Loading…

Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach

Background/objectives Accurate estimation of energy requirements is crucial for health maintenance and prevention of malnutrition in older adults. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in older adults and to test the validity of new predic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of clinical nutrition 2021-01, Vol.75 (1), p.133-140
Main Authors: Batista, Lais Duarte, De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande, Pfrimer, Karina, Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello, Ferriolli, Eduardo, Fisberg, Regina Mara
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863
container_end_page 140
container_issue 1
container_start_page 133
container_title European journal of clinical nutrition
container_volume 75
creator Batista, Lais Duarte
De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande
Pfrimer, Karina
Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello
Ferriolli, Eduardo
Fisberg, Regina Mara
description Background/objectives Accurate estimation of energy requirements is crucial for health maintenance and prevention of malnutrition in older adults. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in older adults and to test the validity of new predictive equations for this age group. Subjects/methods This is a cross-sectional study including 38 Brazilian community-dwelling older adults aged 60–84 years, who had their total energy expenditure measured by doubly labeled water (TEE DLW ). The energy expenditure was compared to the Institute of Medicine (Dietary Reference Intake (DRI)) and Vinken et al. previous predictive equations and three predictive models developed in a modeling sample. The agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient, Bland–Altman plots, and Lin’s concordance correlation. Accuracy was evaluated considering ±10% of the ratio between estimated and measured energy expenditure. Results The mean (standard deviation) TEE DLW was 2656.7 (405.6) kcal/day for men and 2168.9 (376.9) for women. Vinken et al. and both DRI equations presented moderate to good degree of agreement, while the developed models vary from fair to very good agreement in comparison to DLW. The accuracy rate was the same for both DRI equations and Vinken et al. equation (60.53%). The new equations developed in this study had accuracy in predicting TEE for Brazilian older adults varying from 43.11% to 73.68%. Conclusions The results corroborate the use of previous predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in Brazilian older adults. Further studies have the potential to explore the use of the developed models to assess energy needs in this population.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41430-020-00717-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2435756815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A655716554</galeid><sourcerecordid>A655716554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1q3DAUhU1paaZpX6CLIiiUbpxK1o_t7kJIfyDQTfZCI13NKMjSRJInzJP0davJpE1ThiIsG93vnCtfTtO8JfiMYDp8yowwilvc1Qf3pG_xs2ZBWC9aLhh-3izwyFlLa-2keZXzDca12HcvmxPaDYQNnCyan5e5uEkVF1aoxKI8Msr5HYIAabVDCW5nl2CCUDJyAek4TXNwZdeaO_B-r4reQELKzL7kz2irvDO1jqJFmwRbF-e8_zBOF7cFVP1qsxgyUsGgKRo4mFikUIA7pDabFJVev25eWOUzvHl4nzbXXy6vL761Vz--fr84v2o1J6S0A-5gVESMdGk0MG7FuLSM2nosemWsEsp0lJrRdrhXFA-9VtrgJR-ZUIOgp83Hg23tejtDLnJyWdc_UwHqzWXHKO-5GAiv6Pt_0Js4p1AvV6l-JCMeiXikVsqDdMHGkpTem8pzwXlP6sYq1R6hVvuhKx8DWFePn_BnR_i6DExOHxV8-EuwBuXLOkc_34_-KdgdQJ1izgms3KSah7STBMt9yuQhZbKmTN6nTOIqevcwink5gfkj-R2rCtADkGsprCA9zuo_tr8AD8Ldqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479190916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach</title><source>LexisNexis - News &amp; Business</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Batista, Lais Duarte ; De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande ; Pfrimer, Karina ; Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello ; Ferriolli, Eduardo ; Fisberg, Regina Mara</creator><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lais Duarte ; De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande ; Pfrimer, Karina ; Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello ; Ferriolli, Eduardo ; Fisberg, Regina Mara</creatorcontrib><description>Background/objectives Accurate estimation of energy requirements is crucial for health maintenance and prevention of malnutrition in older adults. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in older adults and to test the validity of new predictive equations for this age group. Subjects/methods This is a cross-sectional study including 38 Brazilian community-dwelling older adults aged 60–84 years, who had their total energy expenditure measured by doubly labeled water (TEE DLW ). The energy expenditure was compared to the Institute of Medicine (Dietary Reference Intake (DRI)) and Vinken et al. previous predictive equations and three predictive models developed in a modeling sample. The agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient, Bland–Altman plots, and Lin’s concordance correlation. Accuracy was evaluated considering ±10% of the ratio between estimated and measured energy expenditure. Results The mean (standard deviation) TEE DLW was 2656.7 (405.6) kcal/day for men and 2168.9 (376.9) for women. Vinken et al. and both DRI equations presented moderate to good degree of agreement, while the developed models vary from fair to very good agreement in comparison to DLW. The accuracy rate was the same for both DRI equations and Vinken et al. equation (60.53%). The new equations developed in this study had accuracy in predicting TEE for Brazilian older adults varying from 43.11% to 73.68%. Conclusions The results corroborate the use of previous predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in Brazilian older adults. Further studies have the potential to explore the use of the developed models to assess energy needs in this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5640</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41430-020-00717-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32814851</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/53 ; 692/700/2814 ; 692/700/478/2772 ; 82/58 ; Accuracy ; Adults ; Aged ; Clinical Nutrition ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Dietary intake ; Energy ; Energy expenditure ; Energy requirements ; Epidemiology ; Estimation ; Internal Medicine ; Malnutrition ; Mathematical models ; Measurement ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Men ; Metabolic Diseases ; Modelling ; Nutritional aspects ; Older people ; Physiological aspects ; Prediction models ; Public Health ; Recommended daily allowances</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical nutrition, 2021-01, Vol.75 (1), p.133-140</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32814851$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lais Duarte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfrimer, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferriolli, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisberg, Regina Mara</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach</title><title>European journal of clinical nutrition</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>Background/objectives Accurate estimation of energy requirements is crucial for health maintenance and prevention of malnutrition in older adults. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in older adults and to test the validity of new predictive equations for this age group. Subjects/methods This is a cross-sectional study including 38 Brazilian community-dwelling older adults aged 60–84 years, who had their total energy expenditure measured by doubly labeled water (TEE DLW ). The energy expenditure was compared to the Institute of Medicine (Dietary Reference Intake (DRI)) and Vinken et al. previous predictive equations and three predictive models developed in a modeling sample. The agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient, Bland–Altman plots, and Lin’s concordance correlation. Accuracy was evaluated considering ±10% of the ratio between estimated and measured energy expenditure. Results The mean (standard deviation) TEE DLW was 2656.7 (405.6) kcal/day for men and 2168.9 (376.9) for women. Vinken et al. and both DRI equations presented moderate to good degree of agreement, while the developed models vary from fair to very good agreement in comparison to DLW. The accuracy rate was the same for both DRI equations and Vinken et al. equation (60.53%). The new equations developed in this study had accuracy in predicting TEE for Brazilian older adults varying from 43.11% to 73.68%. Conclusions The results corroborate the use of previous predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in Brazilian older adults. Further studies have the potential to explore the use of the developed models to assess energy needs in this population.</description><subject>692/53</subject><subject>692/700/2814</subject><subject>692/700/478/2772</subject><subject>82/58</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical Nutrition</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Dietary intake</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy expenditure</subject><subject>Energy requirements</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Malnutrition</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Nutritional aspects</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Recommended daily allowances</subject><issn>0954-3007</issn><issn>1476-5640</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ks1q3DAUhU1paaZpX6CLIiiUbpxK1o_t7kJIfyDQTfZCI13NKMjSRJInzJP0davJpE1ThiIsG93vnCtfTtO8JfiMYDp8yowwilvc1Qf3pG_xs2ZBWC9aLhh-3izwyFlLa-2keZXzDca12HcvmxPaDYQNnCyan5e5uEkVF1aoxKI8Msr5HYIAabVDCW5nl2CCUDJyAek4TXNwZdeaO_B-r4reQELKzL7kz2irvDO1jqJFmwRbF-e8_zBOF7cFVP1qsxgyUsGgKRo4mFikUIA7pDabFJVev25eWOUzvHl4nzbXXy6vL761Vz--fr84v2o1J6S0A-5gVESMdGk0MG7FuLSM2nosemWsEsp0lJrRdrhXFA-9VtrgJR-ZUIOgp83Hg23tejtDLnJyWdc_UwHqzWXHKO-5GAiv6Pt_0Js4p1AvV6l-JCMeiXikVsqDdMHGkpTem8pzwXlP6sYq1R6hVvuhKx8DWFePn_BnR_i6DExOHxV8-EuwBuXLOkc_34_-KdgdQJ1izgms3KSah7STBMt9yuQhZbKmTN6nTOIqevcwink5gfkj-R2rCtADkGsprCA9zuo_tr8AD8Ldqw</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Batista, Lais Duarte</creator><creator>De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande</creator><creator>Pfrimer, Karina</creator><creator>Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello</creator><creator>Ferriolli, Eduardo</creator><creator>Fisberg, Regina Mara</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach</title><author>Batista, Lais Duarte ; De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande ; Pfrimer, Karina ; Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello ; Ferriolli, Eduardo ; Fisberg, Regina Mara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>692/53</topic><topic>692/700/2814</topic><topic>692/700/478/2772</topic><topic>82/58</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical Nutrition</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Dietary intake</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy expenditure</topic><topic>Energy requirements</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Malnutrition</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Nutritional aspects</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Recommended daily allowances</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lais Duarte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfrimer, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferriolli, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisberg, Regina Mara</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batista, Lais Duarte</au><au>De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande</au><au>Pfrimer, Karina</au><au>Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello</au><au>Ferriolli, Eduardo</au><au>Fisberg, Regina Mara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>133-140</pages><issn>0954-3007</issn><eissn>1476-5640</eissn><abstract>Background/objectives Accurate estimation of energy requirements is crucial for health maintenance and prevention of malnutrition in older adults. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in older adults and to test the validity of new predictive equations for this age group. Subjects/methods This is a cross-sectional study including 38 Brazilian community-dwelling older adults aged 60–84 years, who had their total energy expenditure measured by doubly labeled water (TEE DLW ). The energy expenditure was compared to the Institute of Medicine (Dietary Reference Intake (DRI)) and Vinken et al. previous predictive equations and three predictive models developed in a modeling sample. The agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient, Bland–Altman plots, and Lin’s concordance correlation. Accuracy was evaluated considering ±10% of the ratio between estimated and measured energy expenditure. Results The mean (standard deviation) TEE DLW was 2656.7 (405.6) kcal/day for men and 2168.9 (376.9) for women. Vinken et al. and both DRI equations presented moderate to good degree of agreement, while the developed models vary from fair to very good agreement in comparison to DLW. The accuracy rate was the same for both DRI equations and Vinken et al. equation (60.53%). The new equations developed in this study had accuracy in predicting TEE for Brazilian older adults varying from 43.11% to 73.68%. Conclusions The results corroborate the use of previous predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in Brazilian older adults. Further studies have the potential to explore the use of the developed models to assess energy needs in this population.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>32814851</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41430-020-00717-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-3007
ispartof European journal of clinical nutrition, 2021-01, Vol.75 (1), p.133-140
issn 0954-3007
1476-5640
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2435756815
source LexisNexis - News & Business; Springer Nature
subjects 692/53
692/700/2814
692/700/478/2772
82/58
Accuracy
Adults
Aged
Clinical Nutrition
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Dietary intake
Energy
Energy expenditure
Energy requirements
Epidemiology
Estimation
Internal Medicine
Malnutrition
Mathematical models
Measurement
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Men
Metabolic Diseases
Modelling
Nutritional aspects
Older people
Physiological aspects
Prediction models
Public Health
Recommended daily allowances
title Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A54%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20total%20daily%20energy%20requirements%20in%20community-dwelling%20older%20adults:%20validity%20of%20previous%20predictive%20equations%20and%20modeling%20of%20a%20new%20approach&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20nutrition&rft.au=Batista,%20Lais%20Duarte&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=133-140&rft.issn=0954-3007&rft.eissn=1476-5640&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41430-020-00717-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA655716554%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479190916&rft_id=info:pmid/32814851&rft_galeid=A655716554&rfr_iscdi=true