.4%; P  = 0.0116). A univariate analysis showed that PS scores ≥ 2, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and pN stage were independent predictors of decreased overall survival rates in the VE group. A multivariate analysis showed total gastrectomy, a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and the pN stage to be independent predictors in the VE group. Conclusion LG for gastric cancer is, thus, considered to be safe for patients aged 80 years or older. Total gastrectomy, a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and the pN stage were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis in these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-1291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-2813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02078-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32676846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Article ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan), 2021-02, Vol.51 (2), p.219-225</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-210cfe658575f3f937d5c5e2c7899a162e2cbdd1b78cd6616e3e6f2ba52abdaa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-210cfe658575f3f937d5c5e2c7899a162e2cbdd1b78cd6616e3e6f2ba52abdaa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0430-4939</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Ryuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Eiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Teppei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishida, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsui, Yugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horita, Kenta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitta, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mise, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Takehisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeo, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arii, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><title>The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in very elderly patients: short-and long-term outcomes</title><title>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</title><addtitle>Surg Today</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Today</addtitle><description>Purpose It remains unclear whether laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer is a suitable treatment for very elderly (VE) patients. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of LG for gastric cancer in VE patients. Methods We reviewed 226 consecutive patients who underwent LG between January 2010 and December 2016. We compared VE patients (age ≥ 80, n  = 38) with non-elderly patients (age ≤ 79, n  = 188). Results An ASA-PS score ≥ 2 was more common in VE group (86.8 vs. 48.9%; P  &lt; 0.01). There were no significant differences in the operating time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or postoperative morbidity between the groups. The 3-year survival rate and 3-year disease-specific survival rate were lower in the VE group (53.7 vs. 85.6%; P  &lt; 0.0001, 78.5 vs. 92.4%; P  = 0.0116). A univariate analysis showed that PS scores ≥ 2, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and pN stage were independent predictors of decreased overall survival rates in the VE group. A multivariate analysis showed total gastrectomy, a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and the pN stage to be independent predictors in the VE group. Conclusion LG for gastric cancer is, thus, considered to be safe for patients aged 80 years or older. Total gastrectomy, a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and the pN stage were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis in these patients.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>0941-1291</issn><issn>1436-2813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtO3TAQhi1UBAfaF2BRecnGrS-x47BDCCgSUjd0bTnO-BCUxKntVMqOR68PoSy7GM3tn1-aD6ELRr8xSuvviVLZSEI5PUStSXWEdqwSinDNxCe0o03FCOMNO0VnKb1QyitN6Qk6FVzVSldqh16fngEn6yGv2E4d9mBT3_ZDX_rg8WBnG0NyYe4d3tuUI7gcxhX7ELe-zJ2dHETcT_gPxBXD0EEcVjzb3MOU0xVOzyFmcrAfwrQnGeKIw5JdGCF9RsfeDgm-vOdz9Ovu9unmB3n8ef9wc_1InKhZJpxR50FJLWvphW9E3UkngbtaN41lipey7TrW1tp1SjEFApTnrZXctp214hxdbr5zDL8XSNmMfXIwDHaCsCTDKy5pAap1kfJN6srrKYI3c-xHG1fDqDmQNxt5U6ibN_KmKkdf3_2XdoTu4-Qf6iIQmyCV1bSHaF7CEqfy8_9s_wJ105HF</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Mikami, Ryuichi</creator><creator>Tanaka, Eiji</creator><creator>Murakami, Teppei</creator><creator>Ishida, Satoshi</creator><creator>Matsui, Yugo</creator><creator>Horita, Kenta</creator><creator>Yamada, Masaki</creator><creator>Nitta, Takashi</creator><creator>Mise, Masahiro</creator><creator>Harada, Takehisa</creator><creator>Takeo, Masahiko</creator><creator>Arii, Shigeki</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0430-4939</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in very elderly patients: short-and long-term outcomes</title><author>Mikami, Ryuichi ; Tanaka, Eiji ; Murakami, Teppei ; Ishida, Satoshi ; Matsui, Yugo ; Horita, Kenta ; Yamada, Masaki ; Nitta, Takashi ; Mise, Masahiro ; Harada, Takehisa ; Takeo, Masahiko ; Arii, Shigeki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-210cfe658575f3f937d5c5e2c7899a162e2cbdd1b78cd6616e3e6f2ba52abdaa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Ryuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Eiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Teppei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishida, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsui, Yugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horita, Kenta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitta, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mise, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Takehisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeo, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arii, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mikami, Ryuichi</au><au>Tanaka, Eiji</au><au>Murakami, Teppei</au><au>Ishida, Satoshi</au><au>Matsui, Yugo</au><au>Horita, Kenta</au><au>Yamada, Masaki</au><au>Nitta, Takashi</au><au>Mise, Masahiro</au><au>Harada, Takehisa</au><au>Takeo, Masahiko</au><au>Arii, Shigeki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in very elderly patients: short-and long-term outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</jtitle><stitle>Surg Today</stitle><addtitle>Surg Today</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>219-225</pages><issn>0941-1291</issn><eissn>1436-2813</eissn><abstract>Purpose It remains unclear whether laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer is a suitable treatment for very elderly (VE) patients. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of LG for gastric cancer in VE patients. Methods We reviewed 226 consecutive patients who underwent LG between January 2010 and December 2016. We compared VE patients (age ≥ 80, n  = 38) with non-elderly patients (age ≤ 79, n  = 188). Results An ASA-PS score ≥ 2 was more common in VE group (86.8 vs. 48.9%; P  &lt; 0.01). There were no significant differences in the operating time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or postoperative morbidity between the groups. The 3-year survival rate and 3-year disease-specific survival rate were lower in the VE group (53.7 vs. 85.6%; P  &lt; 0.0001, 78.5 vs. 92.4%; P  = 0.0116). A univariate analysis showed that PS scores ≥ 2, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and pN stage were independent predictors of decreased overall survival rates in the VE group. A multivariate analysis showed total gastrectomy, a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and the pN stage to be independent predictors in the VE group. Conclusion LG for gastric cancer is, thus, considered to be safe for patients aged 80 years or older. Total gastrectomy, a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and the pN stage were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis in these patients.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><pmid>32676846</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00595-020-02078-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0430-4939</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-1291
ispartof Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan), 2021-02, Vol.51 (2), p.219-225
issn 0941-1291
1436-2813
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2425000588
source Springer Nature
subjects Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Article
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
title The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in very elderly patients: short-and long-term outcomes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T11%3A05%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20safety%20and%20feasibility%20of%20laparoscopic%20gastrectomy%20for%20gastric%20cancer%20in%20very%20elderly%20patients:%20short-and%20long-term%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Surgery%20today%20(Tokyo,%20Japan)&rft.au=Mikami,%20Ryuichi&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=219-225&rft.issn=0941-1291&rft.eissn=1436-2813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00595-020-02078-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2425000588%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-210cfe658575f3f937d5c5e2c7899a162e2cbdd1b78cd6616e3e6f2ba52abdaa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425000588&rft_id=info:pmid/32676846&rfr_iscdi=true