Loading…
Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes
Background En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs). Objectives To compare the short and long‐term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with thos...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2020-12, Vol.122 (7), p.1435-1443 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03 |
container_end_page | 1443 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1435 |
container_title | Journal of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 122 |
creator | Júnior, Sérgio S. Coelho, Fabricio F. Tustumi, Francisco Cassenote, Alex J. F. Jeismann, Vagner B. Fonseca, Gilton M. Kruger, Jaime A. P. Ernani, Lucas Cecconello, Ivan Herman, Paulo |
description | Background
En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs).
Objectives
To compare the short and long‐term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with those submitted to isolated hepatectomies.
Methods
From a prospective database, a case‐matched 1:2 study was performed comparing MLRs and isolated hepatectomy. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MLRs and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long‐term survival.
Results
Fifty‐three MLRs were compared with 106 matched controls. Patients undergoing MLRs had longer operative time (430 [320‐525] vs 360 [270‐440] minutes, P = .005); higher estimated blood loss (600 [400‐800] vs 400 [100‐600] mL; P = .011); longer hospital stay (8 [6‐14] vs 7 [5‐9] days; P = .003); and higher postoperative mortality (9.4% vs 1.9%, P = .042). Number of resected organs was not an independent prognostic factor for perioperative major complications (odds ratio [OR], 1 organ = 1.8 [0.54‐6.05]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 4.0 [0.35‐13.84]) or perioperative mortality (OR, 1, organ = 5.2 [0.91‐29.51]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 6.5 [0.52‐79.60]). No differences in overall (P = .771) and disease‐free survival (P = .28) were observed.
Conclusion
MLRs are feasible with acceptable morbidity but relatively high perioperative mortality. MLRs did not negatively affect long‐term outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jso.26162 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432856816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2432856816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10LtOwzAUBmALgaAUBl4AWWKBIcV24hsbqriqUgdgjpzYgVROXOwE1I1H4Bl5EtwLDEhMZzjf-aXzA3CE0QgjRM5nwY0Iw4xsgQFGkiUSSbENBnFHkoxLtAf2Q5ghhKRk2S7YSwnnkmA5AGbsmqJujYa2fjMeqlbDprdd_VaH0nhloTfBlF3t2nABL2HpmrnyKu5NtMouQh2gq2B4cb5bXVvXPn99fHbGN9D1XTww4QDsVMoGc7iZQ_B0ffU4vk0m05u78eUkKVOakkRhplOtdVFxYojMJGWoRBhxobnCGS8qibhmlGghZEqx4FooIkrKZUFIhdIhOF3nzr177U3o8mb5hrWqNa4POclSIigTmEV68ofOXO_jR0vFMso5pSSqs7UqvQvBmyqf-7pRfpFjlC-7z2P3-ar7aI83iX3RGP0rf8qO4HwN3mtrFv8n5fcP03XkN3JWjnc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464577552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Júnior, Sérgio S. ; Coelho, Fabricio F. ; Tustumi, Francisco ; Cassenote, Alex J. F. ; Jeismann, Vagner B. ; Fonseca, Gilton M. ; Kruger, Jaime A. P. ; Ernani, Lucas ; Cecconello, Ivan ; Herman, Paulo</creator><creatorcontrib>Júnior, Sérgio S. ; Coelho, Fabricio F. ; Tustumi, Francisco ; Cassenote, Alex J. F. ; Jeismann, Vagner B. ; Fonseca, Gilton M. ; Kruger, Jaime A. P. ; Ernani, Lucas ; Cecconello, Ivan ; Herman, Paulo</creatorcontrib><description>Background
En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs).
Objectives
To compare the short and long‐term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with those submitted to isolated hepatectomies.
Methods
From a prospective database, a case‐matched 1:2 study was performed comparing MLRs and isolated hepatectomy. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MLRs and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long‐term survival.
Results
Fifty‐three MLRs were compared with 106 matched controls. Patients undergoing MLRs had longer operative time (430 [320‐525] vs 360 [270‐440] minutes, P = .005); higher estimated blood loss (600 [400‐800] vs 400 [100‐600] mL; P = .011); longer hospital stay (8 [6‐14] vs 7 [5‐9] days; P = .003); and higher postoperative mortality (9.4% vs 1.9%, P = .042). Number of resected organs was not an independent prognostic factor for perioperative major complications (odds ratio [OR], 1 organ = 1.8 [0.54‐6.05]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 4.0 [0.35‐13.84]) or perioperative mortality (OR, 1, organ = 5.2 [0.91‐29.51]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 6.5 [0.52‐79.60]). No differences in overall (P = .771) and disease‐free survival (P = .28) were observed.
Conclusion
MLRs are feasible with acceptable morbidity but relatively high perioperative mortality. MLRs did not negatively affect long‐term outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jso.26162</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32779219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; comparative study ; Female ; hepatectomy ; Hepatectomy - adverse effects ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Humans ; Liver cancer ; Liver Neoplasms - mortality ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; matched pair analysis ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; postoperative complications ; Prospective Studies ; survival analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical oncology, 2020-12, Vol.122 (7), p.1435-1443</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3529-3993 ; 0000-0001-6695-0496 ; 0000-0002-7260-0799</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32779219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Júnior, Sérgio S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Fabricio F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tustumi, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassenote, Alex J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeismann, Vagner B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Gilton M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jaime A. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernani, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecconello, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Paulo</creatorcontrib><title>Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes</title><title>Journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background
En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs).
Objectives
To compare the short and long‐term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with those submitted to isolated hepatectomies.
Methods
From a prospective database, a case‐matched 1:2 study was performed comparing MLRs and isolated hepatectomy. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MLRs and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long‐term survival.
Results
Fifty‐three MLRs were compared with 106 matched controls. Patients undergoing MLRs had longer operative time (430 [320‐525] vs 360 [270‐440] minutes, P = .005); higher estimated blood loss (600 [400‐800] vs 400 [100‐600] mL; P = .011); longer hospital stay (8 [6‐14] vs 7 [5‐9] days; P = .003); and higher postoperative mortality (9.4% vs 1.9%, P = .042). Number of resected organs was not an independent prognostic factor for perioperative major complications (odds ratio [OR], 1 organ = 1.8 [0.54‐6.05]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 4.0 [0.35‐13.84]) or perioperative mortality (OR, 1, organ = 5.2 [0.91‐29.51]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 6.5 [0.52‐79.60]). No differences in overall (P = .771) and disease‐free survival (P = .28) were observed.
Conclusion
MLRs are feasible with acceptable morbidity but relatively high perioperative mortality. MLRs did not negatively affect long‐term outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>comparative study</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>hepatectomy</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>matched pair analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>postoperative complications</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>survival analysis</subject><issn>0022-4790</issn><issn>1096-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10LtOwzAUBmALgaAUBl4AWWKBIcV24hsbqriqUgdgjpzYgVROXOwE1I1H4Bl5EtwLDEhMZzjf-aXzA3CE0QgjRM5nwY0Iw4xsgQFGkiUSSbENBnFHkoxLtAf2Q5ghhKRk2S7YSwnnkmA5AGbsmqJujYa2fjMeqlbDprdd_VaH0nhloTfBlF3t2nABL2HpmrnyKu5NtMouQh2gq2B4cb5bXVvXPn99fHbGN9D1XTww4QDsVMoGc7iZQ_B0ffU4vk0m05u78eUkKVOakkRhplOtdVFxYojMJGWoRBhxobnCGS8qibhmlGghZEqx4FooIkrKZUFIhdIhOF3nzr177U3o8mb5hrWqNa4POclSIigTmEV68ofOXO_jR0vFMso5pSSqs7UqvQvBmyqf-7pRfpFjlC-7z2P3-ar7aI83iX3RGP0rf8qO4HwN3mtrFv8n5fcP03XkN3JWjnc</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Júnior, Sérgio S.</creator><creator>Coelho, Fabricio F.</creator><creator>Tustumi, Francisco</creator><creator>Cassenote, Alex J. F.</creator><creator>Jeismann, Vagner B.</creator><creator>Fonseca, Gilton M.</creator><creator>Kruger, Jaime A. P.</creator><creator>Ernani, Lucas</creator><creator>Cecconello, Ivan</creator><creator>Herman, Paulo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-3993</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-0496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7260-0799</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes</title><author>Júnior, Sérgio S. ; Coelho, Fabricio F. ; Tustumi, Francisco ; Cassenote, Alex J. F. ; Jeismann, Vagner B. ; Fonseca, Gilton M. ; Kruger, Jaime A. P. ; Ernani, Lucas ; Cecconello, Ivan ; Herman, Paulo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>comparative study</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>hepatectomy</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>matched pair analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>postoperative complications</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>survival analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Júnior, Sérgio S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Fabricio F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tustumi, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassenote, Alex J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeismann, Vagner B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Gilton M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jaime A. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernani, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecconello, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Paulo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Júnior, Sérgio S.</au><au>Coelho, Fabricio F.</au><au>Tustumi, Francisco</au><au>Cassenote, Alex J. F.</au><au>Jeismann, Vagner B.</au><au>Fonseca, Gilton M.</au><au>Kruger, Jaime A. P.</au><au>Ernani, Lucas</au><au>Cecconello, Ivan</au><au>Herman, Paulo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1435</spage><epage>1443</epage><pages>1435-1443</pages><issn>0022-4790</issn><eissn>1096-9098</eissn><abstract>Background
En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs).
Objectives
To compare the short and long‐term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with those submitted to isolated hepatectomies.
Methods
From a prospective database, a case‐matched 1:2 study was performed comparing MLRs and isolated hepatectomy. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MLRs and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long‐term survival.
Results
Fifty‐three MLRs were compared with 106 matched controls. Patients undergoing MLRs had longer operative time (430 [320‐525] vs 360 [270‐440] minutes, P = .005); higher estimated blood loss (600 [400‐800] vs 400 [100‐600] mL; P = .011); longer hospital stay (8 [6‐14] vs 7 [5‐9] days; P = .003); and higher postoperative mortality (9.4% vs 1.9%, P = .042). Number of resected organs was not an independent prognostic factor for perioperative major complications (odds ratio [OR], 1 organ = 1.8 [0.54‐6.05]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 4.0 [0.35‐13.84]) or perioperative mortality (OR, 1, organ = 5.2 [0.91‐29.51]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 6.5 [0.52‐79.60]). No differences in overall (P = .771) and disease‐free survival (P = .28) were observed.
Conclusion
MLRs are feasible with acceptable morbidity but relatively high perioperative mortality. MLRs did not negatively affect long‐term outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32779219</pmid><doi>10.1002/jso.26162</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-3993</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-0496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7260-0799</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4790 |
ispartof | Journal of surgical oncology, 2020-12, Vol.122 (7), p.1435-1443 |
issn | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432856816 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged comparative study Female hepatectomy Hepatectomy - adverse effects Hepatectomy - methods Humans Liver cancer Liver Neoplasms - mortality Liver Neoplasms - surgery Male matched pair analysis Middle Aged Mortality postoperative complications Prospective Studies survival analysis |
title | Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long‐term outcomes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A28%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20liver%20and%20multivisceral%20resections:%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20short%20and%20long%E2%80%90term%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=J%C3%BAnior,%20S%C3%A9rgio%20S.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1435&rft.epage=1443&rft.pages=1435-1443&rft.issn=0022-4790&rft.eissn=1096-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jso.26162&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2432856816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-a16d3dddbf72e2949560c01078d7a147bf907d652d88935187d8a28c579b22f03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464577552&rft_id=info:pmid/32779219&rfr_iscdi=true |