Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Approach to Hiatal Hernia Repair: Results After 7 Years of Robotic Experience

Introduction Robotic hiatal hernia repair offers potential advantages over traditional laparoscopy, most notably enhanced visualization, improved ergonomics, and articulating instruments. The clinical outcomes, however, have not been adequately evaluated. We report outcomes of laparoscopic and robot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American surgeon 2020-09, Vol.86 (9), p.1083-1087
Main Authors: O’Connor, Sean C., Mallard, Matthew, Desai, Shivani S., Couto, Francisco, Gottlieb, Matthew, Ewing, Alex, Cobb, William S., Carbonell, Alfredo M., Warren, Jeremy A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Body mass index
Complications
Continuity (mathematics)
Dissection
Endoscopy
Ergonomics
Gastrointestinal surgery
Hernia
Hiatal hernias
Hospitals
Laparoscopy
Robotics
Robots
Surgeons
Thoracic surgery
Visualization
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction Robotic hiatal hernia repair offers potential advantages over traditional laparoscopy, most notably enhanced visualization, improved ergonomics, and articulating instruments. The clinical outcomes, however, have not been adequately evaluated. We report outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic hiatal hernia repairs. Methods A retrospective observational cohort study was performed of all hiatal hernia repairs performed from 2006 through 2019. Operative, demographic, and outcomes data were compared between laparoscopic and robotic groups. Discrete variables were analyzed with Chi-square of Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were analyzed with Student’s t test (mean) or Wilcoxon rank sum (medians). All analyses were performed using R statistical software. Results Laparoscopic repair was performed in 278 patients and robotic repair in 114. More recurrent hernias were repaired robotically (24.5% vs 12.9%, P = .08). Operative times were no different between groups (175 vs 179 minutes; P = .681). Robotic repair resulted in significantly shorter length of stay (LOS; 2.3 vs 3.3 days; P = .003). Rate of readmission was no different, and there were no differences in acute complications. For patients with at least 1 year of follow-up, recurrence rates were lower after robotic repair (13.3% vs 32.8%; P = .008); however, mean follow-up is significantly longer after laparoscopic repair (23.7 ± 28.4 vs 15.1 ± 14.9 months; P < .001). Discussion Robotic hiatal hernia repair offers technical advantages over laparoscopic repair with similar clinical outcomes.
ISSN:0003-1348
1555-9823
DOI:10.1177/0003134820943547