Loading…
Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature
Concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy is the non‐surgical mainstay of treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The following aspects have emerged as fundamental components of the combined approach: first, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the minimum standard te...
Saved in:
Published in: | Head & neck 2020-11, Vol.42 (11), p.3405-3414 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243 |
container_end_page | 3414 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3405 |
container_title | Head & neck |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | De Felice, Francesca Bonomo, Pierluigi Sanguineti, Giuseppe Orlandi, Ester |
description | Concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy is the non‐surgical mainstay of treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The following aspects have emerged as fundamental components of the combined approach: first, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the minimum standard technical requirement, with level 1 evidence in support of its reduction of late treatment‐induced morbidity in comparison with 3D conformal radiotherapy. Second, cisplatin‐based chemotherapy is the preferred systemic agent to be associated with radiation, with 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks deemed as the reference schedule. Because of significant progress in irradiation techniques achieved in last 15 years, the optimal fractionation schedule in modern radiation era remains controversial, especially for locally advanced disease. The purpose of this work was to perform a critical review on the value of moderately accelerated IMRT using simultaneous‐integrated boost (SIB) in HNSCC, aiming to provide insights on current clinical practice and directions for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hed.26400 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2431825859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2449951264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1TAQhi0EoqWw4AWQJTZ0kdaOnThhU1W90EpFsIB15NjjHldOHGwHlB2PwMPwRDxJfU7aTSVWHo---efyI_SWkiNKSHm8AX1U1pyQZ2ifklYUhHHxfBtzVjAi-B56FeMdIYTVvHyJ9lgpalExso_-fvYagkzgFiyVArf7aGzHBGO0afn3-8_g9ex22SC1lcn6EadNBqcFz9GOtzjaYXZJjuDnuCu9XVV672P6iL8GqZJV0uEAMvoxYh8w_LQaRgW5QS9jhtXGWwUn-BSrYFdcTlOQNubIG-xs2g43B3iNXhjpIrx5eA_Q98uLb2dXxc2XT9dnpzeFYk1DCqMoo4YJAX2lW9HUNVBllOANGC17JSuqoWSsqbnOF6v6lmshTW8qXnJVcnaAPqy6U_A_ZoipG2zMN3Lrpl1GaFNWTdVm9P0T9M7PYczTZYq3bUWzQZk6XCkVfIwBTDcFO8iwdJR0Wyu7bGW3szKz7x4U537I2Ufy0bsMHK_AL-tg-b9Sd3VxvkreA3ukrs0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449951264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>De Felice, Francesca ; Bonomo, Pierluigi ; Sanguineti, Giuseppe ; Orlandi, Ester</creator><creatorcontrib>De Felice, Francesca ; Bonomo, Pierluigi ; Sanguineti, Giuseppe ; Orlandi, Ester</creatorcontrib><description>Concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy is the non‐surgical mainstay of treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The following aspects have emerged as fundamental components of the combined approach: first, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the minimum standard technical requirement, with level 1 evidence in support of its reduction of late treatment‐induced morbidity in comparison with 3D conformal radiotherapy. Second, cisplatin‐based chemotherapy is the preferred systemic agent to be associated with radiation, with 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks deemed as the reference schedule. Because of significant progress in irradiation techniques achieved in last 15 years, the optimal fractionation schedule in modern radiation era remains controversial, especially for locally advanced disease. The purpose of this work was to perform a critical review on the value of moderately accelerated IMRT using simultaneous‐integrated boost (SIB) in HNSCC, aiming to provide insights on current clinical practice and directions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-3074</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hed.26400</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32767530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Chemotherapy ; Cisplatin ; Head & neck cancer ; head and neck cancer ; intensity modulated radiotherapy ; Morbidity ; Radiation therapy ; radiotherapy ; simultaneous integrated boost ; Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><ispartof>Head & neck, 2020-11, Vol.42 (11), p.3405-3414</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6495-8574 ; 0000-0001-8999-5208 ; 0000-0001-6937-1406</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32767530$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Felice, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanguineti, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlandi, Ester</creatorcontrib><title>Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature</title><title>Head & neck</title><addtitle>Head Neck</addtitle><description>Concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy is the non‐surgical mainstay of treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The following aspects have emerged as fundamental components of the combined approach: first, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the minimum standard technical requirement, with level 1 evidence in support of its reduction of late treatment‐induced morbidity in comparison with 3D conformal radiotherapy. Second, cisplatin‐based chemotherapy is the preferred systemic agent to be associated with radiation, with 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks deemed as the reference schedule. Because of significant progress in irradiation techniques achieved in last 15 years, the optimal fractionation schedule in modern radiation era remains controversial, especially for locally advanced disease. The purpose of this work was to perform a critical review on the value of moderately accelerated IMRT using simultaneous‐integrated boost (SIB) in HNSCC, aiming to provide insights on current clinical practice and directions for future research.</description><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cisplatin</subject><subject>Head & neck cancer</subject><subject>head and neck cancer</subject><subject>intensity modulated radiotherapy</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>radiotherapy</subject><subject>simultaneous integrated boost</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><issn>1043-3074</issn><issn>1097-0347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctu1TAQhi0EoqWw4AWQJTZ0kdaOnThhU1W90EpFsIB15NjjHldOHGwHlB2PwMPwRDxJfU7aTSVWHo---efyI_SWkiNKSHm8AX1U1pyQZ2ifklYUhHHxfBtzVjAi-B56FeMdIYTVvHyJ9lgpalExso_-fvYagkzgFiyVArf7aGzHBGO0afn3-8_g9ex22SC1lcn6EadNBqcFz9GOtzjaYXZJjuDnuCu9XVV672P6iL8GqZJV0uEAMvoxYh8w_LQaRgW5QS9jhtXGWwUn-BSrYFdcTlOQNubIG-xs2g43B3iNXhjpIrx5eA_Q98uLb2dXxc2XT9dnpzeFYk1DCqMoo4YJAX2lW9HUNVBllOANGC17JSuqoWSsqbnOF6v6lmshTW8qXnJVcnaAPqy6U_A_ZoipG2zMN3Lrpl1GaFNWTdVm9P0T9M7PYczTZYq3bUWzQZk6XCkVfIwBTDcFO8iwdJR0Wyu7bGW3szKz7x4U537I2Ufy0bsMHK_AL-tg-b9Sd3VxvkreA3ukrs0</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>De Felice, Francesca</creator><creator>Bonomo, Pierluigi</creator><creator>Sanguineti, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Orlandi, Ester</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-8574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8999-5208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-1406</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature</title><author>De Felice, Francesca ; Bonomo, Pierluigi ; Sanguineti, Giuseppe ; Orlandi, Ester</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cisplatin</topic><topic>Head & neck cancer</topic><topic>head and neck cancer</topic><topic>intensity modulated radiotherapy</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>radiotherapy</topic><topic>simultaneous integrated boost</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Felice, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanguineti, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlandi, Ester</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Head & neck</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Felice, Francesca</au><au>Bonomo, Pierluigi</au><au>Sanguineti, Giuseppe</au><au>Orlandi, Ester</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature</atitle><jtitle>Head & neck</jtitle><addtitle>Head Neck</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3405</spage><epage>3414</epage><pages>3405-3414</pages><issn>1043-3074</issn><eissn>1097-0347</eissn><abstract>Concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy is the non‐surgical mainstay of treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The following aspects have emerged as fundamental components of the combined approach: first, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the minimum standard technical requirement, with level 1 evidence in support of its reduction of late treatment‐induced morbidity in comparison with 3D conformal radiotherapy. Second, cisplatin‐based chemotherapy is the preferred systemic agent to be associated with radiation, with 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks deemed as the reference schedule. Because of significant progress in irradiation techniques achieved in last 15 years, the optimal fractionation schedule in modern radiation era remains controversial, especially for locally advanced disease. The purpose of this work was to perform a critical review on the value of moderately accelerated IMRT using simultaneous‐integrated boost (SIB) in HNSCC, aiming to provide insights on current clinical practice and directions for future research.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32767530</pmid><doi>10.1002/hed.26400</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-8574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8999-5208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-1406</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1043-3074 |
ispartof | Head & neck, 2020-11, Vol.42 (11), p.3405-3414 |
issn | 1043-3074 1097-0347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2431825859 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Chemotherapy Cisplatin Head & neck cancer head and neck cancer intensity modulated radiotherapy Morbidity Radiation therapy radiotherapy simultaneous integrated boost Squamous cell carcinoma |
title | Moderately accelerated intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence‐based choice? A critical appraisal of literature |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T02%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moderately%20accelerated%20intensity%E2%80%90modulated%20radiation%20therapy%20using%20simultaneous%20integrated%20boost:%20Practical%20reasons%20or%20evidence%E2%80%90based%20choice?%20A%20critical%20appraisal%20of%20literature&rft.jtitle=Head%20&%20neck&rft.au=De%20Felice,%20Francesca&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3405&rft.epage=3414&rft.pages=3405-3414&rft.issn=1043-3074&rft.eissn=1097-0347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hed.26400&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2449951264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-fc131f377eb5d97866e1cfc748efdabca51de233864d0345b94d7afbf5424c243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449951264&rft_id=info:pmid/32767530&rfr_iscdi=true |