Reimbursement for Hip Fractures: The Impact of Varied Current Procedural Terminology Coding Using Relative Value Units

• Published in: The Journal of arthroplasty 2020-12, Vol.35 (12), p.3464-3466
• Main Authors: Beck, Cameron M., Blair, Somer E., Nana, Arvind D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; coding; CPT; Current Procedural Terminology; hemiarthroplasty; hip fractures; Hip Fractures - surgery; Humans; Medicare; Operative Time; Orthopedics; reimbursement; relative value units; United States
• ISSN: 0883-5403; 1532-8406
• DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.088

Many orthopedic practices routinely code hip fracture hemiarthroplasty as Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 27125 even though 27236 is the correct CPT code. Our objective is to determine the financial impact this simple mistake has on surgeon reimbursement. Our data comprised cases assigned International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code S72.001A through S72.035A and CPT code 27125 or 27236 within the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2016-2017 database. Relative value units (RVUs) per CPT code and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reported that RVU conversion factor of $36.0896 per 1 RVU was used to calculate reimbursement per case. The dollar difference and percent difference per case was then calculated between cases assigned CPT code 27125 and those assigned 27236. Our total sample consisted of 12,287 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program cases. Of those, 4185 (34%) were cases of a hip fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty that were incorrectly coded as CPT code 27125. That error in coding results in a decrease in reimbursement of $35.01 per case, a 5.51% difference. Since the current healthcare reimbursement model relies solely on CPT codes to determine RVUs, it is imperative that orthopedic surgeons understand the financial impact of incorrect coding. Although correct coding of hemiarthroplasty procedures for hip fractures is an easy task to fix in the future, we hope that through this study a greater emphasis is placed on coding in orthopedic surgery.