Loading…
Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage
Background: Use of suction drain after superficial parotidectomy (SP) is based on national consensus considered best practice, but there is no evidence on the effect of the treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of drainage after SP by evaluating the rate of complic...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ear, nose, & throat journal nose, & throat journal, 2022-02, Vol.101 (2), p.105-109 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83 |
container_end_page | 109 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Ear, nose, & throat journal |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Nielsen, Charlotte Fog Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand Christensen, Anne Louise Bach Mirz, Frank Reinholdt, Kasper Basse Ovesen, Therese Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck |
description | Background:
Use of suction drain after superficial parotidectomy (SP) is based on national consensus considered best practice, but there is no evidence on the effect of the treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of drainage after SP by evaluating the rate of complications after SP in relation to the (ie, duration) of drainage and tumor size.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis was performed involving data from all consecutive patients undergoing SP at the Ear, Nose, and Throat department, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Denmark, between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Demographics including comorbidity, medication, tumor size, postoperative secretion through the drainage, as well as complications (hematoma, seroma, infection, fistulas, Frey syndrome, facial nerve palsy) were registered. Patients with secretion below 25 mL were compared to patients with secretion above 25 mL, that is, drainage less than 24 hours versus longer than 24 hours. Results: Two hundred five consecutive patients undergoing SP were enrolled. The overall risk of postoperative infection was 16.2%. Ten of 33 patients with infection were also diagnosed with an hematoma or seroma. The risk of infection increased with secretion above 25 mL (27.2%) compared to patients with less than 25 mL (13.1%; P = .0318). The same accounts for the risk of seromas/hematomas (P = .0055). We found no evidence that demographics or comorbidity correlated to the secretion in the drainage, but there is a tendency toward male gender having a higher risk off secretion above 25 mL (odds ratio 1.39).
Conclusion:
Overall, the risk of complications after SP increased with secretion beyond 25 mL (ie, drainage for more than 24 hours). This applied in particular to infections and seromas/hematomas demanding treatment. The use of routine drainage after SP is questionable, and a randomized trial is warranted to unravel the necessity of postoperative drainage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0145561320942380 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2430371747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0145561320942380</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2627353624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePUnAi5fo7Fc21ZPUr0LBgnoOm82spCTdupsI_e_d0qogeJph3m_eDI-QUwqXlCp1BVRImVHOYCwYz2GPDGnsUiUZ2yfDjZxu9AE5CmEBEAcZPSQDzpQQY2BDcvPSr9Db2tS6Sebau66u0HSuXV8n03alTZc4m8xd6FzkdFd_YnLndb3U73hMDqxuAp7s6oi8Pdy_Tp7S2fPjdHI7S40A1aWiLEFDzhnmOkMAqaCqclqiQiql0uWYZkoqbnMKigmbaQ2Ga4tWWDAm5yNysfVdeffRY-iKtg4Gm0Yv0fWhYIIDV1QJFdHzP-jC9X4ZvytYxhSXPIv0iMCWMt6F4NEWK1-32q8LCsUm2OJvsHHlbGfcly1WPwvfSUYg3QIhJvN79V_DL7eOffk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627353624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog ; Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand ; Christensen, Anne Louise Bach ; Mirz, Frank ; Reinholdt, Kasper Basse ; Ovesen, Therese ; Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</creator><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog ; Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand ; Christensen, Anne Louise Bach ; Mirz, Frank ; Reinholdt, Kasper Basse ; Ovesen, Therese ; Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Use of suction drain after superficial parotidectomy (SP) is based on national consensus considered best practice, but there is no evidence on the effect of the treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of drainage after SP by evaluating the rate of complications after SP in relation to the (ie, duration) of drainage and tumor size.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis was performed involving data from all consecutive patients undergoing SP at the Ear, Nose, and Throat department, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Denmark, between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Demographics including comorbidity, medication, tumor size, postoperative secretion through the drainage, as well as complications (hematoma, seroma, infection, fistulas, Frey syndrome, facial nerve palsy) were registered. Patients with secretion below 25 mL were compared to patients with secretion above 25 mL, that is, drainage less than 24 hours versus longer than 24 hours. Results: Two hundred five consecutive patients undergoing SP were enrolled. The overall risk of postoperative infection was 16.2%. Ten of 33 patients with infection were also diagnosed with an hematoma or seroma. The risk of infection increased with secretion above 25 mL (27.2%) compared to patients with less than 25 mL (13.1%; P = .0318). The same accounts for the risk of seromas/hematomas (P = .0055). We found no evidence that demographics or comorbidity correlated to the secretion in the drainage, but there is a tendency toward male gender having a higher risk off secretion above 25 mL (odds ratio 1.39).
Conclusion:
Overall, the risk of complications after SP increased with secretion beyond 25 mL (ie, drainage for more than 24 hours). This applied in particular to infections and seromas/hematomas demanding treatment. The use of routine drainage after SP is questionable, and a randomized trial is warranted to unravel the necessity of postoperative drainage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-5613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7522</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0145561320942380</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32744902</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Comorbidity ; Exocrine glands ; Facial Paralysis - diagnosis ; Facial Paralysis - prevention & control ; Female ; Hematoma ; Hematoma - diagnosis ; Humans ; Infections ; Male ; Maxillofacial surgery ; Middle Aged ; Parotid Gland - surgery ; Parotid Neoplasms - pathology ; Parotid Neoplasms - surgery ; Postoperative Care ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Retrospective Studies ; Salivary Gland Fistula - diagnosis ; Salivary Gland Fistula - prevention & control ; Seroma - diagnosis ; Seroma - prevention & control ; Sex Factors ; Suction ; Surgical outcomes ; Surgical Wound Infection - diagnosis ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control ; Sweating, Gustatory - diagnosis ; Sweating, Gustatory - prevention & control ; Tumor Burden]]></subject><ispartof>Ear, nose, & throat journal, 2022-02, Vol.101 (2), p.105-109</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3494-278X ; 0000-0002-5464-7948</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0145561320942380$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0145561320942380$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32744902$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Anne Louise Bach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinholdt, Kasper Basse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovesen, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</creatorcontrib><title>Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage</title><title>Ear, nose, & throat journal</title><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><description>Background:
Use of suction drain after superficial parotidectomy (SP) is based on national consensus considered best practice, but there is no evidence on the effect of the treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of drainage after SP by evaluating the rate of complications after SP in relation to the (ie, duration) of drainage and tumor size.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis was performed involving data from all consecutive patients undergoing SP at the Ear, Nose, and Throat department, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Denmark, between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Demographics including comorbidity, medication, tumor size, postoperative secretion through the drainage, as well as complications (hematoma, seroma, infection, fistulas, Frey syndrome, facial nerve palsy) were registered. Patients with secretion below 25 mL were compared to patients with secretion above 25 mL, that is, drainage less than 24 hours versus longer than 24 hours. Results: Two hundred five consecutive patients undergoing SP were enrolled. The overall risk of postoperative infection was 16.2%. Ten of 33 patients with infection were also diagnosed with an hematoma or seroma. The risk of infection increased with secretion above 25 mL (27.2%) compared to patients with less than 25 mL (13.1%; P = .0318). The same accounts for the risk of seromas/hematomas (P = .0055). We found no evidence that demographics or comorbidity correlated to the secretion in the drainage, but there is a tendency toward male gender having a higher risk off secretion above 25 mL (odds ratio 1.39).
Conclusion:
Overall, the risk of complications after SP increased with secretion beyond 25 mL (ie, drainage for more than 24 hours). This applied in particular to infections and seromas/hematomas demanding treatment. The use of routine drainage after SP is questionable, and a randomized trial is warranted to unravel the necessity of postoperative drainage.</description><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Exocrine glands</subject><subject>Facial Paralysis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Facial Paralysis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematoma</subject><subject>Hematoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxillofacial surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Parotid Gland - surgery</subject><subject>Parotid Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Parotid Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Care</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Salivary Gland Fistula - diagnosis</subject><subject>Salivary Gland Fistula - prevention & control</subject><subject>Seroma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Seroma - prevention & control</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Suction</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Sweating, Gustatory - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sweating, Gustatory - prevention & control</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><issn>0145-5613</issn><issn>1942-7522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePUnAi5fo7Fc21ZPUr0LBgnoOm82spCTdupsI_e_d0qogeJph3m_eDI-QUwqXlCp1BVRImVHOYCwYz2GPDGnsUiUZ2yfDjZxu9AE5CmEBEAcZPSQDzpQQY2BDcvPSr9Db2tS6Sebau66u0HSuXV8n03alTZc4m8xd6FzkdFd_YnLndb3U73hMDqxuAp7s6oi8Pdy_Tp7S2fPjdHI7S40A1aWiLEFDzhnmOkMAqaCqclqiQiql0uWYZkoqbnMKigmbaQ2Ga4tWWDAm5yNysfVdeffRY-iKtg4Gm0Yv0fWhYIIDV1QJFdHzP-jC9X4ZvytYxhSXPIv0iMCWMt6F4NEWK1-32q8LCsUm2OJvsHHlbGfcly1WPwvfSUYg3QIhJvN79V_DL7eOffk</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog</creator><creator>Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand</creator><creator>Christensen, Anne Louise Bach</creator><creator>Mirz, Frank</creator><creator>Reinholdt, Kasper Basse</creator><creator>Ovesen, Therese</creator><creator>Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-278X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5464-7948</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage</title><author>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog ; Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand ; Christensen, Anne Louise Bach ; Mirz, Frank ; Reinholdt, Kasper Basse ; Ovesen, Therese ; Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Exocrine glands</topic><topic>Facial Paralysis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Facial Paralysis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematoma</topic><topic>Hematoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxillofacial surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Parotid Gland - surgery</topic><topic>Parotid Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Parotid Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Care</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Salivary Gland Fistula - diagnosis</topic><topic>Salivary Gland Fistula - prevention & control</topic><topic>Seroma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Seroma - prevention & control</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Suction</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Sweating, Gustatory - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sweating, Gustatory - prevention & control</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Anne Louise Bach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinholdt, Kasper Basse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovesen, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ear, nose, & throat journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nielsen, Charlotte Fog</au><au>Riis, Charlotte Bjerg Sand</au><au>Christensen, Anne Louise Bach</au><au>Mirz, Frank</au><au>Reinholdt, Kasper Basse</au><au>Ovesen, Therese</au><au>Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage</atitle><jtitle>Ear, nose, & throat journal</jtitle><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>105-109</pages><issn>0145-5613</issn><eissn>1942-7522</eissn><abstract>Background:
Use of suction drain after superficial parotidectomy (SP) is based on national consensus considered best practice, but there is no evidence on the effect of the treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of drainage after SP by evaluating the rate of complications after SP in relation to the (ie, duration) of drainage and tumor size.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis was performed involving data from all consecutive patients undergoing SP at the Ear, Nose, and Throat department, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Denmark, between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Demographics including comorbidity, medication, tumor size, postoperative secretion through the drainage, as well as complications (hematoma, seroma, infection, fistulas, Frey syndrome, facial nerve palsy) were registered. Patients with secretion below 25 mL were compared to patients with secretion above 25 mL, that is, drainage less than 24 hours versus longer than 24 hours. Results: Two hundred five consecutive patients undergoing SP were enrolled. The overall risk of postoperative infection was 16.2%. Ten of 33 patients with infection were also diagnosed with an hematoma or seroma. The risk of infection increased with secretion above 25 mL (27.2%) compared to patients with less than 25 mL (13.1%; P = .0318). The same accounts for the risk of seromas/hematomas (P = .0055). We found no evidence that demographics or comorbidity correlated to the secretion in the drainage, but there is a tendency toward male gender having a higher risk off secretion above 25 mL (odds ratio 1.39).
Conclusion:
Overall, the risk of complications after SP increased with secretion beyond 25 mL (ie, drainage for more than 24 hours). This applied in particular to infections and seromas/hematomas demanding treatment. The use of routine drainage after SP is questionable, and a randomized trial is warranted to unravel the necessity of postoperative drainage.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32744902</pmid><doi>10.1177/0145561320942380</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-278X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5464-7948</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0145-5613 |
ispartof | Ear, nose, & throat journal, 2022-02, Vol.101 (2), p.105-109 |
issn | 0145-5613 1942-7522 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2430371747 |
source | Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 |
subjects | Comorbidity Exocrine glands Facial Paralysis - diagnosis Facial Paralysis - prevention & control Female Hematoma Hematoma - diagnosis Humans Infections Male Maxillofacial surgery Middle Aged Parotid Gland - surgery Parotid Neoplasms - pathology Parotid Neoplasms - surgery Postoperative Care Postoperative Complications - diagnosis Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Retrospective Studies Salivary Gland Fistula - diagnosis Salivary Gland Fistula - prevention & control Seroma - diagnosis Seroma - prevention & control Sex Factors Suction Surgical outcomes Surgical Wound Infection - diagnosis Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control Sweating, Gustatory - diagnosis Sweating, Gustatory - prevention & control Tumor Burden |
title | Superficial Parotidectomy: Impact of Postoperative Drainage |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A43%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Superficial%20Parotidectomy:%20Impact%20of%20Postoperative%20Drainage&rft.jtitle=Ear,%20nose,%20&%20throat%20journal&rft.au=Nielsen,%20Charlotte%20Fog&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=105-109&rft.issn=0145-5613&rft.eissn=1942-7522&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0145561320942380&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2627353624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4bb0a0832e8a6e00570dd81be7e1557ab9167573f810724f6aa0c3afef4f0cc83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627353624&rft_id=info:pmid/32744902&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0145561320942380&rfr_iscdi=true |