Loading…

Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature

Concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy is the non‐surgical mainstay of treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The following aspects have emerged as fundamental components of the combined approach: first, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the minimum standard te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Head & neck 2020-11, Vol.42 (11), p.3405-3414
Main Authors: De Felice, Francesca, Bonomo, Pierluigi, Sanguineti, Giuseppe, Orlandi, Ester
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243
container_end_page 3414
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3405
container_title Head & neck
container_volume 42
creator De Felice, Francesca
Bonomo, Pierluigi
Sanguineti, Giuseppe
Orlandi, Ester
description Concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy is the non‐surgical mainstay of treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The following aspects have emerged as fundamental components of the combined approach: first, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the minimum standard technical requirement, with level 1 evidence in support of its reduction of late treatment‐induced morbidity in comparison with 3D conformal radiotherapy. Second, cisplatin‐based chemotherapy is the preferred systemic agent to be associated with radiation, with 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks deemed as the reference schedule. Because of significant progress in irradiation techniques achieved in last 15 years, the optimal fractionation schedule in modern radiation era remains controversial, especially for locally advanced disease. The purpose of this work was to perform a critical review on the value of moderately accelerated IMRT using simultaneous‐integrated boost (SIB) in HNSCC, aiming to provide insights on current clinical practice and directions for future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hed.26400
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2431825859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2449951264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1TAQhi0EoqWw4AWQJTZ0kdaOnThhU1W90EpFsIB15NjjHldOHGwHlB2PwMPwRDxJfU7aTSVWHo---efyI_SWkiNKSHm8AX1U1pyQZ2ifklYUhHHxfBtzVjAi-B56FeMdIYTVvHyJ9lgpalExso_-fvYagkzgFiyVArf7aGzHBGO0afn3-8_g9ex22SC1lcn6EadNBqcFz9GOtzjaYXZJjuDnuCu9XVV672P6iL8GqZJV0uEAMvoxYh8w_LQaRgW5QS9jhtXGWwUn-BSrYFdcTlOQNubIG-xs2g43B3iNXhjpIrx5eA_Q98uLb2dXxc2XT9dnpzeFYk1DCqMoo4YJAX2lW9HUNVBllOANGC17JSuqoWSsqbnOF6v6lmshTW8qXnJVcnaAPqy6U_A_ZoipG2zMN3Lrpl1GaFNWTdVm9P0T9M7PYczTZYq3bUWzQZk6XCkVfIwBTDcFO8iwdJR0Wyu7bGW3szKz7x4U537I2Ufy0bsMHK_AL-tg-b9Sd3VxvkreA3ukrs0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449951264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>De Felice, Francesca ; Bonomo, Pierluigi ; Sanguineti, Giuseppe ; Orlandi, Ester</creator><creatorcontrib>De Felice, Francesca ; Bonomo, Pierluigi ; Sanguineti, Giuseppe ; Orlandi, Ester</creatorcontrib><description>Concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy is the non‐surgical mainstay of treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The following aspects have emerged as fundamental components of the combined approach: first, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the minimum standard technical requirement, with level 1 evidence in support of its reduction of late treatment‐induced morbidity in comparison with 3D conformal radiotherapy. Second, cisplatin‐based chemotherapy is the preferred systemic agent to be associated with radiation, with 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks deemed as the reference schedule. Because of significant progress in irradiation techniques achieved in last 15 years, the optimal fractionation schedule in modern radiation era remains controversial, especially for locally advanced disease. The purpose of this work was to perform a critical review on the value of moderately accelerated IMRT using simultaneous‐integrated boost (SIB) in HNSCC, aiming to provide insights on current clinical practice and directions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-3074</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hed.26400</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32767530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Chemotherapy ; Cisplatin ; Head &amp; neck cancer ; head and neck cancer ; intensity modulated radiotherapy ; Morbidity ; Radiation therapy ; radiotherapy ; simultaneous integrated boost ; Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><ispartof>Head &amp; neck, 2020-11, Vol.42 (11), p.3405-3414</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6495-8574 ; 0000-0001-8999-5208 ; 0000-0001-6937-1406</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32767530$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Felice, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanguineti, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlandi, Ester</creatorcontrib><title>Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature</title><title>Head &amp; neck</title><addtitle>Head Neck</addtitle><description>Concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy is the non‐surgical mainstay of treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The following aspects have emerged as fundamental components of the combined approach: first, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the minimum standard technical requirement, with level 1 evidence in support of its reduction of late treatment‐induced morbidity in comparison with 3D conformal radiotherapy. Second, cisplatin‐based chemotherapy is the preferred systemic agent to be associated with radiation, with 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks deemed as the reference schedule. Because of significant progress in irradiation techniques achieved in last 15 years, the optimal fractionation schedule in modern radiation era remains controversial, especially for locally advanced disease. The purpose of this work was to perform a critical review on the value of moderately accelerated IMRT using simultaneous‐integrated boost (SIB) in HNSCC, aiming to provide insights on current clinical practice and directions for future research.</description><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cisplatin</subject><subject>Head &amp; neck cancer</subject><subject>head and neck cancer</subject><subject>intensity modulated radiotherapy</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>radiotherapy</subject><subject>simultaneous integrated boost</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><issn>1043-3074</issn><issn>1097-0347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctu1TAQhi0EoqWw4AWQJTZ0kdaOnThhU1W90EpFsIB15NjjHldOHGwHlB2PwMPwRDxJfU7aTSVWHo---efyI_SWkiNKSHm8AX1U1pyQZ2ifklYUhHHxfBtzVjAi-B56FeMdIYTVvHyJ9lgpalExso_-fvYagkzgFiyVArf7aGzHBGO0afn3-8_g9ex22SC1lcn6EadNBqcFz9GOtzjaYXZJjuDnuCu9XVV672P6iL8GqZJV0uEAMvoxYh8w_LQaRgW5QS9jhtXGWwUn-BSrYFdcTlOQNubIG-xs2g43B3iNXhjpIrx5eA_Q98uLb2dXxc2XT9dnpzeFYk1DCqMoo4YJAX2lW9HUNVBllOANGC17JSuqoWSsqbnOF6v6lmshTW8qXnJVcnaAPqy6U_A_ZoipG2zMN3Lrpl1GaFNWTdVm9P0T9M7PYczTZYq3bUWzQZk6XCkVfIwBTDcFO8iwdJR0Wyu7bGW3szKz7x4U537I2Ufy0bsMHK_AL-tg-b9Sd3VxvkreA3ukrs0</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>De Felice, Francesca</creator><creator>Bonomo, Pierluigi</creator><creator>Sanguineti, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Orlandi, Ester</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-8574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8999-5208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-1406</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature</title><author>De Felice, Francesca ; Bonomo, Pierluigi ; Sanguineti, Giuseppe ; Orlandi, Ester</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cisplatin</topic><topic>Head &amp; neck cancer</topic><topic>head and neck cancer</topic><topic>intensity modulated radiotherapy</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>radiotherapy</topic><topic>simultaneous integrated boost</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Felice, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanguineti, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlandi, Ester</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Head &amp; neck</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Felice, Francesca</au><au>Bonomo, Pierluigi</au><au>Sanguineti, Giuseppe</au><au>Orlandi, Ester</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature</atitle><jtitle>Head &amp; neck</jtitle><addtitle>Head Neck</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3405</spage><epage>3414</epage><pages>3405-3414</pages><issn>1043-3074</issn><eissn>1097-0347</eissn><abstract>Concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy is the non‐surgical mainstay of treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The following aspects have emerged as fundamental components of the combined approach: first, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the minimum standard technical requirement, with level 1 evidence in support of its reduction of late treatment‐induced morbidity in comparison with 3D conformal radiotherapy. Second, cisplatin‐based chemotherapy is the preferred systemic agent to be associated with radiation, with 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks deemed as the reference schedule. Because of significant progress in irradiation techniques achieved in last 15 years, the optimal fractionation schedule in modern radiation era remains controversial, especially for locally advanced disease. The purpose of this work was to perform a critical review on the value of moderately accelerated IMRT using simultaneous‐integrated boost (SIB) in HNSCC, aiming to provide insights on current clinical practice and directions for future research.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32767530</pmid><doi>10.1002/hed.26400</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-8574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8999-5208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-1406</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1043-3074
ispartof Head & neck, 2020-11, Vol.42 (11), p.3405-3414
issn 1043-3074
1097-0347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2431825859
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Chemotherapy
Cisplatin
Head & neck cancer
head and neck cancer
intensity modulated radiotherapy
Morbidity
Radiation therapy
radiotherapy
simultaneous integrated boost
Squamous cell carcinoma
title Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T02%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moderately%20accelerated%20intensity%E2%80%90modulated%20radiation%20therapy%20using%20simultaneous%20integrated%20boost:%20Practical%20reasons%20or%20evidence%E2%80%90based%20choice?%20A%20critical%20appraisal%20of%20literature&rft.jtitle=Head%20&%20neck&rft.au=De%20Felice,%20Francesca&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3405&rft.epage=3414&rft.pages=3405-3414&rft.issn=1043-3074&rft.eissn=1097-0347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hed.26400&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2449951264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449951264&rft_id=info:pmid/32767530&rfr_iscdi=true