Loading…

Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of ST-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) can be clinically categorized as ST-segment elevation (STE) and non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE), whose clinical prognosis are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and their predictors of pati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of the medical sciences 2020-12, Vol.360 (6), p.686-692
Main Authors: Xu, Bin, Abdu, Fuad A., Liu, Lu, Mohammed, Abdul-Quddus, Yin, Guoqing, Luo, Yanru, Xu, Siling, Lv, Xian, Fan, Rui, Che, Wenliang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4041-8956fc3ecf3675818d5ca74c5d91d72e75a9dab5aef9ce5a17b0bc045751313c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4041-8956fc3ecf3675818d5ca74c5d91d72e75a9dab5aef9ce5a17b0bc045751313c3
container_end_page 692
container_issue 6
container_start_page 686
container_title The American journal of the medical sciences
container_volume 360
creator Xu, Bin
Abdu, Fuad A.
Liu, Lu
Mohammed, Abdul-Quddus
Yin, Guoqing
Luo, Yanru
Xu, Siling
Lv, Xian
Fan, Rui
Che, Wenliang
description Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) can be clinically categorized as ST-segment elevation (STE) and non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE), whose clinical prognosis are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and their predictors of patients with STE and NSTE in MINOCA population. A total of 265 patients with MINOCA (102 with STE, and 163 with NSTE) were consecutively collected. Clinical profile, prognosis, and predictors of all patients were assessed. The proportion of patients with NSTE was greater than patients with STE in MINOCA population. Patients with NSTE were older and more likely to be female and had a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation. Both high density lipoprotein (HDL) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were higher in the NSTE group. Patients with STE were more likely to have a history of smoking and a higher diastolic blood pressure. During the 1-year follow up, there were no differences in the outcomes between the STE and NSTE groups, with no significant differences in mortality and a similar rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (20.9% vs 19.3%, P = 0.767). The multivariable predictors of MACE in the NSTE groups were age, lower level of total cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking history, whereas reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and diabetes mellitus were the multivariable predictors of major adverse cardiac events in the STE group. There were differences in the clinical profile between STE and NSTE in the MINOCA population, whereas the outcomes during the 1-year follow up were similar. The STE and NSTE groups had different predictive factors for major adverse cardiac events.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.07.016
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2429786804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002962920303104</els_id><sourcerecordid>2429786804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4041-8956fc3ecf3675818d5ca74c5d91d72e75a9dab5aef9ce5a17b0bc045751313c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFq3DAQFaWl2ab9gkLxsRc7I8myrEMPYUnaQJINJO1VyPKY1da2UsneJR_Q_652Ny3kUsEg9HjvaeYNIR8pFBRodbYpzLAZYsGAQQGySNgrsqCC1zlTCl6TBQCwXFVMnZB3MW4AKKspf0tOOJO8qjksyO9l70ZnTZ-t5sn6AWNmxja7C9g6O_kQM99l9w_5RY9bMzk_Zj8wxDlmt37MX-A3T96a0LpkdTV2JtgDunPT-sBdNXEKcwK3mC198KMJT9l5mDA4jO_Jm870ET8836fk--XFw_Jbfr36erU8v85tCSXNayWqznK0Ha-kqGndCmtkaUWraCsZSmFUaxphsFMWhaGygcZCKaSgnHLLT8nno-9j8L9mjJMeXLTY92ZEP0fNSqZkXdVQJio_Um3wMQbs9GNwQ2paU9D7_PVGH_LX-_w1SJ2wpPr0_MHcDNj-0_wNPBHKI2Hn-zR7_NnPOwx6jaaf1hr2p0yT7j0pS488FaVJ9uUow5TO1iVFtA5Hm7YU0E669e6_ff0Bz52pIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429786804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of ST-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries</title><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>Xu, Bin ; Abdu, Fuad A. ; Liu, Lu ; Mohammed, Abdul-Quddus ; Yin, Guoqing ; Luo, Yanru ; Xu, Siling ; Lv, Xian ; Fan, Rui ; Che, Wenliang</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin ; Abdu, Fuad A. ; Liu, Lu ; Mohammed, Abdul-Quddus ; Yin, Guoqing ; Luo, Yanru ; Xu, Siling ; Lv, Xian ; Fan, Rui ; Che, Wenliang</creatorcontrib><description>Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) can be clinically categorized as ST-segment elevation (STE) and non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE), whose clinical prognosis are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and their predictors of patients with STE and NSTE in MINOCA population. A total of 265 patients with MINOCA (102 with STE, and 163 with NSTE) were consecutively collected. Clinical profile, prognosis, and predictors of all patients were assessed. The proportion of patients with NSTE was greater than patients with STE in MINOCA population. Patients with NSTE were older and more likely to be female and had a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation. Both high density lipoprotein (HDL) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were higher in the NSTE group. Patients with STE were more likely to have a history of smoking and a higher diastolic blood pressure. During the 1-year follow up, there were no differences in the outcomes between the STE and NSTE groups, with no significant differences in mortality and a similar rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (20.9% vs 19.3%, P = 0.767). The multivariable predictors of MACE in the NSTE groups were age, lower level of total cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking history, whereas reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and diabetes mellitus were the multivariable predictors of major adverse cardiac events in the STE group. There were differences in the clinical profile between STE and NSTE in the MINOCA population, whereas the outcomes during the 1-year follow up were similar. The STE and NSTE groups had different predictive factors for major adverse cardiac events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-2990</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.07.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32736830</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; China ; Coronary Circulation ; Coronary Vessels - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; MINOCA ; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - complications ; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis ; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - pathology ; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology ; Non-ST-segment elevation ; Outcomes ; Predictors ; Prognosis ; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - complications ; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis ; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - pathology ; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology ; ST-segment elevation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The American journal of the medical sciences, 2020-12, Vol.360 (6), p.686-692</ispartof><rights>2020 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 by the Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4041-8956fc3ecf3675818d5ca74c5d91d72e75a9dab5aef9ce5a17b0bc045751313c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4041-8956fc3ecf3675818d5ca74c5d91d72e75a9dab5aef9ce5a17b0bc045751313c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8840-5437</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002962920303104$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32736830$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdu, Fuad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Abdul-Quddus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Guoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yanru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Siling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Che, Wenliang</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of ST-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries</title><title>The American journal of the medical sciences</title><addtitle>Am J Med Sci</addtitle><description>Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) can be clinically categorized as ST-segment elevation (STE) and non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE), whose clinical prognosis are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and their predictors of patients with STE and NSTE in MINOCA population. A total of 265 patients with MINOCA (102 with STE, and 163 with NSTE) were consecutively collected. Clinical profile, prognosis, and predictors of all patients were assessed. The proportion of patients with NSTE was greater than patients with STE in MINOCA population. Patients with NSTE were older and more likely to be female and had a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation. Both high density lipoprotein (HDL) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were higher in the NSTE group. Patients with STE were more likely to have a history of smoking and a higher diastolic blood pressure. During the 1-year follow up, there were no differences in the outcomes between the STE and NSTE groups, with no significant differences in mortality and a similar rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (20.9% vs 19.3%, P = 0.767). The multivariable predictors of MACE in the NSTE groups were age, lower level of total cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking history, whereas reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and diabetes mellitus were the multivariable predictors of major adverse cardiac events in the STE group. There were differences in the clinical profile between STE and NSTE in the MINOCA population, whereas the outcomes during the 1-year follow up were similar. The STE and NSTE groups had different predictive factors for major adverse cardiac events.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>MINOCA</subject><subject>Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - complications</subject><subject>Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - pathology</subject><subject>Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Non-ST-segment elevation</subject><subject>Outcomes</subject><subject>Predictors</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - complications</subject><subject>ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis</subject><subject>ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - pathology</subject><subject>ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</subject><subject>ST-segment elevation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0002-9629</issn><issn>1538-2990</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcFq3DAQFaWl2ab9gkLxsRc7I8myrEMPYUnaQJINJO1VyPKY1da2UsneJR_Q_652Ny3kUsEg9HjvaeYNIR8pFBRodbYpzLAZYsGAQQGySNgrsqCC1zlTCl6TBQCwXFVMnZB3MW4AKKspf0tOOJO8qjksyO9l70ZnTZ-t5sn6AWNmxja7C9g6O_kQM99l9w_5RY9bMzk_Zj8wxDlmt37MX-A3T96a0LpkdTV2JtgDunPT-sBdNXEKcwK3mC198KMJT9l5mDA4jO_Jm870ET8836fk--XFw_Jbfr36erU8v85tCSXNayWqznK0Ha-kqGndCmtkaUWraCsZSmFUaxphsFMWhaGygcZCKaSgnHLLT8nno-9j8L9mjJMeXLTY92ZEP0fNSqZkXdVQJio_Um3wMQbs9GNwQ2paU9D7_PVGH_LX-_w1SJ2wpPr0_MHcDNj-0_wNPBHKI2Hn-zR7_NnPOwx6jaaf1hr2p0yT7j0pS488FaVJ9uUow5TO1iVFtA5Hm7YU0E669e6_ff0Bz52pIQ</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Xu, Bin</creator><creator>Abdu, Fuad A.</creator><creator>Liu, Lu</creator><creator>Mohammed, Abdul-Quddus</creator><creator>Yin, Guoqing</creator><creator>Luo, Yanru</creator><creator>Xu, Siling</creator><creator>Lv, Xian</creator><creator>Fan, Rui</creator><creator>Che, Wenliang</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Copyright by the Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8840-5437</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of ST-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries</title><author>Xu, Bin ; Abdu, Fuad A. ; Liu, Lu ; Mohammed, Abdul-Quddus ; Yin, Guoqing ; Luo, Yanru ; Xu, Siling ; Lv, Xian ; Fan, Rui ; Che, Wenliang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4041-8956fc3ecf3675818d5ca74c5d91d72e75a9dab5aef9ce5a17b0bc045751313c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>MINOCA</topic><topic>Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - complications</topic><topic>Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - pathology</topic><topic>Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Non-ST-segment elevation</topic><topic>Outcomes</topic><topic>Predictors</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - complications</topic><topic>ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis</topic><topic>ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - pathology</topic><topic>ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</topic><topic>ST-segment elevation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdu, Fuad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Abdul-Quddus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Guoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yanru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Siling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Che, Wenliang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of the medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Bin</au><au>Abdu, Fuad A.</au><au>Liu, Lu</au><au>Mohammed, Abdul-Quddus</au><au>Yin, Guoqing</au><au>Luo, Yanru</au><au>Xu, Siling</au><au>Lv, Xian</au><au>Fan, Rui</au><au>Che, Wenliang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of ST-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of the medical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Med Sci</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>360</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>686</spage><epage>692</epage><pages>686-692</pages><issn>0002-9629</issn><eissn>1538-2990</eissn><abstract>Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) can be clinically categorized as ST-segment elevation (STE) and non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE), whose clinical prognosis are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and their predictors of patients with STE and NSTE in MINOCA population. A total of 265 patients with MINOCA (102 with STE, and 163 with NSTE) were consecutively collected. Clinical profile, prognosis, and predictors of all patients were assessed. The proportion of patients with NSTE was greater than patients with STE in MINOCA population. Patients with NSTE were older and more likely to be female and had a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation. Both high density lipoprotein (HDL) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were higher in the NSTE group. Patients with STE were more likely to have a history of smoking and a higher diastolic blood pressure. During the 1-year follow up, there were no differences in the outcomes between the STE and NSTE groups, with no significant differences in mortality and a similar rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (20.9% vs 19.3%, P = 0.767). The multivariable predictors of MACE in the NSTE groups were age, lower level of total cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking history, whereas reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and diabetes mellitus were the multivariable predictors of major adverse cardiac events in the STE group. There were differences in the clinical profile between STE and NSTE in the MINOCA population, whereas the outcomes during the 1-year follow up were similar. The STE and NSTE groups had different predictive factors for major adverse cardiac events.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32736830</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjms.2020.07.016</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8840-5437</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9629
ispartof The American journal of the medical sciences, 2020-12, Vol.360 (6), p.686-692
issn 0002-9629
1538-2990
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2429786804
source ScienceDirect (Online service)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
China
Coronary Circulation
Coronary Vessels - pathology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
MINOCA
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - complications
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - pathology
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology
Non-ST-segment elevation
Outcomes
Predictors
Prognosis
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - complications
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - pathology
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology
ST-segment elevation
Young Adult
title Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of ST-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A07%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Outcomes%20and%20Predictors%20of%20ST-Elevation%20Versus%20Non-ST-Elevation%20Myocardial%20Infarction%20with%20Non-Obstructive%20Coronary%20Arteries&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20the%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Xu,%20Bin&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=360&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=686&rft.epage=692&rft.pages=686-692&rft.issn=0002-9629&rft.eissn=1538-2990&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjms.2020.07.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429786804%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4041-8956fc3ecf3675818d5ca74c5d91d72e75a9dab5aef9ce5a17b0bc045751313c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429786804&rft_id=info:pmid/32736830&rfr_iscdi=true