Loading…
The relative and absolute benefit of programmed death receptor-1 vs programmed death ligand 1 therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
[Display omitted] •PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors significantly extended OS compared with standard of care therapy in advanced NSCLC.•Superior relative and absolute OS benefits in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors than in patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors.•The same increased OS benefit was obser...
Saved in:
Published in: | International immunopharmacology 2020-10, Vol.87, p.106852-106852, Article 106852 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | [Display omitted]
•PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors significantly extended OS compared with standard of care therapy in advanced NSCLC.•Superior relative and absolute OS benefits in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors than in patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors.•The same increased OS benefit was observed regardless of PD-L1 status.
Programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors have shown promising results in treating advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our objective was to compare the relative and absolute benefits between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced NSCLC.
PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched up to Dec 1, 2019, for randomized controlled trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors that had available overall survival (OS) data in NSCLC. Random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled estimates.
Twenty-three randomized controlled trials (15,797 patients) of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were included in the analysis. PD-1 inhibitors significantly extended OS compared with standard of care therapy (difference in means, 4.80 months, 95% CI 3.41–6.18; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66–0.78; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1567-5769 1878-1705 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106852 |