Loading…
Differential Response of Meloidogyne , Pratylenchus , Globodera , and Xiphinema Species to the Nematicide Fluazaindolizine
This research focused on the effects of fluazaindolizine on a diversity of plant-parasitic nematodes. In microwell assays, 24-h dose-response curves were generated for several species and populations of , , , , and . In a greenhouse study, the impact of fluazaindolizine on fecundity of , , and was t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Phytopathology 2020-12, Vol.110 (12), p.2003-2009 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This research focused on the effects of fluazaindolizine on a diversity of plant-parasitic nematodes. In microwell assays, 24-h dose-response curves were generated for several species and populations of
,
,
,
, and
. In a greenhouse study, the impact of fluazaindolizine on fecundity of
,
, and
was tested by exposing nematodes for 24 h in solution and inoculating on tomato. The average 24-h ED
s (dose that resulted in the immobility of 50% of exposed nematodes) for
,
, and
were 325.7, 223.4, and 100.7 ppm, respectively.
had the most variation among populations, with 24-h ED
s ranging from 72 to 788 ppm.
had the lowest 24-h ED
at 30 ppm.
spp. were unaffected by fluazaindolizine.
was the only species where effects of fluazaindolizine were reversible, but had a 24-h ED
that fell in the range of the
spp. In the greenhouse study,
was the least sensitive with reproduction reaching 62% of the untreated control after a pre-exposure to 47 ppm, whereas
and
at the same exposure dose had reproduction rates of 27 and 36% of the untreated control, respectively. Despite varying in in vitro responses to fluazaindolizine, reproduction of all
spp. was suppressed after only 24 h of exposure. This study expanded our understanding of how
,
,
, and
respond to fluazaindolizine. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-949X 1943-7684 |
DOI: | 10.1094/PHYTO-05-20-0189-R |