Loading…

The value of saline-aided ultrasound in diagnosing congenital duodenal obstruction

Purpose The aim of the study is to assess the value of saline-aided ultrasound (US) in diagnosing congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO). Methods The neonates with CDO were enrolled in this study, including the neonates confirmed with annular pancreas (AP) by operation, the neonates confirmed with du...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric surgery international 2020-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1197-1203
Main Authors: Yang, Boyang, Huang, Danping, Zhou, Luyao, Zhong, Wei, He, Qiuming, Wang, Zhe, Fang, Qian, Wang, Hongying
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The aim of the study is to assess the value of saline-aided ultrasound (US) in diagnosing congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO). Methods The neonates with CDO were enrolled in this study, including the neonates confirmed with annular pancreas (AP) by operation, the neonates confirmed with duodenal atresia, the neonates confirmed with duodenum web, and the neonates confirmed with malrotation. Pertinent data were recorded, including the US features, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures. The methodology of this study is a diagnostic test study which means the US feature is the test and the intraoperative finding is the gold standard. Results A total of 95 neonates were enrolled, including 33 neonates with AP, 6 neonates with duodenal atresia, 29 neonates with duodenum web, and 27 neonates with malrotation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the hyperechogenic band for the detection of AP were 78.8% (26/33), 90.3% (56/62), 81.2% (26/32), 88.8% (56/63), and 86.3% (82/95), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and accuracy for the detection of duodenal atresia were 0% (0/6), 100% (89/89), 93.6% (89/95), and 93.6% (89/95), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for the detection of duodenum web were 100% (29/29), 100% (66/66), 100% (29/29), 100% (66/66), and 100% (95/95), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for the detection of malrotation were 100% (27/27), 100% (68/68), 100% (27/27), 100% (68/68), and 100% (95/95), respectively. Conclusion Saline-aided US is a feasible tool to diagnose CDO.
ISSN:0179-0358
1437-9813
DOI:10.1007/s00383-020-04723-y