Loading…
Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach
Background/objectives Accurate estimation of energy requirements is crucial for health maintenance and prevention of malnutrition in older adults. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in older adults and to test the validity of new predic...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of clinical nutrition 2021-01, Vol.75 (1), p.133-140 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863 |
container_end_page | 140 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | European journal of clinical nutrition |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Batista, Lais Duarte De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande Pfrimer, Karina Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello Ferriolli, Eduardo Fisberg, Regina Mara |
description | Background/objectives
Accurate estimation of energy requirements is crucial for health maintenance and prevention of malnutrition in older adults. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in older adults and to test the validity of new predictive equations for this age group.
Subjects/methods
This is a cross-sectional study including 38 Brazilian community-dwelling older adults aged 60–84 years, who had their total energy expenditure measured by doubly labeled water (TEE
DLW
). The energy expenditure was compared to the Institute of Medicine (Dietary Reference Intake (DRI)) and Vinken et al. previous predictive equations and three predictive models developed in a modeling sample. The agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient, Bland–Altman plots, and Lin’s concordance correlation. Accuracy was evaluated considering ±10% of the ratio between estimated and measured energy expenditure.
Results
The mean (standard deviation) TEE
DLW
was 2656.7 (405.6) kcal/day for men and 2168.9 (376.9) for women. Vinken et al. and both DRI equations presented moderate to good degree of agreement, while the developed models vary from fair to very good agreement in comparison to DLW. The accuracy rate was the same for both DRI equations and Vinken et al. equation (60.53%). The new equations developed in this study had accuracy in predicting TEE for Brazilian older adults varying from 43.11% to 73.68%.
Conclusions
The results corroborate the use of previous predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in Brazilian older adults. Further studies have the potential to explore the use of the developed models to assess energy needs in this population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41430-020-00717-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2435756815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A655716554</galeid><sourcerecordid>A655716554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1q3DAUhU1paaZpX6CLIiiUbpxK1o_t7kJIfyDQTfZCI13NKMjSRJInzJP0davJpE1ThiIsG93vnCtfTtO8JfiMYDp8yowwilvc1Qf3pG_xs2ZBWC9aLhh-3izwyFlLa-2keZXzDca12HcvmxPaDYQNnCyan5e5uEkVF1aoxKI8Msr5HYIAabVDCW5nl2CCUDJyAek4TXNwZdeaO_B-r4reQELKzL7kz2irvDO1jqJFmwRbF-e8_zBOF7cFVP1qsxgyUsGgKRo4mFikUIA7pDabFJVev25eWOUzvHl4nzbXXy6vL761Vz--fr84v2o1J6S0A-5gVESMdGk0MG7FuLSM2nosemWsEsp0lJrRdrhXFA-9VtrgJR-ZUIOgp83Hg23tejtDLnJyWdc_UwHqzWXHKO-5GAiv6Pt_0Js4p1AvV6l-JCMeiXikVsqDdMHGkpTem8pzwXlP6sYq1R6hVvuhKx8DWFePn_BnR_i6DExOHxV8-EuwBuXLOkc_34_-KdgdQJ1izgms3KSah7STBMt9yuQhZbKmTN6nTOIqevcwink5gfkj-R2rCtADkGsprCA9zuo_tr8AD8Ldqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479190916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach</title><source>LexisNexis - News & Business</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Batista, Lais Duarte ; De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande ; Pfrimer, Karina ; Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello ; Ferriolli, Eduardo ; Fisberg, Regina Mara</creator><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lais Duarte ; De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande ; Pfrimer, Karina ; Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello ; Ferriolli, Eduardo ; Fisberg, Regina Mara</creatorcontrib><description>Background/objectives
Accurate estimation of energy requirements is crucial for health maintenance and prevention of malnutrition in older adults. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in older adults and to test the validity of new predictive equations for this age group.
Subjects/methods
This is a cross-sectional study including 38 Brazilian community-dwelling older adults aged 60–84 years, who had their total energy expenditure measured by doubly labeled water (TEE
DLW
). The energy expenditure was compared to the Institute of Medicine (Dietary Reference Intake (DRI)) and Vinken et al. previous predictive equations and three predictive models developed in a modeling sample. The agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient, Bland–Altman plots, and Lin’s concordance correlation. Accuracy was evaluated considering ±10% of the ratio between estimated and measured energy expenditure.
Results
The mean (standard deviation) TEE
DLW
was 2656.7 (405.6) kcal/day for men and 2168.9 (376.9) for women. Vinken et al. and both DRI equations presented moderate to good degree of agreement, while the developed models vary from fair to very good agreement in comparison to DLW. The accuracy rate was the same for both DRI equations and Vinken et al. equation (60.53%). The new equations developed in this study had accuracy in predicting TEE for Brazilian older adults varying from 43.11% to 73.68%.
Conclusions
The results corroborate the use of previous predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in Brazilian older adults. Further studies have the potential to explore the use of the developed models to assess energy needs in this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5640</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41430-020-00717-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32814851</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/53 ; 692/700/2814 ; 692/700/478/2772 ; 82/58 ; Accuracy ; Adults ; Aged ; Clinical Nutrition ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Dietary intake ; Energy ; Energy expenditure ; Energy requirements ; Epidemiology ; Estimation ; Internal Medicine ; Malnutrition ; Mathematical models ; Measurement ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Men ; Metabolic Diseases ; Modelling ; Nutritional aspects ; Older people ; Physiological aspects ; Prediction models ; Public Health ; Recommended daily allowances</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical nutrition, 2021-01, Vol.75 (1), p.133-140</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32814851$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lais Duarte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfrimer, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferriolli, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisberg, Regina Mara</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach</title><title>European journal of clinical nutrition</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>Background/objectives
Accurate estimation of energy requirements is crucial for health maintenance and prevention of malnutrition in older adults. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in older adults and to test the validity of new predictive equations for this age group.
Subjects/methods
This is a cross-sectional study including 38 Brazilian community-dwelling older adults aged 60–84 years, who had their total energy expenditure measured by doubly labeled water (TEE
DLW
). The energy expenditure was compared to the Institute of Medicine (Dietary Reference Intake (DRI)) and Vinken et al. previous predictive equations and three predictive models developed in a modeling sample. The agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient, Bland–Altman plots, and Lin’s concordance correlation. Accuracy was evaluated considering ±10% of the ratio between estimated and measured energy expenditure.
Results
The mean (standard deviation) TEE
DLW
was 2656.7 (405.6) kcal/day for men and 2168.9 (376.9) for women. Vinken et al. and both DRI equations presented moderate to good degree of agreement, while the developed models vary from fair to very good agreement in comparison to DLW. The accuracy rate was the same for both DRI equations and Vinken et al. equation (60.53%). The new equations developed in this study had accuracy in predicting TEE for Brazilian older adults varying from 43.11% to 73.68%.
Conclusions
The results corroborate the use of previous predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in Brazilian older adults. Further studies have the potential to explore the use of the developed models to assess energy needs in this population.</description><subject>692/53</subject><subject>692/700/2814</subject><subject>692/700/478/2772</subject><subject>82/58</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical Nutrition</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Dietary intake</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy expenditure</subject><subject>Energy requirements</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Malnutrition</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Nutritional aspects</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Recommended daily allowances</subject><issn>0954-3007</issn><issn>1476-5640</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ks1q3DAUhU1paaZpX6CLIiiUbpxK1o_t7kJIfyDQTfZCI13NKMjSRJInzJP0davJpE1ThiIsG93vnCtfTtO8JfiMYDp8yowwilvc1Qf3pG_xs2ZBWC9aLhh-3izwyFlLa-2keZXzDca12HcvmxPaDYQNnCyan5e5uEkVF1aoxKI8Msr5HYIAabVDCW5nl2CCUDJyAek4TXNwZdeaO_B-r4reQELKzL7kz2irvDO1jqJFmwRbF-e8_zBOF7cFVP1qsxgyUsGgKRo4mFikUIA7pDabFJVev25eWOUzvHl4nzbXXy6vL761Vz--fr84v2o1J6S0A-5gVESMdGk0MG7FuLSM2nosemWsEsp0lJrRdrhXFA-9VtrgJR-ZUIOgp83Hg23tejtDLnJyWdc_UwHqzWXHKO-5GAiv6Pt_0Js4p1AvV6l-JCMeiXikVsqDdMHGkpTem8pzwXlP6sYq1R6hVvuhKx8DWFePn_BnR_i6DExOHxV8-EuwBuXLOkc_34_-KdgdQJ1izgms3KSah7STBMt9yuQhZbKmTN6nTOIqevcwink5gfkj-R2rCtADkGsprCA9zuo_tr8AD8Ldqw</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Batista, Lais Duarte</creator><creator>De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande</creator><creator>Pfrimer, Karina</creator><creator>Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello</creator><creator>Ferriolli, Eduardo</creator><creator>Fisberg, Regina Mara</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach</title><author>Batista, Lais Duarte ; De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande ; Pfrimer, Karina ; Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello ; Ferriolli, Eduardo ; Fisberg, Regina Mara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>692/53</topic><topic>692/700/2814</topic><topic>692/700/478/2772</topic><topic>82/58</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical Nutrition</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Dietary intake</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy expenditure</topic><topic>Energy requirements</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Malnutrition</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Nutritional aspects</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Recommended daily allowances</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lais Duarte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfrimer, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferriolli, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisberg, Regina Mara</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batista, Lais Duarte</au><au>De França, Natasha Aparecida Grande</au><au>Pfrimer, Karina</au><au>Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello</au><au>Ferriolli, Eduardo</au><au>Fisberg, Regina Mara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>133-140</pages><issn>0954-3007</issn><eissn>1476-5640</eissn><abstract>Background/objectives
Accurate estimation of energy requirements is crucial for health maintenance and prevention of malnutrition in older adults. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in older adults and to test the validity of new predictive equations for this age group.
Subjects/methods
This is a cross-sectional study including 38 Brazilian community-dwelling older adults aged 60–84 years, who had their total energy expenditure measured by doubly labeled water (TEE
DLW
). The energy expenditure was compared to the Institute of Medicine (Dietary Reference Intake (DRI)) and Vinken et al. previous predictive equations and three predictive models developed in a modeling sample. The agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient, Bland–Altman plots, and Lin’s concordance correlation. Accuracy was evaluated considering ±10% of the ratio between estimated and measured energy expenditure.
Results
The mean (standard deviation) TEE
DLW
was 2656.7 (405.6) kcal/day for men and 2168.9 (376.9) for women. Vinken et al. and both DRI equations presented moderate to good degree of agreement, while the developed models vary from fair to very good agreement in comparison to DLW. The accuracy rate was the same for both DRI equations and Vinken et al. equation (60.53%). The new equations developed in this study had accuracy in predicting TEE for Brazilian older adults varying from 43.11% to 73.68%.
Conclusions
The results corroborate the use of previous predictive equations for estimating energy requirements in Brazilian older adults. Further studies have the potential to explore the use of the developed models to assess energy needs in this population.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>32814851</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41430-020-00717-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-3007 |
ispartof | European journal of clinical nutrition, 2021-01, Vol.75 (1), p.133-140 |
issn | 0954-3007 1476-5640 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2435756815 |
source | LexisNexis - News & Business; Springer Nature |
subjects | 692/53 692/700/2814 692/700/478/2772 82/58 Accuracy Adults Aged Clinical Nutrition Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Dietary intake Energy Energy expenditure Energy requirements Epidemiology Estimation Internal Medicine Malnutrition Mathematical models Measurement Medicine Medicine & Public Health Men Metabolic Diseases Modelling Nutritional aspects Older people Physiological aspects Prediction models Public Health Recommended daily allowances |
title | Estimating total daily energy requirements in community-dwelling older adults: validity of previous predictive equations and modeling of a new approach |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A54%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20total%20daily%20energy%20requirements%20in%20community-dwelling%20older%20adults:%20validity%20of%20previous%20predictive%20equations%20and%20modeling%20of%20a%20new%20approach&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20nutrition&rft.au=Batista,%20Lais%20Duarte&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=133-140&rft.issn=0954-3007&rft.eissn=1476-5640&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41430-020-00717-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA655716554%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-802e9a1693bdce45f69bf43f02e67adfa6ad233d9f207a3087cacd0b5946a863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479190916&rft_id=info:pmid/32814851&rft_galeid=A655716554&rfr_iscdi=true |