Loading…

Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage

Background: Use of suction drain after superficial parotidectomy (SP) is based on national consensus considered best practice, but there is no evidence on the effect of the treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of drainage after SP by evaluating the rate of complic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ear, nose, & throat journal nose, & throat journal, 2022-02, Vol.101 (2), p.105-109
Main Authors: Nielsen, Charlotte Fog, Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand, Christensen, Anne Louise Bach, Mirz, Frank, Reinholdt, Kasper Basse, Ovesen, Therese, Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83
container_end_page 109
container_issue 2
container_start_page 105
container_title Ear, nose, & throat journal
container_volume 101
creator Nielsen, Charlotte Fog
Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand
Christensen, Anne Louise Bach
Mirz, Frank
Reinholdt, Kasper Basse
Ovesen, Therese
Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck
description Background: Use of suction drain after superficial parotidectomy (SP) is based on national consensus considered best practice, but there is no evidence on the effect of the treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of drainage after SP by evaluating the rate of complications after SP in relation to the (ie, duration) of drainage and tumor size. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed involving data from all consecutive patients undergoing SP at the Ear, Nose, and Throat department, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Denmark, between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Demographics including comorbidity, medication, tumor size, postoperative secretion through the drainage, as well as complications (hematoma, seroma, infection, fistulas, Frey syndrome, facial nerve palsy) were registered. Patients with secretion below 25 mL were compared to patients with secretion above 25 mL, that is, drainage less than 24 hours versus longer than 24 hours. Results: Two hundred five consecutive patients undergoing SP were enrolled. The overall risk of postoperative infection was 16.2%. Ten of 33 patients with infection were also diagnosed with an hematoma or seroma. The risk of infection increased with secretion above 25 mL (27.2%) compared to patients with less than 25 mL (13.1%; P = .0318). The same accounts for the risk of seromas/hematomas (P = .0055). We found no evidence that demographics or comorbidity correlated to the secretion in the drainage, but there is a tendency toward male gender having a higher risk off secretion above 25 mL (odds ratio 1.39). Conclusion: Overall, the risk of complications after SP increased with secretion beyond 25 mL (ie, drainage for more than 24 hours). This applied in particular to infections and seromas/hematomas demanding treatment. The use of routine drainage after SP is questionable, and a randomized trial is warranted to unravel the necessity of postoperative drainage.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0145561320942380
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2430371747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0145561320942380</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2627353624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePUnAi5fo7Fc21ZPUr0LBgnoOm82spCTdupsI_e_d0qogeJph3m_eDI-QUwqXlCp1BVRImVHOYCwYz2GPDGnsUiUZ2yfDjZxu9AE5CmEBEAcZPSQDzpQQY2BDcvPSr9Db2tS6Sebau66u0HSuXV8n03alTZc4m8xd6FzkdFd_YnLndb3U73hMDqxuAp7s6oi8Pdy_Tp7S2fPjdHI7S40A1aWiLEFDzhnmOkMAqaCqclqiQiql0uWYZkoqbnMKigmbaQ2Ga4tWWDAm5yNysfVdeffRY-iKtg4Gm0Yv0fWhYIIDV1QJFdHzP-jC9X4ZvytYxhSXPIv0iMCWMt6F4NEWK1-32q8LCsUm2OJvsHHlbGfcly1WPwvfSUYg3QIhJvN79V_DL7eOffk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627353624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog ; Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand ; Christensen, Anne Louise Bach ; Mirz, Frank ; Reinholdt, Kasper Basse ; Ovesen, Therese ; Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</creator><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog ; Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand ; Christensen, Anne Louise Bach ; Mirz, Frank ; Reinholdt, Kasper Basse ; Ovesen, Therese ; Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Use of suction drain after superficial parotidectomy (SP) is based on national consensus considered best practice, but there is no evidence on the effect of the treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of drainage after SP by evaluating the rate of complications after SP in relation to the (ie, duration) of drainage and tumor size. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed involving data from all consecutive patients undergoing SP at the Ear, Nose, and Throat department, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Denmark, between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Demographics including comorbidity, medication, tumor size, postoperative secretion through the drainage, as well as complications (hematoma, seroma, infection, fistulas, Frey syndrome, facial nerve palsy) were registered. Patients with secretion below 25 mL were compared to patients with secretion above 25 mL, that is, drainage less than 24 hours versus longer than 24 hours. Results: Two hundred five consecutive patients undergoing SP were enrolled. The overall risk of postoperative infection was 16.2%. Ten of 33 patients with infection were also diagnosed with an hematoma or seroma. The risk of infection increased with secretion above 25 mL (27.2%) compared to patients with less than 25 mL (13.1%; P = .0318). The same accounts for the risk of seromas/hematomas (P = .0055). We found no evidence that demographics or comorbidity correlated to the secretion in the drainage, but there is a tendency toward male gender having a higher risk off secretion above 25 mL (odds ratio 1.39). Conclusion: Overall, the risk of complications after SP increased with secretion beyond 25 mL (ie, drainage for more than 24 hours). This applied in particular to infections and seromas/hematomas demanding treatment. The use of routine drainage after SP is questionable, and a randomized trial is warranted to unravel the necessity of postoperative drainage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-5613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7522</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0145561320942380</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32744902</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Comorbidity ; Exocrine glands ; Facial Paralysis - diagnosis ; Facial Paralysis - prevention & control ; Female ; Hematoma ; Hematoma - diagnosis ; Humans ; Infections ; Male ; Maxillofacial surgery ; Middle Aged ; Parotid Gland - surgery ; Parotid Neoplasms - pathology ; Parotid Neoplasms - surgery ; Postoperative Care ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Retrospective Studies ; Salivary Gland Fistula - diagnosis ; Salivary Gland Fistula - prevention & control ; Seroma - diagnosis ; Seroma - prevention & control ; Sex Factors ; Suction ; Surgical outcomes ; Surgical Wound Infection - diagnosis ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control ; Sweating, Gustatory - diagnosis ; Sweating, Gustatory - prevention & control ; Tumor Burden]]></subject><ispartof>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal, 2022-02, Vol.101 (2), p.105-109</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3494-278X ; 0000-0002-5464-7948</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0145561320942380$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0145561320942380$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32744902$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Anne Louise Bach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinholdt, Kasper Basse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovesen, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</creatorcontrib><title>Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage</title><title>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal</title><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><description>Background: Use of suction drain after superficial parotidectomy (SP) is based on national consensus considered best practice, but there is no evidence on the effect of the treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of drainage after SP by evaluating the rate of complications after SP in relation to the (ie, duration) of drainage and tumor size. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed involving data from all consecutive patients undergoing SP at the Ear, Nose, and Throat department, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Denmark, between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Demographics including comorbidity, medication, tumor size, postoperative secretion through the drainage, as well as complications (hematoma, seroma, infection, fistulas, Frey syndrome, facial nerve palsy) were registered. Patients with secretion below 25 mL were compared to patients with secretion above 25 mL, that is, drainage less than 24 hours versus longer than 24 hours. Results: Two hundred five consecutive patients undergoing SP were enrolled. The overall risk of postoperative infection was 16.2%. Ten of 33 patients with infection were also diagnosed with an hematoma or seroma. The risk of infection increased with secretion above 25 mL (27.2%) compared to patients with less than 25 mL (13.1%; P = .0318). The same accounts for the risk of seromas/hematomas (P = .0055). We found no evidence that demographics or comorbidity correlated to the secretion in the drainage, but there is a tendency toward male gender having a higher risk off secretion above 25 mL (odds ratio 1.39). Conclusion: Overall, the risk of complications after SP increased with secretion beyond 25 mL (ie, drainage for more than 24 hours). This applied in particular to infections and seromas/hematomas demanding treatment. The use of routine drainage after SP is questionable, and a randomized trial is warranted to unravel the necessity of postoperative drainage.</description><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Exocrine glands</subject><subject>Facial Paralysis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Facial Paralysis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematoma</subject><subject>Hematoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxillofacial surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Parotid Gland - surgery</subject><subject>Parotid Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Parotid Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Care</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Salivary Gland Fistula - diagnosis</subject><subject>Salivary Gland Fistula - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Seroma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Seroma - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Suction</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Sweating, Gustatory - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sweating, Gustatory - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><issn>0145-5613</issn><issn>1942-7522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePUnAi5fo7Fc21ZPUr0LBgnoOm82spCTdupsI_e_d0qogeJph3m_eDI-QUwqXlCp1BVRImVHOYCwYz2GPDGnsUiUZ2yfDjZxu9AE5CmEBEAcZPSQDzpQQY2BDcvPSr9Db2tS6Sebau66u0HSuXV8n03alTZc4m8xd6FzkdFd_YnLndb3U73hMDqxuAp7s6oi8Pdy_Tp7S2fPjdHI7S40A1aWiLEFDzhnmOkMAqaCqclqiQiql0uWYZkoqbnMKigmbaQ2Ga4tWWDAm5yNysfVdeffRY-iKtg4Gm0Yv0fWhYIIDV1QJFdHzP-jC9X4ZvytYxhSXPIv0iMCWMt6F4NEWK1-32q8LCsUm2OJvsHHlbGfcly1WPwvfSUYg3QIhJvN79V_DL7eOffk</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog</creator><creator>Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand</creator><creator>Christensen, Anne Louise Bach</creator><creator>Mirz, Frank</creator><creator>Reinholdt, Kasper Basse</creator><creator>Ovesen, Therese</creator><creator>Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-278X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5464-7948</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage</title><author>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog ; Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand ; Christensen, Anne Louise Bach ; Mirz, Frank ; Reinholdt, Kasper Basse ; Ovesen, Therese ; Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Exocrine glands</topic><topic>Facial Paralysis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Facial Paralysis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematoma</topic><topic>Hematoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxillofacial surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Parotid Gland - surgery</topic><topic>Parotid Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Parotid Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Care</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Salivary Gland Fistula - diagnosis</topic><topic>Salivary Gland Fistula - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Seroma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Seroma - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Suction</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Sweating, Gustatory - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sweating, Gustatory - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Anne Louise Bach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinholdt, Kasper Basse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovesen, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog</au><au>Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand</au><au>Christensen, Anne Louise Bach</au><au>Mirz, Frank</au><au>Reinholdt, Kasper Basse</au><au>Ovesen, Therese</au><au>Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage</atitle><jtitle>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal</jtitle><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>105-109</pages><issn>0145-5613</issn><eissn>1942-7522</eissn><abstract>Background: Use of suction drain after superficial parotidectomy (SP) is based on national consensus considered best practice, but there is no evidence on the effect of the treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of drainage after SP by evaluating the rate of complications after SP in relation to the (ie, duration) of drainage and tumor size. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed involving data from all consecutive patients undergoing SP at the Ear, Nose, and Throat department, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Denmark, between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Demographics including comorbidity, medication, tumor size, postoperative secretion through the drainage, as well as complications (hematoma, seroma, infection, fistulas, Frey syndrome, facial nerve palsy) were registered. Patients with secretion below 25 mL were compared to patients with secretion above 25 mL, that is, drainage less than 24 hours versus longer than 24 hours. Results: Two hundred five consecutive patients undergoing SP were enrolled. The overall risk of postoperative infection was 16.2%. Ten of 33 patients with infection were also diagnosed with an hematoma or seroma. The risk of infection increased with secretion above 25 mL (27.2%) compared to patients with less than 25 mL (13.1%; P = .0318). The same accounts for the risk of seromas/hematomas (P = .0055). We found no evidence that demographics or comorbidity correlated to the secretion in the drainage, but there is a tendency toward male gender having a higher risk off secretion above 25 mL (odds ratio 1.39). Conclusion: Overall, the risk of complications after SP increased with secretion beyond 25 mL (ie, drainage for more than 24 hours). This applied in particular to infections and seromas/hematomas demanding treatment. The use of routine drainage after SP is questionable, and a randomized trial is warranted to unravel the necessity of postoperative drainage.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32744902</pmid><doi>10.1177/0145561320942380</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-278X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5464-7948</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0145-5613
ispartof Ear, nose, & throat journal, 2022-02, Vol.101 (2), p.105-109
issn 0145-5613
1942-7522
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2430371747
source Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
subjects Comorbidity
Exocrine glands
Facial Paralysis - diagnosis
Facial Paralysis - prevention & control
Female
Hematoma
Hematoma - diagnosis
Humans
Infections
Male
Maxillofacial surgery
Middle Aged
Parotid Gland - surgery
Parotid Neoplasms - pathology
Parotid Neoplasms - surgery
Postoperative Care
Postoperative Complications - diagnosis
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Retrospective Studies
Salivary Gland Fistula - diagnosis
Salivary Gland Fistula - prevention & control
Seroma - diagnosis
Seroma - prevention & control
Sex Factors
Suction
Surgical outcomes
Surgical Wound Infection - diagnosis
Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control
Sweating, Gustatory - diagnosis
Sweating, Gustatory - prevention & control
Tumor Burden
title Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A43%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Superficial%20Parotidectomy:%20Impact%20of%20Postoperative%20Drainage&rft.jtitle=Ear,%20nose,%20&%20throat%20journal&rft.au=Nielsen,%20Charlotte%20Fog&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=105-109&rft.issn=0145-5613&rft.eissn=1942-7522&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0145561320942380&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2627353624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627353624&rft_id=info:pmid/32744902&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0145561320942380&rfr_iscdi=true