In patients undergoing dialysis who require a valve replacement is a bioprosthetic valve superior to a mechanical prosthesis in terms of long-term survival and morbidity?

• Published in: Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 2020-08, Vol.31 (2), p.174-178
• Main Authors: Fong, Laura S, Ang, Zhen Hao, Wolfenden, Hugh, Akhunji, Zakir
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bioprosthesis; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Global Health; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods; Humans; Inpatients; Morbidity - trends; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Postoperative Complications - therapy; Prosthesis Design; Renal Dialysis - methods; Risk Factors; Survival Rate - trends
• ISSN: 1569-9293; 1569-9285
• DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa084

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'In [dialysis patients undergoing a valve replacement] is [a bioprosthetic valve superior to a mechanical prosthesis] for [long-term survival and morbidity]'. Altogether more than 501 papers were found using the reported search, of which five represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. There was limited high-quality evidence with all studies being retrospective. One meta-analysis and four cohort studies provided the evidence that there was no significant difference in long-term survival based on prosthesis type. However, the majority of studies demonstrated a significantly higher rate of valve-related complications including bleeding and thromboembolism, and readmission to hospital in the mechanical valve prosthesis group, likely related to the requirement for long-term anticoagulation. We conclude that overall long-term survival in dialysis-dependent patients is poor. While prosthesis type does not play a significant contributing role to long-term survival, bioprosthetic valves were associated with significantly fewer valve-related complications. Based on the available evidence, a bioprosthetic valve may be more suitable in this high-risk group of patients as it may avoid the complications associated with long-term anticoagulation without any reduction in long-term survival.