Breast Implants for Mammaplasty: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Multiple Complications

• Published in: Aesthetic plastic surgery 2020-12, Vol.44 (6), p.1988-1996
• Main Authors: Bi, Siwei, Liu, Ruiqi, Wu, Beiyi, Shen, Yinzhi, Jia, Kaiyu, Sun, Kaibo, Gu, Jun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Breast Implantation - adverse effects; Breast implants; Breast Implants - adverse effects; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Mammaplasty - adverse effects; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Otorhinolaryngology; Plastic Surgery; Review; Risk Assessment; Silicones; Transplants & implants
• ISSN: 0364-216X; 1432-5241; 1432-5241
• DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01866-0

Background The association of breast implants and complications after mammaplasty has been extensively researched. The aim of this study is to summarize all available results in meta-analysis investigating the association between implants and the incidence of various complications. Methods An umbrella review for breast implants and associated complications was performed by searching related reviews from electronic databases including Pubmed, Ovid and CINAHL. We collected and reviewed evidence across meta-analyses of observational and interventional studies of implants and any health outcome. The quality of the reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR tool (A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews). Results The research included 92 meta-analyses of 609 studies concerning various areas. Capsular contracture was the most investigated outcome. Radiotherapy, human acellular dermal matrix application, direct-to-implant reconstruction, smooth implant, silicone-filled implant and periareolar incision were significantly associated with higher rates of some of the complications. Conclusions This umbrella review provides surgeons with summarized evidence of the association between the complications and implant-related factors in mammaplasty surgery to help surgeons make informed choices in the future. Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .