Loading…

Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes

Background En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs). Objectives To compare the short and long‐term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with thos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of surgical oncology 2020-12, Vol.122 (7), p.1435-1443
Main Authors: Júnior, Sérgio S., Coelho, Fabricio F., Tustumi, Francisco, Cassenote, Alex J. F., Jeismann, Vagner B., Fonseca, Gilton M., Kruger, Jaime A. P., Ernani, Lucas, Cecconello, Ivan, Herman, Paulo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03
container_end_page 1443
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1435
container_title Journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 122
creator Júnior, Sérgio S.
Coelho, Fabricio F.
Tustumi, Francisco
Cassenote, Alex J. F.
Jeismann, Vagner B.
Fonseca, Gilton M.
Kruger, Jaime A. P.
Ernani, Lucas
Cecconello, Ivan
Herman, Paulo
description Background En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs). Objectives To compare the short and long‐term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with those submitted to isolated hepatectomies. Methods From a prospective database, a case‐matched 1:2 study was performed comparing MLRs and isolated hepatectomy. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MLRs and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long‐term survival. Results Fifty‐three MLRs were compared with 106 matched controls. Patients undergoing MLRs had longer operative time (430 [320‐525] vs 360 [270‐440] minutes, P = .005); higher estimated blood loss (600 [400‐800] vs 400 [100‐600] mL; P = .011); longer hospital stay (8 [6‐14] vs 7 [5‐9] days; P = .003); and higher postoperative mortality (9.4% vs 1.9%, P = .042). Number of resected organs was not an independent prognostic factor for perioperative major complications (odds ratio [OR], 1 organ = 1.8 [0.54‐6.05]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 4.0 [0.35‐13.84]) or perioperative mortality (OR, 1, organ = 5.2 [0.91‐29.51]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 6.5 [0.52‐79.60]). No differences in overall (P = .771) and disease‐free survival (P = .28) were observed. Conclusion MLRs are feasible with acceptable morbidity but relatively high perioperative mortality. MLRs did not negatively affect long‐term outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jso.26162
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432856816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2432856816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10LtOwzAUBmALgaAUBl4AWWKBIcV24hsbqriqUgdgjpzYgVROXOwE1I1H4Bl5EtwLDEhMZzjf-aXzA3CE0QgjRM5nwY0Iw4xsgQFGkiUSSbENBnFHkoxLtAf2Q5ghhKRk2S7YSwnnkmA5AGbsmqJujYa2fjMeqlbDprdd_VaH0nhloTfBlF3t2nABL2HpmrnyKu5NtMouQh2gq2B4cb5bXVvXPn99fHbGN9D1XTww4QDsVMoGc7iZQ_B0ffU4vk0m05u78eUkKVOakkRhplOtdVFxYojMJGWoRBhxobnCGS8qibhmlGghZEqx4FooIkrKZUFIhdIhOF3nzr177U3o8mb5hrWqNa4POclSIigTmEV68ofOXO_jR0vFMso5pSSqs7UqvQvBmyqf-7pRfpFjlC-7z2P3-ar7aI83iX3RGP0rf8qO4HwN3mtrFv8n5fcP03XkN3JWjnc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464577552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Júnior, Sérgio S. ; Coelho, Fabricio F. ; Tustumi, Francisco ; Cassenote, Alex J. F. ; Jeismann, Vagner B. ; Fonseca, Gilton M. ; Kruger, Jaime A. P. ; Ernani, Lucas ; Cecconello, Ivan ; Herman, Paulo</creator><creatorcontrib>Júnior, Sérgio S. ; Coelho, Fabricio F. ; Tustumi, Francisco ; Cassenote, Alex J. F. ; Jeismann, Vagner B. ; Fonseca, Gilton M. ; Kruger, Jaime A. P. ; Ernani, Lucas ; Cecconello, Ivan ; Herman, Paulo</creatorcontrib><description>Background En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs). Objectives To compare the short and long‐term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with those submitted to isolated hepatectomies. Methods From a prospective database, a case‐matched 1:2 study was performed comparing MLRs and isolated hepatectomy. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MLRs and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long‐term survival. Results Fifty‐three MLRs were compared with 106 matched controls. Patients undergoing MLRs had longer operative time (430 [320‐525] vs 360 [270‐440] minutes, P = .005); higher estimated blood loss (600 [400‐800] vs 400 [100‐600] mL; P = .011); longer hospital stay (8 [6‐14] vs 7 [5‐9] days; P = .003); and higher postoperative mortality (9.4% vs 1.9%, P = .042). Number of resected organs was not an independent prognostic factor for perioperative major complications (odds ratio [OR], 1 organ = 1.8 [0.54‐6.05]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 4.0 [0.35‐13.84]) or perioperative mortality (OR, 1, organ = 5.2 [0.91‐29.51]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 6.5 [0.52‐79.60]). No differences in overall (P = .771) and disease‐free survival (P = .28) were observed. Conclusion MLRs are feasible with acceptable morbidity but relatively high perioperative mortality. MLRs did not negatively affect long‐term outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jso.26162</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32779219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; comparative study ; Female ; hepatectomy ; Hepatectomy - adverse effects ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Humans ; Liver cancer ; Liver Neoplasms - mortality ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; matched pair analysis ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; postoperative complications ; Prospective Studies ; survival analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical oncology, 2020-12, Vol.122 (7), p.1435-1443</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3529-3993 ; 0000-0001-6695-0496 ; 0000-0002-7260-0799</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32779219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Júnior, Sérgio S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Fabricio F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tustumi, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassenote, Alex J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeismann, Vagner B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Gilton M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jaime A. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernani, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecconello, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Paulo</creatorcontrib><title>Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes</title><title>Journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs). Objectives To compare the short and long‐term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with those submitted to isolated hepatectomies. Methods From a prospective database, a case‐matched 1:2 study was performed comparing MLRs and isolated hepatectomy. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MLRs and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long‐term survival. Results Fifty‐three MLRs were compared with 106 matched controls. Patients undergoing MLRs had longer operative time (430 [320‐525] vs 360 [270‐440] minutes, P = .005); higher estimated blood loss (600 [400‐800] vs 400 [100‐600] mL; P = .011); longer hospital stay (8 [6‐14] vs 7 [5‐9] days; P = .003); and higher postoperative mortality (9.4% vs 1.9%, P = .042). Number of resected organs was not an independent prognostic factor for perioperative major complications (odds ratio [OR], 1 organ = 1.8 [0.54‐6.05]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 4.0 [0.35‐13.84]) or perioperative mortality (OR, 1, organ = 5.2 [0.91‐29.51]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 6.5 [0.52‐79.60]). No differences in overall (P = .771) and disease‐free survival (P = .28) were observed. Conclusion MLRs are feasible with acceptable morbidity but relatively high perioperative mortality. MLRs did not negatively affect long‐term outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>comparative study</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>hepatectomy</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>matched pair analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>postoperative complications</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>survival analysis</subject><issn>0022-4790</issn><issn>1096-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10LtOwzAUBmALgaAUBl4AWWKBIcV24hsbqriqUgdgjpzYgVROXOwE1I1H4Bl5EtwLDEhMZzjf-aXzA3CE0QgjRM5nwY0Iw4xsgQFGkiUSSbENBnFHkoxLtAf2Q5ghhKRk2S7YSwnnkmA5AGbsmqJujYa2fjMeqlbDprdd_VaH0nhloTfBlF3t2nABL2HpmrnyKu5NtMouQh2gq2B4cb5bXVvXPn99fHbGN9D1XTww4QDsVMoGc7iZQ_B0ffU4vk0m05u78eUkKVOakkRhplOtdVFxYojMJGWoRBhxobnCGS8qibhmlGghZEqx4FooIkrKZUFIhdIhOF3nzr177U3o8mb5hrWqNa4POclSIigTmEV68ofOXO_jR0vFMso5pSSqs7UqvQvBmyqf-7pRfpFjlC-7z2P3-ar7aI83iX3RGP0rf8qO4HwN3mtrFv8n5fcP03XkN3JWjnc</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Júnior, Sérgio S.</creator><creator>Coelho, Fabricio F.</creator><creator>Tustumi, Francisco</creator><creator>Cassenote, Alex J. F.</creator><creator>Jeismann, Vagner B.</creator><creator>Fonseca, Gilton M.</creator><creator>Kruger, Jaime A. P.</creator><creator>Ernani, Lucas</creator><creator>Cecconello, Ivan</creator><creator>Herman, Paulo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-3993</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-0496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7260-0799</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes</title><author>Júnior, Sérgio S. ; Coelho, Fabricio F. ; Tustumi, Francisco ; Cassenote, Alex J. F. ; Jeismann, Vagner B. ; Fonseca, Gilton M. ; Kruger, Jaime A. P. ; Ernani, Lucas ; Cecconello, Ivan ; Herman, Paulo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>comparative study</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>hepatectomy</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>matched pair analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>postoperative complications</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>survival analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Júnior, Sérgio S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Fabricio F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tustumi, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassenote, Alex J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeismann, Vagner B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Gilton M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jaime A. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernani, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecconello, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Paulo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Júnior, Sérgio S.</au><au>Coelho, Fabricio F.</au><au>Tustumi, Francisco</au><au>Cassenote, Alex J. F.</au><au>Jeismann, Vagner B.</au><au>Fonseca, Gilton M.</au><au>Kruger, Jaime A. P.</au><au>Ernani, Lucas</au><au>Cecconello, Ivan</au><au>Herman, Paulo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1435</spage><epage>1443</epage><pages>1435-1443</pages><issn>0022-4790</issn><eissn>1096-9098</eissn><abstract>Background En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs). Objectives To compare the short and long‐term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with those submitted to isolated hepatectomies. Methods From a prospective database, a case‐matched 1:2 study was performed comparing MLRs and isolated hepatectomy. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MLRs and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long‐term survival. Results Fifty‐three MLRs were compared with 106 matched controls. Patients undergoing MLRs had longer operative time (430 [320‐525] vs 360 [270‐440] minutes, P = .005); higher estimated blood loss (600 [400‐800] vs 400 [100‐600] mL; P = .011); longer hospital stay (8 [6‐14] vs 7 [5‐9] days; P = .003); and higher postoperative mortality (9.4% vs 1.9%, P = .042). Number of resected organs was not an independent prognostic factor for perioperative major complications (odds ratio [OR], 1 organ = 1.8 [0.54‐6.05]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 4.0 [0.35‐13.84]) or perioperative mortality (OR, 1, organ = 5.2 [0.91‐29.51]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 6.5 [0.52‐79.60]). No differences in overall (P = .771) and disease‐free survival (P = .28) were observed. Conclusion MLRs are feasible with acceptable morbidity but relatively high perioperative mortality. MLRs did not negatively affect long‐term outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32779219</pmid><doi>10.1002/jso.26162</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-3993</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-0496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7260-0799</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4790
ispartof Journal of surgical oncology, 2020-12, Vol.122 (7), p.1435-1443
issn 0022-4790
1096-9098
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432856816
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
comparative study
Female
hepatectomy
Hepatectomy - adverse effects
Hepatectomy - methods
Humans
Liver cancer
Liver Neoplasms - mortality
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Male
matched pair analysis
Middle Aged
Mortality
postoperative complications
Prospective Studies
survival analysis
title Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A28%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20liver%20and%20multivisceral%20resections:%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20short%20and%20long%E2%80%90term%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=J%C3%BAnior,%20S%C3%A9rgio%20S.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1435&rft.epage=1443&rft.pages=1435-1443&rft.issn=0022-4790&rft.eissn=1096-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jso.26162&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2432856816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464577552&rft_id=info:pmid/32779219&rfr_iscdi=true