Loading…

The relative and absolute benefit of programmed death receptor-1 vs programmed death ligand 1 therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

[Display omitted] •PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors significantly extended OS compared with standard of care therapy in advanced NSCLC.•Superior relative and absolute OS benefits in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors than in patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors.•The same increased OS benefit was obser...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International immunopharmacology 2020-10, Vol.87, p.106852-106852, Article 106852
Main Authors: Yi, Kun, Zhu, Qian, Kuang, Yu-Kang, Jiang, Si-Cong, Hu, Hao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors significantly extended OS compared with standard of care therapy in advanced NSCLC.•Superior relative and absolute OS benefits in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors than in patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors.•The same increased OS benefit was observed regardless of PD-L1 status. Programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors have shown promising results in treating advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our objective was to compare the relative and absolute benefits between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced NSCLC. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched up to Dec 1, 2019, for randomized controlled trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors that had available overall survival (OS) data in NSCLC. Random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled estimates. Twenty-three randomized controlled trials (15,797 patients) of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were included in the analysis. PD-1 inhibitors significantly extended OS compared with standard of care therapy (difference in means, 4.80 months, 95% CI 3.41–6.18; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66–0.78; P 
ISSN:1567-5769
1878-1705
DOI:10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106852